1) Cagampang sued Morano to recover possession of a parcel of land abutting the sea, claiming he had possessed it for over 80 years. Morano counterclaimed, arguing he possessed it under a foreshore lease permit.
2) At a pre-trial, the parties agreed that if the land was reached by the highest ordinary tide, it belonged to Morano, and if not, Morano would abandon the land.
3) The court found the land was covered by the highest tides from May to July, making it public land belonging to the state under Spanish law. As Morano held a state grant, he had the right to possession over Cagampang, who held
1) Cagampang sued Morano to recover possession of a parcel of land abutting the sea, claiming he had possessed it for over 80 years. Morano counterclaimed, arguing he possessed it under a foreshore lease permit.
2) At a pre-trial, the parties agreed that if the land was reached by the highest ordinary tide, it belonged to Morano, and if not, Morano would abandon the land.
3) The court found the land was covered by the highest tides from May to July, making it public land belonging to the state under Spanish law. As Morano held a state grant, he had the right to possession over Cagampang, who held
1) Cagampang sued Morano to recover possession of a parcel of land abutting the sea, claiming he had possessed it for over 80 years. Morano counterclaimed, arguing he possessed it under a foreshore lease permit.
2) At a pre-trial, the parties agreed that if the land was reached by the highest ordinary tide, it belonged to Morano, and if not, Morano would abandon the land.
3) The court found the land was covered by the highest tides from May to July, making it public land belonging to the state under Spanish law. As Morano held a state grant, he had the right to possession over Cagampang, who held
CAGAMPANG VS MORANO Cagampang then appealed for reversal for the reason that the
Court had disregarded the agreement and considered the
FACTS: possession and foreshore lease permit of Morano, instead of Silverio Cagampang sued Flaviano Mariano with forcible entry the determination of whether the land was covered by the tide and detainer suit to recover a parcel of land abutting on the or not. sea in the municipality of Bacuag, Surigao del Norte. HELD: Cagampang claimed to have been in possession of the land It is without merit. At the ocular inspection, the Court found for over 80 years, charging defendant that in 1960 through that the land was covered by the sea water at high tide in the strategy and stealth, occupied a portion of the land and months of May to July. This finding makes it clear that the refused to vacate it so he sought to have possession restored land was part of the shore, and was, public land belonging to to him, to collect a rental of P3.00 a month, plus P5,000.00 the State according to Spanish Law damages and costs. Morano’s answer pleaded occupancy by virtue of a foreshore The Shores are part of public domain. By shore is "grant from proper authorities", and counterclaimed for understood that space covered and uncovered by the movement of the tide. Its interior or terrestrial limit is the damages and attorneys' fees. line reached by the highest equinoctial tides. Where the At the pre-trial in the Court of First Instance, they agreed, that tides are not appreciable, the shore begins on the land if they found out that the lot can be reached by the highest side at the line reached by the sea during ordinary storms ordinary tide as it is situated next to the sea, then the plaintiff and tempests. shall concede that the lot rightfully belongs to Morano. Should the findings be different, then the defendant should abandon As Article 420 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, shores are declared property of the public domain. As the lot was the lot in favor of the Cagampang. covered by the highest tides from May to July, and there is no It is the finding of this Court, with the assistance of the showing that these tides are due to abnormal conditions, the representative of the Bureau of Lands, that the lot in question land is obviously part of the shore and public property. Hence, is not reached OR covered by the highest ordinary tide. It can legal possession pertains to the national government or its only be reached or covered by the highest tide from May to grantees. No error was committed in holding that Morano, as a grantee, has the right to possession as against the plaintiff July. who has no State grant. The judgment under appeal is affirmed.
Report of the Lords Commissioners for Trade and Plantations on the Petition of the Honourable Thomas Walpole, Benjamin Franklin, John Sargent, and Samuel Wharton, Esquires, and their Associates
1772
Abel Obabueki v. International Business MacHines Corp. And Choicepoint, Inc., Choicepoint Services, Inc., D/B/A Choicepoint and Choicepoint Business and Government Services, Inc., D/B/A Choicepoint, Consolidated-Defendants-Appellees, 319 F.3d 87, 2d Cir. (2003)