“AL. No: 10028, Quly 1, 2018 __ — MAXIMIND NDRLE II} Complainant vé- AMT ORLANDO O- AILES ReCpndeuT FACTS: : — maxinving alleged that =m = Anguet 18, 2010, _ Brlomdo filed” a complaint por damages Osainat a ram __ baothor maclo 0. Ail, fr. whan Mavinwine nepresented , Maxininn claimed that ot the Hime of We ee = Said mplaint , Ortands BP shad — have reflected ene of Ma oe lee canmial dues _ fr ee wt 2009 , and that he shawl rawe o tind MCLE Conyplizence not fue ine Ate - = Crop Lad none also teamed that —Dalando- “thon gh tert Wl SC Dat he awt fo Macerls had heen mali anine He porn er ond die LS v7) Arter frm pttaining the SAW As ~ of maciaino as Crunsed cthinaing fiat. che = ws fincrm. pi-euct ne that ke charged —_ ¢xorbitant fet saying cling others: “xx pets laminae “yr hi-Faack - (aentar wha will _impov-erish yu with has wnem sonable fe ssa fe. “Mase Noble as Shem jin unwt reeds newer appeared ten nee tad why You lost in the pre- trial Stage ) oe ae nid of hoble as eee ie ere ee, et Sp ert an OT ne eo a Mhee nn i phat __mismmg —abogade mivg__polpel / Records Show that Crlando wen prepared a None W Termnrae Senvices _of ‘counsel Ae wht as o onenppronnd 6, reemtnt , bot bf which he seat to Maveclo px bus siguechire . (BP Reermmindatin IBR rteemmended that the Crerplordak against __ Atty. “wrtanda Ailee be lisence aggrieved, Malin fd “the ~ presovt pebitine rit ™ Horan ISSUE < = whether as not the BP eayreet dismitsed the complaint agadast ando- HELD: we the pebihon SS partly meritorious. The prnckin iofee law I on pre lage hese om _lawy dre who meet high Standards of legal prof chamcy amd __movatity - Conseq ue ntey, a lawyer must “at all tes , wht ie public oy private life, not os aA manner eed vepreach Gpeci uly whin dealing w lan yer: : x a this Mato, Ryle 7.03 of Comm F as wel 5 Camm 8B of the CPR pee oe ah Bone eet ere oe RR ere Bree oeneni ae ‘whether in public. oy. private Wife, behave ina seawdaleus mauner tp the diseredit of the _legak profession - CANON. B- x lawyer shal eomduet ranaself with wwriesy 1 fairness awd canrdoy twavd Wd popitional colleagues , and shal aunid “harascing neue against opposing aunsel- : Roly 8-0l- A lavyer chal not, in Ws professional Acalings ee lang nage whide (Ss abusive offensive or _vthernare *aproper. Rule 8-04- A layer shall vot, dire oy Indiretty » Monach vupm fe profesional employment” of — gmother lawyer; hawever, - ieee the night of aay lawnfey without Oh iol 0. Ive proper adn ad assistamiy fp those eet king relief agarnst wofovi tle fie Oo neghect ful counsel - In tus case, the IBP frumnd ye fey messages frat vvlande Seah fo Wk prothe, Maelo as a casual — Cammurnications camsidenng that thoy were conveyed _ priv a ound, however toa os the _messorges cannot be _ treated. Wg ntty The fect messages were hearty intended ’ malign and dmnoy Mavinwind, as enident the use of word “pol pol" (stupid. Likenstse, bvlandse inaiatence | that Marcelo —Oe EEE he againt his colleague, in Vidlativn oF the aloove- quoted rules: wh re avd p “orlomdes alteged violation of BM. No. 1422, the Court agrees that hrs failure to disclose he required ro br MCLE muplionce 1S not Bs around er Malia most, Wis vielen shall rly be cause fv thee dismissal of the I Ormplaint at well 0s the typunetionn | hereof fou the _reeorils: ; aes ti -ilaing_ Rule 703 yi Canm Fo he Cann § of the OR nate & hereby homouisttep rahe more etree peet Tn dealing with but : aa “colleagues ol STERNLY WARNED t A Cramcstm of the = Same similar ack in the frture shal be dealt with — wove severely.