Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Orthodontic-Endodontic Treatment
Planning of Traumatized Teeth
David R. Steiner and John D. West
ccording to Andreasen, l 12% to 33% of injuries to the teeth and alveolar bone of a young
children will experience traumatic dental patient. Two c o m m o n injuries are tooth avulsion
injuries by 12 years of age. Boys sustain injuries to and pulpal necrosis. Clinical information about
p e r m a n e n t teeth about twice as often as girls do. a specific endodontic-orthodontic problem in
The peak incidence of dental trauma occurs each of these areas will be presented in this
between ages 8 and 10 years. As a result of the article. The topics to be discussed are treatment
prevalence and timing of dental injuries to of ankylosed replanted teeth and apexification
children, orthodontic treatment planning will during active orthodontic movement.
often require decisions regarding the long-term
viability of traumatized teeth. The orthodontist
Treatment of Ankylosed Replanted
may have clinical questions regarding the effect
Teeth to Maximize Alveolar
of trauma on the developing dentoalveolar com-
Ridge Development*
plex and the success of endodontic treatment in
a specific site. Answers to these questions are A clinical problem arises when a replanted
crucial in preparing the broader orthodontic avulsed tooth becomes ankylosed. In some chil-
treatment plan. dren and adolescents a large alveolar ridge de-
Trauma can cause many different types of fect may be associated with the ankylosed tooth,
whereas in other individuals there is minimal
disruption to the developing ridge (Fig 1). Is it
From the Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, possible for a clinician to predictably intervene
University of Washi~Nlon, Seattle, WA.
Address correspondence to David R. Steine~; DDS, M£D, Depart-
ment of Endodonties, School of Dentistr); University of Washington,
Seattle, WA 98195. *Adapted with permission from Steiner DR: Timing of
Copyr~g'ht© 1997 by W.B. Saunde~" Company extraction of ankylosed teeth to maximize ridge develop-
1073-8746/97/0301-000455.00/0 ment.J Endodont (in press).
Figure 1. If a tooth is avulsed and replanted, it may ankylose and create significant (A) or minor (B)
infraocclusion depending on the age of the patient at the time of the trauma.
Figure 2. A maxillary left central incisor was replanted at 8 years of age (A). The tooth ankylosed and at age 9 the
incisal edge was about 0.75 mm in infraocclusion (B). At age 10, tile incisal edge was 1.5 mm in infraocclusion
(C). By age 11 the incisal edge was 9 mm in infraocclnsion (D). At age 131, the ankylosed tooth was 5 mm ill
infraocclusion (E). By age 16 (F) the incisal edge was 8 mm apical to the incisal of the right central at the start of
orthodontic treammnt (G). Because of ankylosis, surgical luxation and forced orthodontic eruption failed to
move the tooth (H). Tile tooth was removed 9 months before debanding (I and J). The soft tissue level masks tile
severe alveolar ridge defect shown by a radiograph of the site (K).
<< Artt, .': >> Home I TOC I Bndex
r:
Figure 2
<<Ad. 7: >> Home I TOC I Bndex
7,-% .
Figure 5. The maxillary central and lateral incisors were pulpless (A). After 7 months of treaunent with calcium
hydroxide (B) a barrier had formed on the lateral incisor. At the start of orthodontics (C), the central incisor
apex had a partial barrier and at the completion of orthodontics (D and E) both teeth had complete calcific
barriers despite the tooth movement.
<< Arh, 7: >> Home I TOC I Index
inducing a calcified apical barrier in an incom- tion procedure during active orthodontic move-
pletely f o r m e d root of a pulpless tooth. It has ment. A calcific barrier develops even with ongo-
now become a routine e n d o d o n t i c procedure ing resorption and apposition during orthodontic
(Fig 4). The treatment involves the use of cal- movement. The tooth movement does not ap-
cium hydroxide to fill a debrided, biomechani- pear to inhibit or retard barrier formation. Also,
cally prepared immature root canal. The calcium a tooth u n d e r g o i n g simultaneous apexification
hydroxide leaches from the canal over time and and orthodontic m o v e m e n t does not seem to be
needs to be replenished every 3 to 6 months. more susceptible to apical resorption, which is
However, apexification may take between 6 to 24 similar to Spurrier's findings that endodontically
months to induce formation of an apical barrier. treated mature incisors resorbed significantly
Some patients requiring this regimen are at an less than vital incisors. 7
age when orthodontic treatment should be initi- The thin walls of an immature root undergo-
ated. By delaying the start of orthodontic treat- ing apexification are more likely to fracture.
ment, the optimal time to influence orthodontic Cvek s has reported that the fi-equency of cervical
change in an area could be compromised. root fracture is about 28% in teeth with a wide,
Will active orthodontic m o v e m e n t affect for- open apex and a nearly completed root length. If
mation of an apical barrier on a tooth undergo- teeth have a divergent apical o p e n i n g and only
ing an apexiflcation procedure? A typical ex- half of the root has formed, the frequency of
ample of teeth u n d e r g o i n g apexification and cervical fracture can be as high as 77%.
active orthodontic m o v e m e n t is shown in Figure Even with the increased chance of fracturing,
5. An 11-year-old patient had a bicycle accident these teeth should not be arbitrarily extracted.
at age 10. E n d o d o n t i c evaluation revealed that They help to preserve the developing alveolar
the maxillary left central and lateral incisors ridge, act as a space maintainer, and preserve the
were pulpless (Fig 5). These teeth had wide open natural appearance of the site. If the tooth
apices and a 17 × 15 m m periapical lesion. eventually fractures after the completion of fa-
Apexification procedures were initiated and 7 cial growth, a p e r m a n e n t replacement can be
months later the patient returned for evaluation more favorably placed.
of the teeth and replacement of the calcium
hydroxide. The periapical lesion had resolved. References
The left lateral incisor had started to form an
1. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Textbook and Color Atlas
apical barrier. No apical barrier was evident at of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth (ed 3). Copenhagen:
the apex of the central incisor. One year after Munksgaard, Mosby, 1994.
starting apexification, active orthodontic move- 2. Graber TM, Swain BE Orthodontics Current Principles
m e n t was initiated. An endodontic evaluation at and Tcctmiques. St. l,ouis MO: Mosby, 1985.
that time showed a fully fbrmed barrier on the 3. Tanner JM. Growth at Adolescence (ed 2). Oxiord:
Blackwell Scientific, 1962.
lateral incisor and a partially f o r m e d barrier on 4. Steiner DR. Timing of extraction of ankylosed teeth to
the central incisor. Calcium hydroxide was replen- maximize ridge development. J Endodon 1997 (in press).
ished at that time. It was replaced again 6 months 5. Malmgren B, Cvek M, Lundberg M, et al. Surgical treaF
later. Two years after beginning endodontic treat- ment of ankylosed and inti'apositioned reimplanted inci-
m e n t both teeth had fully f o r m e d apical barriers. sors in adolescents. ScandJ Dent Res 1984;92:391-399.
6. Anthony DR. Apexification during active orthodontic
The canals were obturated with gutta-percha at movement. J Endodon 1986; 12:419-421.
that time. O r t h o d o n t i c treatment was completed 7. Spurrier S, Hall S, .loondeph D, et al. A comparison of
6 months later. The preorthodontic and postorth- apical root resorption during treatment in endodontically
odontic cephalometric superimposition shows treatment and vital teeth. Am.l Orthod Dentotac Orthop
that although the maxillary central incisors had 1990;97:130-134.
8. Cvek M. Prognosis of luxated nonvital maxillary incisions
inoved during the apexification process, the lreated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta
apical barrier had f o r m e d successtully. percha. A retrospective clinical study. Endodon l)ent
Anthony ~; has reported a successfld apexifica- Traumatol 1992;8:45-55.