Refer to ​this doc ​for help. Instructions begin at page 7. Each person has their matrix to fill in.

Concept we selected:
Design 2 (Dashed Line) since it seems the most pragmatic and simple of the 3 while also staying
environmentally friendly.

Team Matrix:
Value Scale 1-10
10 good - 1 bad

Evaluation Design 1 Design 2 Design 3

Criteria (Solid Line) (Dashed Line) (Dotted Line)

Wt. Val₁ Wt.*Val Val₂ Wt.*Val Val₃ Wt.*Val

₁ ₂ ₃

Consistency of 0.125 2 0.25 10 1.25 5 0.625

Power
Generation

Energy Storage 0.1 7 0.7 7 0.7 7 0.7

Pollution 0.05 10 0.5 5 0.25 10 0.5

Simplicity of 0.075 5 0.375 7 0.525 1 0.075

materials

Adaptability 0.15 7 1.05 8 1.20 3 0.45

Cost of materials 0.1 6 0.6 10 1.0 1 0.1

Robustness of 0.15 7 1.05 8 1.20 4 0.6

Design (how
reliable)

Minimization of 0.025 7 0.175 7 0.175 3 0.075

Parts Used

Independence of 0.15 6 0.9 10 1.5 4 0.6

Functions

Ease of 0.075 3 0.225 9 0.675 1 0.075

Installation

Total 1 6.075 8.375 4.25

Tyler’s Matrix:
Value Scale 1-10
Evaluation Design 1 Design 2 Design 3
Criteria (Solid Line) (Dashed Line) (Dotted Line)

Wt. Val₁ Wt.*Val Val₂ Wt.*Val Val₃ Wt.*Val

₁ ₂ ₃

Consistency of 0.125 2 0.25 10 1.25 5 0.625

Power
Generation

Energy Storage 0.1 7 0.7 7 0.7 7 0.7

Pollution 0.05 10 0.5 5 0.25 10 0.5

Simplicity of 0.075 5 0.375 7 0.525 1 0.075

materials

Adaptability 0.15 7 1.05 8 1.20 3 0.45

Cost of materials 0.1 6 0.6 10 1.0 1 0.1

Robustness of 0.15 7 1.05 8 1.20 4 0.6

Design (how
reliable)

Minimization of 0.025 7 0.175 7 0.175 3 0.075

Parts Used

Independence of 0.15 6 0.9 10 1.5 4 0.6

Functions

Ease of 0.075 3 0.225 9 0.675 1 0.075

Installation

Total 1 6.075 8.375 4.25

Alex’s Matrix:
Value Scale 1-10
Evaluation Design 1 Design 2 Design 3
Criteria (Solid Line) (Dashed Line) (Dotted Line)

Wt. Val₁ Wt.*Val Val₂ Wt.*Val Val₃ Wt.*Val

₁ ₂ ₃

Consistency of 0.1 4 0.4 7 0.7 8 0.8

Power
Generation

Energy Storage 0.15 10 1.5 10 1.5 10 1.5

Pollution 0.05 10 1.5 8 0.4 10 0.5

Simplicity 0.15 3 0.45 6 0.9 0 0

Adaptability 0.1 0 0 5 0.5 5 0.5

Cost of materials 0.05 3 0.15 7 0.35 0 0

Robustness of 0.1 4 0.4 5 0.5 3 0.3

Design

Minimization of 0.1 3 0.3 7 0.7 0 0

Parts Used

Independence of 0.1 8 0.8 8 0.8 8 0.8

Functions

Ease of 0.1 3 0.3 7 0.7 1 0.1

Installation

Total 1 49 5.4 63 7.05 45 4.5

Jackson’s Matrix:
Value Scale 1-10
Evaluation Design 1 Design 2 Design 3
Criteria (Solid Line) (Dashed Line) (Dotted Line)

Wt. Val₁ Wt.*Val Val₂ Wt.*Val Val₃ Wt.*Val

₁ ₂ ₃

Consistency of .2 4 .8 7 1.4 8 1.6

Power
Generation

Energy Storage .15 10 1.5 10 1.5 10 1.5

Pollution .2 10 2 9 1.8 10 2

Simplicity .1 7 .7 7 .7 4 .4

Adaptability .05 7 .35 6 .3 5 .25

Cost of materials .1 8 .8 8 .8 8 .8

Robustness of .025 5 .125 5 .125 3 .075

Design

Minimization of .05 5 .25 5 .25 2 .1

Parts Used

Independence of .1 6 .6 7 .7 8 .8
Functions

Ease of .025 5 .125 6 .15 1 .025

Installation

Total 1 67 7.25 70 7.725 59 7.55

Ty’s Matrix:
Value Scale 1-10
Evaluation Design 1 Design 2 Design 3
Criteria (Solid Line) (Dashed Line) (Dotted Line)

Wt. Val₁ Wt.*Val Val₂ Wt.*Val Val₃ Wt.*Val

₁ ₂ ₃

Consistency of .1
Power
Generation

Energy Storage .025

Pollution .1

Simplicity .2

Adaptability .25

Cost of materials .1

Robustness of
Design

Minimization of
Parts Used

Independence of .025
Functions

Ease of 0.05
Installation

Total 1