Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CAN Bus
Door Climate
Controller Controller
20
such as engine control, the priorities of door and climate be supported. This limitation could be mitigated by setting
control need to be set low enough so that these functions up multiple networks within the car in a hierarchical con-
do not interfere with engine control. figuration. There might be one network that deals only
The net result is that the CAN bus is well suited as a with engine control and diagnostics, a second network
communications network between the mechanical sensors that handles backseat entertainment and the audio sys-
and systems within a car, but it is not readily extended to tem, and another network that handles driver-assist func-
the higher-bandwidth requirements of applications such as tions such as vision-enhancement cameras. In the end,
entertainment systems or sensors for cameras or radar. Ethernet provides greater capacity than the CAN bus, at
the expense of greater complexity, but still struggles to
Ethernet handle the highest-bandwidth applications such as video.
Ethernet is one of the most common high-speed interfaces
found in homes and offices, and there are some automo- FPD-Link
biles where Ethernet is being used to transport a variety FPD-Link is a technology developed for point-to-point
of high-speed data. Like the CAN bus, Ethernet is a pack- transport of high-bandwidth data. It has one forward
etized system, where information is transferred in packets channel with a very high speed of several gigabits per
between nodes on various parts of the network. Also like second and a low-speed back channel. The back channel
the CAN bus, Ethernet is bidirectional, and the speed can be used to transport an I2C bus at 400 kbps or it can
possible on any individual link decreases as the number of control GPIO lines at rates of up to 1 Mbps. FPD-Link was
nodes on the system increases. Still, Ethernet can transport developed to transport video data within the car. For
data over a link 100 times faster than a CAN bus. example, it can be used to send uncompressed video to a
Ethernet is good for midbandwidth communications in video display while the back channel sends information
applications such as navigation systems and control. It can from a touch panel on the display screen back to the proc
be used in much the same way as a CAN bus while provid- essor generating the video. The physical layer for FPD-
ing much more bandwidth. Ethernet would be an ideal Link is either a twisted-pair or coaxial cable. The wiring is
choice to replace the CAN bus, but since Ethernet’s cost dedicated, so if FPD-Link is used for a backup camera,
per node is higher, it probably will not replace but rather one cable goes from the backup camera to a processor,
will augment the CAN bus. and a second cable goes from the processor to the display
Some cars today are using Ethernet for data-intensive in the cabin.
requirements such as backup cameras and entertainment The big advantage of using FPD-Link in this application
systems. Of particular interest in automotive applications is is that both the camera and the display can be much sim-
the DP83848Q-Q1 from Texas Instruments (TI). This is an pler circuits, since compression and decompression are
Ethernet PHY, screened to AEC-Q100 grade 2, and includes not required. Additionally, since the links are dedicated,
a loopback test mode for facilitating system diagnostics. the image quality of one video system is independent of
To transport video over an Ethernet network, even if what else is going on in the vehicle. The back channel can
there is only one video channel being transported, the be used to configure a camera, operate a zoom lens, or
video must be compressed at its source, then decom- send touch-screen information back to a controller with-
pressed at the destination to avoid exceeding Ethernet out interrupting video flow on the forward channel.
bandwidth limitations. For an application such as a backup For autonomously driven vehicles, another important
camera, this implies that there needs to be a relatively factor will be the amount of latency in the link. The proc
high-power processor in the camera to compress the essing required to compress and decompress an image
image sufficiently to get it into the Ethernet network. This adds to this latency. For an application such as backseat
in turn means that the camera will be physically larger and entertainment, a delay between reading the data from a
more expensive and will have higher power dissipation DVD and its display on the screen is not important.
than a solution that doesn’t require much image process- However, if the image being transported is from a camera
ing. Another disadvantage of this solution is that video looking for pedestrians in the path of the vehicle, latency
compression and decompression add latency to the link. may have dire consequences.
If the same Ethernet network is shared by several cam- FPD-Link is perfect for critical links where high band-
eras or other video sources in the car, there is a trade-off width and low latency are the most important factors.
between the amount of compression (and corresponding Additionally, with the ability to support a back channel
video quality) and the number of video channels that can and power over a single twisted-pair or coaxial connection,
21
GPIO
GPIO
GPO
GPO
FSO
with
FSYNC FSYNC FSYNC FSYNC Touch Screen
2 2 2 2
IC IC IC IC
GPIO
GPO
FSO
FSYNC FSYNC
2 2
IC IC
Serializer B Deserializer B
wiring can be simplified. Figure 2 shows an OMAP™ video highest bandwidth and lowest-latency link are required,
processor connected to two different cameras, and a display such as for a surround-view camera system providing
with a single twisted-pair cable going to each peripheral. input to an autonomous vehicle pilot, then FPD-Link is
This twisted-pair cable supports camera video data and ready to meet the challenge.
touch-screen/camera-setup data. It can also provide power
for the display or camera. Since each link is dedicated to Related Web sites
one peripheral, there is no risk of interference between Interface:
the signals from the two cameras. www.ti.com/interface-aaj
www.ti.com/dp83848qq1-aaj
Conclusion www.ti.com/ds90ub913qq1-aaj
So which interface is best for automotive communications? www.ti.com/ds90ub914qq1-aaj
They all are—but each for its own purpose. The CAN bus www.ti.com/ds90ub925qq1-aaj
reigns supreme for low-speed control applications where www.ti.com/ds90ub926qq1-aaj
cost is a driving factor. When bandwidth requirements
Subscribe to the AAJ:
move up, Ethernet can step in as an enhanced interface to
www.ti.com/subscribe-aaj
support moderate bandwidth requirements. When the
22
Internet
TI Semiconductor Product Information Center
Home Page
support.ti.com
E2E and OMAP are trademarks of Texas Instruments. All other trademarks are the
property of their respective owners.
Mailing Address: Texas Instruments, Post Office Box 655303, Dallas, Texas 75265
Copyright © 2014, Texas Instruments Incorporated