Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Your address
[City, ST ZIP Code]
3
5 [COURT NAME]
6
7
[PLAINTIFF'S NAME], Case No.: [Number]
8
Plaintiff,
9
NOTICE TO COURT
10 vs.
VACATE SUPPORT ORDER
11 ON THE GROUNDS OF FRAUD
[DEFENDANT'S NAME],
THE SIGNATURE WAS INDUCED
12
Defendant BY SUPPORT ORDER IS VOID
13 AND RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL
RULE 60(B) OR STATE LAW
14
EQUIVALENT
15
16
17 NOTICE TO COURT
18
VACATE SUPPORT ORDER
19
23
UNDER FEDERAL RULE 60(b) OR STATE LAW EQUIVALENT
24 Comes now, [Type in your name and date and remove brackets] is
25
requiring this court to void the contract for child support on the grounds his
26
NOTICE TO COURTVACATE SUPPORT ORDERON THE GROUNDS OF FRAUD THE SIGNATURE WAS
INDUCED BY SUPPORT ORDER IS VOID AND RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE 60(B) OR STATE LAW
EQUIVALENT - 1
1 signature on the contract for child support was induced based upon
2
misrepresentation of the law by the representative for the State IV-D Child Support
3
4 Agency. Misrepresentation is fraud and is grounds for relief under Federal Rule
5
60(b) or State law equivalent.
6
7
THE DEFENDANT WAS NEVER OBLIGATED BY LAW TO
8
16
misrepresented to the Defendant that he must sign the support agreement or
20
of grounds of fraud and relief is required by the court vacating this support
21 agreement.
22
2. The existing support agreement is void under the circumstances that the
23
24
child support representative misrepresented the fact that the Defendant was
25 not legally required to sign the support agreement and thereby the Defendant
26
NOTICE TO COURTVACATE SUPPORT ORDERON THE GROUNDS OF FRAUD THE SIGNATURE WAS
INDUCED BY SUPPORT ORDER IS VOID AND RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE 60(B) OR STATE LAW
EQUIVALENT - 2
1 is not bound to the terms of the support agreement under these
2
circumstances.1
3
8 signed on February 27, 1995 requires that State Child Support Enforcement
9 under Title IV-D is required to follow the guidelines 42 USC Sections 651-
10
669(b).4
11 1
12
“As a general rule, the signer of a written agreement is deemed to be conclusively bound by its
terms, in the absence of a showing of fraud, duress or some other wrongful act on the part of a party to the contract”
13
Wells Fargo Bank v. Rolon, 2009 NY Slip Op 31529 - NY: Supreme Court 2009 citing Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.,
253 NY 159 [1930]
14 2
20
Ex. Ord. No. 12953, Feb. 27, 1995, 60 F.R. 11013 Sec. 203. "Child support enforcement"
21 means any administrative or judicial action by a court or administrative entity of a State necessary to establish
paternity or establish a child support order, including a medical support order, and any actions necessary to enforce a
22 child support or medical support order. Child support actions may be brought under the civil or criminal laws of a
State and are not limited to actions brought on behalf of the State or individual by State agencies providing services
23 under title IV-D of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 651 et seq.
4
24
Blessing v. Freestone, 520 US 329 - Supreme Court 1997 The structure of each State's Title IV
25 —D agency, like the services it provides, must conform to federal guidelines. For example, States must create
separate units to administer the plan, § 654(3), and to disburse collected funds, § 654(27), each of which must be
staffed at levels set by the Secretary, 45 CFR § 303.20 (1995)
26
NOTICE TO COURTVACATE SUPPORT ORDERON THE GROUNDS OF FRAUD THE SIGNATURE WAS
INDUCED BY SUPPORT ORDER IS VOID AND RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE 60(B) OR STATE LAW
EQUIVALENT - 3
1 4. Child Support Enforcement under Executive Order 12953 requires members
2
of the United States Uniformed Services5 and employees of a federal
3
9 5. It is a fact that under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act7 the
10
Defendant must submit to the jurisdiction of the court and waive consent and
11
12
the Defendant was not informed of these facts and informed consent was not
13 acquired and therefore the signature of the Defendant was induced by fraud
14
5
15
Ex. Ord. No. 12953, Feb. 27, 1995, 60 F.R. 11013, Sec. 202. "Uniformed Services" means the
16 Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard, and the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, and the Public Health Service.
17
18 6
19 Ex. Ord. No. 12953, Feb. 27, 1995, 60 F.R. 11013, Sec. 201. "Federal agency" means any
authority as defined at 5 U.S.C. 105, including the Uniformed Services, as defined in section 202 of this order 5
20 U.S. Code § 105 - Executive agency “For the purpose of this title, “Executive agency” means an Executive
department, a Government corporation, and an independent establishment.”
7
21
4 6. It is a fact that the Defendant is not a member of the United States uniformed
9 7. The fact that the Defendant is not subjected to State IV-D Child Support
10
Enforcement under the terms of Executive Order 12953 the Defendant’s
11
12
consent would be required for the Defendant to be obligated to pay support
16
The court must grant relief8 by vacating the support agreement made
17 in violation of right to due process under Federal Rule 60(b)(3) or a State Law
18
equivalent.
19
20
21
22
23 8
24
Relief 5 USC § 551(11) “relief” includes the whole or a part of an agency— (A) grant of
25 money, assistance, license, authority, exemption, exception, privilege, or remedy; (B) recognition of a claim, right,
immunity, privilege, exemption, or exception; or (C) taking of other action on the application or petition of, and
beneficial to, a person;
26
NOTICE TO COURTVACATE SUPPORT ORDERON THE GROUNDS OF FRAUD THE SIGNATURE WAS
INDUCED BY SUPPORT ORDER IS VOID AND RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE 60(B) OR STATE LAW
EQUIVALENT - 5
1
9
Your Name
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
NOTICE TO COURTVACATE SUPPORT ORDERON THE GROUNDS OF FRAUD THE SIGNATURE WAS
INDUCED BY SUPPORT ORDER IS VOID AND RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE 60(B) OR STATE LAW
EQUIVALENT - 6