in Ong was _ incr vesporckent tty William F Oclos famfes by sheclf Pemands Mewado. — Lata, Ong ond tity. Delos fauctos became friends. In tine, according te_Ong , Atty. Delos Combos asked inv te encash - post -dated Be Le oi he woe weed ol cath. Te reasswe “that fhe cheek 4mntd wo brunw ie actorney loragged about is lwerative practice and _W'c gued. paying ice Sonvined, Ong handed to_pbtty. Dele nil. P 100, 003.00 ia exchange i the laters pest -doted check. Hever, the check was lotted. upon presenbnrenct for jhe veasm that the actount -was ea Ong veloued We matey of the dishonor hp __fitty. Delos Soitos , tind demawded, Inmeditbe, peymout but he Inkler just muored. him . When efforts to alley remain foble ona broicut a orininal tengpla abut if Eshafev_ awd foc violation of _Piokas Paula awn bly.Tegel Pav of the. ae (rep). FINDINGS @ RECOMMEN OATIONS OF THe I8P IEPs Final veemumendation. _i5_ for _rttty.. Delos Sauctar be thd ible fer violating Camm 4 Rube 1-0( cmd Canon 7, Rule 7:03 of ine Code of pe oeomal is eae and that _ te penalty of _ancpension fom. te practi law pe three years plus the relum of P 100,000.00 4p he Coonpla- aud willy beg inkvest ase Hurty - -dous ‘ieee receupt ol wha be ick at Atty: Delos Contos ci Uren of aw eylier dishorment case nhainsi him CLucman vs Hy. Delos Santos’) HELD + The Supreme, Court agrees with toe findings of the IBP butt nedified bg Meerincaeel penclty. pp aa is emattd in der fe cnfequan he nto st of fhe bamking susten. ond the lig timate public checking acecunt ee The tau’ is designed. to ‘bit oud Marts te) poche of sewing cheeke usthe insufheient find wre fil wo ovedit been the puctic is pleemehd a public vulcamce , & Crime aqainct 5 pililic oder to as Doe th, cee i. 2 Odes: Sours 24S Doel’ ayereyoe was Eenetheloss presumed to Know thon fr foe. oe war pural in tlanelee and application: ‘ the wr funded check violated ap an and oclibited bit Pre (esuonce of indi florence tovards the effect _o ff his ullegal aet to ee intrest awk publie order, ‘thereby, clivegarcling b's Lax Oath. also a genaced. fle. “express Eee He tle Code of Professional, Rézpensiilty speci fieally Canon 1, | Rae ee nA. Cason Rie 7.03 via | CANON 4 =A lawyer shall. upheld yhe constrtuchin, obey Hee laws of the © “land ad. ipronole respec pov tre (aus and Leged 3 processes. Rule “2.01 —_A lawyer s engage in _walanrfol, dichmest , Jmoral cv dacs cmaduet. deer sa chal wt all mes uphold the ike gy and dignity of tee Legal Phofesstovt anol stapport “the aelivities oP the Inteqrated iene ied Rule 4-03- A lawyer shall fe engage ta emanet [that eueicelinece} cts m Ws frmess te punch law, wr shall he whether in rameters ov private Ufe behave, in a seandalous manner to the diseredit of the legal ssiom » that bus ot involved or private dealing with Ong did not _matter. His being a \anryer invested Bie whether he was aching as eli oy in a woe professional. capacity — wit the Solinadion to exlubit good Jat, fairness mel Bi mile a relat ose ‘atth othors. There iS wo Ques that a lamver enld be clisctplined net onlyse amar ak act Sa a perm of “the. bein eat moval ond professional iwtegnty ae spobity tn Wis ltalings -witle ches. amoreover, in issuing Ye dishmored check Athy: Delos Sauutos pit” into Serious question vet bis personal indegnity but alee he integrity of We evctie Tntegratecs ae Th cannot be deuted ‘hat Ong acceded fo Siify. Delos Sautes” request fr Se re. of the checle because a venaplete Di ancora anlrlity of He Legpl Droge sim - Noking Hot the BP 22 change. Was already dismissed md toot be already repaid. “Pp Og Pt vw apd.0,, botte £ nlely are frewled on math geking craton as lu ws tance. _ Aeoordinglay, sty. Willian delec Santas i Gully of violating te Lancers oath , and Comm 1, Rule 1:01 ae ees 4. Rule 4-03 of He Cede of Professional Resp ons! nlity ov era sus pends betnn from the, peti af sles for a period of Six morte, with a Cem warning that anu) Gila infraction in the. future, bord be. deatt with nwre Severely.