Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rrs Unit 4 16marks - NoRestriction PDF
Rrs Unit 4 16marks - NoRestriction PDF
21. Wh a t a r!
the considem tion s before demolition ? :-"I$-l
$ov I rrac
Consiilerations should be given to
I
:PART -B lq Marks
hundred percent.
. Generally higher workability and higher stringth or very low workabiliry and
higher srrength do no! go hand in hand.
!
. Now. vacuum prccess of concreting enables to meet this conflicting demand and
this process helps a high workable concrete ro get high strength.
VacuuEr Concr€le: Only lbour hall of the water added in concrete goes into chemical
conrbination and thc renlaining waler is used to ntake concrete workable.
Afier laying concrele. lvater wllich was making concreting workable is extracted by a
special melhod knorvn as "vacuunt nrethod". This water left in this concrete is only thaf
which is to go in chenrical conthrnalion and her)ce resulting concrele become very strong.
Mrpufilclurinp I'rocessi
6cncral arr'lngclltcnt lor racuurlr concrilc Process.
thc cquipnrcnr cssenltallY consists of'
; \,acuunl pulltl)
I
. Thc vacuum processing can be carricd out either from the top surface or fiom the
side surface. There will be only nominal difference in the efliciency of the top
processing or side processing.
:r
2. Explain in rtetail about Guhite. Sovlaazaz - 8la'*4
Gunite can be defined as mortar conveycd.through a hose and pneumatically projected
at a high vclocity on to a surface.
. Thc dcvelopment of this method is by thc intmduction of cou6e aggregation and thc
rcduction ofcement makes the process economical.
Guniting was first introduc€d in 1900 and this process is mostly used lor
pneumatically application old monsr ofless thick)ess.
Shotcrcte is a recent development on the similar principle of guniling for
achieving g'eater thickncss with small coarse aggregate.
'fhere are two process in usc. namely;-
. The dry mix process consisls ofa number ofsiagcs and calls li)r sonlc specrticd
plant.
i
I
. The stages iDvolvcd in the dry mix process
. Cement and sand are thoroughly mixed.
. The cement/ sand mixture is fbd into a, spccial
air pressur.ized mechanical feeder
termed as Cun.
. The mixture is rnetered inro the delivery hose
bj a feed wheel or distributor
within the gun.
The material is carried by compressed air thrdughi
the delivery hosc to a spccial
nozzle. The nozzle is fitted inside with a perforated
manifold through which water
is sprayed under pressure and intimately nrixed with
the sand /cementjet.
. The web motor is jetted from the nozzle at high velocity
onto the surface ofthe
gunited.'
' carb.nafion rcduces Ihe pH rever in concrete and ariows future deterioration
of
steel rebaN. It has better chentical resistance, rvealher resisfance.
This coatjng has
penctration thro.gh aI rhe stratilied rust rayer, reactions and conversion of.ust
stabilization
. '[hc coaling is \ralcr bare(l with
good covetage of inechanicai surface treatment as
rusl rcltovill ir[ r.nlor.s srrch as scrapping. bruslring or powder cleaning
are
I
eliminated by rust convener coating
. Future it react with rust and forms a metallic organic protective film which
neutralizes the corosion process and provides an ideal solution to completely
passivate the tightly bound rust removing, chemically preventing it from
Preliminnrv Invesaigation
Demolition is a highly skilled and dangerous activity in lerins ofdamage to life and
- Property and there are certain basic factors lo consider before a contract is placed:
. The demolition conractor should have ample experience oflhe type ofwork to be
offered;
. Fully comprehensive insurance against all risks musl be maintained at all times;
. An expedenced supervisor should be continuously in charge ofthe rvoqk;
. The contract pricc should include all safety precautions included in the reievanl
building regulationsi
. The completion date should be realistic, avoiding and need to take risks to
achieve the date.
,
Prelimin{rv Considerations
Demolition operations are the subject ofstrict legal controls - there ,s a subslantial body
of legislation and a great deal ofcase law relating to such operations. There may aiso be
some regulations which impose additional restrictions: for example, action against
nuisance such as noise and aust.:fhl SSI Code of Practice for Demolition BS 6187
exerts further influence, in thatlif the demolition conrractor does not observe rhe
recommendatioo of th€ Code, tliis may well influence a Courr's decision as to his
liability in any legal proceedings.
t: l0
be provided.
D. Working Arens
These will well signposted and clear warnings given that demolition
need ro be
work is in progress. This may include the necessity for some kind oflighting.
E. Debris
Sections ofthe building must not be overloaded with debris either on suspcnded
floors or against party walls.
. F. Weather Condition.s
These can aft'ect saf'ety. Strong winds or drifting snow against unsafe walls,
suspended floosletc. which are unpropped nray lead to collapse.
G. Iiloodine
'Ilre build-up ofrvater can sotnetimes
be hazardous.
H. Oyerhc{d Cnblcs
An cranc heights erc. must be checked ag.irlst the height ofany su(ounding
ovcrhead tablcs rrr avoid damage and cuttitlg offsupplies etc.
I Sclffoldine rud tloxrdins
'l hese ntust bc conslructed
and illuminated 10 the rclevant building legulations.
J Sccurily
-lhr
dcmolitiorr \rlc luLl iury prrtially derrrolished buildinSs Irrust be properly
secured againsl entry
K. Dust :
redevelopment, coupled with increasing torvn cenlre regenerating calling for careful
demolition on constructed and restricted site, have resulted irr more consideration being
given to demolition as part ofthe process of constuction and ledevelopment lhan was
typical in previous times.
Developing a Demolition Strategv
The strategy lvill need to take into accoLrnt the method ol'construction used for lhe
original building and its proximity to other burldings. strurrures and the general public.
These tactors, together with location, the cost and availabilit) ol-tipping and disposal and
the desirability and economics ofreuse, must be taken ir)to accounl ill the developmeDl 01'
understanding of thc mcthod of construction and the stress panerns imposed upon the
building. Failure to do so rray result in risks to the safety ofboth ihose involved in the
dcn1olition and those in close proximity to the site.
Selecting Arrrrrorrriatc'l'echniques
Major's t'aclors to be considered in selecting an appropriate technique
include
i Safety of personnel and public
! Working rnethods
> Legislationapplicable
) Insurance cover
problrnu cnJ their solrrtrnns. arld form a relerence lor lhe sire supervision'
. The nrethod stittentcnl shouid be easy to understand, agreed by and known to all
levels ofnranagerlrent itrld supervision, alld should includc such matlers as:-
' 'l hc scqLrencc arrd mcthod ol dcmolilion or dismantling of the building or shucture
\!,ilh dctails ol'personnei access, working platlbrms and machinery reqr'rirements;
. [)clrils ilrrd rlesrgrr ol any telnPorary suppofiillg structures to be used during the
dcrnolition processi
' Specilic details ol any ptc-weakening on struclures which are to be pulled down or
dtrrcrlrshed rviLh exPlosivcs.
t_
. A[angements for the protection of personnel and the public and the exclusion of
unauthorized persons, with details of areas outside the site boundaries that may
Occasionally need to be controlled to improve sal'ety during critical aspects of the
wOrk; i
. Details of thq removal or making safe of electrical, gas and other services and
drains;
. Details oftem'porary services available or required lor lhe conlractor's tlse:
. Details ofthe hethods for detai]ing with flammable materials and gases which
may have bedn ietained or depo{ited as residue in process machinery,'pipework or
sromge: , ,
. Arrangements for the control of site transport used for the removal qf demolition
debris.
and its environment. Risks to the public. operalives involved in the dcmolition process and
adjacent structures and buildings should be considered.
. Piecemeal demolition. using hand:held tools or machines. lo reduce the height o1_
the huilding or structurc gmdually:
,g
81'M.rchine
Sirnple roolslructurcs supported on wall plates should normaliy be demolished to the level
of wall plales by hand. bur if rhis nlay i[volve unsale working, then demolitioD totally by
machine may be appropriate.
Whcre ir buildinS that is to be demoiished by nraclrine is attached to another structure, the
Iwo propcI.ties shoul(l be separared by the use ol harrd merhbds before the main demolition
Process begins.
Whcn arry part of a building is being demolished byla bolljng machine, pusher arm or
sirr)ilar equipnrent, orlly the nrachine operator and banksnran should be allowed close to
Ihc \()rking arca. Thc cabs ol'all nlachiues shoulJ be strong enough ro protect the
opc.Itor agitinst rlrc t-lll ol drbris ln Palticular. thc windscrcen and rooflight should be
lattice crane jib. The denblition ball, with a steel anti-spin device, is suspended
from the lifting ropc and sirung by the drag rope.
I
Balling should only carried out by skilled opemrives under the control of
experielced supervisors using well maintained machines adequate for the
prcposed duty and standjng on a iirm, level base.
Walls or columns can be demolished eirher by s\ringing the ball in line with the
Draglin*
Lifting rope
iM < $/l
stationary jib, using the drag rope, or by slewing the jib. The ball should not swung by
derricking thejib. I
Demolition ball
B. Hydraulic Pusher Arnl
Aniculaled. hydraulically-powered pusher-arnr ntirchincs are normallv nrounted on
a lracked or u,heeled chassis. and havc a toothed plalc or hook tbr applying for
l!
C. Erplosives
!
Il explosives are to be used for demolition, the pianning and execution, include
pre-r.veakening. should be under the control of i person competent
in these
techniques. For la.ge demolition, the competend person is likely to be an
experienced explosive engineer: for smaller wo*. a shor-firer may be sufficient.
When rhe use of explosives is contemplated, it is usual ro employ a techrique
that will
ensure lhe toral demoljtion ol the whole building by staging a controlled collapse. The
explosive charges are sef and llred in a sequence that will weaken the structue in such a
way that the blrilding collapses ir Lrpon itsell
Although u,e tend to think ol explosives as devices producing spectacular bomb_like
explosions, the use of non-explosive ,,explosives,, is now at an advanced stage.
These
noD-cxplosivc lechDiLlucs arc csrjcnlially expanding charges that achieve the same
results
as explosives but wilhour rhe noise and iritial devastating blast.
Nibblers
greater than 600mm in depth, sleel rejnforcement should be cut separately as necessary.
Pre-\ryeakenine
Buildings and structures normally have slructural elemerts designed to carry sa1_ely lhe
loading likely to be imposed during their lii'e.
As a preliminary to a deliberate controlled colllpse. afler lolds such cs turrrislings. plant
and machinery have been removed, lhe demolition contmctor mnv be ablc (o wcaken
some structural elenlents and remove Ih,)se new redLlndant. Ilris frr\\cakening is
essentially a planned exercise and nlusl bc preceded by an analysis of its possibie eflccts
on the structure until it collapscs. to ensLue lhat the strucluril rnregrit) of ihc buildjng is
not jeopardized accidentalll. Insulficient inlinmation and planDing rclating ro rhe
structure may resrrlt in dangcrorrs and unsafe rvork
t*
Methodolosy
In order to dcmolish a building salily, nust nlap out each eleDlent of lhe
blasters
implosion ahead o[ time. The Ir\r step is t{) examine
xr(hitechrrrl bl[eprlnfs of the
building, if they can be located, to determine how the
buildirg is pur together. Next, the
blaster crcw touls the building (Several times). jofling
down notes aboul the support
structurc on each floor. Once they have gathered all
the ralv dala lhey need. the blasters
hamher out a plan of attack_ Drawing from past experiences
rvith sinilar buildings, they
decide what explosives to use, where to position
thenr in rhe buildiDg and how 10 tr.me
their detonations. In some cascs, the blasters may develop
3_D computer model of the
shucture so th€y can test out their plan ahead of time
in a vitual world.
The mai. challenge in bringing a building down is
conrrojling which way ir falls. Ideally,
a blasting crcw will be able to tumble the building
over on one side, into a parking Jot or
Other open area. This sort of biast is 0re easiest
to execute. and it js generally the safest
way to go_ Tipping a building over is something
like felljng a tree. To topple &e building
to the north, the blasters detonate:expiosives on the north
side ofthe building flrst, in the
same way you wourd chop into aitree liom
rhe nofth side ifyou wanted it ro faii
in rhar
direction. Blasters may also s.cu.i steel cables
to support coiumns in the building, so
that
they are pulled a cenain way as they crumble.
Sorrerimes, though, a building is
surounded by structurcs that must be preserved.
ln this case. the blasters proceed lvith a
true implosion, demolishing the building
so tlut it collapses srraight down inro
irs own
footprint (rhe total area at the base ofthe building).
This feal requires such skil rhar only
a handfulofdemolition companies in the rvorld
willatrempt ir.
Blasters approach each projecr a liftie dift-erently,
but rhe basic idea is lo lhink of the
building as a collection of separate towers.
l.he blasters sel the expiosives so lhat
each
"tower" f'alis toward the center of thc building, in
rcughly the samc wav thal lhc) lvould
se1 the exprosives ro toppre a singre
slr.clurr, to lhe sidc. whcn Ihe exprosives
are
24
:::::::l::l:::,T.cenrerof
the center ofthe building befo.e
the buirding. Anorher.op,,""
*..",*"",re corlrmns at
the other c",,,-""
"^:,r", *^ .-
Accordine to Brent Branchard.
Protect documentation services ",,;f#[::'#'::T:::i;::'::::il,,ilf*
virtually every buildingin the world is unique. ana for
any given building, there is
any number of ways a blasting crew migtrr Uring
Blanchard notes the demolition lt aown.
olthe
Hayes Homes, a l0-buiiding housing pro.iecr in Newark,
New Jersey, which was
dcmolished in three separate phases
over the couse ofthree years. ,a
aif"r"rrt Ut*ting
ilrm performed each phase,,, Blanchand ,,and
says, alrhough all of the buildings were
identical, each blaster chose a
slighlly differenr rype of explosive and
loaded varying
numbers of suppon columns. Th
the buildinss down in different
marhemaricar sequences, *,,,
,":^l-^*:1^::".:qhl
yrng amounts of time factored in
between each
building's collapse.,,
Generally speaking. brasters wilr exprode
trrc maior suppon corumns on
the rower floors
iirst and then a t'e!v upper stories. In
a 2o-story building, for example,
the blasters might
blorv rhe columns on the firsl and second
floor, as well as tle l2th and l5th floors.
In
most cases, blowing the support
struclures on the Iower fioors is
sufficient lbr collapsing
the building, but loading columns
on upper floors helps break the building
material into
srrarrer pieces as ir rh1s.
This nrakes fbr.easier clean_up loilowing
the biast. Once rhe biasters have figued
out
holv ro set up an inrplosjon, it's time
to prepare the building. In the next section,
we,ll
find out whar,s involved in predetonalion prepping
and see how blastqs rig the
explosives lor a preciscly timed
demoiition.
I
1rIp,s. rl rrrr
";j:"i:lrx;|;;;t;ffi;.;:;il'i:ff
ir rlr, ti.,.rrl fr,,(ecrlir.gs i5quolcd
;:
hclow:
"li) asscss ritc rr(l.ir(.rnc,t ()l.spcci:rl reprrrs r(, b,ildints nnJ
ro.*ls and recommend
demolition ofunsafe / uneconomical buildings at old KV Bolaram Complex"
I,INDINGS OF TIIE BOAR,D:
The Board found thot all the buitdings located in lhe complex were of 1850 to
1910 vintage consfucted with brick masonary and mud morta. and served more than
thcir expected lifc. The buildings were in occupatio! by Kendriya {idyalaya, Bolaram
for a considerable time and were vacated during 1989-90, All buildings were in bad shape
due to vintage and needed extensive repairs.
The board also recommended six buildings for demolition as they lvere found to be in
dilapidated condition and unsafe and beyond economical rcpairs The board
recommended sanction of demolition of the said six buildings and to iniliate new u'orks
for recoupment of these buildings through a separate board of officers urgently ( as the
work on the new loilets is to be completed by lhe time ofcompletion ofthe proposed
special repairs so that troops occupying the buildings afler special repairs will have toilel
facilities )
Based on the recommendations of the Board, the GOC-in-C S.C. vide lener
No:300050/9712/2(wks) dated 25.10.1997 accepted necessily and accorded Admin
Approval for the special repairs at an estimated cosl of 42.05 lakhs. The Admin
Approval included the demolition ofold buildings also as recommended by the Board.
32 weeks time was given for complelion of work. Based on the sanclion a conlracl
agre€ment was concluded for Rs.43-45 lakes by CE(Fys) I-lyd zone vrde CA N-o:
CE(Fysy Hyd / Sec / l6 of97-98. In addilion, the following wor*s were also executed to
bring the buildings into use.
i
CA / Sanction No & Date ature of work done
l.cwE(s)/sEC-E/M/25 Augnentation of ex
-98
97 16.63 lakhs ilcctrical, water supply
sewage disposal etc (capi
2 HQ ASA Repairs to Tem
No:4045/0TM/Q3W 1.97 lakhs Buildings T.12 (Revenr
dt.1.12.97 and CA No:
HQ ASA letter
Repairs to T
No:4045/oTM/Q3w(i) 3,20lakhs Buildings T. I2-l (Reveuu
dt.3.12.9'1 work)
3. HQASA ter vision of Gate for
No:4093/Q3 dr.9.5.98 I Coliege (Revenue Work)
otal:24.60 Iakhs
Thus a total sum of I{s.68.05 lakhs (43.45 + 24.60 lakhs) was spent
on the buildings in
order to make them liabitable. The work was completed in all respects
irr Jan ,99 and
GE(S) Secunderabad vide iris lener No:23 I I l2S4/E2 d,ated 28.1.99 requested
the
station HQrs ro.insrruct the users concemed to take over the accommodation
from llEs.
The RAO MES Secunderabad, during review of the GE's accounts found it
curious that a
huge sunr of Rp.68 larkhs rvas spenr on barracks lying vacanr for alnrost
l0 yeals and
therelbre probe[ the ,]atter riorn the GE/CWE records. The detailed examination
ofthe
rocords brought out the loilowing interesting l'acls:
1 flQrs convening order dated 4.6.97 to assess the requirement ofspecial repairs to
thc unuscd barlacks rvhich ultimately resrrlred in spending ol.more than
6g lakhs
rrn unused blrrlcks was only s 5squgl tO the proposal to establish an Army
Dental
CnilcSc Ct ScirrDdcrcb.d to he ru by a leginrculal ilstilurion viz.. army Welfare
hducarioD Socicry (AWES). :
Annexure - A)
|
4. The need to rbappropriate the land & buildings for use by the Army D*rtal College
was clearly brought our by rhe Engineering Appreciation repon ofCWE.
5. The necessary reappropriation sanction was also called for from Station HQrs by
CWE Secunderabad vide their letter No:24 225t11lE2 dated 2 8. I 0.97 imnred iately
after issue of:Admin Approval dated 25.x.97 for which no aclion was laken by the
Admin Authorities-
6. Neither the Board proceedings nor the Admin Approval and other' subsequent
sanctions brotrght out the purpose ofthe whole.exercise thus effectivelY concealing
the mafter from audil
In thc light of the above findings, the RAO(MES) Secunderabad placed lhe entire
expenditure under objection and reported the matter to CDA Secunherabad for further
necessary action
9. Explain the techniqucs av{ilabl€ for thc protection ofrebar (Nov lDec 2012)
/ Paper towels.
r' Paint brush.
/ Primer.
'/ The substance rvlrich has aci<jic in nature can works well when it comes to getting rid
olrLtst ond ihe acidiry o1'lenons is.what makes this remedies effective_
'/ Soak a sponge in the mixlure and use it to rub your rusty object clean.
/ You nlay want to usc plastic gloves for this task.