Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Prof. P. M. Shah
HOD Civil Department
Government Polytechnic
, Godhra-389001
A
A Thesis Submitted to Gujarat Technological University
In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement For
The Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil
(Transportation) Engineering
May-2018
I
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that research work embodied in this thesis entitled “Traffic Flow Capacity
Analysis and Level of Service determination of Selected Bridges across Tapi River in
Surat City” was carried out by Mr. Bhoya Bhavinkumar Gulabbhai (Enrolment No.
160900713002) at Tatva Institute of Technological Studies, Modasa (090) for partial
fulfilment of Master of Engineering degree in Civil-Transportation Engineering to be
awarded by Gujarat Technological University. This research work has been carried out under
my supervision and is to my satisfaction.
Date: / /20
Place: Modasa
Principal
II
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that research work embodied in this thesis “Traffic Flow Capacity
Analysis and Level of Service determination of Selected Bridges across Tapi River in
Surat City” was carried out by Mr. Bhoya Bhavinkumar Gulabbhai (Enrolment No.
160900713002) at Tatva Institute of Technological Studies, Modasa (090) for partial
fulfilment of Master of Engineering degree to be awarded by Gujarat Technological
University. He has complied with the comments given by the Dissertation phase-1 as well as
Mid Semester Thesis Reviewer to my satisfaction.
Date: / / 20
Place: Modasa
Guide Co-Guide
Bhoya Bhavinkumar G. Prof. P. M. Shah Dr. H. R. Varia
(160900713002) Head of Department, TITS,
Government Polytechnic, Modasa-383315
Godhra-389001
III
PAPER PUBLICATION CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that research work embodied in this thesis entitled “Traffic Flow Capacity
Analysis and Level of Service determination of Selected Bridges across Tapi River in
Surat City” was carried out by Mr. Bhoya Bhavinkumar Gulabbhai (Enrolment No.
160900713002) at Tatva Institute of Technological Studies, Modasa (090) for partial
fulfilment of Master of Engineering degree to be awarded by Gujarat Technological
University has published Research paper entitiled “Evaluation of Level of Service and
Traffic Capacity for congested River Bridges of Surat City”, (Apr-2018), International
Journal of Advance Research in Engineering Science and Technology(IJAREST).
(ISSN: 2393-9877) Vol. 05, Issue 04, Apr-2018.
Date: / /20
Place: Modasa
Guide Co-Guide
Bhoya Bhavinkumar G. Prof. P. M. Shah Dr. H. R. Varia
(160900713002) Head of Department, TITS,
Government Polytechnic, Modasa-383315
Godhra-389001
Principal
TITS, Modasa-383315
IV
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY
I hereby certify that I am the sole author of this thesis and that neither any part of this thesis
nor the whole of the thesis has been submitted for a degree to any other University or
Institution.
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the current thesis does not infringe upon anyone‟s
copyright nor violate any proprietary rights and that any ideas, techniques, quotation or any
other people include in my thesis, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in
accordance with the standard referencing practices. I declare that this is a true copy of thesis,
including any final revision, as approved by thesis review committee.
I have checked write up of the present thesis using anti-plagiarism database and it is in
allowable limit. Even though later on in case of any complaint pertaining of plagiarism.
I am sole responsible for the same and I understand that as per UGC norms, University can
even revoke Master of Engineering degree conferred to the student submitting this thesis.
Date: / / 20
V
Dedicated to my,
Sweet Family
Acknowledgement
It is indeed a pleasure for me to express my sincerity gratitude to who have always helped me
for the thesis work.
First of all, I am humbly express thanks to my respected guide Prof. P. M. Shah(HOD Civil
Department Government Polytechnic College, Godhra) and co-guide Dr. H. R. Varia
(Principal, TITS Modasa) for his valuable time and constant help given to me. He has been a
pillar of support and inspired me throughout this study, without him this would not have been
possible. I also express my thanks to Prof. Y. G. Zaz (HOD, Civil) and Prof. J. R. Puwar
(Campus Director) of T.I.T.S. Modasa for their continuous support.
I am thankful to My Parents, my lovely Sister & Brothers and all my family members for
their unconditional love, understanding and moral support they rendered me throughout my
life. Today, whatever I have achieved it would not have been possible without them.
I would like to thanks Sir. Snehal Kania (SMC: Bridge cell) for providing me permission for
videography in my study area.
Thanks to all my friends Rahul Pandya, Hardik Solanki, Viral Gosai, Jatin Panchal,
Archit Shah, Parth Patel, Samir Sutariya, Vishal Makvana, Indrajit Parmar, Kalpesh
Solanki, Kapil Patel, Dhananjay Chauhan, Shashank Patel, Aashis Patel, Gurjar Jigar,
who directly and indirectly support me to complete my work.
Bhoya Bhavin G.
(160900713002)
VII
List of Content
Sr. No. Description Page No.
Title Page i
Certificate ii
Compliance Certificate iii
Paper Publication Certificate iv
Declaration of Originality v
Dedication Page vi
Acknowledgement vii
List of Content viii
List of Figures xi
List of Tables xiii
Abstract xvi
1 Chapter-1: Introduction 1
1.1 General 1
1.2 Transportation Scenario in India 1
1.3 Factor affecting on traffic flow characteristics 7
1.3.1 Traffic stream characteristics 7
1.3.2 Vehicular characteristics 7
1.3.3 Roadway characteristics 7
1.4 Problem Statement 7
1.5 Aim of Study 8
1.6 Objective of Study 8
1.7 Scope of Study 8
1.8 Structure of Report 8
2 Chapter-2: Literature Review 10
2.1 General 10
2.2 Time Space Diagram 10
2.3 Fundamental Diagram of Road Traffic 11
2.3.1 Flow-density curve 11
2.3.2 Speed-Density curve 11
2.3.3 Speed-Flow curve 12
2.4 Level of Service 13
VIII
2.4.1 Factor affecting of level of service 13
2.5 Research papers 14
3 Chapter-3: Methodology 19
3.1 General 19
3.2 Technical Terminologies related to Traffic Flow 19
3.3 Field Survey method 20
3.3.1 Traffic volume count survey(Videography) 20
3.3.2 Spot Speed Survey 21
3.3.3 Licence Plate Survey 22
3.4 Methodology chart 24
4 Chapter-4: Study Area and Data Collection 25
4.1 General 25
4.2 Introduction of Surat City 25
4.2.1 Population of Surat city in 2017 27
4.2.2 Physical Geography 27
4.2.3 Demographics 27
4.3 Location Map of Study Area 29
4.4 Details of Selected Bridges 30
4.4.1 Savjibhai Korat Bridge 30
4.4.2 Sardar Bridge 31
4.4.3 Amroli Bridge 32
4.5 Data Collection 34
4.5.1 Classified Traffic Volume Count 34
4.5.2 Spot-Speed study 50
4.5.3 Density Calculation 57
4.5.4 Travel time Calculation 64
4.5.5 Speed Calculation 75
4.5.6 V/C Ratio Calculation 79
5 Chapter-5: Results and Conclusion 83
5.1 Results 83
5.1.1 Traffic Flow Count 83
5.1.2 Spot-Speed Study and Density 83
5.1.3 Travel Time of Different vehicles 83
IX
5.1.4 Comparison of Spot-Speed and Speed 85
5.1.5 L.O.S Calculation 85
5.2 Conclusion 86
5.2.1 Suggested Measures 86
References
Annexure
Review Card
Paper Publication Certificate
Turnitin Digital Receipt
Turnitin Percentage Report
X
List of Figure
Sr. No. Name of Figure Page No.
1 2.1: Time-Space Diagram 10
2 2.2: Speed-Flow-Density curves 12
3 3.1: Spot Speed Relative Frequency curve 22
4 3.2: Spot speed cumulative frequency curve 22
5 3.3: Methodology Chart 24
6 4.1: Map of Surat city (Map of India) 26
7 4.2: Map of Surat city (Google Map) 26
8 4.3: Demographic Map of Surat city 28
9 4.4: Location Map of Study Area 29
10 4.5: Savjibhai Korat Bridge(Google) 30
11 4.6: Savjibhai Korat Bridge 30
12 4.7: Traffic Flow on Savjibhai Korat Bridge 31
13 4.8: Sardar Patel Bridge(Google) 31
14 4.9: Traffic Flow on Sardar Patel Bridge 32
15 4.10: Amroli Bridge(Google) 32
16 4.11: Amroli Bridge 33
17 4.12: Traffic Flow on Amroli Bridge 33
18 4.13: Graph of PCU/15min (Nana Varachcha to Mota 37
Varachcha)
19 4.14: Graph of PCU/15min (Mota Varachcha to Nana 38
Varachcha)
20 4.15: Cumulative Traffic Flow (Nana Varachcha to Mota 38
Varachcha)
21 4.16: Cumulative Traffic Flow (Mota Varachcha to Nana 39
Varachcha)
22 4.17: Graph of PCU/15min (Athwa Gate to Adajan) 41
23 4.18: Cumulative Traffic Flow (Athwa Gate to Adajan) 41
24 4.19: Graph of PCU/15min (Adajan to Athwa Gate) 44
25 4.20: Cumulative Traffic Flow (Adajan to Atwa Gate) 44
26 4.21: Graph of PCU/15min (Katargam to Amroli) 47
27 4.22: Cumulative Traffic Flow (Katargam to Amroli) 47
XI
28 4.23: Graph of PCU/15min(Amroli to Katargam) 49
29 4.24: Cumulative Traffic Flow(Amroli to Katargam) 50
30 4.25: Entry Time of Vehicles 66
31 4.26: Exit Time of Vehicles 66
XII
List of Table
Sr. No. Table Name Page
No.
1 1.1: The total registered Motor Vehicles in India (State wise) 3
2 1.2: Category-Wise Automobile Production ( In Numbers) 5
3 2.1: LoS of Urban road based on Stream Speed, V/C Ratio and FFS 13
4 4.1: Total classified Traffic Volume: Nana Varachcha to Mota 34
Varachcha
5 4.2: Total classified Traffic Volume: Mota Varachcha to Nana 35
Varachcha
6 4.3: PCU values for Rural/Urban condition (IRC: SP-41:1994) 36
7 4.4: PCU/15min (Nana Varachcha to Mota Varachcha) 36
8 4.5: PCU/15min (Mota Varachcha to Nana Varachcha 37
XIII
24 4.21: Flow-Speed-Density: Katargam to Amroli 58
XIV
50 5.3 Result of Travel Time of different Vehicles 84
52 5.5 L.O.S of Urban road based on stream speed, v/c Ratio and FFS 85
XV
Abstract
India is developing country in the world. There are many complex problems related to
transportation system is observed in the country. These include ever increasing population,
vehicular growth and traffic congestion. Gujarat is the one of the top five fastest developing
state of our country. Surat city is developing city. The city is 2nd biggest city in Gujarat and
9th biggest city in India. In Surat city- the fourth fastest developing city of the world-at many
places the bottleneck conditions on the roads occurs due to limited availability of road space.
Due to bottleneck condition at the bridges across Tapi river, traffic congestion is occurring.
Out of the 10 bridges across the Tapi River in Surat city, some of the bridges which is
connecting the commercial and residency area in the city are witnessing heavy amount of
traffic during pick hours which leads to traffic jam and bottlenecks condition at some places.
After reckoning survey the three bridges namely Sardar Bridge, Amroli Bridge and Savjibhai
korat Bridge are selected for Traffic flow capacity and level of Service analysis. Therefore, it
is necessary to quantify the Traffic characteristics in existing traffic conditions on selected
bridges and understand the responsible factors for suggesting improvement in existing Traffic
congestion over selected bridges. In this study, it is proposed to find traffic flow capacity and
Level of Service by measuring traffic speed, flow and density parameters on the selected
bridges during peak hours. This may be helpful to check whether existing bridges are capable
to handle existing as well as future increased traffic flow safety or not. As per data analysis
the level of service for the selected two bridges were found was LOS F while for one bridge it
is evaluated as LOS E. Accordingly suggested measures for improving the LOS of selected
bridges are given in the last chapter.
XVI
INTRODUCTION
Chapter-1
Introduction
1.1 General
In developing country like India, Traffic congestion has been one of major issues that most
metropolises are facing and thus, many measures have been taken in order to mitigate
congestion. Identification of congestion characteristics is the first step for such efforts since it
is an essential guidance for selecting appropriate measures. Basic knowledge of traffic flow
characteristics like traffic volume under such Traffic conditions is fundamental traffic volume
is basic variable in planning, designing, and operation of roadway systems. Congestion - both
in perception and in reality - impacts the movement of people and freight and is deeply tied to
the history of high levels of accessibility and mobility. Traffic congestion wastes time and
energy, causes pollution and stress, decreases productivity and imposes costs on society.
Transportation plays important role in development and growth of any nation. Transportation
is significant for trade, organization and social interaction, while consuming considerable
time and resource. Transportation sector in India is a very extensive system, comprising
different modes of transport like Road, Railway, Aviation, Waterway and Shipping, which
facilitate easy and different conveyance of goods and people across the nation. The backbone
of economic development of the India is largely depends on its transportation. Road transport
is primary mode of transport which plays an important role in conveyance of goods and
passengers and linking the centres of production, consumption and distribution.
from road transport. Similarly, rail dominated freight transport in India; however, this share is
on the decline in recent years.
In urban areas, road transport dominates. Present status of urban transport is characterized by
increasing trip distances, increasing share of private motorized transport, and declining share
of public and non-motorized transport. These trends are leading to increasing problems of
poor air quality, road safety, noise, and congestion.
India is also one of the rapid developing Nations. So, it is necessity to have adequate
transportation facility so it meets existing future transportation demand. India has
experiencing tremendous growth rate in vehicle growth (Fig. 1.1), an average growth rate of
9% per year in country.
The total registered Motor Vehicles in India (State wise) are shown in below table 1.1 and
Category-Wise Automobile Production ( In Numbers) are shown in table 1.2.
Sikkim 12 13 15 17 20 22 25 26 29 34 39 43 36 40 43
Tamil Nadu 5162 5658 8005 8575 9257 10054 10981 11930 12891 14062 15638 17412 19232 20864 22519
Telangana 6376 7073 7845
Tripura 50 57 66 76 73 106 120 131 144 160 188 204 245 256 282
Uttarakhand 364 406 457 516 573 643 643 731 787 831 997 1244 1460 1640 1827
Uttar Pradesh 4921 5171 5928 6460 7344 7989 9086 9826 10779 11988 13287 15445 17048 19115 21636
West Bengal 1690 $ 1690 $ 2366 2548 2681 2872 3198 2762 3044 2747 3261 3861 6111 6745 7403
TOTAL
STATES 50639 54482 62073 67466 76218 83953 89936 98072 1,07,163 1,19,240 1,32,725 1,50,070 1,66,171 180725 199365
Union
Territory:
A. & N. Islands 25 28 28+ 28 + 37 41 48 53 60 62 69 77 85 94 102
Chandigarh 386** 386** 562 586 617 647 678 712 747 949 1008 1058 1106 631 676
D. & N. Haveli 13* 13* 31 35 40 45 51 58 63 69 76 85 93 103 112
Daman & Diu 37 41 44 48 51 55 62 68 70 72 78 85 92 95 100
Delhi 3635 3699 3971 4237 4187 4487 5492 5899 6302 6747 7228 7350 7785 8293 8851
Lakshadweep 4 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 8 9 10 11 13 14
Puducherry 252 270 293 313 347 384 432 484 538 599 673 755 700 751 803
TOTAL UTs 4352 4442 4934 5252 5283 5665 6771 7281 7788 8506 9140 9420 9873 9979 10658
GRAND
TOTAL 54991 58924 67007 72718 81502 89618 96707 1,05,353 1,14,951 1,27,746 1,41,866 1,59,491 1,76,044 1,90,704 2,10,023
Source :Ministry of Road
Transport and Highways
* : Data relates to 1997. + :Data relates to 2002 .
** :Data relates to 1998.
&: Data relates
$ :Data relates to 2000. to 2010
#:Data relates to
R:Revised 2012
2001- 2002- 2003- 2004 2005 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015-
Category 02 03 04 -05 -06 07 08 09 10 2011 12 13 14 15 16
(Segment)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Passenger Vehicles
(PVs)
78256 96048 10461 12380 14262 15169 19326 245311 27751 26686 25192 25951 27020
Passenger Cars* 500301 557410 2 7 33 32 12 67 20 3 24 33 81 23 29
20699 24938 26316 30720 35137 32162 42479 37094 56492 56869 62629 71183
Multi-Utility Vehicles 169418 165920 8 9 7 2 1 6 1 534183 5 8 2 6 0
Total Passenger Vehicles 98956 12098 13093 15452 17775 18385 23574 298729 31460 32335 30879 32214 34138
(PVs) 669719 723330 0 76 00 34 83 93 11 6 69 61 73 19 59
Commercial Vehicles
(CVs)
M & HCVs
Passenger Carriers 20283 21156 27628 30419 28982 32828 46542 40995 46026 54552 54156 50024 41175 49365 54187
13849 18438 19031 26143 24841 15128 20414 33064 22853 18038 21919 28699
Goods Carriers 76469 99346 5 8 3 8 5 8 5 289990 5 6 1 3 4
16612 21480 21929 29426 29495 19228 25017 38480 27856 22155 26855 34118
Total M & HCVs 96752 120502 3 7 5 6 7 3 1 344542 1 0 6 8 1
LCVs
Passenger Carriers 14977 19821 20962 22619 25395 29443 33882 28635 34751 38008 50017 51376 45136 46585 50654
11627 14639 19629 22016 19595 28168 49431 50180 43234 38315 39097
Goods Carriers 50779 63374 87955 7 3 1 7 2 6 370185 8 8 3 5 9
10891 13889 17178 22573 25404 22458 31643 54433 55318 47747 42974 44163
Total LCVs 65756 83195 7 6 8 4 9 7 7 408193 5 4 9 0 3
Total Commercial 27504 35370 39108 52000 54900 41687 56660 92913 83174 69903 69829 78281
Vehicles (CVs) 162508 203697 0 3 3 0 6 0 8 752735 6 4 5 8 4
Three Wheelers
24508 23741 28698 38544 37106 41743 53020 76868 74068 73324 84537 83413
Passenger Carriers 170013 210454 4 3 7 3 0 4 3 698811 7 9 4 2 4
11113 13703 14743 17068 12960 11060 10364
Goods Carriers 42735 66265 9 2 6 1 0 79586 88890 100742 2 99053 96864 7 99816
35622 37444 43442 55612 50066 49702 61909 87928 83974 83010 94901 93395
Total Three Wheelers 212748 276719 3 5 3 4 0 0 3 799553 9 2 8 9 0
Two wheelers
93527 98749 10210 94397 10749 11612 14944 214476 26593 30250 36762 47227 52758
Scooter/Scooterettee 937506 848434 9 8 13 4 33 76 09 5 40 14 13 47 88
Motorcycles/Step- 290632 387617 43551 51938 62076 71122 65035 67981 84448 105271 11982 11904 12474 13011 12816
Throughs 3 5 68 94 90 25 32 18 57 11 669 212 626 219 012
33229 34843 37999 37998 43082 43621 57107 78552 79195 73221 75534 73788
Mopeds 427498 351612 4 7 4 7 7 9 0 704575 3 4 0 5 6
Electric Two Wheelers - - - - - 30454 17389 24179 2567 - - - - - -
427132 507622 56227 65298 76086 84666 80266 84197 10512 133764 15427 15721 16883 18489 18829
Total Two wheelers 7 1 41 29 97 40 81 92 903 51 532 180 049 311 786
531630 627996 72435 84678 97435 11087 10853 11172 14056 179160 20382 20626 21500 23358 23960
Grand Total 2 7 64 53 03 998 930 275 015 35 026 227 165 047 409
Source :Society of Indian Automobile
Manufacturers, New Delhi
* Vans are included in Passenger
Cars
river, traffic congestion is occurring. Out of the 10 bridges across the Tapi River in Surat city,
some of the bridges which is connecting the commercial and residency area in the city are
witnessing heavy amount of traffic during pick hours which leads to traffic jam and
bottlenecks condition at some places. After reckoning survey the three bridges namely Sardar
Bridge, Amroli Bridge and Savjibhai korat Bridge Are selected for Traffic flow capacity and
level of Service analysis. So, it is interesting to determine traffic flow capacity by measuring
traffic speed, flow and density parameters on the selected bridges during peak hours in Surat
city.
Summary
This chapter contains Introduction, Transportation in India, Factor affecting on traffic flow
characteristics, Problem Statement, Aim of study, Objectives of study and Scope of study.
Chapter-2
Literature Review
2.1 General
In General, some content including in literature review:
Provide an overview of the subject, issue, or theory under consideration.
Divide outside works into categories and concepts (in support or against a particular
position).
Connect the works to what has come before your work and ideas.
Provide conclusion about those works that make the greatest contribution to the
understanding and development of the subject.
In this chapter, consist of some review of literature that has studied by varies researchers to
get some innovative idea related to this research and also to get guideline for this study.
Here it is a typical plot of time space diagram of three vehicles at particular trajectory.
Inverse of slope of trajectory gives speed while curvature its acceleration. An increasing
slope indicates that the vehicle is decelerating while decreasing slope shows that vehicle is
accelerating. A vertical line in diagram indicate that the time at which successive vehicle pass
a stationery observer, while horizontal line vehicle position at given time. The time between
consecutive vehicle observation at fixed location are called Headway (H bc in fig. 2.1) and
distance separation between consecutive vehicles at a given instance, Spacing (Sbc in fig. 2.1).
A vertical line for a at position X1 shows that the vehicle a has come to a complete stop.
When trajectories intersect as c does with b at position X2, it means that vehicle c has
overtaken vehicle b. The horizontal distance Sbc between trajectories b and c at time t1 tells us
the spacing while the vertical distance Hbc between b and c at position X3, the headway.
is jam density, the speed of the vehicles becomes zero. It is also possible to have non-linear
relationships as shown by the dotted lines. These will be discussed later. Speed -density
relation graph shows in fig 2.2
2.3.3 Speed-Flow curve
Relationship between the speed and flow can be postulated as follow. The flow is zero either
because there is no vehicle or there are too many vehicles so that they cannot move. At
maximum flow, the speed will be in between zero and free flow speed. The maximum
flow(q) max occurs at speed u. It is possible to have two different speeds for a given flow.
Speed-Flow relation graph show in fig 2.2.
A term closely related to capacity and often confused with it is service volume. When
capacity gives a quantitative measure of traffic, level of service or LOS tries to give a
qualitative measure. A service volume is the maximum number of vehicles, passengers, or the
like, which can be accommodated by a given facility or system under given conditions at a
given level of service.
The intention of LOS is to relate the traffic service quality to a given flow rate of traffic. It is
a term that designates a range of operating conditions on a particular type of facility. In this
study, Indian Highway Capacity Manual (INDO-HCM) used for determine LOS. It divides
the quality of traffic into six levels ranging from level A to level F. A represents the best
quality of traffic where the driver has the freedom to drive with free flow speed and level F
represents the worst quality of traffic. Level of service is defined based on the measure of
effectiveness or (MOE). Typically three parameters are used under this and they are speed
and travel time, density, and delay. Table no. 2.1 contains urban street LOS, which are based
on average travel speed over the segment being considered.
Table 2.1: LoS of Urban road based on Stream Speed, V/C Ratio and FFS
Level of Range of Average V/C Ratio (Volume/ Percentage of
Service(L.O.S) Stream Speed Capacity Ratio) Free flow Speed
LoS A > 64 < 0.15 > 84
LoS B 64-58 0.15-0.45 84-76
LoS C 58-45 0.45-0.75 76-59
LoS D 45-31 0.75-0.85 59-41
LoS E 31-17 0.85-1.0 41-22
LoS F <17 >1 < 22
(Source: INDO-HCM-2018)
One of the important measures of service quality is the amount of time spent in travel.
Therefore, speed and travel time are considered to be more effective in defining LOS of a
facility. Density gives the proximity of other vehicles in the stream. Since it affects the ability
of drivers to maneuver in the traffic stream, it is also used to describe LOS.
2.4.1 Factors affecting level of service
The level of service can be derived from a road under different operating characteristics
and traffic volumes. The factors affecting level of service (LOS) can be listed as follows:
1. Speed ,volume of traffic flow and Travel time
2. Traffic interruptions/restrictions
3. Freedom to travel with desired speed
4. Driver comfort and convenience
5. Operating cost.
Amaliyar and Varia (2017) carried out the speed-volume relationship is used to find the
capacity of Roads and obtained the speed flow density curves of selected stretches of
Ahmedabad city. It is concluded that existing equation of traffic stream are suitable for this
Heterogeneous traffic. According to their complete analysis they found the traffic stream
parameters. They got standard relationship between traffic stream parameters and a equation
for heterogeneous traffic of Ahmadabad city.
Sang-Hyo Kim et al. (2017) carried out evaluation vehicle loads for bridge safety assessment
based on the extreme load effects that may occur during the remaining service life. Realistic
probabilistic traffic models were used to reflect the actual traffic environment. The presented
model was used to analyse the extreme load effect on pre-stressed concrete (PSC) and steel
box girder bridges, which are typical bridge types. A simulation technique is presented for
analysing the effects of extreme vehicle loads on the superstructures of highway bridges
based on the developed vehicle traffic models.
A. Hasabnis et. al. (2016) carried out traffic problems and alternative solutions in order to
reduce traffic congestion. The method adopted for evaluating the traffic density is Video
Image Detection. Cameras were installed at such locations such that it covered whole
junction. Cameras were installed for 12 hrs a day for two days. After capturing the data of
vehicle count vehicles were categorized into various types such as two wheelers, cars, LCV,
trucks, etc.
Olusina and Samson (2016) carried out identifying causes of congestion on some selected
routes in Lagos Metropolis. Traffic data were collected on some selected roads and analysed
in a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) environment. Models were derived to assist in
predicting volume of traffic along the selected roads within Lagos Metropolis at any time.
When integrated with Intelligent Transport System (ITS), road infrastructure management,
up-to-date traffic incident management and traffic redistribution, to reduce congestion, can be
achieved through this work and its extension to other roads in Lagos Metropolis.s
Hemant Kumar Sharma et.al. (2016) carried out congestion models and speed-flow
analysis for urban roads with interrupted flow comprising of heterogeneous structure of
traffic. VISSIM uses the psychophysical driver behaviour model developed by Wiedemann.
The basic concept of this model is that the driver of a faster moving vehicle starts to
decelerate as he reaches his individual perception threshold to a slower moving vehicle. The
investigation and analysis presented in this paper gives more realistic values of speed,
capacity and congestion as the investigation is based on total performance of network and the
model captures both operational characteristics as well as volume characteristics of
interrupted heterogeneous flow through simulations.
E. Elangovan et. al. (2015) have been discuss on traffic flow characteristics at work zones
helps to plan traffic management and is a useful resource for planning future work zone
activities. Traffic flow at work zones were studied using videography and probe vehicles
(GPS fitted). Videography was used to record classified volume count of vehicles entering
the work zone and the speed of vehicles at work zones. GPS fitted probe vehicles were run
along the work zone sections to obtain the speed variations. To study the behaviour of
heterogeneous traffic, GPS fitted cars were run and the probe vehicles formed 1-3% of the
vehicular flow, Speed and capacity reduction at work zones on urban roads for heterogeneous
traffic was estimated.
Emmanue Segun Oguntade et. al. (2015) have been discussed about Queue performance
parameters is inevitable for efficient and effective congestion control and traffic free
networking system. This study assesses the efficiency and effectiveness of road traffic
systems, using the Atlas Hotel road intersection, Gwagwalada, Abuja Nigeria as a case study.
Queue theory analytic methodologies are applied and parameters such as average arrival and
service rate are calculated based on the data obtained. It was concluded that with reference to
the intersection studied, road traffic system performance within the Gwagwalada metropolis
is stable as Level of Service is A with Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) ≤ 10 seconds
per vehicle.
Pandya and Raval (2015) carried oud to develop speed- density relationship for selected
corridor of Ahmedabad city. Traffic data are collected on the corridor through videography.
The developed model can be used for the traffic condition similar to Ahmedabad city.
Ebin Nirmal Joseph1 and Dr.M.S.Nagakumar(2014) carried out different parameters such
as capacity, level of service, vehicle to capacity ratio, average journey time, average delay in
each midblock, peak hour traffic and to provide necessary improvement measures in this
midblock. Speed and delay studies were conducted three times during peak and non-peak
hour and the average journey time was determined. Average delay of all these mid-blocks
were also determined using speed and delay studies. The traffic data collected from the field
shows that the mid blocks are congested during peak hours. The vehicle to capacity ratio
during peak hour was found to be exceeding 1. The level of service of the entire stretch was
found to F during the entire survey. The average time required to travel the entire 3.8km
stretch during peak hour was found to be 17min and the average travel speed was below
13kmph.
Polly Trottenberg et al. (2014) carried out Traffic Volumes of vehicles and classification
data for selected bridges of New York city. The bridges are monitored with automatic traffic
recording (ATR) machines. Hourly volumes by direction for each bridge are presented in
tabular form. Graphical presentations of the hourly volumes by direction are provided by
histograms. Hourly classification data identifies the volumes by vehicle type. In addition,
changes in the traffic volumes for all facilities over the past 66 years are shown in graphical
form. NYCDOT uses the averages of vehicular volumes from selected representative
weekdays. Publications from other sources may be based on alternative computation
methodologies for some facilities, notably the tolled bridges and tunnels, possibly yielding
different results for those facilities. Each bridge and tunnel is classified under a highway
functional classification system. Functional classification is the process by which streets and
highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service each
roadway provides.
includes data collected from permanent automatic traffic recorders and short-term collection
units, which are typically collected for 48-hour periods. To help establish a thorough
understanding of the existing conditions of the study area and to help develop the toll
forecasting model, an extensive data collection effort was undertaken. This included the
collection of both desk and original data.
Gabriel Fadairo (2013) has been investigates traffic congestion which has become a
common sight in recent times in Akure, especially along Federal University of Technology
Akure Road / Oja-Oba Road. The primary source of data collection involves direct collection
of information on the field, using cameral to capture three-dimensional situation of traffic
jam, traffic counts, oral interview and observations. The secondary source of data collection
involves sourcing information from existing records. The study has also highlighted some
remedies to improve traffic congestion in Nigeria. Good road network, encouragement of
mass transport system, proper traffic planning/management, regular road maintenance,
construction of interchanges and regular education of road users are among the
recommendations to reduce traffic congestions.
Chetan R Patel and Joshi (2012) carried out investigation in the behaviour of mixed traffic
stream speed and flow rate on an access controlled urban arterial in Surat city in Gujrat of
India. Field traffic survey are carried out to capture the classified volume and speed data
through manual as well as video graphic technique. Threshold of level of service based on
volume to capacity ratio are established by cluster analysis approach. The result are very
helpful for evaluation of traffic quality for access controlled urban arterial in mixed traffic
condition.
Mohan Rao and Ramchandra Rao (2012) had discuss in this study to identify and measure
metrics for urban arterial congestion. A systematic review is carried out, based on
measurement metrics such as speed, travel time/delay and volume and level of service. The
review covers distinct aspects like definition; measurement criteria followed by different
countries/organizations. Data collection techniques can be broadly classified into two
categories, one-probe vehicles (mobile vehicles with data collection equipment), and others
that are making use of fixed sensors. The traffic congestion studies data can be collected by
both methods, point‟s data like traffic volume count, speed etc., using fixed sensors and travel
time, journey speed etc., using probe vehicles data like „floating car method‟. The strengths
and weaknesses of these measures are discussed. Further, a short critique of measurement
criteria is presented.
Akintayo and Agbede (2012) have been discussed in this study, A simple traffic flow
simulator was developed and to simulate flow for different congestion scenarios by varying
the minimum and maximum headways of vehicles. Comparison of simulated and field values
for a heavily traffic highway in Ibadan metropolis produced an error of 35 % at high
vehicular interaction. The simulator could be used to generate flows on two-lane highways
characterised by heavy traffic and operating under non-ideal roadway, traffic and control
conditions in urban centres. Based on the preliminary traffic study on three heavily trafficked
two-lane roads (Total Garden-Agodi Gate, J Allen-Oke Bola and Odo Ona-Apata) in Ibadan
metropolis, different congestion scenarios were simulated with TRAFLOS by varying the
minimum and maximum headways between 1 and 18 seconds. The observation period was
set at 15 minutes (900 seconds) for each scenario. A total of 171 experimental runs were
carried out over a period of 2,565 minutes.
Summary
In this chapter, Time Space Diagram, Fundamental diagram of road traffic & Different types
of research papers related to the traffic capacity analysis study has been studied out.
Chapter-3
Methodology
3.1 General
In this chapter comprises of outline of whole study of including methods of data collection
and analysis. Speed, flow and density are the basic parameters of traffic flow. To study the
effect of moving vehicle on the traffic flow characteristics the traffic volume count survey is
carried out with the help of videography on selected Bridges of different lengths during time
period.
Average Speed (AS): The test vehicle‟s average speed (in km per hour) over a
distance.
To study the fluctuation of traffic volume per 5min videography were conducted at selected
bridges. Traffic Volume count survey carried out by videography on all selected Bridges
during peak hour. The camera was situated on the footpath of side of lane with suitable
visibility of lane. The height of camera may be a different for each road lane but not less than
1m on any lane.
In order to count classified volume per 5 min from videography excel sheet was prepared
(Annexure 1). Every five minute volume count record in it. This procedure has conducted to
each selected Bridges.
planning a new Bridge project or up-grading existing Bridge facilities and for effective
management of traffic:
(a) Variation in volume during different hours of the day
(b) Average volume during different day of the week
(c) Average volume per day during different seasons of the year
(d) Variation in traffic volume on different lanes
(e) Directional distribution of traffic during different time periods and
(f) Annual average daily traffic (AADT)
The purpose and uses of traffic volume and studies are given below:
(a) To decide the priority for improvement and up-gradation of roads
(b) For geometric design of Bridge facilities
(c) For analysis of traffic patterns, trends and rate of growth of each vehicle
class and projecting future traffic volume along selected Bridges
(d) For computing Bridge capacity
(e) To plan traffic operation and control of existing facilities
(f) For planning of Bridge and other regulatory measures
(g) To plan and design new facilities
Advantages:
Disadvantages
Travel time data limited to locations where observers or video cameras can be
positioned.
Limited geographic coverage on a single day.
Accuracy of license plate reading is an issue for manual and portable computer.
Problem Statement
Literature Review
Data Collection
Results
Level of Service
Conclusion
Chapter 4
Study Area and Data Collection
4.1 General
In this study, the Bridges are selected across Tapi river in Surat city. They are high level four-
lane way Bridges which are selected based on monitoring of travelling vehicles on bridges
before selection. Detail data collection is carried out on these selected bridges.
Surat has grown in area since the early 1700s. The oldest part of the city developed in the
area between the train station and the area known as Athwalines. Since the 1970s most of the
new development, including the most desirable location for the city's burgeoning middle and
upper class, is the area between Athwalines and the coast at Dumas.
4.2.3 Demographics
According to the 2011 India census, the population of Surat is 4,462,002. Surat has an
average literacy rate of 89%, higher than the national average of 79.5%: male literacy is 93%,
and female literacy is 84%. Males constitute 53% of the population and females 47%.
Gujarati, Sindhi, Hindi, Marwari, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, and Odia are the main languages
spoken in Surat. In Surat, 13% of the population is under 6 years of age. Surat also has
sizeable Parsi and Jewish populations.
Table 4.2: Total classified Traffic Volume: Mota Varachcha to Nana Varachcha
Time 2w 3w car Bus/Truck L.C.V N.M Total Veh/5min
9:00 to 9:05 305 102 162 0 2 3 574
9:05 to 9:10 302 101 150 1 4 1 559
9:10 to 9:15 299 111 154 0 0 0 564
9:15 to 9:20 298 112 161 0 2 0 573
9:20 to 9:25 305 115 152 1 2 1 576
Morning
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
1150
9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45
to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to
9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 1:00 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 6:00
1380
1360
1340
1320
1300
PCU/15min
1280
1260
1240
1220
1200
1180
9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30
to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to
9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 1:00 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45
Time
25% 2w
3w
53% Car
Bus/Truck
L.C.V
21%
N.M
Data collection of Traffic volume count from videography on Sardar Patel Bridge of both
side direction.
Following tables 4.6 and 4.8 show the traffic volume count data
Date: 20/12/2017
Table 4.6: Total classified Traffic Volume: Athwa gate to Adajan
Time 2w 3w car Bus/Truck LCV NM Total Veh/5min
PCU/15min
1600
1550
1500
PCU/15min
1450
1400
1350
10:30 to 10:45
12:15 to 12:30
9:45 to 10:00
12:45 to 1:00
10:00 to 10:15
10:15 to 10:30
10:45 to 11:00
12:00 to 12:15
9:00 to 9:15
9:15 to 9:30
9:30 to 9:45
4:30 to 4:45
4:45 to 5:00
5:00 to 5:15
5:15 to 5:30
5:30 to 5:45
5:45 to 6:00
6:00 to 6:15
6:15 to 6:30
12:30 to 12:45
Bus/Truck
17% 60%
L.C.V
N.M
1700
1650
1600
1550
PCU/15min
1500
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250 9:45 to 10:00
12:15 to 12:30
12:45 to 1:00
10:00 to 10:15
10:15 to 10:30
10:30 to 10:45
10:45 to 11:00
12:30 to 12:45
4:30 to 4:45
9:00 to 9:15
9:15 to 9:30
4:45 to 5:00
5:00 to 5:15
5:15 to 5:30
5:30 to 5:45
5:45 to 6:00
6:00 to 6:15
6:15 to 6:30
12:00 to 12:15
9:30 to 9:45
21% 3w
Car
14%
64% Bus/Truck
L.C.V
N.M
Data collection of Traffic volume count from videography on Amroli Bridge of both side
direction.
Following tables 4.10 and 4.12 show the traffic volume count data
Date: 21/12/2017
Table 4.10: Total classified Traffic Volume: Katargam to Amroli
Time 2w 3w car Bus/Truck LCV NM Total Veh/5min
9:00 to 9:05 379 120 145 1 5 40 690
9:05 to 9:10 399 115 155 1 4 51 725
9:10 to 9:15 395 119 160 0 3 43 720
9:15 to 9:20 395 125 160 2 2 24 708
9:20 to 9:25 389 126 158 0 2 40 715
Morning
1600
1580
1560
1540
1520
PCU/15min1500
1480
1460
1440
1420
1400
9:45 to 10:00
12:45 to 1:00
10:00 to 10:15
10:15 to 10:30
10:30 to 10:45
10:45 to 11:00
12:00 to 12:15
12:30 to 12:45
9:00 to 9:15
4:30 to 4:45
4:45 to 5:00
5:00 to 5:15
5:15 to 5:30
5:30 to 5:45
5:45 to 6:00
6:00 to 6:15
6:15 to 6:30
12:15 to 12:30
9:30 to 9:45
9:15 to 9:30
22% 3w
3%
Car
57% Bus/Truc
17% k
L.C.V
N.M
2000
1800
1600
1400
PCU/15min 1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
12:15 to 12:30
9:45 to 10:00
12:45 to 1:00
10:00 to 10:15
10:15 to 10:30
10:30 to 10:45
10:45 to 11:00
12:00 to 12:15
12:30 to 12:45
9:30 to 9:45
4:30 to 4:45
5:00 to 5:15
5:15 to 5:30
5:30 to 5:45
5:45 to 6:00
6:00 to 6:15
6:15 to 6:30
9:00 to 9:15
9:15 to 9:30
4:45 to 5:00
16% Bus/Truck
L.C.V
N.M
= 15.92 kmph
= 14.19 kmph
Data collection of Spot Speed from videography on Sardar Bridge of both side direction.
Spot speed study: Distance 20m
Table 4.16: Sample Spot Study data of Direction: Athwa Gate to Adajan
Time in Time in Sec Speed in
Sec 2w 3w car Bus LCV N.M kmph
09:00:3 4.6 3.9 4.6 4.1 3.8 4 8 15.25
0 5 4 5 4.2 4.5 7
3.4 5.1 4.6
3.9 5.2 4.8
09:01:0 4.5 3.8 4.8 4.6 5.2 3.8 8.1 15.20
0 4.9 3.9 5.3 5 4.5
4.8 4.9 4.7 4.1
4.7 4 4.4
09:01:3 4 4.5 5 3.9 4.6 3.7 4.1 16.29
0 4.7 3.8 5.1 4 4 4.6
5 5.6 4.3 4.3 3.8
4.8 4.7 4.3
09:02:0 5.3 3.9 4.4 4.6 4.5 3.9 8.2 14.72
0 5.4 4.6 4.5 5 3.8 7.6
5.1 4.3 4.6 3.9
5.2 5 4
09:02:3 5 3.1 5.2 4.9 3.8 4.1 4.1 7.9 15.37
0 4.8 4.2 5.1 5 3.9
4.6 5.5 4.8 4
4.9 4.6 4.2
09:03:0 4.8 4.3 5.2 5.4 3.8 4 7.5 15.23
0 4.9 4.2 5.1 4.2 4.3
4.5 5.5 4.6 5
4 4.6 3.9
09:03:3 5.5 4.5 4.7 4.5 5 4.2 15.34
0 5.2 3.8 4.6 5.5 4.9
4.2 5 4.7
4.9 4.6 4
09:04:0 4 3.9 4 4.8 3.8 4.1 4.8 6 15.33
0 5.2 4.5 4.8 5.3 3.9 4.2 8
4.6 4.9 4.9 4 4.4
5 4.7 4.2
09:04:3 5 4.7 5.6 5 3.8 4.8 4.1 8.1 14.57
0 5.4 4 5.3 5.1 4.2 5.2
4.8 5.4 4.6 5
4.3 5.5 3.9
09:05:0 5.4 4.8 4.8 4.4 5 4.4 14.54
0 5.1 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.9 4.6
= 15.25 kmph
Table 4.17: Sample Spot Study data of Direction: Adajan to Athwa Gate
Time in Time in Sec Speed in
Sec 2w 3w car Bus LCV N.M kmph
09:00:30 5.1 5.2 5.5 5.5 5 4.6 4.2 14.95
4.9 4.8 4.6 4.1
4 4.9 4.2
5.1 5.8 4.4
09:01:00 4 5.4 5.7 4.9 4.6 4.7 5.3 7.8 13.93
5 5.1 5.5 4.7 4.8 5
5.2 5.2 5
5.4 5.2 4.9
09:01:30 5 5.1 5 5.6 4.7 4.6 4.5 6 14.30
4.8 4.9 5.7 5.3 5 4.2
5 5.5 5 4.7
5 5.3 4.8
09:02:00 5.4 5.2 4.9 4.6 4.6 15.04
4.8 4.8 4.2 4.3
4.3 5.7 4.7 4.3
5.4 5 4.4
09:02:30 5.1 5.3 6 5.5 4.6 5 4.2 14.77
4.8 5.4 5.4 5.3 4 3.9
4.6 5.7 4.3
5.1 4.1 4.3
09:03:00 4.9 5 4.9 4.5 4.4 7.4 14.74
4 4.8 4.7 5 4.6 7.8
5.1 4.9 3.9
4 4 4
09:03:30 5 5.1 5 5.6 5 4.6 14.62
5.2 5.1 3.9 4.3
5.4 5.6 5 4.3
5 4.7 4.9
09:04:00 4.8 4.9 4.4 4.7 5 4.1 15.18
5 4.6 5 4.1
5 4.3 5
5.2 5 4.8
09:04:30 5.4 4 5.2 5.5 4.6 4.6 7.3 14.66
5 4.2 5.1 4.6 4.2 4.8
4.8 5.5 4.7 4.4
5.3 4.6 4.4
09:05:00 5.4 4.4 4 4.9 4.6 4.6 15.22
5.1 5.5 4.8 4.7 4
5.2 4.9 4.3
5 4.7 4.3
= 14.95 kmph
Data collection of Spot Speed from videography on Sardar Bridge of both side direction.
Spot speed study: Distance 20m
Table 4.18: Sample Spot Study data of Direction: Nana Varachcha to Mota Varachcha
Time in Time in Sec Speed in
Sec 2w 3w car Bus LCV N.M kmph
09:00:30 3.9 3.4 4.2 4.7 3.5 3.9 8.4 17.33
3.5 3 4.2 4.8 3.4
3.7 4.6 3.8
3.4 4.8 3.6
09:01:00 3.5 3.7 4.7 3.9 3.8 3.1 8.7 17.07
3.6 3.8 4.1 4.5 3.9 3.1 7.7
3.8 3.7 4.2 3.4
3.4 4.5 3.5
09:01:30 3.5 4.1 4.9 5.3 3.4 3.8 3.4 18.03
3.4 3.9 4.8 3.6
3.8 4.6 3.4
3.6 4.9 3.5
09:02:00 3.2 3.5 5.1 5.2 3.8 3.7 17.84
3.7 4.6 5.8 3.4 3.2
3.6 4.2 3.8
3.9 4.5 3.4
09:02:30 3 4.1 4.8 3.5 4.1 4.1 7.9 17.41
3.9 3.4 4.8 3.5
3.2 4.6 3.2
3.7 4.9 3.6
09:03:00 3.5 3.3 4.5 3.2 3.2 19.66
3 4.6 3.4
= 17.33 kmph
Table 4.19: Sample Spot Study data of Direction: Mota Varachcha to Nana Varachcha
Time in Time in Sec Speed in
Sec 2w 3w car Bus LCV N.M kmph
09:00:3 3.6 3.8 4.2 5.4 3.9 4 4.4 17.29
0 3.8 4.5 5.8 3.7
3.4 4.9 3.5
3.5 4.8 3.6
09:01:0 3.4 4.1 4.6 4.3 3.4 4 17.71
0 3.8 4.5 4.9 3.8 4.1
3.6 5.1 3.9
3.2 4.6 3.8
09:01:3 3.7 3.9 4.2 4.5 3.9 4.7 4.6 4.6 17.79
0 3.6 3.4 4.5 3.7 4.2
3.9 4.8 3.5
3 4.8 3.4
09:02:0 3.9 4.2 4.6 5.4 3.6 3.9 17.84
0 3.2 4.1 4.9 3.7 4.2
3.7 4.5 3.4
= 17.29kmph
4.5.3 Density Calculation
After collecting volume count and Space Mean Speed, density of vehicles can be obtained by,
q = k*v
Where, q = Traffic flow in pcu/hr
k = density in pcu/km
v = speed in kmph
Calculation of density:
Table 4.20: The LOS of Mid-Block Section
LOS Quality Speed V/C Description
kmph
A Free Flow 80 0.6 High Level of Physical and
Psychological Comfort
B Reasonable Free Flow 70 0.7 Reasonable level of physical and
psychological comfort
C Near Free Flow 60 0.8 Local deterioration possible with
blockages
D Medium Flow 50 0.85 Non-recoverable local desruption
E At Capacity Flow 40 0.9 Minor disturbance resulting
break down
F Congested Flow 15 1.0 Break down of flow capacity
drops
(Source: NPTEL.in/IITB/tom Mathew)
Density Calculation for Amroli Bridge of Both direction.
Table 4.21: Flow-Speed-Density: Katargam to Amroli
Time Traffic flow Speed kmph Density PCU/km (k)
PCU/Hr (q) (v)
9:00 to 9:05 5790 15.2 380.92
9:05 to 9:10 6024 14.24 423.03
9:10 to 9:15 6012 14.39 417.79
9:15 to 9:20 6030 14.41 418.46
9:20 to 9:25 6006 14.36 418.25
9:25 to 9:30 6024 14.49 415.73
9:30 to 9:35 5946 14.16 419.92
9:35 to 9:40 6126 14.52 421.90
9:40 to 9:45 6006 14.36 418.25
9:45 to 9:50 5826 14.37 405.43
9:50 to 9:55 5928 14.65 404.64
9:55 to 10:00 6084 14.59 417.00
12:00 to 12:05 5946 14.39 413.20
12:05 to 12:10 5940 14.74 402.99
12:10 to 12:15 5892 14.73 400.00
12:15 to 12:20 6072 14.99 405.07
12:20 to 12:25 6240 14.81 421.34
Density(k) =
= 380.92 PCU/km
Table 4.22: Flow-Speed-Density: Amroli to Katargam
Time Traffic flow Speed kmph Density PCU/km
PCU/Hr (q) (v) (k)
9:00 to 9:05 7164 14.31 500.63
9:05 to 9:10 6612 14.72 449.18
9:10 to 9:15 7008 14.44 485.32
9:15 to 9:20 6588 14.5 454.34
9:20 to 9:25 6666 14.28 466.81
9:25 to 9:30 6888 14.46 476.35
9:30 to 9:35 6534 14.51 450.31
9:35 to 9:40 6708 14.5 462.62
9:40 to 9:45 6372 14.47 440.36
9:45 to 9:50 6306 15.33 411.35
9:50 to 9:55 6666 13.93 478.54
9:55 to 10:00 6612 14.44 457.89
The observed Average Spot-speed of all category of vehicles is around 15 kmph in both
direction of Amroli Bridge. So, From the table 4.20, The L.O.S of mid-block section for the
selected bridge is obtained as category F.
The observed Average Spot-speed of all category of vehicles is around 15 kmph in both
direction of Sardar Patel Bridge. So, From the table 4.20, The L.O.S of mid-block section for
the selected bridge is obtained as category F.
Density Calculation for Savjibhai Korat Bridge of Both direction.
Table 4.25: Flow-Speed-Density: Nana Varachcha To Mota Varachcha
Time Traffic flow Speed kmph Density PCU/km (k)
PCU/Hr (q) (v)
9:00 to 9:05 4992 17.72 281.72
9:05 to 9:10 4794 17.48 274.26
9:10 to 9:15 4920 17.63 279.07
9:15 to 9:20 4854 17.36 279.61
9:20 to 9:25 5040 17.41 289.49
9:25 to 9:30 5034 17.5 287.66
9:30 to 9:35 4986 17.34 287.54
The observed Average Spot-speed of all category of vehicles is More than 15 kmph in both
direction of Savjibhai Korat Bridge. So, From the table 4.20, The L.O.S of mid-block section
for the selected bridge is obtained as category E.
4.5.4 Travel Time Calculation
Travel time Calculation for Sardar Bridge for both direction.
Length of Bridge: 772.23 M
Table 4.27: Travel Time Calculation: Athwa Gate to Adajan
Time L.P T.T Avg. L.P T.T Avg. L.P T.T Avg.
2w T.T 3w T.T 4w T.T
9:00 to 3720 03:04 03:00 7809 03:16 03:10 7075 03:06 03:05
9:05 2959 02:58 5216 03:13 2758 03:04
2427 02:58 1616 03:10 4299 03:07
444 03:00 2360 03:09 576 03:08
1920 03:02 3113 03:09 6567 03:09
9:05 to 773 03:02 03:00 1487 03:07 03:11 1319 03:05 03:05
9:10 6416 03:01 915 03:11 7580 03:06
2868 03:00 9840 03:13 6721 03:05
8257 02:59 4475 03:10 3657 03:04
2128 03:04 4905 03:15 4460 03:04
2344 02:58 4691 03:14 1426 03:05
5890 03:00 3222 03:10 1366 03:04
4633 03:03 5427 03:11 585 03:05
8325 03:04 4609 03:08 4170 03:06
1519 02:58 79 03:09 5075 03:05
234 02:58 9142 03:07 214 03:04
873 03:00 5245 03:11 9153 03:06
7561 03:02 3925 03:13 2902 03:07
3164 03:01 4679 03:10 5497 03:04
3605 03:00 5950 03:15 3402 03:07
6118 02:59 2191 03:14 191 03:08
9885 03:04 9572 03:10 7002 03:09
2244 02:58 4270 03:05
Time L.P Bus T.T Avg. T.T L.P T.T Avg. T.T
LCV
9:00 to 9:05 3395 03:29 03:29 1605 3:05 3:05
8244 3:06
5706 3:07
773 3:05
9:05 to 9:10 8309 3:09 3:05
2956 3:04
773 3:05
8690 3:03
5977 3:05
9:05 3053 03:01 03:00 4600 03:12 03:10 6655 03:05 03:05
to 5130 03:02 9590 03:09 3403 03:06
9:10 1683 02:59 4956 03:10 6218 03:04
4065 03:03 1661 03:11 7878 03:07
2197 03:04 1535 03:12 5570 03:08
28 02:58 4788 03:16 9001 03:09
2985 02:58 1562 03:13 6252 03:05
2325 03:00 9199 03:10 1328 03:06
7656 03:02 7161 03:09 1092 03:03
1444 03:01 5351 03:09 6465 03:04
Time L.P Bus T.T Avg. T.T L.P LCV T.T Avg. T.T
9:05 8607 02:29 02:25 5615 02:36 02:36 4347 02:32 02:32
to 7245 02:28 9403 02:37 5151 02:31
9:10 845 02:24 2764 02:38 7230 02:35
1026 02:31 966 02:39 9803 02:34
6206 02:29 5478 02:38 3753 02:33
5048 02:24 7734 02:35 3258 02:32
7439 02:25 8831 02:39 5646 02:30
2604 02:26 7720 02:34 7131 02:29
9942 02:24 3522 02:36 8714 02:34
4595 02:23 5263 02:34 1872 02:33
4827 02:25 1184 02:32 4149 02:32
5619 02:27 5844 02:31
3680 02:22 7923 02:35
2814 02:23 9704 02:34
1098 02:25 1971 02:33
7684 02:24 4953 02:32
6982 02:26 4842 02:30
5913 02:25 8220 02:29
1602 02:24 6141 02:34
Time L.P Bus T.T Avg. T.T L.P LCV T.T Avg. T.T
9:00 3236 02:24 02:24 531 02:32 02:35 9233 02:34 02:32
to 1179 02:25 8080 02:38 914 02:33
9:05 5344 02:26 8066 02:35 831 02:32
3483 02:24 969 02:39 7008 02:31
3035 02:23 6964 02:34 7715 02:35
2582 02:25 6348 02:36 2870 02:34
1789 02:27 8922 02:35 8863 02:33
221 02:22 1346 02:32 2495 02:32
6872 02:23 6777 02:38 2313 02:30
214 02:25 3765 02:35 1077 02:29
7643 02:24 1349 02:39 342 02:34
299 02:26 5865 02:34 3159 02:33
5405 02:25 8288 02:36 1461 02:32
5147 02:24 3043 02:30
7957 02:23 9874 02:29
6145 02:29 7855 02:34
667 02:24 3007 02:33
9:05 2225 02:24 02:25 780 02:35 02:35 2664 02:35 02:32
to 3570 02:31 3980 02:39 8923 02:34
9:10 3894 02:29 4720 02:34 5018 02:33
7318 02:24 4126 02:36 4413 02:32
8505 02:25 9677 02:35 4984 02:30
3813 02:26 7944 02:32 2194 02:29
7951 02:24 1787 02:38 3122 02:34
6669 02:23 2444 02:35 9767 02:33
4060 02:25 855 02:39 5518 02:32
1385 02:27 9047 02:34 8650 02:31
6571 02:22 5417 02:36 4161 02:35
6655 02:23 8056 02:39 9195 02:34
2417 02:25 6816 02:34 7879 02:33
8430 02:24 9968 02:35
1894 02:26 1790 02:34
9517 02:25 2392 02:33
4289 02:24 5710 02:32
5128 02:23 8337 02:30
7258 02:29 4192 02:31
2999 02:24
2673 02:25
1507 02:26
4611 02:24
8764 02:23
8487 02:25
4855 02:27
9269 02:22
Travel time Calculation for Savjibhai Korat Bridge for both direction.
Length of Bridge: 544.6 M
Table 4.31: Travel Time Calculation: Nana Varachcha To Mota Varachcha
Time L.P T.T Avg. L.P T.T Avg. L.P T.T Avg.
2w T.T 3w T.T 4w T.T
9:00 8121 01:02 01:07 5495 01:27 01:30 2870 01:10 01:08
to 1859 01:04 4182 01:29 5193 01:09
9:05 2043 01:08 5091 01:29 2264 01:06
9030 01:08 7112 01:37 3880 01:08
3374 01:04 5697 01:32 7315 01:10
9434 01:03 4687 01:33 4385 01:08
7111 01:05 6304 01:28 2769 01:09
9232 01:02 9394 01:27 1759 01:07
9050 01:05 4485 01:29 2062 01:11
7313 01:04 5899 01:28 1658 01:08
5046 01:05 6001 01:29 4284 01:10
2162 01:06 9637 01:24 1254 01:09
8727 01:53 5047 01:38 5395 01:06
2879 01:05 9738 01:32 1456 01:08
4045 01:04 4283 01:28 5800 01:10
6505 01:08 8627 01:37 1961 01:11
1051 01:08 4788 01:32 7416 01:08
1657 01:04 8223 01:33
8020 01:03 4384 01:28
7212 01:05 9435 01:27
9:05 2061 01:05 01:04 6506 01:29 01:30 3577 01:12 01:09
to 9131 01:04 1043 01:28 6204 01:09
9:10 8222 01:08 9031 01:37 2567 01:08
1354 01:08 5394 01:32 5597 01:09
7515 01:04 8930 01:33 8060 01:12
8828 01:03 4889 01:28 3072 01:08
3273 01:05 7049 01:27 7113 01:09
2667 01:02 6405 01:29 6507 01:10
8049 01:01 8728 01:28 3274 01:11
7010 01:04 7819 01:33 7820 01:12
9636 01:05 6607 01:30 6911 01:09
2970 01:04 9940 01:31 5901 01:08
3677 01:04 6708 01:31 6810 01:10
9535 01:03 6910 01:29 2668 01:12
596 01:02 9839 01:28 6103 01:09
263 01:04 5192 01:37 8527 01:08
163 01:08 4586 01:32 4890 01:09
2364 01:08 6809 01:33 2971 01:12
3172 01:04 8050 01:28 6406 01:08
8929 01:03 7011 01:27 4951 01:09
3980 01:29
Time L.P T.T Avg. T.T L.P LCV T.T Avg. T.T
Bus
9:00 to 3173 01:38 01:39 3562 01:18 01:17
9:05 7517 01:41 4635 01:16
3524 01:17
9:05 to 3852 01:15 01:15
9:10 2649 01:14
3456 01:18
2564 01:15
9:05 2631 01:04 01:03 8691 01:35 01:30 6167 01:11 01:09
to 1924 01:05 3541 01:21 5561 01:08
9:10 5257 01:02 4551 01:31 8894 01:09
9014 01:03 9803 01:29 7177 01:07
4449 01:04 7883 01:37 7076 01:08
Time L.P Bus T.T Avg. T.T L.P T.T Avg. T.T
LCV
4348 01:15
9:05 to 9:10 8288 01:12 01:11
2632 01:10
Speed(v) =
= 16.15 kmph
Table 4.34: Speed Calculation: Amroli to Katargam
Time Veh. Type Avg. T T Speed Avg. Speed (kmph)
(kmph
Morning 2w 2:24 16.38 15.36
3w 2:35 15.21
4w 2:32 15.51
Bus 2:45 14.29
LCV 2:33 15.41
Afternoon 2w 2:24 16.38 15.43
3w 2:36 15.12
4w 2:32 15.51 15.40
Bus 2:41 14.65
LCV 2:32 15.51
Evening 2w 2:24 16.38 15.42
3w 2:36 15.12
4w 2:31 15.62
Bus 2:43 14.47
LCV 2:32 15.51
5982 1.10
6060 1.12
6006 1.11
V/C Ratio Calculation for Sardar Patel Bridge for both Direction
Table 4.41: V/C Ratio Calculation: Athwa Gate to Adajan
Time PCU Veh/hr v/c Ratio Avg. V/C
Ratio
Morning 5988 1.10
5802 1.07
5988 1.10
5820 1.07
6018 1.11
5946 1.10
Afternoon 5796 1.07
5784 1.07
5904 1.09 1.10
5964 1.10
6090 1.12
5868 1.08
Evening 5910 1.09
5922 1.09
5610 1.04
5706 1.05
5730 1.06
5880 1.08
6048 1.12
6102 1.13
6006 1.11
6264 1.16
6060 1.12
V/C Ratio Calculation for Sardar Patel Bridge for both Direction
Table 4.43: V/C Ratio Calculation: Nana Varachcha to Mota Varachcha
Time PCU Veh/hr v/c Ratio Avg. V/C
Ratio
Morning 4992 0.92
4794 0.88
4920 0.91
4854 0.90
5040 0.93
5034 0.93
Afternoon 5214 0.96
5274 0.97
5208 0.96
5136 0.95 0.96
5076 0.94
5220 0.96
Evening 5226 0.96
5274 0.97
5208 0.96
5124 0.95
5358 0.99
5214 0.96
5490 1.01
Evening 5292 0.98
5640 1.04
5340 0.99
5166 0.95
5244 0.97
5202 0.96
Chapter 5
Results and Conclusion
5.1Results
5.1.1Traffic Flow Count
The results of Traffic flow count of all selected River Bridges are shown in below table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Results of Traffic Flow count
Bridge Name Direction PCU/hr
Bus 01:40
LCV 01:15
Mota Varachcha to 2w 01:05
Nana Varachcha 3w 01:29
Car 01:09
Bus 01:39
LCV 01:15
Table 5.5: LoS of Urban road based on Stream Speed, V/C Ratio and FFS
Level of Range of Average V/C Ratio (Volume/ Percentage of
Service(L.O.S) Stream Speed Capacity Ratio) Free flow Speed
LoS A > 64 < 0.15 > 84
LoS B 64-58 0.15-0.45 84-76
LoS C 58-45 0.45-0.75 76-59
LoS D 45-31 0.75-0.85 59-41
LoS E 31-17 0.85-1.0 41-22
LoS F <17 >1 < 22
(Source: INDO-HCM-2018)
5.1.5 L.O.S Calculation from table 5.5.
The L.O.S of all selected River Bridges are shown in below table.
Table 5.6: L.O.S Calculation
Bridge Name Direction Avg. Speed (v) Avg. V/C L.O.S
kmph Ratio
Amroli Bridge Katargam to Amroli 15.37 1.11
Amroli to Katargam 15.40 1.14 F
Sardar Patel Bridge Athwa Gate to Adajan 14.67 1.10
Adajan to Athwa Gate 14.68 1.11 F
Savjibhai Korat Bridge Nana Varachcha to Mot 25.90 0.96
Varachcha
Mota Varachcha to 25.25 0.96 E
Nana Varachcha
5.2 Conclusion
As per the IRC criteria urban roads are design for L.O.S category C. But in this case,
observed L.O.S is found for Amroli Bridge and Sardar Bridge as category F and for Svajibhai
Korat Bridge, L.O.S is found as category E. So, to improve the level of service of selected
bridges certain remedial measures is required to be implemented.
5.2.1 Suggested Measures:
Improvement of public transportation system
Staggering working hours of public and private organisations
Rescheduling of school timing
Enforcement of traffic rules and Lane discipline
Possibility of diversion of traffic to to alternate routes
Expanding capacity of Existing bridge
Construction of new bridge adjacent to existing bridge
Gleave Steer Davies (2013). “Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Traffic &
Revenue Study”, Kentucky Public Transportation Infrastructure Authority, U.S.A.
Sang-Hyo Kim, Won-Ho Heo, Dong-woo You and Jae-Gu Choi (2017). “Vehicle Loads for
Assessing the Required Load Capacity Considering the Traffic Environment”, School of
Civil & Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Litman Todd (2017). “Generated traffic and Induced Travel”, ITE Journal, Vol. 71, No. 4,
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Victoria, British Columbia.
Amudapuram Mohan Rao And Kalaga Ramachandra Rao (2012). “MEASURING URBAN
TRAFFIC CONGESTION – A REVIEW”, IIT Delhi, Department of Civil Engineering, Hauz
Khas, New Delhi - 110 016, India.
Folake Akintayo and Oluwole Agbede (2012). “A Simple Traffic Flow Simulator for Two-
lane Highways”, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Emmanue Segun Oguntade, Sunday Samuel Bako and Godwin Monday Mayaki (2015). “On
Markovian Modelling of Vehicular Traffic Flow in Gwagwalada Metropolis, Nigeria”,
Matematika, 2015, Volume 31, Number 1, 77–91, Nigeria.
V/C Ratio
Time PCU Veh/hr v/c Ratio Avg. V/C
Ratio