Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARTICLE
CITROME
10.1177/0091270004269870
ARIPIPRAZOLE
DRUG INTERACTIONS
ET ALAND CONCOMITANT LITHIUM AND VALPROATE
The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics clearance decreased by 15%. There was no effect on the
of the antipsychotic aripiprazole when coadministered with steady-state pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of
lithium or valproate. Two open-label, sequential treatment de- aripiprazole. Coadministration with valproate decreased the
sign studies were conducted in chronically institutionalized pa- AUC and Cmax of aripiprazole by 24% and 26%, respectively,
tients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder requir- with minimal effects on the active metabolite. Therapeutic
ing treatment with lithium (n = 12) or valproate (divalproex doses of lithium and divalproex had no clinically significant
sodium) (n = 10). Patients received aripiprazole 30 mg/day on effects on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in patients
days 1 to 14 and aripiprazole with concomitant therapy on with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
days 15 to 36. Lithium was titrated from 900 mg until serum
concentrations reached 1.0 to 1.4 mEq/L for at least 5 days. Keywords: Aripiprazole; valproate; lithium; schizophrenia;
Valproate was titrated to 50 to 125 mg/L. Coadministration with pharmacokinetics
lithium increased mean Cmax and AUC values of aripiprazole by Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005;45:89-93
about 19% and 15%, respectively, whereas the apparent oral ©2005 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology
MATERIALS AND METHODS events were observed. After day 21, the dose of
valproate was held constant for the following 2 weeks
Two open-label, sequential treatment design studies (days 22-36). On the final day of lithium or valproate
were conducted at 3 state-operated psychiatric centers: and aripiprazole coadministration, serial blood sam-
Rockland and Bronx Psychiatric Centers in New York ples were collected for the determination of
state and Norristown State Hospital in Pennsylvania. aripiprazole pharmacokinetics in the presence of
The time period was April 2000 to March 2001. therapeutic concentrations of lithium or valproate.
Among the inclusion criteria were a DSM-IV diagno- Pharmacokinetic sample collection was accom-
sis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder that re- plished by collecting venous blood at each of the fol-
quired lithium or valproate for the management of lowing time points (relative to aripiprazole administra-
symptoms, aged 18 to 55 years, and able to give in- tion): 0 (prior to dosing), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24
formed consent and/or consent obtained from a legally hours. Trough concentrations (Cmin) were determined
acceptable representative (as required by the local in- from the day 14 and day 36 predose samples. Pharmaco-
vestigational review boards that approved the studies). kinetic measures for orally administered aripiprazole
Excluded from both studies were subjects with a his- and its active metabolite, OPC-14857, were derived
tory of recent (within 6 months) drug or alcohol abuse; from plasma concentration versus time data. The fol-
a diagnosis of delirium, dementia, or amnestic or other lowing pharmacokinetic parameters were determined
cognitive disorders; presence of focal or epileptiform by study day (days 14 and 36): peak plasma concentra-
abnormalities in screening electroencephalogram tion (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax), area under the
(EEG); need for any concomitant medications that plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing inter-
might potentially interfere with metabolism of val (AUCτ), and apparent oral clearance (CLT/F). Geo-
aripiprazole, lithium, or valproate; positive hepatitis B metric means and coefficients of variation for Cmax and
surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody test at screen- AUC on days 14 and 36, as well as corresponding ratios
ing; and evidence of organ dysfunction or any clini- of day 36 values to day 14 values, were also deter-
cally significant deviation from normal in the physi- mined. Medians and ranges were calculated for tmax.
cal, electrocardiographic, or clinical laboratory Means, standard deviations, and ranges were calcu-
examinations. lated for Cmin and CLT/F.
The following tests and procedures were done at Assays for aripiprazole and metabolite concentra-
baseline and at regular intervals during the trial: physi- tions and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed
cal examination, vital signs, clinical laboratory, elec- under the supervision of the bioanalytical group of the
trocardiogram (ECG), EEG, Positive and Negative Clinical Discovery Department at Bristol-Myers
Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Mini-Mental State Exam Squibb. Assays for lithium and valproate concentra-
(MMSE), Simpson-Angus Scale, Barnes Akathisia tions were performed using standard commercial
Scale, and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale. methods by duly licensed laboratories.
After a medication washout period, subjects on day
1 were administered aripiprazole 30 mg once daily (2 RESULTS
tablets of 15 mg) for the duration of the study. On day
14, serial blood samples were collected for the determi- The lithium study enrolled 12 subjects, with 7 com-
nation of aripiprazole pharmacokinetics. Beginning on pleters (all male) whose results are reported here. The
day 15 and lasting for the next 21 days (days 15-36), average age was 37 years (range, 20-47), with 3 of white
lithium (lithium carbonate slow-release tablets) or ethnicity, 3 black, and 1 Hispanic. Mean weight was
valproate (divalproex sodium) was coadministered 95.3 kg (range, 66.6-143.1), mean height was 174.7 cm
with aripiprazole. (range, 167.6-188.0), and mean body mass index was
The lithium dose was titrated upward from a start- 33.5 (range, 23.9-42.7). The daily dose of lithium
ing dose of 900 mg (in a once- or twice-daily regimen) ranged from 1200 to 1800 mg/d. Actual lithium plasma
until serum lithium concentrations approached the levels achieved ranged from 0.43 to 1.2 mEq/L.
upper end of the lithium therapeutic concentration Coadministration of lithium with aripiprazole had no
range (1.0-1.4 mEq/L) and were maintained for at least major effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of
5 days or until dose-limiting adverse events were ob- aripiprazole (Table I and Figure 1). The geometric mean
served. For patients in the valproate study, the dose Cmax and AUCτ values of aripiprazole increased by
was titrated upward from a starting dose of 250 mg about 19% and 15%, respectively, while the apparent
twice a day until a serum concentration of 50 to 125 oral clearance decreased by 15%. However, there were
mg/L was achieved or until dose-limiting adverse no consistent differences in the Cmax, AUCτ, and CLT/F
Cmax, ng/mL, geometric mean and 364.1 431.5 115.1 136.2 426.9 315.5 109.4 101.9
coefficient of variation (%) (23) (28) (34) (25) (23) (27) (19) (30)
Median tmax, h 2.0 2.0 24.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.5
(minimum, maximum) (2.0, 24.0) (1.0, 12.0) (0.0, 24.0) (0.0, 24.0) (1.0, 2.0) (2.0, 24.0) (0.5, 2.0) (0.5, 24.0)
AUCτ, ng•h/mL,a geometric 6113 7041 2360 2534 7474 5677 2202 2021
mean and coefficient of (34) (18) (36) (17) (19) (25) (24) (32)
variation (%)
CLT/F, mL/min,a mean and 85.1 72.1 67.9 90.3
standard deviation (24.8) (14.1) (12.3) (22.4)
Weight-normalized CLT/F, 0.97 0.80 0.82 1.08
mL/min/kg,a mean and (0.44) (0.21) (0.18) (0.25)
standard deviation
Cmin, ng/mL, mean and 212.3 230.9 108.0 115.2 281.2 219.1 98.2 87.0
standard deviation (82.6) (72.1) (33.2) (29.4) (65.8) (97.4) (15.8) (32.8)
Treatment ratiob of Cmax and NA 1.19 NA 1.18 NA 0.74 NA 0.93
AUCτa geometric mean and (34) (21) (26) (39)
coefficient of variation (%) 1.15 1.07 0.76 0.92
(31) (25) (29) (34)
a. n = 6 for ARI and Li.
b. ARI with Li or VAL (day 36) to ARI alone (day 14).
450
no apparent effect on the steady-state pharmaco- 400
kinetics of the major aripiprazole metabolite, dehydro- 350
aripiprazole (OPC-14857). 300
The valproate study enrolled 10 male subjects, with 250
6 completers whose results are reported here. The aver- 200
age age was 33 years (range, 22-40), with 4 of black eth- 150
nicity, 1 white, and 1 Hispanic. Mean weight was 85.0 100
kg (range, 79.2-92.3), mean height was 174.8 cm (range, 50
170.2-177.8), and mean body mass index was 27.8 0
(range, 25.0-30.5). All achieved steady-state valproate 0 5 10 15 20
concentrations above 50 mg/L by day 36 of the study. Time (Hours)
Coadministration of divalproex had minor effects
on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole (Table I and Figure 1. Mean plasma concentration versus time profiles of
aripiprazole at steady state following administration of 30 mg of
Figure 2). It decreased the geometric mean AUCτ and aripiprazole alone and with lithium.
Cmax of aripiprazole by 24% and 26%, respectively; it
increased median tmax of aripiprazole by 2 hours and
the CLT/F of aripiprazole by 33%. Coadministration of
divalproex had minimal effects on the pharmaco-
kinetics of dehydro-aripiprazole. It decreased the geo- Due to the small sample size in both studies, both
metric mean AUCτ and Cmax of dehydro-aripiprazole by safety and efficacy could not be adequately deter-
8% and 7%, respectively; it increased the median tmax mined. However, no untoward effects were seen in
of dehydro-aripiprazole by 1.5 hours. EEG, ECG, or clinical laboratory monitoring or in mea-
DRUG INTERACTIONS 91
CITROME ET AL
Aripiprazole + Valproate
tabolites is the diazepam binding site (site II, same as
Aripiprazole alone
the aripiprazole primary binding site), but it can also
Aripiprazole Concentration (ng/mL)
3. Frye MA, Ketter TA, Leverich GS, et al. The increasing use of 14. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Abilify (aripiprazole) tablets. In:
polypharmacotherapy for refractory mood disorders: 22 years of Physicians’ Desk Reference. 58th ed. Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDR,
study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:9-15. 2004:1034-1038.
4. Tohen M, Chengappa KN, Suppes T, et al. Efficacy of olanzapine in 15. Baldessarini RJ, Tarazi FI. Drugs and the treatment of psychiatric
combination with valproate or lithium in the treatment of mania in disorders. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, eds. Goodman & Gilman’s
patients partially nonresponsive to lithium or valproate The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 10th ed. New York:
monotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:62-69. McGraw-Hill, 2001:507-511.
5. Sachs G, Chengappa K, Suppes T, et al. Quetiapine with lithium or 16. GlaxoSmithKline: Eskalith—lithium carbonate capsules, Eskalith
divalproex for the treatment of bipolar mania: a randomized, double- CR—lithium carbonate controlled-release tablets product informa-
blind, placebo-controlled study. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6:213-223. tion. In: Physicians’ Desk Reference. 58th ed. Montvale, NJ: Thomson
6. Delbello MP, Schwiers ML, Rosenberg HL, Strakowski SM. A PDR, 2004:1496-1498.
double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine as 17. Abbott Laboratories. Depacon—valproate sodium injection,
adjunctive treatment for adolescent mania. J Am Acad Child Adol Depakene—valproic acid capsules and syrup, Depakote Sprinkle
Psychiatry. 2002;41:1216-1223. Capsules—divalproex sodium coated particles in capsules, Depakote
7. Yatham LN, Grossman F, Augustyns I, Vieta E, Ravindran A. Mood Tablets—divalproex sodium delayed-release tablets, Depakote ER—
stabilizers plus risperidone or placebo in the treatment of acute ma- divalproex sodium extended-release tablets product information. In:
nia: international, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Br J Physicians’ Desk Reference. 58th ed. Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDR,
Psychiatry. 2003;182:141-147. 2004:420-446.
8. Sachs GS, Grossman F, Ghaemi SN, Okamoto A, Bowden CL. Com- 18. Anderson GD. A mechanistic approach to antiepileptic drug in-
bination of a mood stabilizer with risperidone or haloperidol for teractions. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32:554-563.
treatment of acute mania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled com- 19. Panjehshahin MR, Bowmer CJ, Yates MS. Effect of valproic acid,
parison of efficacy and safety. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1146-1154. its unsaturated metabolites and some structurally related fatty acids
9. Suppes T, Webb A, Paul B, Carmody T, Kraemer H, Rush AJ. Clini- on the binding of warfarin and dansylsarcosine to human albumin.
cal outcome in a randomized 1-year trial of clozapine versus treat- Biochem Pharmacol. 1991;41:1227-1233.
ment as usual for patients with treatment-resistant illness and a his- 20. Imamura H. Determination of human, rat and dog serum protein
14
tory of mania. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1164-1169. binding of C-OPC-14597 using a polydimethylsiloxane-coated
10. Casey DE, Daniel DG, Wassef AA, Tracy KA, Wozniak P, glass bead assay. Otsuka Report No. 010398, August 28, 1996. BMS
Sommerville K. Effect of divalproex combined with olanzapine or Document Control No. 920001390.
risperidone in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. 21. Calvo R, Carlos R, Erill S. Differential effects of valproic acid on
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:182-192. the serum protein binding of lorazepam and diazepam. Int J Clin
11. Citrome L. Schizophrenia and valproate. Psychopharmacol Bull. Pharmacol Res. 1986;6:213-215.
2003;37(suppl 2):74-88. 22. Sansom LN, Beran RC, Schapel GJ. Interaction between
12. Shapiro DA, Renock S, Arrington E, et al. Aripiprazole, a novel phenytoin and valproate. Med J Aust. 1980;2:212.
atypical antipsychotic drug with a unique and robust pharmacology. 23. Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: Mar-
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:1400-1411. cel Dekker, 1982.
13. Bowles TM, Levin GM. Aripiprazole: a new atypical
antipsychotic drug. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37:687-694.
DRUG INTERACTIONS 93