AM No: 219, September 24, 1402 —-CASIANO_U. LAPUT , Petithmer _ ve. ATTY. FRAN CISCO_E.F. REMOTIEUE or OnE a FORTUNATO P. fATALINGHUG | Respondents. FACTS + Pete Casiono U- “ Lapet was rehaine leu es Rillas Vda: de Barrera +o handle her case, ent _ “Testale Estale of Macaig Barrera’ Pettimer ARE plated the closing of the said administration prouedings wd Foo pleadings, at Wis point, however, te oe Piles Ge ae eo eg —__ ooamtersiqn these documents and advised petitioner wot records of said prosdings shat esp ondeutt Atty» Porta entire die "appearance as counsel: sto file them. Some weeks later, pertioner found in te rato Patalingnug pled a wrifen appearance as the : new commnsel” efor Vda. de Barrera. There aftr, petihinoy — obtked the crt to ee nN a aE ESE ake were umeditcal anol improper 4 en hod desires 5 replace the pettiour as a Heat before thetr Appearance hey made. dee ead es captioned * i Pauacarine of Power of ftimey” ad cout the Same mail & ceveral _ceeporaions od esfrdolisbuneute where Pre Estate of Macand parrera_is owner of Cert- Npeats of stocks Picturing Wn aso disnest ieee a trusted py Ws Cldeut; ond that fy : PateLinghve, ewlered hts f apeamno uitant novethet when he entered I's appearance we pdm uistratns Vda. de Barrera bod allreody lest Onificlemte la her lawyer , the herein pebthoney , rh bad ih fat already with her ee onde “Discharge of. Coussiel fe , the Adnunistaion aA Motion +o Cite tty oe Laput’ whidy she _ herself hod fled with the Court: Ta amsuser, resprndent B Rematiyve sfated oat whew he filed. has | ee on Febomany +, (455, So The _Aupreme Court dA the case to He Selicctor the petitioner has areas has al | withdrwm at crusel. beroral fr Invechgccion , ireport wd veeommendaction 4 SOLICITOR GENERALS aa The Soltcitor General, ad ee “contplole, examen af respond evs Tr appears oud it y —— ~ Sollertor ieee respond-eut iwnato fila endered Wis Are. Raduntimiie ad, ady filed ae Game pladiig Arsolsarqing fy. Lap: ‘ z= a ISSUES ss eae Whether or not not the 2 appeavamess. ¢ of responchouks +o __reploce ee cepilesteets without nohte to “tte laHer were 3 a nclleh tr deeleprmnend a soe HELD: eee lve see m0 tmeGodanthy in He appearance of respondeat pity. Patabinglug a eavacel. forthe wtlond » much Lees Can we citer tas an actral gable na f case puttin The evidence found by the lat eon hens that Aity patelingluag (professional Guvas sat Onntrrcted by toe widow a ta naejnultoneersly of motto for the paymeut of fee eS attemeyi fk amounted 40 acquiescence fo He 1 appearance of respond Attu: patolinahug oe 4 fr the widow: nts shold ectop pettionza fom row tempting thet the appecamin of respondent uss { varpro-fessionah : eas 1 ae Muche Less we could hdd respondent Atty, Rumohe i his appearance, and his (petthiners ) felling almost _guily of vanprrfisclonal cmduet jnasmuch as he ‘ “endined is “oppenrewce afer Ys. Barret, had i dispemeed -itle petitiners series od alt the later < had voluntarily withdrawn lic pearance: ne With respect to re preperation by ity. Pateding . uf the ramerhont of pruee of edie 06 enuplat a = + by | pebblewr the Sclicrhy General same” dees ret appear b> be eS —_indtnded te hurt relioned dubas Dut purelyro sfequaird oe teres of the tadukaistratriy. No Sufficient: evidence fe having Pea sede Jo sustain’ te Changes hese owe herelon ditmtesed ond toe case closed.”