Be se Pclact coer and Veet. rics erm, mt, me wae samen agin, decarvonan the sccnomyy 38 mean Bee we gana oat rma of id pellet, Groen ie nm Seco koe Wok ow precooro sore ights of workors, delvor fai income, provide sucurty wn the workplace wn sock * pose {wmlien, and promote social dialogue. (Phiipphoe Groon Jobe Act of 2018, Sex. 4 fc) EA IO7T, 2268) RECRUITMENT AND PLACEMENT ‘What are the slemonts of illegal recruitment in largo scale? ‘Three elements must concur; (LRS) ‘Offender has no valid leanse or autrosity to engage Offender undertakes any of the ‘any ofthe prohibited prectices w in cocrutment aed piscerert of workers rat and plocemont acivves under Ate 7). LC, rors under Nice eG Sec. 8A RA. 8. Moons ered tre same against 2 or more persons indica of as a group (Poor w Cagalingan, 2016). BUT NOTE: llega roctment can be commined by 2 icensed recruiter cr folder of euony 4 98 ae rates any atthe prohibited actintios under Arie 4, LC or Sec. 6 of R.A 6OS2. (Sto, Tomas vs Salac, 2012), ‘What are some important principles on the persons liable for illegal recruitment? held able for ilegal recruimnent as poncps) ort at ochvely and corecouyFENEO CENTRAL BAK OPERATIONS Zo 1p 08. ‘a10, 10. on, sedi, 0k et purpcnety to wpa an iy to.an toa msnnd coursoad by tw oF conte, nds ta pcm Monpowor Services v2 Malnne, 2010) 3 ads ¥ Grand Placoment art General Ser Dogo rind Placomon ral Services Corporavon (2017), wa Cou Weld tat ovate ‘allow terminaion without cause are invad. Whilo our Civil Codo rovognizns that porta in thle conucts auc ome i contione ns Uy iy doom cnwait ar ane {td condtions must be contrary wo low. moral, goad cies, pubNe ord, oF pokey” The Constitution guarmtoos thal wrnployeos, local oF overseas, are ontilied 10 secur ot seus tae ze ‘mplayer to raver fi Wo trnvna employons wih cute is voioive of No" Se ‘sour of onan ‘When do foreign laws apply (o OFW contracts? contact must be procossed through tne BOEA, (IPAMS v..Do Vora, ‘What wage rates apply to PWDS7 Qualified individval tsbiity- 100% ofthe appiicablo minimum wage (See. 5, RA. 7277) 2 ame a oiasa an To lappa mewmum wane (MA. 60 LC) istnguish between a person whois a qualified individual witha disability and a hendleapped nat, Atuatiie ndvdual with» Disab is an ndvidoa wih a dsaity who, with of witnou wasnt i m en perform the essential funcions ofthe employment position that such individual desires. (Sec. 4, R.A, 7277) se rt 2 oiCoca Coss Praeyonen te [Wat ace the methods of fixing the minicwum wage rates? ais AS. the Aung cf a determinate amount to be axied to the Thos cat append n worker wage et 16. What are the rates for holiday pay?A29. a2. 1) Te can hows ‘Ah, AND the. Parton atv wld 1) The contractor oF st einghoyea (DO No. 174-17 OTE: Th nmin tanta ya ny tr a ae tet rt ei ha i a d 174, dd nol change aliying ip the dafibon 0 o nn ee seas er ne Cree a Contracting oF wuroon tine shui only Um oki Abt a bl 4. The contiador of wubconvaci i» wngagad ino lei nntanices cont denn Inssinien® Mpceandiig vi Ke me sara inetd, 2 ayaa ws stale! ery ot the oP re ne acon ard aan vat oe, eve ce ‘and supervision a Per a wn nt moni ns ot 1 an ec mpm BMS IEE 2 ‘4. ThaSorvca hgwonontonaures comosiac With al a sighte and banetite for altho erpbnfoe Pride eontrcr or subrankce unde th lao I9er eacten 8, 0.01811) I an employee who resigns rquired to serve notes? ‘ps0 vara uo, on ooyon rus wt ne ot Bo Svat en wsuncn, Tn empenye ig a eye ati taro 10 cnr wa Woe sega ere eum by wo eye hermits 0 ed aren A hes e794 1 Bernama urexarabie Restrnt wired Nn nt ia Tipit rappin Wegner Firemen ch w ren cen Uy a ego erossetanre aa} to pasa ‘What ace the standards thet an employer should meet to jusity retvenchment? 5 oon arard tat am expy seid rach 10 pay ebrenetynog EO CENTRAL JOAR OPERATIONS 2013 Inte etsminatn of e amour of amin mags, sever acto ae nen eo acon AME 1. The authorized cause invoked (whether i was a fetrenchment or a closure or cessation of operation of the establishment due to serious business loso0s of financial reverse oF ) 2. The number of employees to be awarded; 2. The capacity of the employers to satisty the awards, tbken into account their prevailing financial sates og ey ete inaten vores in no oe ene 1 ae OTe on peretinie be ore 4. rerio arlene at sean ose oN Wt ara 2 ene eae semper = canteen doe an uingrnce rps anon coe a 1 tar at core any tne curing te probatonary period Pu 1 esseyuicap suis evpryacr toaeel ton, nae uals Mawaxte or 9s ai ty See tomas 429 thee ster rants ts eee rat are not crores 9 tn caves? rod ne Cabos Coch tut mo granted in wo rove grind wt Aree 279 ‘es Corporat v NLRC Steg slate eter epsom mn ‘ OF sapaeamen faxy it he of rerataterrert (SNE sien) 2 Rem of party m en fom ot porns amare foi tas weno Conarearce o procat! ux ccm (AQIS, 2 ‘pecard of Cnmargen an sncrrieys teen (Suero¥ SP 1985) ‘Sree. wtere Din ermpuoyee ® OSH exon of erm sh 1 jal wf atone ‘aan co mp a on eo ex en mney, Ts es ttn Bescon venom sence wt 2 HIE staternent ardor Labor Arbiter and aasumption of Disunguen betren on onde of mastered ae 2 Dinas ara cantcanon over nana he SOLE crunved employee pursuant puto bn Binet Fcertre sahara ota tormor® O10FeNEO CENTRAL 235. Whats the atutory 35, “ompulsory an Optional rerie LABOR Law ms tonne ee 1036, an employes who was lermionted lor authorise causes redundancy} so etna Cary rtrartrt Somes and separation pay berets? Sn eee A38, Yes, asm genera a. Employees er " re ogayontied fo recover bath oss vou ni. Snopes i tunonen Pano Cox Wh ove en eee ales CBA one resrenart pron re tek on ompoyee rt Dare cheb bn corany cepa re tal cymes lang M8 8 kwon, Tnt ant beso Desase be ogy ae era = goneral ve, (Gaodyer vz Meri Angus, 2014) exept When ter an exist provision be cameuny dea oa ne anes SE (Goodyear ve. Marina Angus. 2014 MANAGEMENT PREROGATIVE ‘ast, What are te ursprudentiat guidelines on he tanater ot employees? + se veode ea mre somone poten va tml A rs beoak inthe service a itera one oan are pion arate SY, 2 ea Serer cat Fee on ee TSS 2 Its ota sherk gaan aucnten Han IS A on ons Scena vant aca Ne 4 tamale rcs cemae mea mS 2 a Sonces arn sues. 2019)(EO CENTRAL pon rors the sole factor 1 ie sey benstas peorseate eet 41. What is the process in cla pr Claiming permanent and total disability benefits from the employer of 8 ‘Ta be ented to disabitty monetary berefts. ha Soalare shall suomn o 3 post-irstoymert west ‘eremination by 0 company deesgnatea piysican within 3 working days hance Faure ofthe sentarer 10 comply wt Se a aren requirement shal result inthe forfeiture ofthe ight to claim any bane, "snip bianogoment & Mennng. nc. Aang, 2078), si Phi, In. v. Ouloguw, Jc (2078) he rses were aunrrarzed ns Ces, ‘assessment one sealers sabtY Setar hae atten io enunathe prod #2 Be Seaciiatl 1 fepeeatan te ener Rosco oso ater send 4 Hie een ls ey exes pamaras me 2. foienton si cust te dng rcv sane PT presenising tress ofLABOR LAW BLUE TIPS: 25:3 broadens the coverage af workers who can lor asicoaten, and s no excuse amtuint nian and aceon wont ‘xganization Is nt mtd to unienism. ‘Norkaré may ae fom’ Jon an assocaion ‘rolaction and or other lgiiate purposes (Samahan ng mga Manggogows <2 Mars”, 2018), ‘Must the charter certificate of a labor organization be carted unde oath tobe considered ® legitimate labor organization? ‘No. The charter certificate Is repred and ssed bythe raonal nin ard nah al Do ‘wll rot make sense to have the local chapters officers cory or atest to # ‘90 hand in the preparation. (Samahang Manggagawe sa Caray Cher ¥ ows the pendency of a petition ‘certification election? No, the pendency ofthe cancelation of union {er the carbfcaton election should not prowert he isis that a the ime the union fled Bs pein for ental uch act absert an order drecting is cancoiton. (129204 Monggagena ng Legend, 2011) ‘the nting ofa pettin forthe cancelation af union registration sal iDe = No. The 20% mninwn maniaines heTONS 2019 LABOR LAW BLUE Tips Are reinstated ‘mployees who participate in an legal strike ented to ull backwages? No, the principle of a “air day’ the award thereof, day's wage for @ fair day's labor roma Deck tacior Of course, the lame 10 work pafonned by te emptyes Ue can bh wage py unions ‘ismissed or ctherwise ihegaly proveroe fone jo owas legally locked out, Suspended or backwages working. In he later (Exponent Syste Pee rer aaa cove meno or eed What i are the procedural requirements for valid strike? A53. The a Procedural requirements for ¢ valid Naeeosupee «vad sive ae te folowrg: 3 Or 1S ays Fecal Hes wits he COLE allot 3 dye bao fe rere ate rest Coes Off Period —30 dys for bargaining deatock svkes, 15 dys for ULP sts: 3, Neto a] Caine Off parod is cispensed with if the ULP amounts la union busing: + Refe® of meeting for Stike or Lockoul vote to the NCMS - at east 24 hours Boor the conduc of ing: Conduct AND resuls of Stike or Lockout vote reported ta the NCMB; and .T-day sirike ban observed. ‘therewith by the union will render the ung Coporaton ot 1 ‘Does the non-compliance with the procedural requirements for conducting # vald strike negate the claim of good faith on the part of the striking union? 55, In order to acaul te tujsleon under At 128 (Viral and Enorcoment Powers), dos 255, onder 10 seule Hts gly suorzed representatives need to make # ing 26 to the ‘existence of an employer-employee relationship? in ‘ Jabor standards provisions were a cw sing rai need abt Be Retane te cxntence ofan erpioyer-omloyeo flatenship. (South Cotabato v- So. Tomas, ently shal issue lempo:ar of permanent injunction of restalring order or otherwise Ver iny case invoWng the enforcement orders issued in accordanca with Article e's chaser of bylaws ‘election by the directors. Tina wencpao key, ‘SEC hes dan employee, nd he laberciputo subject tothe uisicton of jon Where @ position Is not expressly mentioned by the charter 0 = Decor pursuant oa power granted by aw chan Uhcoog)eo vENIRAL SS ee 2 NRCIS Mann F; 3. Drectorot te Sogn ROO» Nant Labor Relazons Camassio, 196), ond (esctrguans eee Relate (BLR} wees eee yan his appedaofidcson retary). (AdCoM Laborato: ® ecicies »y his original juniciction which aw appedlable to the OOLE = pions Asn Labwetoned Empey Ua, 00 ‘Tequirements to appeal the LA's decision? Appen! from the secon Cana cane seas fhe Lat Ataris brought by ontry epee othe NLR. win ‘Scent of the decision. (Virjen Shipping and Manne Secviogs v. NLRC, 1982) ‘The 10-day period: is reckoned fram receipt by counsel the fi Tvs apps, ‘otboln appeals tom the lhe final Sacision, onda, oF 20% TB MMAC and NAGI CAS)» Feta Roach 2017) This 10-day period Tan, Zong) Paro Ba mandatory and uactona in native, (Gharer Cramiel & Coating C7? NOTE: There 5s no appeal fom he dson oh NLRC. Te ony wan elovat ho cas Ibe CA is by way of specs oh acon of ctr ud Rie 5, Rese Cou From the ing ofa Corto the Abpea, Kay be ie poste er tc jt may de ied to the SC by ator de Fab fie Rlescl Coa ovat harn Furl Hae NLA, reviow on 1998) When does a Motion to Reduce Bond atoll the running ofthe period te perfect an appes!? “The fMing of a motion to reduce appes! bond shal tl the pared Io perfect an eppeal. shal be eniortained by the NLRC subject othe follwing conditions: “1. Tha moion to reduce bond shal be based on meritorious grounds; and 2. Aressonatie amount (10%) irelation othe monetary awardie posted by he appedant. (McBumie ¥. Ganzon, 2013) ‘Can the amployor invoke financia! difficulties as 2 ground to reduce bond? No. The right ta appeal is nner a natura ight nora component of cue process, must be mxeresed Tene monner precctud bylaw. Financial dificuliee may not be Invoked ae a valld Ground to reduce bond. (Turks Shawarms v. Pajaro, 2017) NOTE: Sufenng trv rausty problems. logeter withthe claim of absence a an smployer employee has Doan accepted by tne Supreme Court as felaScnship between fie compiomant ard fe cefordant, re round to tecuce the appeal bond. (Phiippine Tounsters v. Mas Transt Workers Union, May # money claim arising from implementation ofthe CBA be Med withthe Labor Arter? Voluntary Arbitrators wil have orginal and exclusive aterpretaion or mplementaion ofthe CBA. The orginal Juledcton inder Aile 224 (cof the Labor Code for money claims eae isig rom salves of contracts other than a CBA. (San Jose v: NLRC, 1996) equirements for obtaining an alien employment perm (AEP)?Ro sxtoss LABOR LAW BLUE TH NRCS Ma Dene ite Fer amev Nisin Later Reason C Bucenc ef Lane aber Relsions Commission, 1998) nd {a5 datingisnas tar ee rs as (BURY cases decd hy han nis appedat atsdcon ‘eck it hs sgl janadchon which nv appesabie Be OGLE es -aboraiooms v. ASDSt Lateratones Employees’ Union, 2000) the requirements to appeal the LA's decision? Appeal fom the decson of calenaar of the Labor Arbor is brought by ordinary appeal to tho NLRC wit. 10 evo cc of sac. (Viren Sng an ae Serves MLC 1982) Bg Tre today pins BGS SD, Pees reckoned rom rece ty counsel oe fal econ ord of award. Ts 2 9PSak rom the LA to NLRC and NURG 1 CA (Sy, Faand Rota, 2011) Thi 10-ary pect Ts 1: paa th many end pectoral ae (harr Chem ott OP + NOTE: There is no appeal from the d con of NLRC. The oy ayo eat te casa tothe CA ie by woyospecal acon crera uu 65, Rs Cou From te nung of se Cou of te Appeas, tm te save oe SS by pen fo evn ‘etiorar under Rio 45 ofthe Fie of Ga roca, (St Marlin Funeral Hoe v. NLRC, ot 1298) ‘When does a Motion to Reduce Bond all the running ofthe period te perfect an 20%)? “The fing of » mation to reduce appeal bond shal tl the pered io perfect an appeal." shal be ‘eriertained by the NLC subject ote folowing condtions: “<7. The moton fo reduce bond shal based on metorous grounds; and . 2. Araasorable amount (10%) nrelaton tothe monetary awards posted bythe oppatant. (McBumie ¥. Ganzon, 2013) G61. Can the employer invoke financial dificulies as 2 ground to duce Bond? to. Te rights potas nine nal ht no’ a component of do process tm be nang No, Te ro ptt Oy an. Prantl filles may not be wowed os aval ound te reduce bond. (Turks Shawarma v. Pajaron, 2017) NOTE: Sutering ror hqucty probes \ogster wih the claim of absence o an employer employee aoe sip betzeen te combomant aed te cafercart as bean accepted by ne Suprarne Cos 98 rao evoend i vec the appeal bond. (Phiippine Tourstersv. Mas Trane Workers Union, 2018) May 2 money claie arising trom ipl ne! of Voluntary Arbitrators wil have onginal and exciusive Trem tho Interpretation or iplamentaion of the CBA. The original “Ator under Article 224 () ofthe Labor Code for money claims ‘Zotutes or contracts other an a CBA. (San Jose v. NLRC, 1998) lomentatlon ofthe CBA be fled with the Labor Arbiar? AEP sholl be fed and processed at tho DOLE Regional Office or Field Office he inionded place of work Ys ree appcton frm rast be occmaniod by the pets i sketowing Socumaeniagys of ecg Raley Sos Panos inet Earner te att PEZA Ctetor er PCAB Uosee depen on he na = conducted by the forign national toraAR OPERATIONS 2019 LABOR LAW BLUE Ties, NOTE: Ye ne determinations ec! be issued AEP 00) bw in oso en ae Srtomtletienntemy seman teat seg foe ims Pe scone tay fasoienie eae assed OTS 8 What is the efect, ep ‘of the sbsence of an: ‘snonseeteee ‘ofan alien employment permit io the llega! dieminaal case Mad, Awl warrant tne sisal Lil fhe case, The absence ofan aon empioyrment a pair nage te dae Jeroye-empoje lator wnat, ad vaso mcm ak eee me ms ae ‘erey muted Mcoume x Ganzen, 2013) non-resident alien employee, who was Hiegat'y betta ae 10 on ‘employment permit pricr to Rs employment, ba awarded hie monelay ae? is monetany Gar wi De = enor blere Dee No. The employee cannot unclean hands Candcnbe cio pa lnoeonscnens ery ammo ippine labor laws requiring aliens to sour “employment. (WPP Marketing Communications v. Galore, 2010) Can any of the partios appes! the decision of the Voluntary [between the parties that the decision ofthe arbitrator ail VAs actin a quasi capacity: Ae TAS tase tom jose tow ‘be held to proche in proper cases tho power ‘Fomsa Phiippines v, Bacclad Sales Force Union, 2076) “What is the process of appealing a VA's decision? se VA cx PVA win 30 das rom the roc 6, PW edwin isays rom pte kt mans. te 9, (Gvegve None! Coven A [ANNEX |: $85, GSIS and ECL JERNWENT SERVICE INSURANCE ACT OF "f—— Socal GOVERNMENT SERVICE AGT OF oor TA No, | NSURANCE ACT OF oo 628)ACT OF 1997 [RA No. LABOR LAW BLUE TIPS GOVERNMENT SERVICE | EMPLOYEE'S INSURANCE ACT OF COMPENSATION LAM ee ees ee | compuisory coverage of he ployee shal tae effect fn th et ay of is ‘employment. See. 6, Rule 1) a7 ic0 CENTRAL a UAL Secu | ACT OF 1097 (p 12) ig UA. No,LABOR LAW BLUE TIPS. SOCIAL secuRry | GOVERNMENT ACT OF 1997 (RA No, | INSURANCE +97 Any dispute ensing under A ‘tes Act and other laws ‘Ail money claims and Genefts arising ram employer-employes relations: years fram the time the cause of acon accrvad: = incudes: 4. Money claims arising trom tho CA. 2. Incremental proceeds fom tuiton increases, 3. Money claims of Overseas Flipina Workers (OFWs). (Art 291, LC) b. Inet cisimed within tne above peri, thay shall be forever barred. (Ard. 297, LG) I the 2010 case of Southeastern Shipping v. Navarra, period in Section 28 of POEA-SEC was declared null and vold. The reasons tet Ace 1 he Lato" Code i ths aw governing tho pcescrption of monay caine ot dacs of overseas corral workers. This law provals byt said Secon: 5 ; ' i : a ru ial ni, all