Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Home » Forums » Mechanical Engineers » Activities » Mechanical engineering general discussion Forum
SPONSORED SEARCHES
pipe thread stress calculator pipe thread shear strength
I am trying to calculate the maximum pressure a threaded pipe fitting may withstand when the fitting has a NPT thread (1/4 -18
NPT). The failure mode I am worried about is excess shear load through the thread teeth. For this calculation I cannot determine
shear area though the threads (because of the taper), nor can I easily determine length of engagement for an NPT thread.
http://bellsouthpwp.net/r/s/rsnmar/METhreads.zip
In your case, 1/4 NPT with an 18 TPI is virtually midway between 1/2 - 18 UNS-2G and 9/16 - 18 UNF-2G threading profiles. What I
suggest is that a thread mid range between pin specifications behaves "somewhat like" that of a 1/4 NPT when loaded in shear.
Therefore it stands to reason that the 1/4 MNPT with major, pitch and minor maximum diameters of 0.536, 0.492, 0.447 inches
respectively has the same shear area as a 17/32 UN thread, 18 TPI with thread classification tolerance near that of a coarse
profile. I utilize a thread program, computations have been standardized or looked up in the Machinist Handbook, and obtain an
equivalent major, pitch and minor pin diameter of 0.530, 0.494, 0.465 inches. What I am suggesting is that the 1/4 MNPT thread
behaves like 17/32 - 18 UNC-2G.
Apply the threading computations for Unified National, ANSI B1.1-1982, noting that any thread pin with shear prior to the box (i.e.
shear area of the screw is LESS than that of the nut) for maximum internal minor diameter of 0.484 inches, minimum external pitch
diameter of 0.490 inches and find the screw shear area is 0.854 in^2 per unit length thread engagement.
When a NPT thread seals, although all threads are engaged between pin and box, typically only a few threads act to seal the
joint. In the literature, computations use only one single thread. Therefore the effective length is around 0.047 inches, resulting in
a screw shear area of 0.041 in^2. Naturally this is purely ficticous, when the threaded joint fails in shear we would expect all
threads along the effective length of engagement to let go similtaneously. For the purpose of calculation, we recognize the single
thread shear area method.
Hence, applying normal fracture mechanics, the pressure required to load a MNPT joint to failure is simply the product of pin shear
area, material yield in shear divided by area of the thread seal, 0.492 inches in our case. The resulting mathematics suggests a
pressure of 4700 psi assuming your material is Atlas T316 Stainless Steel. (TY = 22 ksi, Average Shear Theory)
Consulting industry specifications such as Swagelok, Parker-Hannifin, etc typical joint operating pressures are 4500 psi typical, never
to exceed 5000 psi as a rule of thumb. Apparently our computation bears this out.
I hope this helps you out. My gut feeling with stainless fittings is to stay below 3000 psi.
There are several outstanding reasons for it, the mechanics of the thread necessarily imply swaging the joint to specifications in
order to provide a seal capable of carrying 10 or 20 ksi. Just gripping the pipe will necessitate external wall scaring while torsion is
/
applied. Then there is wall allowance; obviously the joint must be able to withstand the stresses, i.e. Theory of Elasticity for
Pressure Vessels. Typically the annulus are small, you need thick walls, perhaps the application cannot withstand choked or
resticted flow, i.e. inlet feed to a pump. And what about shear? NPT threads cannot withstand transverse loading, they have a
tendancy to bend at the last thread. The industry uses the notion of a fotbol to stabilize the joint should you need to carry weight
lateral to the connection. And of course there is a material concern. Typically ferrous connections govern higher pressure ratings,
stainless sometimes and brass never. Oilfield applications, my personal experience, do not use brass, yellow metal is forbidden
since geological formations begin to yield sulfide bearing gases as the water tables begin to rise. Stainless is suspectable to pitting,
chloride radial surface attack. I guess my judgement is one biased upon as a seasoned professional.
You are correct however, in noting prominent companies using elevated pressures. However, almost all note the maximum fitting
working pressure is limited to the lowest NPT rating! Female pipe end ratings are typically much lower than their male counterparts
of a given size, this is due to the geometry, inner/outer diameters for female threads are larger than those for male threads, i.e.
higher stresses.
Cockroach -
I like the idea of your approach very much - it seems practical and no one can deny your experience with it, although I am not clear
on some of your terminology. What do you mean by "pin" and "box"? More importantly, you stated the NPT thread was "mid range
between pin specifications" of the 1/2-18 UNS-2G and 9/16-18 UNF-2G. Please elaborate on this. Also I am not clear on the "G"
modifyer on your thread designations. I am only used to seeing "A" or "B" indicating external or internal thread.
b) Recall that our methodology is to find an equivalent Unified National thread that is representative of your 1/4 NPT profile. Since
the most important dimension of a thread is the pitch diameter, I suggest finding a UN thread closely matched by PD. The problem
is that the pipe thread is inclined, therefore I use the handtight engagement as the "mean" pitch diameter for the NPT, 0.49163
inches in our situation. This is slightly larger than a 1/2 - 18 UNS-2G, but slightly smaller than a 9/16 - 18 UNF-2G thread. Suppose
we split the difference and use the average between the two threads. This means I am searching for a thread with pitch diameter
(0.463+0.525)/2 = 0.494 inches, i.e. mid range specification. This leads to a 17/32 bastardized thread which must have the same
pitch as the NPT, 18 TPI in our case. Finally, pick the UN thread class according to NPT thread height, 0.04444 inches. The one I
picked was 0.03250 inches, there may be one that is closer, but I ran with 17/32 - 18 UNC-2G.
c)Yeah, sorry about that! "G" references the thread fit, in our case class 2, which tells me something about the thread tolerancing
applied in the calculations. You are absolutely correct in noting that "A" is the pin (screw-external) and "B" as the box (nut-
internal). For UN threads we are permitted up to five (5) classes, 2 is what you would find as a commercial available size for
example, i.e. off-the-shelf.
Just as a quick note, NPT profiles are specified by ANSI B1.20.3-1976, which is a revised designation of ANSI B2.2-1968. This same
specification was reaffirmed in 1998. The layout is almost exact to that for UN threads, ANSI B1.1-1982 EXCEPT there is absolutely
/
no appendix discussing fracture mechanics on thread performance. I find this curious, have been perplexed by it, inquired at
several committee meetings to no avail. I remain perplexed and since, developed this method. You may find an old inquiry I
floated in this website regarding this issue, but I have never seen, heard or otherwise given information on a solution to this
problem. What is clear to me now is that others have these same problems!
Join | Advertise