You are on page 1of 6

Skip to main content

Submit
About
Contact
Journal Club
Subscribe
Log in My Cart
Home
Search for this keyword
Keyword, Author, or DOI
Search
Advanced Search

Home
Articles
Front Matter
News
Podcasts
Authors
NEW RESEARCH IN
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Biological Sciences

OPINION
Opinion: We have been in lockdown, but deforestation has not
Douglas C. Daly
PNAS first published September 16, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018489117
Article Figures & SI Info & Metrics PDF
Edilson Consuelo de Oliveira has regained his sense of taste and smell, so he has
finally been able to enjoy a plate of pirapitinga, his favorite fish in all the
Amazon. Before contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Edilson had been in
lockdown on a small farm outside of Rio Branco, the capital of Acre state in
Brazil, but in early June a nephew came to visit from the city, bringing a dry
cough. Edilson was hospitalized for only two days and felt ill for two weeks; since
then he has been recovering back on the farm. It’s lucky for him and for the
Amazon, because Edilson is a “super-mateiro,” or master woodsman, one of a handful
in that vast region (see Fig. 1). Edilson is something of a taxonomic shaman, as he
can name hundreds of species of Amazonian trees on sight and is familiar with
several thousand more.

Fig. 1.
Download figure Open in new tab Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.
Although the pandemic has put much of nature at a distance, Douglas Daly (Left)
asks what field-based researchers can be doing now, what should be done when it’s
again safe to travel to study sites, and how to best train new cohorts of
researchers and super-mateiros like Edilson de Oliveira (Right).

Rarities like Edilson are highly sought after by researchers, forest concessions,
and conservationists. That is because any valid effort to conserve or manage
biodiverse tropical forests requires that we know their species composition.
However, now that the pandemic has put much of nature at a distance, field-based
biologists have had to take stock: What can we be doing now? What must we do when
the coast is clearer and we can safely travel to our study sites once again? Most
importantly, why must we never let up in our efforts to buttress conservation
programs and train new cohorts of researchers and super-mateiros?

Unlike millions of citizens residing in COVID-ravaged countries, devastation of


tropical forests has not been in lockdown. Deforestation in Brazil was up 72%
between August 2019 and May 2020 in comparison with the previous year, giving rise
to a horrifying new metric: more than half a square mile of deforestation per hour
(1). And the annual August–September “burning season” in Amazonia is still heating
up.

There is nothing inevitable about this situation. For example, Brazil’s


environmental institute, the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable
Natural Resources (IBAMA), was able to reduce deforestation in that country by 80
percent between 2004 and 2012 through satellite detection and on-the-ground
enforcement (2). But times have changed. Some governments are using the pandemic as
a smokescreen to eviscerate regulations and slash the staff and operating budgets
of key government agencies (2⇓–4). Environmental protections become both blind and
toothless. Meanwhile, deforestation is spiking along with COVID-19.

“Tele-Communing” with Nature


With fieldwork unavoidably on pause because of COVID and access to our labs and
preserved specimens restricted, what have field-based biologists been able to do to
advance our knowledge of the natural world and bolster its sustainability? Quite a
lot, as it turns out.

A top priority has been to strengthen the many international networks we have built
over decades, ranging from research colleagues and government agencies to local
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and remote forest communities. We’ve also been
working with our host-country collaborators to secure adequate support for
training, training, and more training, from Ph.D. systematists to woodsmen. We must
keep in mind that although biological collections and research programs worldwide
have been slammed financially during the pandemic (5), many of our counterparts in
the developing world face slopes made much steeper by deep cuts in funding and
personnel.

We field-based biologists all have multiple projects underway, as well as piles of


data to crunch and results to write up and publish. We also have a battery of
resources at our disposal. In recent decades, natural history museums worldwide
have contributed incalculably to our work by digitizing millions of specimens and
making them available virtually as high-resolution images linked to field data; an
example is the C. V. Starr Virtual Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden [NYBG
(6)]. These go hand-in-hand with the hundreds of thousands of scientific articles
freely available electronically, including many thousands of historical references,
once the treasures of a few rich institutions but now scanned and posted online for
all to use (7).

Copious data and precious online resources enable us to continue our role as
biodiversity detectives during lockdown. On a macro scale, we can combine DNA
analyses and physical features of organisms to understand the evolution of
adaptations and of lineages and their ancient migrations. We can also document
diversity on a finer scale, completing manuscripts for new species of plants,
fungi, and lichens from Myanmar, Peru, Tennessee, and beyond. To give an idea of
the immensity of the biodiversity that remains undocumented, on average a new
species of plant from Brazil is published every two days (8), with no end in sight.

Rebooting the Meaning of Research


Such biological frontiers are not just romantic concepts with appeal for curious
outsiders and academic insiders; more than just publishing results, much of our
work builds toward a convincing weight of evidence and argument. It is our job to
inform the choices of decision makers that bear on the protection and management of
the organisms and biomes that we devote our professional lives to understanding.
These choices have enormous consequences for health and well-being beyond political
borders. For example, excessive deforestation in Amazonia means drought in São
Paulo, Brazil, pulmonary problems from forest fire smoke blanketing lowland
Bolivia, and, as it reaches the tipping point toward savannification, progressive
loss of livelihoods for some 30 million people in the nine countries that
Amazonia's forests embrace. Globally, the Amazon’s trees—still in the billions—
absorb 2 billion tons of CO2 per year, or 5% of annual emissions, making it a vital
buffer against climate change (9). But for how much longer?

Amid all the bad news about degradation of people, of institutions, and of nature,
each newly named species, each revealing analysis, each scientific step forward, is
a small triumph of affirmation: something positive, constructive, resolved—even if
it’s the identification of a rare and endangered tree. The results of our many
international collaborations allow us to assess the conservation status of such
species, to call attention to their occurrence in areas proposed for protection,
and to improve the accuracy of the forest inventories that form the basis for
sustainable management.

Pending renewed access to the biomes we study, we field-based biologists must


prepare to hit the ground running. We need to drum up government and private
support so that our collaborative work can continue, enhanced, post-COVID. Support
should come from international aid agencies and research consortia, the “BINGOs”
(Big International NGOs), academia, and government agencies, and it should come in
many forms: personnel, fellowships, individual projects, and help with logistics
and red tape. International training grants should be at the heart of this
response.

Amazonia has some compelling initiatives focused on management and conservation of


its still poorly explored flora, but they need to be conducted on a scale that the
region’s size and importance demand. Almost none of them are. In one of the rare
partial exceptions, Brazil’s biodiversity institute Instituto Chico Mendes de
Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), is coordinating a remarkable project on a
number of sites across the Amazon, which is training representatives of communities
in protected areas to monitor wildlife and tree populations and, ultimately, the
health of their forests.

With my Brazilian colleague Flávio Obermüller, a freelance ecologist working with


me for NYBG, I am coordinating that project’s tree-monitoring component, with
Edilson as the linchpin who knows the trees best. In our early collaborative
workshops I trained Edilson, but now his knowledge of the Amazon’s forest flora
greatly exceeds mine. And that’s the whole point. We have developed a multi-
institutional program for training future generations of Amazonian super-mateiros,
with large inputs of time and logistical support from staff at ICMBio, the Rio de
Janeiro Botanical Garden, and the Brazilian Forest Service. However, such training
initiatives require massively more governmental and foundation support, enough to
train and sustain a small army of apprentices. Our team as it stands can’t be
everywhere at once, so scaled-up propagation of international collaborative
programs like ICMBio’s would provide oversight throughout the Amazon Basin by
communities invested in the future of the forests where they live.

Until our study sites are safe enough for the return of botanists and other field-
based biologists, we can of course confer with our counterparts across the globe
and easily access mountains of data and images. However, “tele-communing” with
nature works only up to a point. There is no substitute for the real biological
world, where the processes we study are actually underway. We can be productive
remotely for quite a while, while shoring up our counterparts in less fortunate
countries with human and financial resources. But ultimately we get our nourishment
from fresh data and the new puzzles the forest has to offer. We are aching to
rejoin Edilson de Oliveira and future Edilsons with our boots on the ground—and up
in the trees. We can almost taste it.
Acknowledgments
Support for my recent and current projects at NYBG comes from the Tinker
Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the Leo Model Foundation. I thank Dennis
Stevenson for critical insights.

Footnotes
↵1Email: ddaly@nybg.org.
The author declares no competing interest.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this work are


those of the authors and have not been endorsed by the National Academy of
Sciences.

Published under the PNAS license.

References
1.↵ H. Escobar, Pesquisadores temem explosão de desmatamento em 2020. Jornal da
USP, 5 June 2020. https://jornal.usp.br/ciencias/pesquisadores-temem-explosao-de-
desmatamento-em-2020/. Accessed 20 June 2020.Google Scholar
2.↵ J. Spring, S. Eisenhammer, Exclusive: As fires race through Amazon, Brazil's
Bolsonaro weakens environment agency. Reuters/Environment, 28 August 2019.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-environment-ibama-exclusive/exclusive-as-
fires-race-through-amazon-brazils-bolsonaro-weakens-environment-agency-
idUSKCN1VI14I. Accessed 20 June 2020.Google Scholar
3.↵ E. Gonçalves, Ricardo Salles fala em aproveitar a pandemia para ‘ir passando a
boiada’’. Veja (22 May 2020). https://veja.abril.com.br/politica/ricardo-salles-
fala-em-aproveitar-a-pandemia-para-ir-passando-a-boiada/. Accessed 20 June
2020.Google Scholar
4.↵ C. Davenport, L. Friedman, Trump, citing pandemic, moves to weaken two key
environmental protections. The New York Times, 20 June 2020.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/04/climate/trump-environment-coronavirus.html.
Accessed 20 June 2020.Google Scholar
5.↵ E. Pennisi, Shuttered natural history museums fight for survival. Science 368,
1042–1043 (2020). https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6495/1042?
utm_campaign=toc_sci-mag_2020-06-04&et_rid=97148884&et_cid=3352260.Abstract/FREE
Full TextGoogle Scholar
6.↵The New York Botanical Garden, The C. V. Starr Virtual Herbarium.
https://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/VirtualHerbarium2.asp.html. Accessed 20 June
2020.Google Scholar
7.↵Biodiversity Heritage Library, https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/. Accessed 13
August 2020.Google Scholar
8.↵ M. Sobral, J. R. Stehmann, An analysis of new angiosperm species discoveries in
Brazil (1990–2006). Taxon 58, 227–232 (2009).Google Scholar
9.↵ A. J. Kaiser, AP Explains: Role of the Amazon in global climate change. AP
News, 27 August 2019. https://apnews.com/384fdb5ee7654667b53ddb49efce8023. Accessed
20 June 2020.Google Scholar
View Abstract
We recommend
Profile of Napoleon A. Chagnon.
Paul Gabrielsen, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014
A barrier runs through it... or maybe just a river.
R K Colwell, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000
Distress and rumor exposure on social media during a campus lockdown
Nickolas M. Jones et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017
Profile of Anthony R. Cashmore. Interview by Prashant Nair.
Anthony R Cashmore, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010
Profile of Thomas E. Wellems.
Tinsley H Davis, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010
Solar power sail mission of OKEANOS
Osamu Mori et al., Astrodynamics, 2019
Farmer knowledge and willingness to pay for soil testing in Haiti
Senakpon Kokoye et al., International Journal of Social Economics, 2018
A four-compartment model for the COVID-19 infection—implications on infection
kinetics, control measures, and lockdown exit strategies
Tianbing Wang et al., Precision Clinical Medicine
Environmental and human costs of commercial agricultural production in South Asia
Clevo Wilson, International Journal of Social Economics, 2000
DNA Diagnostics Center Acquiring Male Reproductive Health Firm ContraVac
360Dx, 2018
Powered by

Previous
Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Share

Mendeley logo Mendeley


Submit

Sign up for the PNAS Highlights newsletter—the top stories in science, free to your
inbox twice a month:
Enter Email Address

Sign up for Article Alerts


Enter Email Address
Sign up
ARTICLE CLASSIFICATIONS
Biological SciencesEcology
Physical SciencesSustainability Science
JUMP TO SECTION
Article
“Tele-Communing” with Nature
Rebooting the Meaning of Research
Acknowledgments
Footnotes
References
Figures & SI
Info & Metrics
PDF
YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN
Tropical cyclone Ita just offshore near Cape Flattery, Queensland, Australia.
Trends in tropical cyclone intensity
A study suggests that tropical cyclones have been increasing in intensity over the
past four decades, consistent with predictions of physical theory and numerical
simulations.
Image credit: NOAA/NASA.
Framboidal (raspberry-like) magnetite grains in the Tagish Lake meteorite,
magnetically aligned following formation in water.
Prebiotic and meteorite fluid chemistry
Atomic-scale analysis of the Tagish Lake meteorite finds that its raspberry-like
magnetite grains formed in a sodium-rich, high-pH environment, providing insight
into the chemistry of the earliest fluids in the Solar System.
Image credit: Chi Ma.
Full-hemisphere view of Earth at night.
Likelihood of life and intelligence emerging
Bayesian analysis of the chronology of life’s emergence and development on Earth
suggests that if Earth’s history were repeated, the emergence of intelligence might
be a sufficiently rare event that it would not be guaranteed to reoccur.
Image credit: NASA Earth Observatory image by Joshua Stevens, using Suomi NPP VIIRS
data from Miguel Román, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
Man standing in a lab.
Featured Profile
Profile of NAS member and biochemist Edward H. Egelman.
Two men standing on a large tree branch
Opinion: We have been in lockdown, but deforestation has not
Some governments are using the pandemic as a smokescreen to eviscerate regulations.
Meanwhile, deforestation is spiking along with COVID-19.
Similar Articles
Opinion: What models can and cannot tell us about COVID-19
COVID-19 lockdowns cause global air pollution declines
Timing social distancing to avert unmanageable COVID-19 hospital surges
Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the
Brazilian Amazon
Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19
See more
Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
Submit Manuscript
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Email Alerts
Articles
Current Issue
Latest Articles
Archive
PNAS Portals
Anthropology
Chemistry
Classics
Front Matter
Physics
Sustainability Science
Teaching Resources
Information
Authors
Editorial Board
Reviewers
Press
Site Map
PNAS Updates

Feedback Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490

PDF
Help

You might also like