Karl Lentz, No injured party, no case

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIDdd-4lTCc

Karl: if you go back on Angela’s talkshoes there was a Mr. Cherry from New York or
New Jersey, he shows you how to knock the attorney from the State, the county, the
DMV, IRS, VISA out of the picture so that you are then standing in an empty court room.
If it’s insurance they might have 100 attorneys there. Everyone remembers George Bush
vs. Al Gore with the hanging chads in Florida. This was a very simple case. It went to
the US Supreme Court and the US Supreme court had ruled on that thing in less than 5
minutes. Because even though Al Gore’s daddy owned Occidental Oil and Al Gore is a
billionaire and he was a standing vice president at the time they went before the US
Supreme Court, and he said there were hanging chads, millions and millions of hanging
chads, or I would have won the election.

Karl: they drove up to the US Supreme Court with a tractor trailer full of hanging chads.
They had hundreds, thousands, millions of attorneys on Al Gore’s side to present their
case to the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said, “Is there one man who is
willing to stick his hand on the Bible and before the Supreme Court and say that his
rights to vote was interfered with because of hanging chads. Can that man pick out one
ballot out of that tractor trailer and identify it as his and prove that is a hanging chad on
his ballot?” The attorneys tried to use up all this legalese, millions of documents, old
court cases, citations and codes. Scalia asked him to find someone, a black guy from
Miami, a homeless guy who will come here to the Supreme Court and claim that his right
to vote was interfered with by a machine. Until you bring that man forward to the
Supreme Court, Al Gore, you have no case. Now you go back to Florida and let them do
whatever they want to do. I am telling you right now that you have no standing before
the US Supreme Court because there needs to be an injured party. If you actually read
the Al Gore/ vs. George Bush case with the United States Supreme Court there was no
injured party and they had no case. .

Caller: are you saying that if the attorney doesn’t have the principal standing there beside
him willing to testify that I owe him the money….
Karl: that’s right; there has to be an injured party; he is going to have to swear that his
right, that his property has been interfered with by your action, or your inactions. And,
there is nobody who is going to be able to say, ”My name is Suffolk County and because
she didn’t pay the money she promised me, I couldn’t buy my kid a GI Joe doll for
Christmas so she has injured me” Nobody can do that and they don’t have a case. So,
don’t answer their case as a defendant; go back and listen to this thing and make your
own case that they are filing a false claim against you because there is no injured
party who is going to stand in their court.

Caller: do I put that into the same court?

Karl: you can put it into the same court because anybody with …
Caller: in other words, don’t answer their claim.
Karl: you do want to make an answer and say, “I believe you are filing a false claim
against you.” Yes, they might have the codes and all this stuff on the books that says
‘this and that’ but you still believe it’s a false claim. You don’t have to believe in Santa
and you don’t have to believe whatever they want you to believe. You have the right to
believe whatever you want. And this is always what gets people in trouble all the time—
thank God you asked me this question—oh, they have no facts. Never ever argue the
facts. When the policeman says I did 900 miles backwards down the street, with my tires
squealing, okay, I believe you. You have the right to believe whatever you want. Those
are your beliefs. Now I have the right to believe that unless there is an injured party, you
have no case.

Karl Lentz
Angela’s talkshoe 39904
Episode 1870231:45