Professional Documents
Culture Documents
yes answer no
New research
conclusions
Project design
And structure it
Structure of a scientific paper
Title Results
Authors’ names and Discussion
affiliation Conclusions
Abstract, keywords Acknowledgements
Introduction References
Material and methods Annexes
TITLE
The title should inform accurately about the
content of the manuscript without ambiguities.
Why is important the title?
Most of information retrieval services,
browsers or data bases use titles to
elaborate their indexes, so the more
accurate and concise the better to its
specific dissemination and retrieval.
Basic characteristics of a
title
Informative
Brief
Specific
Accurate
Concise
Unambiguous
Authors’ names and
affiliations
Use always the same name (signature) to avoid
any confussion within the scientific community.
A “reliable name” is advisable. Identify the
author for correspondence (with *).
Give the complete name and address of the
institutions or centers the authors belong to.
Currently e-mails are also given.
Abstract
The abstract, summary or synopsis is, like the
title, one element within the manuscript of
relevant importance. The retrieval of the paper
and its reading depend greatly on it. Therefore it
should provide the concise information to
indicate whether the paper fulfils our
expectations.The main feature of an abstract is its
size. In very few words (200-300) the abstract
should inform about the main aspects of the
manuscripts and respond to why, what, how and
the results and their interpretation.
Keywords
Keywords have not to be “empty
words” or express generalities. Their
source could come from:
Descriptors from a thesaurus
Free text
Characteristics of an abstract
Abstract
Content Format
Brief Informative Structured Single paragraph
Concise Condensed
Samples, sampling
Individuals
Material (origin if neccesary)
Methods (references and brief description)
Statistical methods (packages, software..)
Equations. Internationally nomenclature accepted
Results
S. Harvard S. Vancouver
(Name and year) (numerical sequence)
Long Obscure
Jargonized
MANUSCRIPTS
Redundant Ambiguous
Manuscripts
The clearer
The
Better The
The more more arresting
concise
Does your paper answer
these questions?
Why? introduction
How?
material + methods
What did you find?
results
What does it mean?
discussion
Check the accuracy of the
data in tables and figures
2nd draft
Review the content,
data, references
Final manuscript
Submission and
Editorial processing
Journal
Peer review
Author
2nd version
in house review