Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regulations and
Banks in Canada
Fast facts The bottom line
» During the 2008 global Canada’s banks have been recognized as the soundest banks in
financial crisis, unlike
banks in many other
the world for seven years in a row. Canada’s prudent banks
countries, no Canadian combined with effective regulatory oversight form a model of
banks were bailed out or in
danger of failing. stability in the global financial system.
» This crisis has resulted in
a series of significant
regulatory changes for the Profound regulatory changes are underway
international banking
sector. The ongoing During the recent global financial crisis there was Taken together, the volume and pace of these
volume and pace of these significant turmoil in the global financial system changes mark this as the most profound period of
changes mark this as the and a number of banks in other countries regulatory change in recent banking history.
most profound period of became insolvent and either failed or received
regulatory reform in recent taxpayer-funded bailouts. Financial markets are globally integrated. So in
banking history.
the end, the aim is that consistent implementation
That crisis resulted in a series of significant of these regulatory changes in countries around
» The World Economic
Forum has ranked
regulatory changes to the international banking the world will result in a better functioning global
Canada’s banks as the sector designed to prevent this type of global financial system.
most sound in the world for problem from happening again.
seven years in a row 1 – a Entering the global financial crisis Canada’s
ranking that highlights the The bulk of the changes regarding such things as banks were well capitalized, well managed and
fact that banks in Canada capital, liquidity and systemic risk come out of the well regulated, and they remain so to this day. No
are well capitalized, well Basel III rules agreed to by members of the Basel Canadian bank was in danger of failing or needed
managed and well
Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel a government bailout. And while this turmoil did
regulated.
Committee). [See pull-out box.] The Financial not originate in Canada, it did have an impact on
» Canadians Stability Board, working under the direction of the banks in Canada.
understand this: When G20, sets the policy direction for these changes
asked to rate the
and the Basel Committee turns that direction into There are many important participants – including
performance of banks
in Canada on stability
regulation. Canadian policymakers and regulatory officials –
and security, 79 per involved in shaping and adapting these regulatory
cent Canadians While these rules are being set internationally, it changes for Canada’s financial system. [See
provided a favourable is up to domestic regulators to put them into place Table of Main Participants below.]
rating. 2 and to enforce them. The pace of domestic
implementation is not consistent around the Canada’s banks – through and with the CBA –
world, although there is a global commitment to are working closely with domestic and global
having the rules in place by 2019.3 regulatory organizations to implement all of the
international regulatory changes.
1
“Canadian banks hold steady in top place according to
World Economic Forum ranking: 7th year in a row”, CBA
media release, September 3, 2014, www.cba.ca.
2
From public opinion research conducted on behalf of the
Canadian Bankers Association by Abacus Data, December
2013
3
“Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank
Last updated: September 2014 Governors on monitoring implementation of Basel III
regulatory reform”, BIS report, April 2013, www.bis.org.
Regulatory Changes and What is Basel III?
Rules Basel III is a framework that sets out
global regulatory rules for bank capital
While several regulatory changes are underway, there and liquidity. These rules were originally
are three important areas where rules have been set:
published in December 2010 in response
capital, liquidity and systemic risk. Regulators in
to the global financial crisis and are
Canada implement these international rules and apply
subject to ongoing review and updates.4
them domestically as part of their ongoing oversight of
the Canadian financial system. The phase-in of Basel III capital rules
began in 2013. Canada implemented
1. Capital these changes in January 2013, well
A bank holds capital so that the public will have ahead of many other countries and well
confidence in it to help protect depositors and other ahead of the Basel III timeline. The
stakeholders against losses in the event of a default. phase-in of Basel III’s liquidity rules
Capital is a cushion against bank-specific and market- begins in 2015.
related activities that could have negative impacts on a
bank’s ability to stay solvent. Basel III was developed and agreed to by
members of the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision – commonly called
Basel III capital rules
“the Basel Committee”. This is a
There are several categories of rules related to
capital under Basel III. Taken together, these rules longstanding committee of the Bank for
require banks to hold enough capital to equal at International Settlements (BIS) that is
least 10.5% of their total risk-weighted assets by mandated to review and develop banking
2019. guidelines and supervisory standards at a
global level.
Global and domestic systemically important
For more information, go to www.bis.org
banks
and www.financialstabilityboard.org.
o Banks that are determined to be global
systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and/or
domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) have to hold additional capital. Canadian D-
SIBs (i.e. the six largest banks in the country) will have to hold additional capital by January
2016.5
o G-SIBs and D-SIBs are treated differently under Basel III given the potential impacts that a
failure of any one of them would have on global and domestic economies.
Under the CAR Guideline, OSFI expected banks to meet target capital levels that equal or
exceed the 2019 Basel III minimum capital requirements in 2013, well before that 2019 deadline.
Canada’s banks are among the best capitalized banks in the world in terms of both the quality and
quantity of capital, and have been judged the soundest in the world by the World Economic Forum
for the last six years. Banks in Canada did not receive nor need a government bail-out during the
global financial crisis.
4
In 1988, Basel I established a set of minimum capital requirements for banks. Basel II – initially published in 2004 – built on the
work of Basel I, especially in the areas of risk and capital. See www.bis.org for more information on all the Basel accords.
5
“Domestic Systemic Importance and Capital Targets – DTIs”, OSFI, March 2013, www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca.
LCR requirements were confirmed as of January 2013 and will be phased in between 2015 and
6 7
2019. Details of the NSFR are still being worked out, but it will be in force by 2018.
These rules are meant to ensure banks have sufficient, high-quality liquid assets to withstand a
period of economic stress.
OSFI’s approach is consistent with the Basel Committee’s September 2008 Principles for Sound
Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision
Banks that are determined to be global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and domestic
systemically important banks (D-SIBs) have to hold additional capital. Rules applying to these
institutions will go into effect in January 2016.
o These rules for G-SIBs and D-SIBs are meant to address concerns stemming from banks
whose collapse would cause significant global and/or domestic economic damage.
o Moves to ensure that these institutions have adequate recovery and resolution plans are
part of this overall reform. These plans are road maps to facilitate either the recovery of an
institution or its orderly wind-down in the event of failure. Both recovery and resolution can
be caused by severe financial stress.8
6
“Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools”, January 2013, www.bis.org.
7
“Basel III International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring”, December 2010, www.bis.org.
8
“Building a more resilient financial sector: Reforms in the wake of the global crisis”, IMF publication, 2012, page 185.
In March 2013, OSFI named the six largest banks in Canada as D-SIBs. As a result, these
banks will be required to hold an additional one per cent of capital and will be subject to more
intense supervision and enhanced disclosure.
Banks in Canada are extremely unlikely to fail. However, there are mechanisms in place to help bring
about an orderly resolution in the very unlikely event of a Canadian bank failure.
The American approach is contained in The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act – known generally as The Dodd-Frank Act – which passed in 2010. This act covers a
very wide policy spectrum and touches banks in Canada in many significant ways, as highlighted
below.
The Rule, named after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, is intended to restrict
banks operating in the United States from making certain types of investments − on the bank’s
own behalf and not on behalf of customers − because such investments are considered to be
potentially high risk.
The Rule, in its draft version, was so broad that it captured domestic operations of Canadian-
based banks with U.S. operations as well as other foreign banks that have U.S. subsidiaries, and
would restrict Canadian banks from undertaking activities in Canada that are permitted by the
Canadian government.
In this case, capital and liquidity will be trapped in U.S. operations, thus causing the Canadian
consolidated entity to hold capital levels that far exceed prudent Basel III levels.