1 Your name

2 Your address
[City, ST ZIP Code]
3

5 [COURT NAME]
6

7
[PLAINTIFF'S NAME], Case No.: [Number]
8
Plaintiff,
9
NOTICE OF MOTION
10 vs.
FOR OBJECTION TO THE
11 COURT’S CLAIM OF CONTEMPT
[DEFENDANT'S NAME],
AGAINST THE UNDERSIGNED
12
Defendant RESPONDENT ON THE GROUNDS
13
A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS
14
VOID AND THEREBY THE
15 RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD
16
IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID
SUPPORT ORDER
17

18 NOTICE OF MOTION
19 FOR OBJECTION TO THE COURT’S CLAIM OF
20
CONTEMPT AGAINST THE UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT ON THE
21

22 GROUNDS

23 A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS VOID AND THEREBY THE

24
RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID
25

26
NOTICE OF MOTIONFOR OBJECTION TO THE COURT’S CLAIM OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE
UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT ON THE GROUNDS A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS VOID AND
THEREBY THE RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID SUPPORT ORDER - 1
 1 SUPPORT ORDER
2
Comes now, [Type in your name] has received notice that he must
3

4 appear inside this court and participate in State title IV-D Child Support
5
Enforcement proceedings or he will be held in default, his license suspended and
6
may be arrested.
7

9 The alleged defendant is a living man with unalienable rights secured

10 by the law of the land and a State Citizen1 and thereby he cannot be subjected to
11
legal process2 inside a state Court or administrative tribunal3 without his consent.
12

13

14
Furthermore, it is a published fact under Uniform Interstate Family

15 Support Act or UIFSA where is says the State requires consent under Article 2
16
Section 201(a)(1)(2) and thereby the undersigned has provided a published fact to
17

18 1

19 "One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v State, 15
Ind. 449; Cory v Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis.
20 443."
Mc Donel v State, 90 Ind. Rep. 320 at pg 323;
2
21

22 42 USC § 659(i)(5)The term “legal process” means any writ, order, summons, or other similar
process in the nature of garnishment— (A)which is issued by— (i)a court or an administrative agency of competent
23 jurisdiction in any State, territory, or possession of the United States;
3

24
Tribunal The court, administrative agency, or quasi-judicial agency authorized to establish or
25 modify support orders or to determine parentage.(Page 25) GLOSSARY OF COMMON
CHILD SUPPORT TERMS Office of Child Support Enforcement
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_glossary.pdf
26
NOTICE OF MOTIONFOR OBJECTION TO THE COURT’S CLAIM OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE
UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT ON THE GROUNDS A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS VOID AND
THEREBY THE RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID SUPPORT ORDER - 2
 1 prove he has merit to require this court to provide proof that it has the required
2
personal jurisdiction over his body to force his appearance to participate in legal
3

4 process4 for child support enforcement proceedings under 42 USC Section 651-
5
669(b).
6

7
In accordance with Uniform Interstate Family Support Act the
8

9 defendant is required to file responsive document as a record the undersigned

10
alleged defendant is not waiving personal jurisdiction and thereby not submitting
11
to the jurisdiction of the state.
12

13

14

15 It is a fact the undersigned defendant’s consent was and is required to

16
submit to the jurisdiction of the state and thereby without evidence of the
17

18 defendant’s signature on a loan he cannot be held in default as claimed by this

19
court in the notice to appear.
20

21
Thereby, as a state citizen this state court or administrative tribunal is

22 prohibited to deny due process by presuming the undersigned State Citizen is a

23 4

24
42 USC § 659(i)(5)The term “legal process” means any writ, order, summons, or other similar
25 process in the nature of garnishment— (A)which is issued by— (i)a court or an administrative agency of competent
jurisdiction in any State, territory, or possession of the United States;
26
NOTICE OF MOTIONFOR OBJECTION TO THE COURT’S CLAIM OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE
UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT ON THE GROUNDS A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS VOID AND
THEREBY THE RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID SUPPORT ORDER - 3
 1 private person5 or person6 who may subjected to legal process,7 quasi-judicial
2
proceedings.8
3

4 This written response is proof the respondent is contesting that the

5
state court or administrative tribunal’s does not have personal jurisdiction and
6

7
thereby the respondent’s physical appearance is not required or this court or

8 tribunal must rebut the facts presented or must immediately discharge this matter
9
and cease and desist sending notices to appear.
10

11
This response is proof the respondent did not submit to the
12

13 jurisdiction of the court and thereby the respondent’s physical response is not
14
required.
15

16

17 5

18 42 USC SECTION 659 private person (4)The term “private person” means a person who does
not have sovereign or other special immunity or privilege which causes the person not to be subject to legal process.
6
19

20 42 USC § 1301(a)(3)The term “person” means an individual, a trust or estate, a partnership, or a

corporation.
7
21

22 42 USC § 659(i)(5)The term “legal process” means any writ, order, summons, or other similar
process in the nature of garnishment— (A)which is issued by— (i)a court or an administrative agency of competent
23 jurisdiction in any State, territory, or possession of the United States;
8

24
Quasi-judicial Definition 1) A proceeding conducted by an administrative or executive official
25 that is similar to a court proceeding, e.g. a hearing. A court may review a decision arising from a quasi-judicial
proceeding. 2) A judicial act performed by an official who is either not a judge or not acting in his or her capacity as
a judge.
26
NOTICE OF MOTIONFOR OBJECTION TO THE COURT’S CLAIM OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE
UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT ON THE GROUNDS A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS VOID AND
THEREBY THE RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID SUPPORT ORDER - 4
 1

2
FACTS BEFORE THE COURT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
3

4 REQUIRES A TRIAL BY JURY IN ALL CONTROVERSIES OF $20 OR

5 MORE AND THEREBY THE UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT CANNOT

6
BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF AN ORDER NOT BY PEERS AND COURT
7

8 MUST WITHDRAW ORDER OF CONTEMPT

10

11
1. IT IS A FACT, THAT DUE PROCESS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
12
FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REQUIRES A JUDGMENT
13

14 BY PEERS9 ARISNG FROM A TRIAL BY JURY UNDER THE 7TH

15
AMENDMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMMON LAW. THIS IS A
16

17 VERIFIABLE FACT THAT THE COURT MUST DISPROVE BY

18
RESPONDING WITH A WRITTEN REBUTTAL OR THE FACT
19
STANDS AND THE COURT OR TRIBUNAL MUST DISMISS ORDER
20

21 FOR CONTEMPT.
22
9

23
1."The meaning of the section then seems to be, that no member of the state shall be
24 disfranchised, or deprived of any of his rights and privileges, unless the matter be adjudged against him upon trial
and according to the course of the common law. It must be ascertained judicially that he has forfeited his privileges,
25 or that someone else has a superior title to the property he possesses, before either of them can be taken from him"
Taylor v. Porter, 4 Hill 140, 146; see, also, Wynehamer v. People, 13 N.Y. 378, 394 (1856)). Sharrock v. Dell
Buick-Cadillac, Inc, 45 N.Y.2d 152, 161, 379 N.E.2d 1169, 1174, 408 N.Y.S.2d 39, 44 (1978).)
26
NOTICE OF MOTIONFOR OBJECTION TO THE COURT’S CLAIM OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE
UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT ON THE GROUNDS A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS VOID AND
THEREBY THE RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID SUPPORT ORDER - 5
 1 2. IT IS AN ADJUDICATED FACT10 THE RIGHT OF DUE PROCESS OF
2
LAW REQUIRES A JUDGMENT BY PEERS IN ALL CONTROVERSIES
3

4 OF $20 OR MORE. THIS COURT CANNOT DENY OR DISMISS THIS

5
FACT UNLESS IT CAN PROVIDE PROOF THE CONSTITUTION FOR
6

7
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS BEEN SUSPENDED OR

8 MARTIAL LAW HAS BEEN ORDERED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE

9
UNITED STATES.
10

11

12

13

14

15

16
Dated this [day] of [Month], [year].
17

18

19
Your Name
20

21

22
10

23
“The words, "due process of law," were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the
24 words, "by the law of the land," in Magna Charta. Lord Coke, in his commentary on those words, (2 Inst. 50,) says
they mean due process of law. The constitutions which had been adopted by the several States before the formation
25 of the federal constitution, following the language of the great charter more closely, generally contained the words,
"but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land." Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.
(1856)
26
NOTICE OF MOTIONFOR OBJECTION TO THE COURT’S CLAIM OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE
UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT ON THE GROUNDS A JUDGMENT NOT BY PEERS IS VOID AND
THEREBY THE RESPONDENT CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF A VOID SUPPORT ORDER - 6