You are on page 1of 8

Lebensm.-Wiss. u.-Technol.

34, 168}175 (2001)

Textural Changes of Co!ee Beans as A!ected


by Roasting Conditions
P. Pittia*, M. Dalla Rosa and C. R. LericiR

Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Udine, via Marangoni 97, 33100 Udine (Italy)
(Received March 1, 2000; accepted December 30, 2000)

During the roasting process, cowee beans change their textural properties, losing strength and toughness and becoming progressively
more brittle, owing to chemical, physical and structural modixcations.
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the factors~such as density and moisture~awecting the mechanical properties of cowee beans
roasted at 170, 200 3C and under so-called high yield conditions. To distinguish the ewects due to roasting (where both density and
moisture changes occur) from those due to the water removal alone, heat treatments on cowee bean samples at dehydration temperatures
(90}105 3C) have been also carried out. Results showed that the typical brittleness of roasted and high yield cowee beans seems to be
related both to the water loss and to the change of tissue structure owing to the pyrolysis phenomena and to the decrease of density. In
fact, even if dried and roasted cowee beans showed, at similar moisture content, a reduced and weak signixcant diwerence in the
resistance to fracture and in toughness, roasting caused a decrease of the deformability, the index of a brittle and fragile texture.

 2001 Academic Press

Keywords: co!ee; texture; roasting; moisture; density

Introduction soluble solids to obtain the co!ee brew (Clo & Voilley,
1983; Clarke & Macrae, 1985).
Roasting is probably the most important step in co!ee Even if the changes in the textural and mechanical charac-
processing, causing marked chemical, physical, structural teristics to which the co!ee bean undergo during roasting
and sensorial changes (Sievetz & Desrosier, 1979). Dur- play a relevant role in the quality of the roasted beans,
ing this process, co!ee beans are subjected to high tem- these properties have been scarcely studied until now.
peratures (in the case of an Italian-style roasting it ranges Considering the possible causes of the relevant change of
between 200 and 240 3C bean temperature) for di!erent the texture during roasting, one e!ect could be attributed
times depending on the desired characteristics of the "nal to the noticeable reduction of density due to the volume
product (Lerici & Nicoli, 1990). increase and to the corresponding increase of porosity of
The roasting conditions also give rise to signi"cant the bean structure determined by the increase of the
changes in the textural properties of the co!ee bean. In pressure of the internal gases, products of the heat-in-
fact, during this process, beans lose their strength and duced reactions (mainly water vapour and carbon diox-
toughness and become progressively more crumbly and ide, but also pyrolysis reaction products) (Massini et al.,
brittle, which are typical characteristics of the roasted 1990; Gutierrez et al., 1993). It is known, in fact, that the
product. On the other hand the reaching of a certain overall mechanical properties of a food could be related
degree of brittleness is very important for the grinding to to the cell structure which is typical of various vegetables
which co!ee beans have to be subjected to before brew- and fruits or they may result from the physical state, or
ing. The uniformity of the product of the grinding process porosity (Roos, 1995).
depends on various factors including the brittleness of On the other hand, one of the main factors which may
the roasted co!ee bean and it a!ects the extraction of signi"cantly a!ect mechanical properties of foods during
processing and storage is the presence of plasticizers,
where water can be considered the most important
(Roos, 1995). Some authors discovered the e!ect of
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 39 0432590719; moisture content and water activity on selected mechan-
E-mail: paola.pittia@dsa.uniud.it
R This work is dedicated to the memory of our co-author Prof. C. R. ical properties, such as the hardness, toughness
Lerici, who died March 9, 2000 and breaking force of cereals, intact legumes and nuts
0023-6438/01/050168#08 $35.00/0 doi:10.1006/ fstl.2000.0749
 2001 Academic Press All articles available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on

168
lwt/vol. 34 (2001) No. 3

(Tran et al., 1981; Al Saleh & Gallant, 1985; Borges step two nets were withdrawn from the oven and samples
& Peleg, 1997). of beans were used for analysis.
Thus, considering the relevant loss of water that take The higher temperatures have been chosen on the basis
place during the roasting of the co!ee beans (from of previous works where appeared to be adequate to
11}12 g/100 g to 1.5}2 g/100 g) (Lerici et al., 1980), it produce roasting conditions at laboratory scale (Lerici
could be hypothesized that the brittleness of the roasted et al., 1980). Process times were up to 20 min for roasting
product is related to its very low moisture. and up to 24 h for drying processes. A high yield treat-
In this paper, factors*such as density and moisture* ment was also carried out only on Arabica green co!ee in
a!ecting the mechanical properties of the co!ee beans of order to make a product characterized by a great bean
Arabica and Robusta varieties dried and roasted at dif- expansion, thus with a very low density. In this case,
ferent processing conditions, have been considered. In co!ee beans were heated for 4 min at 240 3C and then for
order to distinguish the e!ects due to roasting (when 16 min at 190 3C.
both density and moisture changes occur) from those due On each sample, before and after the process, the follow-
to the water removal alone, some heating treatments on ing determinations were carried out:
co!ee bean samples at dehydration temperatures
(90}105 3C) and a high yield cycle (T: 240 3C*4 min#
T: 190 3C*16 min), were also carried out. The so-called Moisture, protein, fat and ash
&high yield' roasting is related to a process where the heat Carried out according to AOAC methods (1980).
exchange occurs very fast in order to obtain higher vol-
ume expansion of the beans owing to a faster pressure
increase within the beans, than in the traditional roasting
Mono- and disaccharide
process. This type of process is claimed to produce
This was done by gaschromatographic analysis, follow-
a highly porous structure in the bean cell tissues and this
ing the procedure described in a previous work (Lerici
should determine a higher extraction yield than tra-
et al., 1978).
ditionally roasted co!ee during brewing of ground
co!ee (Anon., 1984; Lerici et al., 1985; Dalla Rosa et al.,
1986).
The results of the textural evaluations on the di!erently Total weight loss (= )
2
treated co!ee beans have bean discussed together with This is expressed as g/100 g, and is calculated by weigh-
the physico-chemical and chemical properties of the ing co!ee samples before (W ) and after roasting or
'
corresponding product. drying (W), as follows: W "100 (W!W )/W
2 ' '

Materials and Methods Density


This was calculated by using a picnometer according to
Arabica (Co+ea arabica, var. Santos) and Robusta (Co+ea Lerici et al. (1980). Data have been given as apparent
Canephora var. Robusta) green beans were utilized for density (d ) considering the actual weight/volume ratio.

the di!erent heat treatments. Physical properties of the Normalized density (d ), to highlight the density reduc-
,
samples used are reported in Table 1. Heat treatments tion as well as due to the increase of volume, were
were performed using a laboratory air circulating oven obtained keeping into account the weight loss due to the
(Memmert, mod.100/UM, Germany) at constant temper- moisture/dry matter loss during drying or roasting
ature of 170 or 200 3C and 90 or 105 3C in order to according to the following equation:
simulate light and dark roasting and drying cycles, re-
spectively. About 40 g of green co!ee beans were placed d "d (1#W /100).
,  2
on stainless steel nets in a single layer. For each sampling

Colour analysis
Table 1 Physical properties of the raw Arabica and Analysed by using a tristimulus colorimeter (Chroma-
Robusta co!ee beans under study (number of sam- meter-2 Re#ectance, Minolta, Japan) equipped with a
ples"20) CR-200 measuring head. The instrument was calibrated
on a white tile before each measurement. Standard C.I.E.
Arabica Robusta conditions with illuminant &C' (6774K) were used. Colour
was expressed in L*, a*, b* Hunter scale parameters and
Mass (g) Mean 0.15 0.16
s.d.? 0.02 0.02 a* and b* were used to compute the hue angle (tan\
Height (m;10\) Mean 3.7 3.9 b*/a*) (Little, 1975). Measurements were performed on
s.d.? 0.4 0.4 samples of ground co!ee beans placed on suitable cells.
Length (m;10\) Mean 9.1 7.6 Mean values and standard deviations were obtained
s.d.? 0.4 0.4 from at least "ve measurements for each sample and the
Width (m;10\) Mean 7.0 6.2
s.d.? 0.3 0.4 variation coe$cient, expressed as the percentage ratio
between the standard deviation and the mean value, was
? Standard deviation. 40.3%.

169
lwt/vol. 34 (2001) No. 3

Mechanical testing Table 2 Chemical composition of raw Arabica and


An Instron Universal Testing Machine, mod. 4301 Robusta co!ee beans under study
(U.T.M., Instron International Limited, High Wycombe,
England) equipped with a 1000 N load cell was used. For (g/100 g)
the measurements, 25 beans of each sample were taken at Arabica Robusta
random, then positioned individually on its longest side
and with the #at side up between two metal parallel Moisture 11.45 11.26
plates of the dynamometer. Compression force was ap- Mono- and disaccaride 14.90 8.54
plied at a rate of 0.83 m\/s until failure occurred; work- Protein 12.45 14.88
Fat 12.27 8.96
ing temperature was 20$1 3C. The heat treatment Ash 3.55 3.76
caused meaningful changes in the trend of the force-
displacement curve of the samples (see discussion in the
text). Thus, due to the di$culty to calculate the true
stress and strain, the mechanical properties of the raw decrease, i.e. 42 g/100 g after 20 min of roasting time. At
and di!erently heated co!ee beans were characterized the same time, a decrease both in weight (due to the water
with the following empirical measurements carried out in loss and heat-induced reaction products loss) and, more
the force-displacement curve (Borges & Peleg, 1997). signi"cantly, in density has been noticed (Fig. 1b and e),
caused by the increase of the volume and internal gas
formation. These changes are, in turn, implied in the bean
Breaking force (N)*corresponding to force at the major expansion and in the formation of a characteristic porous
failure event. It was considered as empirical measure of structure in the roasted co!ee bean (Massini et al., 1990).
strength; During roasting, due to the non-enzymatic browning and
pyrolysis reactions, a change in the co!ee bean colour
takes place. Consequently, the yellow-green colour of the
Strain at fracture (%)*corresponding to the deformation raw bean changes to the brown-black roasted colour.
at the "rst breaking point and used as index of the This is shown by the progressive and marked decrease of
deformability; it was expressed as percentage to keep into the hue angle value of the samples (Fig. 1c and f ). How-
account the actual dimensions of the di!erently heat ever, the colour changes observed in Robusta co!ee were
treated beans; more limited, probably due to the lower sugar content
(Trugo, 1985).
In spite of the di!erent compositions, the roasting condi-
Work (J)*corresponding to the area under the force- tions (170 and 200 3C) gave only minor di!erences be-
displacement curve until the "rst breaking event occur- tween the chemical and physico-chemical parameters of
red. This parameter has been used as empirical index of the Arabica and Robusta co!ee beans. On the other
toughness. hand, the peculiar heating conditions used to obtain the
high yield product caused a quicker decrease in moisture,
higher development and evolution of the thermal-in-
Statistical analysis duced reactions of the Arabica co!ee beans leading to
In order to investigate the in#uence of roasting para- a product, after 20 min of process time, with lower appar-
meters on textural properties of co!ee beans, Student's ent density and lower hue angle than the roasted (170 or
t values computations (two tailed) to determine if the 200 3C) co!ee samples.
di!erence between the means was by chance only (if The trends observed in these results are in agreement
P'0.05) or was statistically signi"cant (if P40.05) at with those reported by other authors (Lerici et al., 1985;
the 95% level of signi"cance, were carried out. Severini et al., 1992) and this con"rms that experimental
conditions, even at the laboratory scale, were adequate to
simulate the roasting process. Preliminary roasting treat-
Results and Discussion ments in our experimental conditions showed to be re-
producible at P(0.05 taking into account the behaviour
In Table 2, composition of raw Arabica and Robusta of chemical and chemico-physical characteristics. Fur-
co!ee beans is reported. Data show that Arabica co!ee thermore, the co!ee beans studied were well representa-
has a sugar and fat content higher than Robusta, in tive of the Arabica and Robusta co!ees, even if obtained
agreement with data reported by other authors (Trugo, from di!erent production areas (Lerici et al., 1980).
1985). In the case of the heating treatments at dehydration
In Fig. 1a, b and c the changes in moisture, apparent temperatures (90}105 3C), despite the relevant decrease
density and hue angle of Arabica co!ee beans during of the moisture content obtained after 24 h, the dried
roasting at 170, 200 3C and under high yield conditions co!ee samples of both co!ee varieties did not show
as a function of the heating time, are represented. In signi"cant changes both in colour and in density in
Fig. 1d, e and f the changes of the same parameters for comparison with the raw ones (Table 3).
the Robusta co!ee are shown. At the same time the physico-chemical modi"cations
It is possible to note that, in our process conditions, were induced by the heat treatments, changes of the
the moisture of both co!ee varieties presents a steep co!ee bean texture were observed. Changes in the

170
lwt/vol. 34 (2001) No. 3

Fig. 1 Changes in moisture, density and hue angle of Arabica (a, b, and c) and Robusta (d, e and f ) co!ee beans during roasting at
170 3C, 200 3C and under high yield conditions (䊏: Arabica, 170 3C; 䉱: Arabica, 200 3C; 䊊: Arabica, high yield; 䊐: Robusta,
170 3C; 䉭: Robusta, 200 3C)

textural characteristics of the co!ee bean as a function of irregular and irreproducible. At the same time, a decrease
the heat treatment time were revealed, at "rst, by the was noticed in the breaking force, stress at fracture, and
variation of the shape of the force-deformation curve an increase in the number of peaks, similar to that seen in
during the instrumental measurements. For example, the brittle foods (Aguilera & Stanley, 1999). Furthermore,
force-deformation curve of an Arabica green bean and an this behaviour has been evidenced for all the heat
Arabica roasted (170 3C, 20 min) bean are reported in treatments carried out, independently of the temperature
Fig. 2. In general, green beans showed a well-de"ned considered.
fracture point (Fig. 2a); on the other hand, in the case of In Fig. 3, changes in the breaking force of Arabica co!ee
co!ee beans that underwent progressively longer heating beans heated under roasting (170 and 200 3C) or drying
times, the force-deformation curves became more (90 and 105 3C) conditions, as a function of process time

171
lwt/vol. 34 (2001) No. 3

Table 3 Chemical and physico-chemical characteristics of Arabica and Robusta co!ee under study after 24 h under
drying conditions

Moisture App. density


(g/100 g) (g/m;10\) Hue angle
Heating
Variety temperature (3C) Mean s.d.? Mean s.d.? Mean s.d.?

Arabica 90 1.590 0.051 1.123 0.002 1.482 0.010


105 1.381 0.062 1.063 0.001 1.402 0.021
Robusta 90 1.481 0.042 1.079 0.002 1.503 0.018
105 1.162 0.041 0.987 0.001 1.442 0.013

? Standard deviation.

Fig. 3 Breaking force of Arabica co!ee beans heated under


roasting (170 3C and 200 3C) or drying (90 3C and 105 3C)
conditions, as a function of process time (䊉: 90 3C; 䉲: 105 3C;
䊏: 170 3C; 䉱: 200 3C; 䊐: high yield). Inset shows "rst hour in
more details

Fig. 2 Examples of force-deformation curve of Arabica green


(a) and roasted at 170 3C for 20 min (b) bean

are reported. The very high breaking force value of the


green co!ee bean of both Arabica and Robusta co!ees
could be attributed, partly, to the presence of a certain
amount of some structural polysaccharides, especially
those derived from the polymerization of mannan
(Trugo, 1985). However, in all cases, as the heating time Fig. 4 Breaking force of co!ee beans di!erently heated as
increases, the force at failure tends to decrease, reaching a function of the respective dry matter (䊉: Arabica, 90 3C; 䉲:
similar and very low values at the end of the process, to Arabica, 105 3C; 䊏: Arabica, 170 3C; 䉱: Arabica, 200 3C; 䊊:
indicate a progressive reduction in the strength of the Arabica, high yield; 䊐: Robusta, 170 3C; 䉭: Robusta, 200 3C)
bean.
The process temperature a!ected textural changes of the
beans as evidenced by the di!erent trends of the breaking In Fig. 4, the breaking force data of Arabica and Robusta
force decrease of the di!erently treated co!ee samples co!ee beans heated di!erently have been further reported
and by the di!erent time needed to reduce the breaking as a function of their respective dry matter. Regardless of
force. the di!erent heating conditions, the trend of the strength

172
lwt/vol. 34 (2001) No. 3

of the samples as a function of the correspondent dry


matter is almost similar showing a progressive and
signi"cant decrease as the moisture content of the co!ee
becomes lower.
It could also be observed that the lowest breaking force
values are reached by the samples of both co!ee varieties,
treated at the di!erent temperatures having similar and
very low moisture content. Statistical analysis carried out
on these last breaking force data evidenced signi"cant
di!erences (P(0.05) among the roasted and dried co!ee
samples both for Robusta and Arabica varieties. No
meaningful di!erences were shown between Arabica and
Robusta co!ee samples roasted at 200 3C for 16 min
(P'0.05). This result could be a!ected also by the ir-
regularity of the size and shape of the beans and possibly
by structural variability within each group of co!ee
Fig. 5 Breaking force of Arabica co!ee beans undergone to
bean sample which caused a variation coe$cient of the di!erent process temperatures and times vs. normalized density
textural evaluations up to 20%. (䊉: 90 3C; 䉲: 105 3C; 䊏: 170 3C; 䉱: 200 3C; 䊐: high yield)
Limited di!erences in the change of the force at failure as
a function of the dry matter could be observed in the "rst
part of the graph (corresponding to the data of the
samples at the initial stage of the heat treatment). In tions on the textural properties of the co!ee beans, the
particular, the treatments carried out at higher temper- strain at fracture and the work of the "rst failure event
atures (roasting and high yield conditions) determined an were also considered. Data of these textural properties
initial higher decrease of the breaking force that could evaluated on the raw co!ee beans and on the those
be attributed to the higher density decrease and to the obtained after the longest time of heat treatment are
higher water loss. A similar e!ect could be implied in the reported in Table 4.
lowest meaningful breaking load of the high yield co!ee It should be noted that, despite the signi"cant reduction
beans in comparison to the other samples at the same in the strength, drying conditions (24 h at 90 or 105 3C)
water content (P(0.02) that is evident from dry matter determined only a limited reduction of the strain in
values above 95 g/100 g. Massini et al. (1990) showed by respect to the corresponding raw sample; this reduction
SEM analysis of co!ee beans under industrial roasting was signi"cant only in the case of the Arabica variety. At
conditions (200}210 3C) the formation of cavities and the same time, a great decrease in toughness of the co!ee
cracks after 4 min roasting in the internal and external beans was observed as shown by the relevant decrease of
bean surface due to the relevant increase in the internal the work of the "rst failure event.
pressure and volume of the co!ee bean. On the contrary, roasted and high yield co!ee presented
To highlight the e!ect of the density on textural changes a meaningful reduction of both strain and work at frac-
of the co!ee beans, the breaking force data of Arabica ture in respect to the raw beans, to indicate a great
co!ee bean from di!erent process temperatures and change of the textural properties of these samples due to
times are plotted against the correspondent normalized the heat treatment. In particular, the lower toughness
density (Fig. 5). accompanied by a lower deformability are a typical index
The reduction of bean strength in co!ee dehydrated at 90 of a brittle and fragile texture (Borges & Peleg, 1997).
and 105 3C does not appear to be caused by the decrease The higher lipid content of the Arabica co!ee could be
of density as due to the increase of volume. It is possible implied in its meaningful (P(0.05) higher strain at frac-
to show that no relevant variation in this physical para- ture than Robusta when textural data are compared for
meter has been observed in these samples after 24 h of both raw samples and after the same heating treatment.
heating time (see also Table 3). On the other hand, in the It is known that the presence of oil could a!ect the
case of the co!ee beans roasted at 170 and 200 3C, the texture of a food due to its ability to act as a plasticizer,
textural changes observed during the roasting treatment even if not to the extent that water is (Borges & Peleg,
seem to be related to the change of density. In fact, in the 1997).
case of the dehydrated samples, co!ee beans with similar The results obtained from the textural analysis seem to
values of density could correspond to samples with very show that the water loss caused by heating, whatever the
di!erent breaking forces, whilst during roasting, co!ee temperature considered, a!ect mainly the sti!ness and
beans show a change in their texture at the same time as the toughness of the co!ee beans, or, in other words, their
their normalized density. resistance to fracture under compression.
The reduction in the fracture strength related to the Water, acting as plasticizer, is expected to decrease the
heating process could be considered as an index to material's sti!ness. Therefore, decreasing the moisture,
describe the typical textural properties of the roasted should increase the sti!ness of the material up to the
co!ee beans, even if it does not seem to be useful enough glassy state. From a macroscopic point of view, the
to discriminate between di!erent heating conditions. results of our study showed an opposite e!ect by water
Thus, in order to show better the e!ect of roasting condi- content. It could be supposed that, increasing the water

173
lwt/vol. 34 (2001) No. 3

Table 4 Mechanical parameters of raw and di!erently heated co!ee beans under study (number of samples"25)
Strain at fracture (%) Work (J)
Co!ee
variety Treatment Mean d.s. Mean d.s.

Arabica Raw 37.95 a 2.04 1.16;10\ a 2.4;10\


90 3C, 24 h 33.83 b 1.73 1.55;10\ b 3.5;10\
105 3C, 24 h 29.48 c 2.15 1.19;10\ b 2.9;10\
170 3C, 20 23.73 de 2.28 7.9 ;10\ c 1.6;10\
200 3C, 16 22.98 d 2.12 7.3 ;10\ c 2.0;10\
High yield 24.28 e 2.18 6.8 ;10\ d 1.8;10\
Robusta Raw 31.59 a 2.29 1.53;10\ a 3.9;10\
90 3C, 24 h 31.76 a 1.84 1.78;10\ b 2.9;10\
105 3C, 24 h 26.19 b 1.75 1.52;10\ c 3.1;10\
170 3C, 20 20.55 c 2.79 9.80;10\ d 2.7;10\
200 3C, 16 21.82 bc 2.66 8.23;10\ e 1.7;10\

Same letter within each co!ee variety and textural parameter means data not signi"cantly di!erent at 95% probability level.

content of the green co!ee bean by moisture sorption, toughness of the green beans is related to a partial
could lead to a reduction of the cellular toughening and, plasticization. These results seems to be in agreement
thus, the original moisture content (about 10 g/100 g on with the data reported by other authors studying the
wet basis) of the green bean corresponds to an intermedi- mechanical properties of cereal products (Harris & Peleg,
ate plasticization level, close to a peak in sti!ness. These 1996).
observations could con"rm the fact that plasticization by Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the roasting
water has di!erent behaviour in di!erent materials process could in#uence the textural properties of the
(Harris & Peleg, 1996). co!ee beans, rather than just the in#uence on the moist-
In our co!ee samples at higher moisture content (i.e. ure. This evidences that the changes of the tissue com-
green beans), water prevents or hinders failure. It enables position and of the density due to the high temperature
the co!ee bean to absorb higher levels of mechanical treatment are determinant to de"ne the mechanical prop-
energy (Harris & Peleg, 1996) before to fracture. On the erties of the co!ee beans. In particular, the heating condi-
other hand, the low strength at failure and toughness of tions used during the roasting and the so-called &high
both dried and roasted co!ee bean reached when the yield roasting' could lead to a bean characterized by
moisture is very low (1.5}2 g/100 g, a +0.1) so that it a low strength, low toughness and a low deformability,

permits a glassy-like structure to form which is very easy which is the typical index of a fragile and brittle texture.
to break.
The treatment of the co!ee beans under roasting or high
yield conditions also a!ected their deformability, leading
References
to a structure with low elasticity, scarce resistance to
fracture and, thus, very brittle. In this case, the relevant AGUILERA, J. M. AND STANLEY, D. W. Microstructural
increase of bean volume and porosity, the correspondent Principles of Food Processing and Engineering. Gaithersburg:
decrease in density and the changes in the cell structure Aspen Publishers (1999)
AL SALEH, A. AND GALLANT, D. J. Rheological and ultrastruc-
caused by the pyrolitic reactions induced by the high tural studies of wheat kernel behaviour under compression as
temperature process could be the main causes of the a function of water content. Food Microstructure, 4, 199}211
observed textural changes. (1985)
The textural behaviour is related to the bean integrity ANONYMOUS Co+ee and Cocoa International, 30, 36}39 (1984)
under a de"nite deformation and its toughness does not AOAC O.cial Methods of Analysis 13th ed. Washington, D.C.:
Association of O$cial Analytical Chemists (1980)
depend only to the rigidity of a single layer of tissue but BORGES, A. AND PELEG, M. E!ect of Water Activity on the
to the whole structure of the bean that becomes very Mechanical Properties of Selected Legumes and Nuts. Jour-
brittle and fragile reducing the moisture and changing its nal of the Science of Food and Agricolture, 75, 463}471 (1997)
structure and physical and chemical properties as a con- CLARKE, R. J. AND MACRAE, R. Co+ee. <ol. 2 ¹echnology.
sequence of the roasting process conditions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Applied Sci. (1985)
CLO, G. AND VOILLEY, A. Evaluation of ground co!ee particle
size for optimum extraction. ¸ebensmittel-=issenschaft und-
¹echnologie, 16, 39}42 (1983)
Conclusions DALLA ROSA, M., BARBANTI, D. AND NICOLI, M. C.
Produzione di ca!è tostato ad alta resa. Nota 2. Qualità della
On the basis of our results, it is possible to summarize bevanda. Industrie Alimentari, 25, 537}540 (1986)
GUTIERREZ, C., ORTOLAE , M. D., CHIRALT, A. AND FITO, P.
that the moisture content showed to mainly a!ect the Analisis for MEB de la porosidad del cafeH tostado. In: ASIC,
mechanical properties of co!ee beans during drying and Proceedings 153 Internat. Scienti,c Colloquium on Co+ee
roasting and the maximum strength to fracture and <ol. 2, Montpellier, pp. 661}671 (1993)

174
lwt/vol. 34 (2001) No. 3

HARRIS, M. AND PELEG, M. Patterns of textural changes in MASSINI, R., NICOLI, M. C., CASSARAE , A. AND LERICI, C. R.
brittle cellular cereal foods caused by moisture absorption. Study on physical and physicochemical changes of co!ee
Cereal Chemistry, 73, 225}229 (1996) beans during roasting. Note 1. Italian Journal of Food
LERICI, C. R. AND NICOLI, M. C. Il ca!è: aspetti chimici, Science, 2, 123}130 (1990)
tecnologici e qualità della bevanda. Rivista della Societa% ROOS, Y. Mechanical properties. In Phase transitions in foods.
Italiana di Scienze degli Alimenti, 19, 1}16 (1990) London: Academic Press, pp. 247}270 (1995)
LERICI, C. R., DALLA ROSA, M. AND PIVA, M. Produzione di SEVERINI, C., NICOLI, M. C., MASTROCOLA, D. AND LERICI, C.
ca!è tostato ad alta resa. Nota 1. Prove di torrefazione. R. In#uence of heating rate on some physical and physico-
Industrie Alimentari, 24, 991}994 (1985) chemical properties of co!ee beans during the roasting pro-
LERICI, C. R., DALLA ROSA, M., MAGNANINI, E. AND FINI, P. cess. In Proceedings 143 Int. Scienti,c Colloquium on Co+ee,
Processi di trasformazione del ca!è: aspetti chimici, "sici ASIC, San Francisco, pp. 641}648 (1992)
e tecnologici. Nota 4: evoluzione di alcuni caratteri "sici del SIEVETZ, N. AND DESROSIER, N. Co+ee ¹echnology. Westport,
ca!è nel corso della torrefazione. Industria delle Bevande, 9, Conn.: AVI Publ. Co. (1979)
375}381 (1980) TRAN, T. L., DEMAN, J. M. AND RASPER, V. F. Measurement of
LERICI, C. R., LERCKER, G., PEPE, M., MATASSA, P. AND DALLA corn kernel hardness. Canadian Institute of Food Science and
ROSA, M. Processi di trasformazione del ca!è: aspetti chim- ¹echnology Journal, 14, 41}48 (1981)
ici, "sici e tecnologici. Nota 1: Modi"cazioni in alcuni carat- TRUGO, L. C. Carbohydrates. In CLARKE, R. J. AND MACRAE,
teri chimici e "sici. Industria delle Bevande, 7, 345}351 (1978) R. (Eds), Co+ee. <ol. 1: Chemistry. London: Elsevier Applied
LITTLE, A. C. O! on a tangent. Journal of Food Science, 40, Science Publisher, pp. 83}114 (1985)
410}412 (1975)

175

You might also like