Professional Documents
Culture Documents
researchers from Cornell University’s Weill Medical College in the year 1999. A search
of EBSCO host search engines did not reveal any articles since 2000 which revised the
original instrument. Search terms were “CASPI” and “child adolescent suicidal potential
index”. As with many instruments, subsequent researchers are often not aware of existing
knowledge beyond those commonly employed, and so that may be why it has not been
widely used.
instruments and their own questions into the CASPI. Since these researchers are
measuring suicidal potential rather than ideation the questions are broad based and
include social factors such as school and home life. They carefully tested the validity of
CASPI had a .76 score which the authors report is consistent with other testing
instruments. The retest was conducted two weeks after the initial screening, which could
be a factor in its high reliability score. The CASPI instrument was measured against
known suicidal potential in the population sampled in order to assess its true validity.
enough neutrality that children and adolescents could answer them honestly. The
subpopulation of young children (less than 13 years old) is notoriously hard to assess, but
this instrument appears to be consistent and valid even with younger children. It was
more consistent and valid with older children, however (up to 96 percent accurate in
distinguishing levels of suicidal potential). This instrument was tested with a significant
number of students with a diverse cross section of socio-economic circumstances and
ethnicities. This is a key element which is sometimes lacking in validating other self-
reporting instruments. It also asks questions about family history, which is an important
indicator of suicidal potentiality that is sometimes left out of other reporting instruments.
participant completes them honestly, they will measure suicidal potential. Self-reporting
conjunction with direct observation by adult authority figures, parental involvement, and
screens for adolescents. Because it was measured against known suicidal potential and
appears to be highly accurate, this instrument could safely be used by other researchers or
by interested professionals as another tool in the suicide prevention arsenal. The authors
note that a high number of false positives is to be expected when administering the
CASPI to a general population, so it should not be relied upon to truly predict behavior in