You are on page 1of 3

the sample are made in the same way method is restricted to a certain ex- (2) Brindley, G . W.

(2) Brindley, G . W., “X-ray Diffraction


tent to the analysis of materials of by Polycr stalline Materials,” Peiser,
as the diffraction measurements, with- Rooksby Wilson, p. 159, tech. eds.,
out moving the sample, which is an fairly low absorption, and the lower Inst. Phys., London, 1955.
advantage over the method proposed limit of concentration that can be esti- (3) Legrand, C., Nicolas, J., Bull. sue.
by Leroux, Lennox, and Kay (6). mated is rather high. However, the jranc. ceram. 38, 29 (1958).
(4) Leroux, J., Nurelco Reptr. 4, 107
Furthermore, in all respects the method use of molybdenum radiation should (1957).
gives the results predicted by theory, eliminate both these defects somewhat. (5) Leroux, J., Lennox, D. H., Kay, K.,
without the need for determining an ANAL.CHEM.25,740 (1953).
empirical correction factor as was found LITERATURE CITED
necessary by Leroux et al. (1) Alexander, L., Klug, H. P., ANAL. RECEIVEDfor review October 27, ,1958.
When using copper radiation, the CHEM.20,886 (1948). Accepted July 9, 1959.

Determination of Blood Urea with


p-dimethy laminobenzaldehyde
HAROLD H. BROWN’
The Memorial Hospital, Pawtucket, R. 1.

bA simple, rapid, accurate procedure carbonate-free sodium hydroxide to r’


i s described for the routine determina- provide 1 liter of approximately 0.5N
tion of urea in protein-free filtrates sodium hydroxide. The zinc sulfate
of blood plasma or serum with an
and sodium hydroxide solutions should
be balanced as follows: Dilute 10 ml.
acidified solution of p-dimethylamino- of the zinc sulfate solution to about 50
benzaldehyde in ethyl alcohol. More ml. with water and titrate slowly with
than 1000 plasmas were analyzed; the sodium hydroxide to the phenol-
only sulfa drugs interfered. A simple phthalein end point. Ten f 0.05 ml.
screening technique to detect con- should be required. If necessary, dilute
taminated filtrates is described and a the stronger solution with water and
procedure to circumvent the contami- titrate again.
nation is given. The effects of such
p-Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde - Sul-
furic Acid Solution. Dissolve 5 grams WAVE LENGTH (m)c)
variables as concentrations of reagents, of pdimethylaminoben~aldehyde(East-
temperature, and time are discussed. man No. 95) in 95% ethyl alcohol Figure 1. Absorption spectra of p-di-
The standard curve is linear to 100 mg. (U.S.P. or reagent grade) and dilute to methylaminobenzaldehyde reagent
of urea nitrogen per 100 ml. Higher 100 ml. with 95% ethyl alcohol. Most A. Urea equivalent to 50 mg. of urea N/100
values may b e determined by dilution lots of PDAB were used as received; ml.
with the reagent. occasionally however, a lot would pro- 6. Urea equivalent to 25 mg. of urea N/100
duce such a high blank that it had to be ml.
recrystallized (I). I n every instance C. Sulfathiazole equivalent to 2 mg./100 rnI.

T HE colored solution formed by urea


and a reagent consisting of p-
dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (PDAB) in
the alcoholic solution had to be filtered
to make it clear.
Slowly add 5 ml. of concentrated
Blank salution was equal volumes of water and
color reagent

ethyl alcohol and hydrochloric acid has sulfuric acid to about 50 ml. of the Urea-Free Plasma. Pooled plasma
been introduced as a colorimetric pro- PDAB solution in a 1Wml. volumetric (or serum) free of urea is required for a
cedure for the determination of urea in flask, mix, and allow to cool to room blank of the unknowns. The following
samples containing urea, hydrazine, temperature. Dilute to the mark with preparation hss been found convenient:
semicarbazide, and ammonium ion (6). more of the solution. This reagent has Pool several plasmas that have normal
A similar reagent was used to determine
a fairly intense yellow color. It is urea concentrations and do not contain
stable for many weeks a t room tem- sulfa drugs to obtain about 5 ml.
urea in an enzymatic, urea-synthesizing perature. Add 3 or 4 drops of the urease prepara-
system (4). This report describes a Alcoholic Buffer Solution. Dissolve tion, cover, and allow to stand over-
procedure for the routine determination 10 grams of sodium acetate trihydrate night a t room temperature. (The
of urea in protein-free filtrates of blood and 1 gram of (ethylenedinitri1o)tetra- presence of sulfa drugs can be detected
serum or plasma with a pdimethyl- acetic acid, disodium salt, dihydrate as described in the procedure.)
aminobenzaldehyde reagent. (disodium EDTA) in about 50 ml. of Standard Urea Solutions (50 mg. of
water in a 1Wml. volumetric flask. urea nitrogen per 100 ml.). Dissolve
REAGENTS Add 30 ml. of 95% ethyl alcohol and 107 mg. of urea in water in a 1Wml.
dilute to the mark with water. The volumetric flask and dilute to the mark.
Reagents are analytical grade unleas pH should be approximately 6.8. Prepare other standards as required by
otherwise indicated. Urease Solution. Add 20 ml. of the diuting aliquots of the standerd with
Zinc Sulfate, 10%. Dissolve 100 alcoholic buffer solution to 0.5 gram of water.
grams of zinc sulfate heptahydrate in defatted jack bean meal (Sigma Chemi-
distilled water and dilute to 1 liter. cal Co.) in an Erlenmeyer flask. Shake APPARATUS
Sodium Hydroxide, approximately for 5 minutes and filter. A sediment
0.5N. Dilute a saturated solution of forms on standing, but the supernatant A Beckman DU spectrophotometer
fluid may be used. This urease retains with l-cm. Corex cells and a Bausch &
1 Present address, Harrisburg Polyclinic its activity for several days, if stored in a Lamb Spectronic 20 SpectrophotoIseter
Hospital, Harrisburg, Pa. refrigerator. with O.binch round cuvettes were used.

1844 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY


mined, and it is multiplied by 2. Greater
dilutions may be made if required, If a
specimen of high urea concentration

//./
is also contaminated with a sulfa drug,
one must be certain that the urease
preparation is potent enough to hvdro-
lyze all the urea.
DISCUSSION

Absorption Spectra. The absorp-


tion spectra cf the urea standards
with the p-dimethylaminobenzalde-
hyde-sulfuric acid reagent are shown
in Figure 1, curves A and B. The
maximum absorption is a t about 435
mp. It drops off sharply and has only
slightly more absorbance than the blank
a t 480 mp.
The absorption spectrum of a sulfa-
thiazole solution equivalent to 2 mg. per
GRAMS OF PDAB
100 ml. mixed with the color reagent is
also plotted in Figure 1, C . There is a
Figure 2. Effect of increasing concentration of PDAB much broader absorption maximum and
in color reagent nearly the same absorbance a t 440 as a t
480 mp.
A. Equal volumes o f color reagent and water VI. water blank
Those specimens that arc contami-
B. Equal volumes of color reagent and 50 mg. urea N stondord
V I . water blank nated by sulfa drugs are thus easily de-
C. The corresponding solutions from A used as blanks to determine tected by the simple screening procedure
absorbances of solutions from B of reading all unknowns a t 480 mp.
If the unknown reads considerably
appropriately labeled beakers. Trans- higher than the blank a t 480 mp, the
fer Zml. aliquots of each filtrate to test absorbance cannot be due to urea and a
tubes or cuvettes that are labeled to urease-treated aliquot of the specimen
correspond to the beakers. Add 2 ml. of must be used as a blank to correct €or
the pdimethylaminobenzaldehyde-sul-
furic acid color reagent to each and mix the contamination.
thoroughly. Allow to stand for 10 The PDAB reagent blank itself has

/-
minutes. Measure the absorbance in a such an intense absorbance below 420
B E K M A N DU
440 r n l spectrophotometer a t 440 mp, setting mp that the spectrophotometer cannot
the instrument a t zero absorbance with be set a t zero absorbance. With in-
the water blank for the standards, and creasing wave length, the blank absorb-
with the urea-free plasma blank for the ance decreases sharply, but a t 440 mp
unknowns. Also measure the absorb- it still has an absorbance that is equiva-
ance of the unknowns a t 480 mp us.
the urea-free plabma blank. lent to approximately 45 mg. of urea
Any of the unknowns that has an nitrogen per 100 ml. of plasma (Figure 2,
absorbance a t 480 mp greater than about A ) . A t higher wave lengths the absorb-
10% of that at 440 mp is contaminated ance of the reagent blank decreases, but
2 4 6 8 ’ io by one of the sulfa drugs and must be the absorbance of the urea-PDAB
treated as follows: Pipet 2-ml. aliquota reagent also decreases.
ML. CONCD. HZSO, of the blank filtrates, the 50-mg. urea The choice of 440 mp as the operating
wave length is a compromise to obtain
a reasonably low blank, sufficient sensi-
reagent each tube,. mix-and let stand for 30 tivity to permit the determination of a
minutes a t room temperature. Add 2 convenient range of values for clinical
Equal volumes of color reagent with increasing
sulfuric acid content and 20 mg. of urea N ml. of the color reagent to each, mix purposes, and adequate sensitivity for
standard measured against color reagent-water and let stand for 10 minutes. Deter- the detection of sulfa drug contamina-
blanks with corresponding amounts of acid mine the absorbance of each in the tion.
spectrophotometer at 440 mp, using the Standard Curve. The calibration
appropriate blanks. The 50-mg. stand- curve is linear u p to 100 mg. of urea
Because of the intense color of the ard should have the same absorbance
PDAB reagent, the Coleman Junior riitrogen per 100 ml. with the Beck-
as ita blank (thus assuring the activity man DU a t 440 mp. Linearity with
spectrophotometer could not be used. of the urease preparation). Subtract
the absorbances of the contaminated the Bausch & Lomb Spectronic 20 ex-
PROCEDURE specimens from the absorbances of the tends only to about 70 mg.
respective unknowns to obtain the Effect of pDimethylaminobenz-
Pipet 1 ml. of water (blank for stand- absorbance due to urea. aldehyde Concentration. A series of
ards), 1 ml. of urea-free p l a s m (blank Plot the absorbances against the color reagent solutions with increasing
for unknowns), 1-ml. aliquota of the concentrations of the standards. De- amounts of PDAB was prepared. A
standards, and 1-ml. aliquots of the termine the concentrations of the un- volume of color reagent was mixed
unknown plasmas or serums into a p knowns from the standard curve.
propriately labeled test tubes. Add 7 with a volume of distilled water and
An unknown with urea nitrogen con-
ml. of water to each and mix. Put 1 ml. centration considerably higher than the absorbance was measured, using
of the zinc sulfate solution in each and 50 mg. per 100 ml. may be diluted with the solution without PDAB as a blank
mix thoroughly. Place 1 ml. of the an equal volume of the urea-free plasma (Figure 2, A ) . The result of sub-
sodium hydroxide solution in each test blank. The absorbance is measured, stituting the urea standard, equivalent
tube and mix thoroughly. Filter into the amount of urea nitrogen is deter- to 50 mg. of urea nitrogen per 100

VOL. 31, NO. 1 1, NOVEMBER 1959 1845


ml., for the water is shown in Figure 2, aged about 0.012 (range sbout 0.005
B. The absorbance of the urea-PDAB Table 1. Results with Two Methods for to 0.02) unit lower than the water
complex alone is shown in curve C . Urea blank and standards. The reason for
The absorbance of the color reagent is Mg. Urea Nitrogen/ the decrease in the color of the plasma
subtracted by using the water-color Sample 100 MI. Plaama filtrates was not determined. Such an
reagent solutions with appropriate con- so. Diacetyl PDAB effect was also noted for trichloroacetic
centration of PDAB as blanks. The 1 35 32 acid filtrates (4). When a urea-free
absorbance of the complex increases 2 8 8 plasma blank was used for the
linearly with increasing concentrations 3 22 24 unknowns, the results agreed more
4 19 18
of PDAB. By using high concentra- 5 13 12 closely with the diacetyl method. 9
tions of PDAB the sensitivity with urea 6 27 24 typical day's results are given in Table I.
is increased, but the absorbance of the 7 16 18 More than lo00 routine determina-
blank increases a t a n even greater rate. 8 10 0 tions were made by both the diacetyl
9 27 26
and PDAB procedures, and only the
A study of the mechanism involved in 10 27 26
the reaction between acidified p - 11 21 19 sulfa drugs were found to interfere.
dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and urea 12 19 20 As described in the procedure, this con-
has indicated that it is an easily rever- 13 23 23 tamination is easily detected by the
14 82 84 simple technique of reading a t two wave
sible, equilibrium reaction involving the 15 40 38
combination of equimolar amounts of 16 41 42 lengths.
reactants ( 2 ) . I n addition about 300 specimens were
Because the color reagent itself has checked for contamination with other
such a marked absorbance particular to be completely reversible. If stand- substances by treating the filtrates with
care must be used in pipetting it. ards are used with each series of un- urease, adding the color reagent, and
Otherwise small differences in the quan- knowns, and if all the samples in a series reading against a urea-free plnsma blank.
tity of color reagent will lead to signifi- are allowed to come to room tempera- Again, the only interfering substances
cant errora. ture before reading, the temperature will found were the sulfa drugs.
Effect of Acid Concentration. not affect the results, providing that no Advantages. The method is rapid
Hydrochloric acid was first used in large fluctuations occur in room tem- if no sulfa drug contamination is
the color reagent, but if the test tubes perature while reading. present. Sulfa drug contamination is
containing it and urea weje left un- Effect of Time. The color formeJ easily detected, and the additional
covered, a ring soon appeared near the by the P D A B reagent and the urea time required to circumvent con-
open end. It was probably ethyl solutions develops immediately and tamination is no greater than that
alcohol condensing, but it developed increases slowly for a few minutes. required by the classical methods
a yellow color t h a t became more in- After about 10 minutes there is very employing urease and direct nessler-
tense with time. Substituting sul- little additional increase in absorb- ization. Ammonia does not interfere.
furic acid for the hydrochloric acid ance. The blank made by adding The standard curve is linear over a
prevented the volatilization of the equal volumes of color reagent and much wider range of values than that
yellow complex. water also shows a slow increase in from the diacetyl procedure, and higher
absorbance, but it increases negligibly values may be determined by simple
A solution containing 6.25 grams of after 10 minutes, provided the cuvette dilution of the colored solution. One
pdimethylaminobenzaldehyde diluted is stoppered and the temperature is need not start again with dilutions of the
t o 100 ml. with 95'% ethyl alcohol was constant. original filtrates.
prepared. Twenty-milliliter aliquota Protein Precipitants. The zinc No heating or cooling ia required.
were added to a series of 25ml. volu- sulfate-sodium hydroxide system was The reagents are stable. The sensi-
metric flasks. Increasing quantities of chosen t o precipitate proteins, be- tivity is adequate for the clinical ranges
concentrated sulfuric acid were added, of urea concentrations. The same
the solutions were mixed and allowed cause it yields a neutral filtrate that
to cool to room cemperature, and 95% may also be used for enzymatic glu- filtrate may also be used for glucose
ethyl alcohol was added to the marks on cose determinations. Tungstic acid determinations.
the flasks. Calculsted on the basis of a filtrates developed turbidities when Disadvantages. Not all colorim-
100-ml. volume, each flask contained the P D A B color reagent was added eters are suited for the method
5 grams of PDAB and from 1 to 10 ml. and were, therefore unsuitable. Tn- described. Small variations in addi-
of concentrated sulfuric acid. One chloroacetic acid filtrates of mouse liver tion of the color reagent can cause
volume of each color reagent was mixed homogenates were used by Nadai (I), significant errors. Sulfa drugs inter-
with one volume of a urea standard but such filtrates cannot be used for fere. A special blank is required for
c,quivalent to 20 mg. of urea nitrogen the plasma filtrates, which are needed
per 100 ml. and read against a blank glucose determinations.
made for each acid concentration by Comparison with the Diacetyl Pro- in large amounts.
substituting water for the standard. cedure. Necessity for Urea-Free
Plasma Blank. The described pro- LITERATURE CITED
The results are plotted in Figure 3, cedure was used t o determine the
and although there is a rather broad concentrations of urea nitrogen i n (1) Adams, R., Coleman, G. El., o l g
samples from the routine clinical Syntheses 2, 17 (1922).
optimum concentration for acid, the 5 (2) Cline, R. E., Fink, R. M., ANAL.
ml. per 100 ml. was chosen beoause it is laboratory t h a t had been analyzed by CHEM.28,47 (1956).
about the maximum. a diacetyl method (S),modified for use (3) Dickenman, R. C . , Craits, B., Zak,B.,
Effect of Temperature. The effect with automatic pipets. Results with Am. J.Clan. Pathol.. 24,981 (1954).
the PDAB procedure ran lower by 1 to (4) Nadai, Y., J. Btochem. (Tokyo) 45,
of temperature was not investigated 387 (1958).
in this study. However, W a t t and 2 mg. of urea nitrogen per 100 ml. (5) Watt, G. W., Chrisp, J. D., ANAL.
Chrisp (6) reported a temperature co- Filtrates of the water blank, stand- CHEM. 26,452 (1954).
efficient of 0.6% absolute transmittancy ards, and unknowns without sulfa
per 1 C. over the range of 20" to 40" C. drugs were then treated with the urease RECEIVED for review April 8, 1959.
O

solution as described in the procedure, Acce ted A u p t 5, 1959. Presented in


with urea solutions of 80 to 160 part Lfore Division of Biological Chemis-
p.p.m. and with their less concentrated and the color reagent was added. The try,.135th Meeting, ACS, Boston, Maaa.,
color reagent. They found the effect unknowns had absorbances that aver- A4prd1959.

1846 e ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

You might also like