Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WRR Final 1 1
WRR Final 1 1
Alyssa Owens
Dr. Vogt
2 December 2018
Rulers in China, Korea, and Japan have used figures from Buddhist myth and the
symbols surrounding them to justify their own claims to rule, primarily by claiming to embody a
legitimizing form of kingship present in Korean, Japanese, and Chinese rulership is the concept
of the cakravartin king, or ‘universal monarch’. Somewhat similar to the idea of the Heavenly
Mandate, which espouses that a certain king is chosen, a cakravartin ruler endorsed Buddhist
theology (making it a state sponsored or protected religion) while also claiming to be some form
of Buddhist divine, making them a sort of ‘chosen’ ruler. The prominence of this form of rule in
each country greatly increased the ability of each ruler to claim legitimacy within a Buddhist
context and incorporate previous religious or cultural ideas of rulership into the cakravartin
model.
Throughout Chinese history there has been an emphasis on using Buddhism as a way to
legitimize rule. One example of this that encompasses many rulers and defines part of the way
Chinese rulers were perceived for a period of time is the concept of the Emperor as bodhisattva,
or a buddha-to-be. This form of kingship, along with the tradition of Cakravartin kingship in
which the ruler endorsed Buddhist theology and might claim to be “an incarnation or avatar of
Buddhist divinities” all play into the larger scheme used by Wu Zetian to sediment her place as
Owens 2
the first and only female emperor of China (Rothschild, “Emperor Wu Zhao” 13). In fact, N.
Harry Rothschild argues that Buddhist texts written during her rule (it is heavily implied that the
monks who wrote such texts were intentionally designing the material) were the primary way in
which she was able to sediment her position as Cakravartin ruler (Rothschild, “Wu Zhao China’s
Part of Wu Zetian’s claims to legitimacy rested within the male line, with Buddhist
ancestors like King Asoka (Sui Wendi) who endorsed the Buddhist faith and helped unify China
(Rothschild, “Emperor Wu Zhao” 14). Wu Zetian used feasts to reinforce her symbolic ties to
King Asoka, relating the symbology of the feasts to his compassion and mercy and his eventual
renunciation of the world, declaring himself bodhisattva and Cakravartin (Rothschild, “Wu Zhao
China’s Only Woman Emperor” 149) A majority of the figures she used to justify her position
were female, allowing her to claim that there was precedence for her position, which was a
reversal of the traditional Confucian and cosmological ideas that had an unstated rule that put
men in the position of power (Rothschild, “Emperor Wu Zhao” 2). Some examples of the
critiques she faced as a woman ascending the throne include being blamed for animal
abominations and natural disasters, all of which stemmed (from the Confucian mode of thought)
from her upsetting the normal order of the emperor being male (Rothschild, “Emperor Wu
Zhao” 3). To combat the Confucian model, she used the example of women like Maya, the
mother of the historical Buddha in addition to a number of Buddhist devis and goddesses
(Rothschild, “Emperor Wu Zhao” 194). Wu Zetian emphasized mothers when introducing new
political ancestors within each belief system to further prove her ability to rule in spite of (or
perhaps because of) her own motherhood (Rothschild, “Emperor Wu Zhao” 195). She used the
symbolism of Maya (particularly the white elephant that represents the Buddha’s immaculate
Owens 3
conception) to solidify the tie between herself and the Buddha’s birth (Rothschild, “Emperor Wu
Zhao” 201). Connecting herself to the symbology of the “divine mother” drew a clear parallel
to her title as “Sage Mother” and “Divine Sovereign”, allowing her to not only justify her place
on the throne as a woman, but also as mother of the nation, effectively overshadowing the
Confucian teachings that set precedence for a male to hold the throne (Rothschild, “Emperor Wu
Zhao” 205).
prophecies that supposedly foretold the ascent of a female emperor to the throne (Rothschild,
“Emperor Wu Zhao" 208). The most compelling use of prophecy is her use of the Great Cloud
Sutra, a prophecy written 200 years before her birth that recounts the Buddha telling “-the
Celestial Maiden of Purity and Light that she ‘will take the body of a woman and obtain a quarter
of the places governed by a Cakravartin’” (Rothschild, “Wu Zhao China’s Only Woman
Emperor” 146). Using these prophecies, she claimed that she represented the Devi of Pure
Radiance, a female devi who would destroy “-the external religions and the perverse and
heretical visions-” (Rothschild, “Wu Zhao China’s Only Woman Emperor” 146). By claiming to
be the result of prophecy and sent to champion Buddhism, she ensured support from Buddhist
factions.
In Japan, Prince Shotoku continued the use of Cakravartin leadership by being considered
one of the founders of the Buddhist tradition in Japan and embodying Maitreya, pegging him as
both a defender of Buddhism and Dharma ruler (Como 28). Like Wu Zetian, prophecies were
connected to Prince Shotoku that foretold Maitreya would come “-in the form of a prince who as
a youth would turn the wheel of the Buddhist Law” (Como 28). Shotoku being connected with
Maitreya represented a larger movement called Maitreyan messianism that claimed Maitreya
Owens 4
would come to earth to rid it of evil and begin a golden age (Como 28). Also like Wu Zetian,
Shotoku represented a connecting force by marrying state and religion through his Cakravartin
was said that before his birth his mother saw the world-saving bodhisattva enter her womb in a
dream right before he was born. He was supposed to have been able to speak from birth and had
the power to predict the future (Lee 36). Obviously, these accounts are hardly trustworthy, but it
does indicate a willingness to connect Shotoku’s origins, birth, childhood, and later adulthood to
a complete devotion to Buddhism all connected to these visions and prophecies, further utilizing
It is worth noting that the concept of the emperor as bodhisattva wouldn’t be completely
new to a Japanese audience at the time, as there was already an association with the emperors as
kami (Ohnuki-Tierney 211). The idea that kami and Shintoism were precursors to Buddhism and
buddhas is called shinbutsu shugo or “the unification of kamis and buddhas” (Lee 62). Because
there was already an established tradition that allows the emperor to take on mythic origins it
isn’t surprising that Buddhism was used in the same way to justify Prince Shotoku’s rise to
power (Ohnuki-Tierney, 211). The Imperial House itself is founded on the belief that they
descend from Amaterasu, goddess of the sun (Ohnuki-Tierney 203). It’s not such a stretch to
label emperors as buddhas or bodhisattvas when they were already accepted as direct
descendants of Amaterasu, who, when shunbutsu shugo overtook, might be considered a buddha
or bodhisattva herself.
Like the previous two examples, Korea also utilized the cakravartin model to justify their
ruler’s legitimacy, especially in the case of King Chinhung. King Chinhung was compared to
Owens 5
Sankha, and Silla the pure land, both found within the Sutra (Keel 14). Utilizing the symbology
surrounding the universal monarch (cakravatin), Chinhung named his sons Kumnyun (Gold
Wheel) and Tongnyun (Bronze Wheel), symbols of the cakravartin to show his devotion to the
model (Keel 14). Also like the other rulers, Chinhung utilized figures like King Asoka, creating
memorials in his honor. One of the most significant instances of this is when Chinhung claimed
to have made Buddha statues out of the gold and wood that King Asoka had intended for the
project. This feat had supposedly never been accomplished by anyone until Chinhung himself
Chinhung wove Buddhism into the ancestral worship system that was popular in Silla up
until that time. According to N.M Panjack, Chinhung utilized Buddhist rituals to support the
system of ancestor worship by amending them to sacralize ancestors (Panjack 18). The title of
Buddha was eventually bestowed on rulers, a result of “a major adaption... made by the Northern
Wei in the institutional premise of Buddhism- “(Panjack 18). The hwarang, a force of young men
from the nobility were also accorded status as an incarnation of Maitreya, a bodhisattva (Keel
13-14). This allowed for the legitimization of the military force that was meant to unite Silla.
Given the use of the cakravartin model in China, Japan, and Korea along with the use of
Buddhist figures to legitimize ruling authority, an interesting topic of study would be to trace the
migration of the cakravartin model, looking to see if it was used in sequence in China, Korea,
and then Japan or if it developed independently as a result of the Buddhist system. It is also
possible to relate the concept of the Heavenly Mandate to the cakravartin ruler, given that they
allow the ruler to claim a certain sovereignty as universal monarch based on being ‘chosen’.
Because Heavenly Mandate became known throughout China and then spread to other regions, it
would be interesting to compare and contrast the Heavenly Mandate and the cakravatin model to
Owens 6
determine if Buddhism was the natural next step in the sequence of ruling legitimacy for a
Final Grade: A
Owens 7
Works Cited
Carr, Kevin. Plotting the Prince Shotoku Cults and the Mapping of Medieval Japanese
Como. Shotoku: “Ethnicity and the Founding Legend of Buddhism”. Oxford University Press,
2008.
Keel, S. “Buddhism and Political Power in Korean History”. The Journal of the International
Lee, Kenneth Doo Young. The Prince and the Monk Shotoku Worship in Shinran’s Buddhism.
Panjack, N.M. The Buddhist Transformation of Silla Kingship: Buddha as a King and King as a
Buddha.
Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko. “The Emperor of Japan as Deity (Kami)”. Ethnology, Vol. 30, No. 3