This document provides an introduction to talent analytics. It discusses how talent can be defined in terms of individual attributes that determine fitness for certain jobs and roles. It also discusses how talent development initiatives like coaching and training can impact return on investment. The document notes that talent cannot be managed without measurement. It then discusses how people analytics and talent science involve developing theories about organizational talent, addressing bias in talent definitions, and determining where talent can be found inside or outside an organization. Finally, the document provides a case study on using analytics to determine what factors like experience, demographics, or training performance best predict promotability and future training performance.
This document provides an introduction to talent analytics. It discusses how talent can be defined in terms of individual attributes that determine fitness for certain jobs and roles. It also discusses how talent development initiatives like coaching and training can impact return on investment. The document notes that talent cannot be managed without measurement. It then discusses how people analytics and talent science involve developing theories about organizational talent, addressing bias in talent definitions, and determining where talent can be found inside or outside an organization. Finally, the document provides a case study on using analytics to determine what factors like experience, demographics, or training performance best predict promotability and future training performance.
This document provides an introduction to talent analytics. It discusses how talent can be defined in terms of individual attributes that determine fitness for certain jobs and roles. It also discusses how talent development initiatives like coaching and training can impact return on investment. The document notes that talent cannot be managed without measurement. It then discusses how people analytics and talent science involve developing theories about organizational talent, addressing bias in talent definitions, and determining where talent can be found inside or outside an organization. Finally, the document provides a case study on using analytics to determine what factors like experience, demographics, or training performance best predict promotability and future training performance.
An Introduction Iqbal Maesa Febriawan Talent Scientist • You may recognize your top performer What makes them a talent: Their intelligence, personality, or work attitude?
• Individual attributes → fitness to certain job
profile / role, performance, match to teammates Exclusive talent: emphasize on fitness Inclusive talent: emphasize on development How to Define Talent development initiative → Coaching, • training, assignment Talent Assessment & Recruitment platform Its impact to RoI, what else? Nowadays? with Data and Analytics
• You cannot manage what you cannot
measure (Peter Drucker)
• Alright…alright we have conducted
assessments / measurements. Then what? Mindset: Im[Prove]; Approach: Audit, Survey, Analytics • People Analytics → Talent Science: • Developing ‘theory’ about organizational talent • Bias in talent definition? • Where talent can be found? Inside or outside • Why people analytic comes late? • Is analytic same as statistic? Yes…but No (Huus, 2015) • Statistic is the basic of analytic → Decision- making is the key • Is analytic goes along with big data? • No, start small and with right question • Insight → Hindsight → Foresight • Being SMART (Marr, 2015) • Strategy first • Measure what matters • Analytic process • Result/Report • (Business) Transformation Case Study • MT in a national bank, in order to be promotable: pass Basic Training • How’s the promotability ratio? • Which one determines promotability? Previous experience, Demographic variables, or the Training itself? • What determines training performance? Is it a reliable source to predict future training performance Any Questions?