Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gene Patenting
Pre-Reading
A. Warm-Up Questions
B. Vocabulary Preview
Match the words on the left with the correct meanings on the right.
Copyright 2016, Red River Press Inc. For use by members of ESL Library in accordance with membership terms. 1
Gene Patenting
Mini-Debates
Reading
1. Monsanto Canada, a biotechnology company, 4. In May 2004, the Supreme Court ruled that
produces canola seed that contains a gene that Monsanto could not patent a plant, but it could
protects the seed from the effects of Roundup, a patent the gene that it had developed and the
weed killer also produced by Monsanto. Farmers process for inserting it into the seeds. It means
who buy and plant Roundup Ready canola seed that farmers who do not buy seed directly from
can use the herbicide to kill the weeds in their Monsanto each year have to remove any crop
fields without damaging their canola crop. They from their land that originated from Monsanto
must agree to buy new seed every year instead seed, no matter how it got there.
of saving seeds from previous crops to plant
5. Earlier, in 2003, a government biotechnology
new ones. Monsanto argues this is the only way
advisory council had recommended that, in some
to recover the money it spends on researching
cases, higher life-forms such as plants could be
and developing genetically improved seeds.
patented, that farmers should have a limited
2. In the late 1990s, Monsanto sued Saskatchewan right to save and use seeds from patented plants,
farmer Percy Schmeiser for growing Roundup and that those who accidentally violate patents
Ready canola without having bought the seed. should have some legal protection.
Schmeiser said the seeds had blown into his field
6. Given the Supreme Court’s decision and the
by accident, either from his neighbors’ fields or
committee’s recommendations, the Federal
off passing farm equipment.
Patent Act needs to be updated to make the
3. Lower courts ruled against Schmeiser’s rules for gene patenting clearer.
“by accident” argument and ordered him to turn
over the profits from his 1998 crop to Monsanto.
He then took his fight to the Supreme Court of
Canada to argue that a company should not be
allowed to patent, or control, the use of a plant.
Copyright 2016, Red River Press Inc. For use by members of ESL Library in accordance with membership terms. 2
Gene Patenting
Mini-Debates
Comprehension
Discuss these questions in pairs, and write the answers in your notebook.
1. What is Roundup?
Vocabulary Review
Complete the sentences using a word from the vocabulary
list on page 1. You may need to change the word form.
2. His business is only two years old, but he is already making a huge .
3. You have to a quarter into the parking meter to park for one hour.
5. If you don’t wear your reading glasses, you will your eyesight.
Copyright 2016, Red River Press Inc. For use by members of ESL Library in accordance with membership terms. 3
Gene Patenting
Mini-Debates
Discuss
Work with a partner or in small groups. Discuss the following questions.
Debate
Below are two topics to debate in small groups or pairs.
Your teacher will tell you if you will be debating for or against the idea.
You will have ten minutes to prepare your arguments.
TOPIC #1 TOPIC #2
Writing
Choose one of the questions from the Discuss section above.
Then write a paragraph in your notebook stating your own opinion.
Copyright 2016, Red River Press Inc. For use by members of ESL Library in accordance with membership terms. 4
Gene Patenting
Mini-Debates
• That doesn’t take away from the fact that... • In my honest opinion...
• That’s beside the point. • It is my belief that...
• With all due respect... • From my experience...
• I agree with you there. • From where I look at it...
• I agree with ---- (name). • From my point of view...
• I see your point, but...
• That may be true, but...
Clarifying / Rephrasing
• We’re going to have to agree to disagree.
• I get/see where you’re coming from, but... • Let’s be clear here...
• I’m afraid I disagree entirely. • I think you misunderstood what I said.
• I’m afraid I’d have to disagree. • What I said was... (repeat a point
• I agree to some extent, but... that was misunderstood or confused)
• I disagree with you there. • What I meant to say was...
• Pardon me for disagreeing, but... (rephrase something in a way that is clearer)
• In other words...
• What I was trying to say
Interrupting / Asking to Contribute
before I was interrupted is that...
• I hate to interrupt, but...
• If I may come in here...
Summarizing / Concluding
• I’d like to add something.
• Would you like to contribute something? • So let me get this straight. You think...
• I’d like to raise a point. • To conclude...
• If I could speak for a moment... • I’d just like to summarize by saying...
• I’d like to cut in here. • Finally, I’d like to reiterate that...
• You haven’t answered my question. • It’s time to take stock of what we’ve heard today.
• Both sides have some valid points.
• The stronger argument/team today is...
Persuading
Copyright 2016, Red River Press Inc. For use by members of ESL Library in accordance with membership terms. 5
Gene Patenting
Mini-Debates
Answer Key
LESSON DESCRIPTION: LEVEL: Int
In this lesson, students read about a 2003 Supreme Court TIME: 1.5 – 2 hours
case between Monsanto, a biotechnology company, and
TAGS: genetically modified food, gene patenting, agriculture,
Percy Schmeiser, a Saskatchewan farmer. They then use their
Monsanto, farming, Saskatchewan, Canada
knowledge and personal opinions to debate two related topics.
Pre-Reading Discuss
A. WARM-UP QUESTIONS Have students discuss in small groups or pairs. Answers will vary.
Copyright 2016, Red River Press Inc. For use by members of ESL Library in accordance with membership terms. 6