Am: NO- P- 13-3132 Jute. 4, 2014 sme oF ie tour AOminETARTOR, Coup ) Regioel rial. Court of Mabel , Savangant Provinw |Br- 38, baa Respondent: | g = FACTS: : the Civil Sevia Ones lachfufed on annie. cae againk Sarak P- Ampong , Court Si ATES fev Dishonesty , Gave Msemcuct, ab Concluct Deda tp te “pes Tnderest the Senis for having Imporsenedecl or hen the hovenben aL Guienie: lay Exun- Dear The offence Was opines uel os SEL app - cinded Court Indew prefer fr Naboel RIC eee nuoved veeons derachiont on the grvund that when the std administrative case wat fied he was already -—_oppeinded to the “foduetan as such, CSC’ we beer, had aaa = Surtdiction vey aes pong motion Was dedied. ter te flea petition before he Cow of ppeats-Co!): eae CAS denied her pettion amd sinter the. Court Cee & gine her petition fv review on Shae and , thus, affimed, her dismissal “feme cone [SSUE whether or wet mwoong pad been dismissed fro. hev —_teaplagmenct 05“ CrurF Tatorprekr Tt of Hoe RTC? HELD: seen The Court vesolves “he fssue Yhe af firmuchee = As records chow, in the August 26,2008 Decision the Qurt had abrercly held Armpong, adnivistvafively Mable fac dish =Deeir. This Court has defined dishonesty as He “disposition to _ lie, cheat, cluceive _, ov (defraud 5 iota lack of ‘ud Feqrity 5 2 — lak of hon ty or inteqnd in principle ; [ack S i el re Areposition oi ‘def, dees eve ov _bebray. * Ampongi dishonest aet as a céull eho 2 rodeys her mfet fo be a Gudieral, ewxplouee. Wwe take nok that che shin have ‘ast bean dp sited 08.6 udi= otal cw had he Supreme, - been made ausare the that cle ¢ commited. in the Cl Sevia ex- Bisinatenee eee Sete aU ener er pest ahs cs a caper ts pot a hindrance + her i TW ehicck “defined under tee Shee Conshituction a ne. toe Pee Code, te dul sewin aces eee brancly agency, Sh vodlursion , ! ord inshumentatity of the vues awh governeneistpas : wed ov conbolld Copovcehions- thwever, the chon. prov (Hes Yhact the Supreme Court f6 given vel tvelusive aducinl - shadive 5 isin over alk courts and Judicial personnel. by virtue of. Huis ee tt is only dhe Supeme eat shat Chk cayose She es awd cou eos evsonnel Wonce imme aft oitade tuto this power, withovt unig doctrine of separcction. of prwert: oe ae fuis cae, te _pettioner Commedia offease before her mee to tre jocliatl bianch.— Admintshectice Gus ‘chon over a_ov crit umployee Uelongs to the SupremeTt must be stresced that overy onsployer | of the peekg houtd be om «xaanple. of iudkegaty upg ldness and howoshy, Like cay public Sue she. mutt odebit the | bigest sense of Thamesty ond iwckegrity wot only ta te parponance of her official duties bt alco In Shoe personal, id paivate dealings with othe peepee. te presewve “they corti gerd. name and chanding. Where five, He Cart Sustains the — desmigsal of resp= —_omdeut coe e- wepong om He armed. of Disligkerte: peendingly her retirement ard eftor benefit ove fofertd except aoonud eave oredite , aad she ws porpes diqualified from re- pletiece: fe Amy gen Ae Ae instrumental fy, twcludng ai) GN ANE Pee awh combolled - ~ coxpracin” or Gsremeutt fronciok inshtution.