Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011) © BSI
A N I N T E R N AT I O N A L CO D E
Supplement 1
The new and revised Cases that appear in this Supplement were considered at the Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Committee meeting of February 5, 2010, and approved by the Board on Nuclear Codes and
Standards on April 9, 2010.
Copyright © 2010 by
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
All rights reserved
Printed in U.S.A.
NC – SUPP. 1
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Replace or insert the following pages. (Unlisted Index pages have not been changed; unlisted Case
pages of revised Cases are only included to show the revised Case number.)
SUBJECT INDEX
Affected Page: xvii–xxi N-729-2 1–13
N-776 1
APPLICABILITY INDEX FOR SECTION N-780 1, 2
XI CASES N-784 1
Affected Pages: xxxvii–xxxix N-788 1, 2
(c) NC – SUPP. 1
Annulled Date/
Case Approval Date Errata Superseded (S)
xiii NC – SUPP. 1
Annulled Date/
Case Approval Date Errata Superseded (S)
NC – SUPP. 1 xiv
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
xvii NC – SUPP. 1
NC – SUPP. 1 xviii
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
xix NC – SUPP. 1
NC – SUPP. 1 xx
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
xxi NC – SUPP. 1
xxii
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
N-694-1 Evaluation Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for PWR 1983 Edition 2001 Edition with the
Reactor Vessel Head Penetration Nozzles 2003 Addenda
N-695 Qualification Requirements for Dissimilar Metal Piping 1989 Edition with the 2001 Edition with the
Welds 1989 Addenda 2003 Addenda
N-696 Qualification Requirements for Appendix VIII Piping 1989 Edition with the 2001 Edition with the
Examinations Conducted From the Inside Surface 1989 Addenda 2003 Addenda
N-697 Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Examination and 1977 Edition 2001 Edition with the
Alternative Examination Requirements for Pressure 2003 Addenda
Retaining Welds in Control Rod Drive and
Instrument Nozzle Housings
N-700 Alternative Rules for Selection of Classes 1, 2, and 3 1995 Edition with the 2001 Edition with the
Vessel Welded Attachments for Examination 1996 Addenda 2003 Addenda
N-702 Alternative Requirements for Boiling Water Reactor 1986 Edition 2007 Edition with the
(BWR) Nozzle Inner Radius and Nozzle-to-Shell 2008 Addenda
Welds
N-705 Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of 1983 Edition with the 2007 Edition with the
Degradation in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Winter 1985 Addenda 2008 Addenda
Vessels and Tanks
N-706 Alternative Examination Requirements to Table 1977 Edition 2004 Edition with the
IWB-2500-1 and Table IWC-2500-1 for PWR 2005 Addenda
Stainless Steel Residual and Regenerative Heat
Exchangers
N-706-1 Alternative Examination Requirements to Table 1977 Edition 2007 Edition with the
IWB-2500-1 and Table IWC-2500-1 for PWR 2008 Addenda
Stainless Steel Residual and Regenerative Heat
Exchangers
N-711 Alternative Examination Coverage Requirements for 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Examination Category B-F, B-J, C-F-1, C-F-2, and 2008 Addenda
R-A Piping Welds
N-712 Class 1 Socket Weld Examinations 1986 Edition 2007 Edition with the
2008 Addenda
N-713 Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography 1986 Edition 2007 Edition with the
2008 Addenda
N-716 Alternative Piping Classification and Examination 1989 Edition 2004 Edition with the
Requirements 2006 Addenda
N-722 Additional Examinations for PWR Pressure Retaining 1980 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Welds in Class 1 Components Fabricated With Alloy 2008 Addenda
600/82/182 Materials
N-722-1 Additional Examinations for PWR Pressure Retaining 1980 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Welds in Class 1 Components Fabricated With Alloy 2008 Addenda
600/82/182 Materials
N-729 Alternative Examination Requirements for PWR 1980 Edition 2004 Edition
Reactor Vessel Upper Heads With Nozzles Having
Pressure-Retaining Partial-Penetration Welds
N-729-1 Alternative Examination Requirements for PWR 1980 Edition 2004 Edition
Reactor Vessel Upper Heads With Nozzles Having
Pressure-Retaining Partial-Penetration Welds
N-729-2 Alternative Examination Requirements for PWR 1980 Edition 2004 Edition
Reactor Vessel Upper Heads With Nozzles Having
Pressure-Retaining Partial-Penetration Welds
N-730 Roll Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive Bottom 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Head Penetrations in BWRs 2008 Addenda
xxxvii NC – SUPP. 1
N-731 Alternative Class 1 System Leakage Test Pressure 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Requirements 2008 Addenda
N-733 Mitigation of Flaws in NPS 2 (DN 50) and Smaller 1983 Edition 2004 Edition with the
Nozzles and Nozzle Partial Penetration Welds in 2006 Addenda
Vessels and Piping by Use of a Mechanical
Connection Modification
N-735 Successive Inspections of Class 1 and 2 Piping Welds 1995 Edition with the 2007 Edition with the
1996 Addenda 2008 Addenda
N-739 Alternative Qualification Requirements for Personnel 1992 Edition with the 2004 Edition with the
Performing Class CC Concrete and Post-tensioning 1992 Addenda 2006 Addenda
System Visual Examinations
N-739-1 Alternative Qualification Requirements for Personnel 1992 Edition with the 2004 Edition with the
Performing Class CC Concrete and Post-tensioning 1992 Addenda 2006 Addenda
System Visual Examinations
N-740 Dissimilar Metal Weld Overlay for Repair of Class 1, 1980 Edition with Winter 2004 Edition with the
2, and 3 Items 1981 Addenda 2006 Addenda
N-740-1 Dissimilar Metal Weld Overlay for Repair or 1980 Edition with Winter 2004 Edition with the
Mitigation of Class 1, 2, and 3 Items 1981 Addenda 2006 Addenda
N-740-2 Full Structural Dissimilar Metal Weld Overlay for 1986 Edition with the 2007 Edition with the
Repair or Mitigation of Class 1, 2, and 3 Items 1988 Addenda 2008 Addenda
N-747 Reactor Vessel Head-to-Flange Weld Examination 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
2008 Addenda
N-751 Pressure Testing of Containment Penetration Piping 1989 Edition 2004 Edition with the
2006 Addenda
N-753 Vision Tests 1986 Edition with the 2004 Edition with the
1988 Addenda 2006 Addenda
N-755 Use of Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe 1995 Edition with the 2007 Edition with the
1995 Addenda 2008 Addenda
N-762 Temper Bead Procedure Qualification Requirements for 1995 Edition with the 2007 Edition with the
Repair/Replacement Activities Without Postweld 1995 Addenda 2008 Addenda
Heat Treatment
N-765 Alternative to Inspection Interval Scheduling 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Requirements of IWA-2430 2008 Addenda
N-769 Roll Expansion of Class 1 In-Core Housing Bottom 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Head Penetrations in BWRs 2008 Addenda
N-770 Alternative Examination Requirements and Acceptance 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Standards for Class 1 PWR Piping and Vessel 2008 Addenda
Nozzle Butt Welds Fabricated With UNS N06082 or
UNS W86182 Weld Filler Material With or Without
Application of Listed Mitigation Activities
N-770-1 Alternative Examination Requirements and Acceptance 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Standards for Class 1 PWR Piping and Vessel 2008 Addenda
Nozzle Butt Welds Fabricated With UNS N06082 or
UNS W86182 Weld Filler Material With or Without
Application of Listed Mitigation Activities
N-773 Alternative Qualification Criteria for Eddy Current 1995 Edition with the 2007 Edition with the
Examinations of Piping Inside Surfaces 1996 Addenda 2008 Addenda
N-776 Alternative to IWA-5244 Requirements for Buried 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
Piping 2010 Edition
N-778 Alternative Requirements for Preparation and Submittal 1989 Edition 2007 Edition with the
of Plans, Schedules, and Preservice and Inservice 2009 Addenda
Inspection Summary Reports
NC – SUPP. 1 xxxviii
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
N-780 Alternative Requirements for Upgrade, Substitution, or 1989 Edition with the 2010 Edition
Reconfiguration of Examination Equipment When 1989 Addenda
Using Appendix VIII Qualified Ultrasonic
Examination Systems
N-784 Experience Credit for Ultrasonic Examiner Certification 1995 Edition 2010 Edition
N-788 Third Party NDE Certification Organizations 1995 Edition 2010 Edition
NOTES:
(1) Applies to the 1974 Edition of Section V.
(2) Applies to the 1974 Edition with the Winter 1976 Addenda of Section V.
(3) Applies to the 1980 Edition of Section V.
xxxix NC – SUPP. 1
xl
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
CASE
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE N-729-2
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
The Committee’s function is to establish rules of safety, relating only to pressure integrity, governing the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks
and nuclear components, and inservice inspection for pressure integrity of nuclear components and transport tanks, and to interpret these rules when questions arise
regarding their intent. This Code does not address other safety issues relating to the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks and nuclear components,
and the inservice inspection of nuclear components and transport tanks. The user of the Code should refer to other pertinent codes, standards, laws, regulations or
other relevant documents.
1 (N-729-2) NC – SUPP. 1
TABLE 1
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
NC – SUPP. 1
CLASS 1 PWR REACTOR VESSEL UPPER HEAD
N-729-2
Examination Deferral of
Item Requirements/ Examination Acceptance Examination to
CASE (continued)
No. Parts Examined Fig. No. Method Standard Extent and Frequency of Examination End of Interval
B4.10 Head with UNS N06600 nozzles and UNS Fig. 1 Visual, VE -3140 Each refueling outage (3), (4) Not permissible
N06082 or UNS W86182 partial penetra- (1), (2)
tion welds
B4.20 UNS N06600 nozzles and UNS N06082 or Fig. 2 (5) Volumetric (6) -3130 All nozzles, every 8 calendar years or Not permissible
UNS W86182 partial-penetration welds in Surface (6) before RIYp2.25, whichever is less
head (7), (8), (9), (10)
B4.30 Head with nozzles and partial-penetration Fig. 1 Visual, VE -3140 Every third refueling outage or 5 calendar Not permissible
welds of PWSCC-resistant materials (1), (2) years, whichever is less (3)
B4.40 Nozzles and partial-penetration welds of Fig. 2 (5) Volumetric (6) -3130 All nozzles, not to exceed one inspection Not permissible
PWSCC-resistant materials in head Surface (6) interval (nominally 10 calendar years)
(8), (10)
NOTES:
(1) The VE shall consist of the following:
(a) A direct examination of the bare-metal surface of the entire outer surface of the head, including essentially 100% of the intersection of each nozzle with the head. If welded or bolted
2 (N-729-2)
obstructions are present (i.e., mirror insulation, insulation support feet, shroud support ring/lug), the examination shall include ≥95% of the area in the region of the nozzles as defined
in Fig. 1 and the head surface uphill and downhill of any such obstructions. The examination may be performed with insulation in place using remote equipment that provides resolution
of the component metal surface equivalent to a bare-metal direct examination.
(b) The examination may be performed with the system depressurized.
(c) The examination shall be performed with an illumination level and a sufficient distance to allow resolution of lower case characters not greater than 0.105 in. (2.7 mm) in height.
(2) Personnel performing the VE shall be qualified as a VT-2 visual examiner and shall have completed at least four (4) hr of additional training in detection of borated water leakage from
UNS N06600, UNS N06082 or UNS W86182 components and the resulting boric acid corrosion of adjacent ferritic steel components.
(3) Examination may be performed with the system depressurized.
(4) If EDY < 8 and no flaws unacceptable for continued service under -3130 or -3140 have been detected, the reexamination frequency may be extended to every third refueling outage or 5
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE
calendar years, whichever is less, provided an IWA-2212 VT-2 visual examination of the head is performed under the insulation through multiple access points in outages that the VE is not
TABLE 1
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES (CONT’D)
NOTES (CONT’D):
(7) If not previously performed, baseline volumetric and surface examinations shall be performed.
(a) for plants with EDY > 12, at the next refueling outage,
(b) for plants with EDY ≥ 8 and EDY ≤ 12, no later than the second refueling outage, or,
(c) for plants with EDY < 8, no later than February 10, 2008.
(8) If flaws have previously been detected that were unacceptable for continued service in accordance with -3132.3 or that were corrected by a repair/replacement activity of -3132.2 or
3 (N-729-2)
-3142.3(b), the reexamination frequency is the more frequent of the normal reexamination frequency (before RIYp2.25) or every second refueling outage, and [Note (9)] does not apply.
Additionally, repaired areas shall be examined during the next refueling outage following the repair.
(9) Reexamination may be extended to RIYp3, not to exceed nominal 10 calendar years, if either of the following apply:
(a) previous examination was Level 1, or
(b) previous examination was Level 2 and plant-specific bounding LOCA CCDP ≤ 5 ⴛ 10−3
(10) Includes essentially 100% of surface or volume.
NC – SUPP. 1 4 (N-729-2)
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
CASE (continued)
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE N-729-2
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
D1
Support lug
Shroud
Flange
.
in m)
1.0 25 m Service structure
(
Insulation
Shroud
Vessel head
Ro
冤
A p 2Ro Ro – 冪Ro2 – (D1 /2)2 冥
Aobstruct p area on head outer surface obstructed within D1
A – Aobstruct
≥ 0.95
A
5 (N-729-2) NC – SUPP. 1
FIG. 2 EXAMINATION VOLUME FOR NOZZLE BASE METAL AND EXAMINATION AREA
FOR WELD AND NOZZLE BASE METAL
B • •A A • •B
a
• •G
F
Buttering
E' • •E
E • •E'
•G •F a
C • •D D • •C
Stainless steel
cladding
a p 1.5 in. (38 mm) for Incidence Angle, , ≤ 30 deg and for all nozzles ≥ 4.5 in. (115 mm) OD or 1 in. (25 mm) for Incidence
Angle, , > 30 deg; or to the end of the tube, whichever is less
A-B-C-D p extent of volumetric examination for the tube (base metal)
A-D p extent of surface examination for the tube inside surface
G-F p 1⁄4 in. (6 mm) from the theoretical point “F” in accordance with the design drawings, including tolerances, unless the point “F”
can be physically determined.
G-F-E-C p extent of surface examination for the J-groove weld (filler metal and buttering) and tube outside surface below the weld
G-F-E p extent of surface examination zone for the J-groove weld (filler metal and buttering)
NC – SUPP. 1 6 (N-729-2)
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
CASE (continued)
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE N-729-2
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
surface examination of the nozzle base material shall be (2) All relevant conditions shall be evaluated to deter-
considered planar. Prior to evaluation, the depth of linear mine the extent, if any, of degradation. The boric acid
indications shall be further characterized by volumetric crystals and residue shall be removed to the extent neces-
examination. If volumetric examination cannot be per- sary to allow adequate examinations and evaluation of
formed, the linear indication shall be assumed to be planar degradation, and a subsequent VE of the previously
and through-wall. obscured surfaces shall be performed, prior to return to
service, and again in the subsequent refueling outage. Any
-3132.2 Acceptance by Repair / Replacement Acti-
degradation detected shall be evaluated to determine if
vity. A component whose volumetric or surface examina-
any corrosion has impacted the structural integrity of the
tion reveals a leak or flaw not acceptable for continued
component. Corrosion that has reduced component wall
service in accordance with the provisions of -3132.3 is
thickness below design limits shall be resolved through
unacceptable for continued service until the additional
repair / replacement activity in accordance with IWA-4000.
exams of -2430 are satisfied and the component is corrected
(c) A nozzle whose VE indicates relevant conditions
by a repair / replacement activity to the extent necessary to
indicative of possible nozzle leakage shall be unacceptable
meet the acceptance standards of -3000.
for continued service unless it meets the requirements of
-3132.3 Acceptance by Analytical Evaluation. A -3142.2 or -3142.3.
component whose volumetric examination detects planar
flaws or whose surface examination detects linear indica- -3142.2 Acceptance by Supplemental Examination.
tions which are assumed to be planar, is acceptable for A nozzle with relevant conditions indicative of possible
continued service without repair/ replacement activity if nozzle leakage shall be acceptable for continued service
an analytical evaluation meets the requirements of if the results of supplemental examinations [-3200(b)] meet
IWB-3660 of the 2004 Edition. The area containing the the requirements of -3130.
flaw shall be reexamined in accordance with -2420(a) -3142.3 Acceptance by Corrective Measures or
and (b). Repair /Replacement Activity
(a) A component with relevant conditions not indicative
of possible nozzle leakage is acceptable for continued ser-
-3140 INSERVICE VISUAL EXAMINATIONS vice if the source of the relevant condition is corrected by
(VE) a repair / replacement activity or by corrective measures
-3141 General necessary to preclude degradation.
(a) The VE required by -2500 and performed in accor- (b) A component with relevant conditions indicative of
dance with IWA-2200 and the additional requirements of possible nozzle leakage shall be acceptable for continued
this Case shall be evaluated by comparing the examination service if a repair/replacement activity corrects the defect
results with the acceptance standards specified in -3142.1. in accordance with IWA-4000.
(b) Acceptance of components for continued service
shall be in accordance with -3142.
(c) Relevant conditions for the purposes of the VE shall -3200 SUPPLEMENTAL EXAMINATIONS
include areas of corrosion, boric acid deposits, discolor-
ation, and other evidence of nozzle leakage. (a) Volumetric or surface examinations that detect flaws
which require evaluation in accordance with -3130 may
be supplemented by other techniques to characterize the
-3142 Acceptance flaw (i.e., size, shape, and orientation).
-3142.1 Acceptance by VE (b) The supplemental examination performed to satisfy
(a) A component whose VE confirms the absence of -3142.2 shall include volumetric examination of the nozzle
relevant conditions shall be acceptable for continued tube and surface examination of the partial-penetration
service. weld, or surface examination of the nozzle tube inside
(b) A component whose VE detects a relevant condition surface, the partial penetration weld, and nozzle tube out-
shall be unacceptable for continued service until the side surface below the weld, in acccordance with Fig. 2,
requirements of -3142.1(b)(1), (b)(2), and (c) below are or the alternative examination area or volume shall be
met. analyzed to be acceptable in accordance with Mandatory
(1) Components with relevant conditions require fur- Appendix I. The supplemental examinations shall be used
ther evaluation. This evaluation shall include determination to determine the extent of the unacceptable conditions and
of the source of the leakage and correction of the source the need for corrective measures, analytical evaluation, or
of leakage in accordance with -3142.3. repair / replacement activity.
7 (N-729-2) NC – SUPP. 1
NC – SUPP. 1 8 (N-729-2)
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
CASE (continued)
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE N-729-2
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
MANDATORY APPENDIX I
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE FOR ALTERNATIVE
EXAMINATION AREA OR VOLUME DEFINITION
9 (N-729-2) NC – SUPP. 1
FIG. I-1 CIRCUMFERENTIAL FLAW ASSUMPTION FOR ELIMINATION OF PORTIONS OF THE REQUIRED
EXAMINATION ZONE ABOVE J-GROOVE WELD
Nozzle
Postulated
circumferential
crack assumptions
(30 deg uphill or downhill
through-wall cracks)
RPV head
Unexamined
zone above
weld
To
p
of
Bo
w
tto
el
d
m
of
w
el
d
Examination
zone
NC – SUPP. 1 10 (N-729-2)
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
CASE (continued)
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE N-729-2
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
FIG. I-2 AXIAL FLAW ASSUMPTION FOR ELIMINATION OF PORTIONS OF THE REQUIRED EXAMINATION ZONE
BELOW J-GROOVE WELD
Nozzle
RPV head
To
p
Examination
of
zone
w
Bo
el
tto
d
m
of
Unexamined zone
w
el
below weld
d
Permissible
crack growth
to edge of weld End of
tensile
stress
Postulated region
through-wall
crack below weld
11 (N-729-2) NC – SUPP. 1
upper extremity of an axial through-wall crack would not (b) Method 2. If acceptability cannot be demonstrated
propagate to the toe of the J-groove weld prior to the next using Method 1, the following shall be performed.
scheduled examination. (1) Review the available UT examination data and
The crack growth calculation shall be performed based demonstrate that the as-built J-groove weld depth is larger
on the following: than the as-designed weld depth.
(1) The initial axial through-wall crack size shall be (2) Determine the hoop stress distribution in the por-
determined by assuming its upper extremity to be initially tion of the nozzle below the weld by performing a stress
located at the bottom edge of the alternative examination analysis based on the as-built J-groove weld configuration.
zone and the lower extremity to be located where either (3) Perform the crack growth calculation of Method
the inside or the outside surface hoop stress becomes com- 1, using the hoop stress distribution for the as-built config-
uration.
pressive (Fig. I-2).
(2) If the hoop stress remains tensile for the entire
portion of the nozzle below the weld, an axial through- I-4000 PROBABILISTIC FRACTURE
wall crack shall be postulated from the bottom edge of the MECHANICS ANALYSIS
alternative examination zone to the bottom of the nozzle These provisions shall not be applied to heads having
(Fig. I-3). prior PWSCC in nozzles or J-groove welds that required
(3) The average of inside and outside surface hoop repair/replacement activity. Calculate the percentage of the
stresses shall be applied along the entire length of the total required examination zone defined in Fig. 2, for all
assumed through-wall crack. nozzles in the head, that will be eliminated. Demonstrate,
using a probabilistic fracture mechanics method, that the
(4) The postulated axial flaw shall be located in the
total eliminated examination zone in all nozzles does not
unexamined zone at the azimuthal location that results in
lead to unacceptable probabilities of leakage and nozzle
the shortest time to reexamination.
ejection prior to the next required examination. A probabil-
(5) The stress intensity factor for an axial through- ity of leakage no greater than 5% per vessel per year and
wall crack in a cylinder shall be used. a probability of core damage associated with the potential
(6) Crack growth rate determination shall be in accor- for nozzle ejection no greater than 1ⴛ10−6 per vessel per
dance with Appendix O of Section XI, in the 2004 Edition. year are acceptable.
NC – SUPP. 1 12 (N-729-2)
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
CASE (continued)
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE N-729-2
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
FIG. I-3 AXIAL FLAW ASSUMPTION FOR ELIMINATION OF PORTIONS OF THE REQUIRED EXAMINATION ZONE
BELOW J-GROOVE WELD (TENSILE STRESS TO BOTTOM OF NOZZLE)
Nozzle
RPV head
To
p
Examination
of
zone
w
Bo
el
tto
d
m
of
Unexamined zone
w
el
below weld
d
Permissible
crack growth
to edge of weld
Postulated through-wall
crack below weld
13 (N-729-2) NC – SUPP. 1
The Committee’s function is to establish rules of safety, relating only to pressure integrity, governing the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks
and nuclear components, and inservice inspection for pressure integrity of nuclear components and transport tanks, and to interpret these rules when questions arise
regarding their intent. This Code does not address other safety issues relating to the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks and nuclear components,
and the inservice inspection of nuclear components and transport tanks. The user of the Code should refer to other pertinent codes, standards, laws, regulations or
other relevant documents.
1 (N-776) NC – SUPP. 1
The Committee’s function is to establish rules of safety, relating only to pressure integrity, governing the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks
and nuclear components, and inservice inspection for pressure integrity of nuclear components and transport tanks, and to interpret these rules when questions arise
regarding their intent. This Code does not address other safety issues relating to the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks and nuclear components,
and the inservice inspection of nuclear components and transport tanks. The user of the Code should refer to other pertinent codes, standards, laws, regulations or
other relevant documents.
1 (N-780) NC – SUPP. 1
blind performance demonstration, or a PDA that has access such as a rectified waveform (A-scan) or side-view image
to the original qualification documentation. (B-scan) and shall be of the same form as the signals that
are used for flaw discrimination or sizing in the original
3 PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION procedure.
In addition to development of the technical justification 3.3 The examination system shall be modified to
described above, a Practical Demonstration shall be per- include the upgraded, substituted, or reconfigured ultra-
formed to provide evidence that the substituted ultrasonic sonic system component and shall be used to record signal
system component will not have an adverse affect on the presentations from the same reflectors or electronic signals.
performance of the procedure. The Practical Demonstration The results shall be documented as specified in 3.2.
need not be monitored by the PDA, however the PDA
3.4 The demonstration results obtained using the origi-
shall evaluate and approve results.
nal ultrasonic system component and the substituted com-
3.1 A set of at least three reflectors or signals shall ponent shall be evaluated for equivalency by the PDA
be selected that will demonstrate the performance of the using the discrimination criteria [i.e., VIII-2100(d)(9)] of
examination system over the normal sound path distance the original procedure. If the data presentations recorded
(near, far, and mid-range) within the scope of the proce- using the substituted component are equivalent to or better
dure. These reflectors may be flaws, artificial flaws (e.g., than those recorded using the original component, the sub-
machined holes or notches), or artificially-generated elec- stitution of the replacement component is acceptable.
tronic signals. If physical test specimens are used, they
may be blind or open specimens.
3.2 The examination system shall be configured as 4 DOCUMENTATION
specified in the originally-qualified procedure and shall be
used to record a signal presentation from each of the The acceptance document for the original procedure
selected reflectors or signals. If flaws or artificial flaws shall be amended to reflect the acceptability of the equip-
are used, signal presentations shall be collected with each ment substitution in accordance with this Case and shall be
model of transducer qualified for use with the procedure. issued to the user by the PDA. A copy of the documentation
If electronic signals are used, the signals shall be generated (Technical Justification, Practical Demonstration results,
using the lowest and highest transducer frequencies quali- and the amended acceptance document for the procedure)
fied for use with the procedure. The results shall be docu- shall be retained by the examination organization and the
mented in a manner that will allow independent evaluation, PDA as long as the procedure remains in use.
NC – SUPP. 1 2 (N-780)
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.
CASE
CASES OF ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE N-784
Licensed to Institut de Soudre Under License number (ASME 2010 004) until (31.10.2011) © BSI
The Committee’s function is to establish rules of safety, relating only to pressure integrity, governing the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks
and nuclear components, and inservice inspection for pressure integrity of nuclear components and transport tanks, and to interpret these rules when questions arise
regarding their intent. This Code does not address other safety issues relating to the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks and nuclear components,
and the inservice inspection of nuclear components and transport tanks. The user of the Code should refer to other pertinent codes, standards, laws, regulations or
other relevant documents.
1 (N-784) NC – SUPP. 1
The Committee’s function is to establish rules of safety, relating only to pressure integrity, governing the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks
and nuclear components, and inservice inspection for pressure integrity of nuclear components and transport tanks, and to interpret these rules when questions arise
regarding their intent. This Code does not address other safety issues relating to the construction of boilers, pressure vessels, transport tanks and nuclear components,
and the inservice inspection of nuclear components and transport tanks. The user of the Code should refer to other pertinent codes, standards, laws, regulations or
other relevant documents.
1 (N-788) NC – SUPP. 1
Party NDE Certification Organization shall keep a con- (c) Audits shall be performed in accordance with
trolled copy of the Manual on file and in a place and written procedures or checklists by personnel not having
manner readily available to the party performing the audit. direct responsibility in the areas being audited.
(4) The Third Party NDE Certification Organization (d) Audit results shall be documented by auditing
shall notify the parties who have accepted its Program of personnel for review by management having responsibility
proposed revisions to the Quality Assurance Manual. The in the area being audited.
party accepting the Program shall evaluate and accept such (e) Procedures shall include provisions for docu-
revisions prior to implementation of the revisions. mentation of corrective action taken in response to defi-
(5) If the Third Party NDE Certification Organiza- ciencies. Follow-up action, including re-audit of deficient
tion’s scope of activities includes approval and control of areas where indicated, shall be taken to verify implementa-
suppliers, such as operators of remote examination facili- tion of such corrective actions.
ties, this activity shall be included in the Third Party NDE (8) The party performing the evaluation shall supple-
Certification Organization’s Quality Assurance Manual ment triennial audits with performance assessments docu-
and shall be reviewed by the party accepting the Program. menting the effectiveness of the Third Party NDE
During surveys or audits of Third Party NDE Certification Certification Organization’s Quality Assurance Program.
Organizations, the party performing the evaluation shall Performance assessments shall meet the following require-
review objective evidence that the Organization’s control ments.
of suppliers is adequate to assure compliance with the (a) Assessment schedules shall be commensurate
applicable requirements of this Case. with the schedule of utilization of NDE personnel certified
by the Third Party NDE Certification Organization, but
(6) If the Third Party NDE Certification Organiza-
assessment need not occur more frequently than once
tion’s scope includes shipment of examination materials
annually.
to others, such as remote examination facilities, control of
(b) Assessments shall include a documented
this activity shall be included in the Quality Assurance
review of a Third Party NDE Certification Organization’s
Manual and shall be reviewed by the party accepting the
history of conditions adverse to quality, nonconformances,
Program. During surveys or audits of Third Party NDE
and corrective actions.
Certification Organizations, the party performing the evalu-
(9) The party performing the evaluation shall verify
ation shall review objective evidence that the qualified
that the Third Party NDE Certification Organization has
Organization’s control of shipments is adequate to assure
a mechanism to provide documents to the Inspector in
that the examination materials are not compromised. accordance with 1(d).
(7) Audits by parties performing evaluations of Third (b) If a Third Party NDE Certification Organization has
Party NDE Certification Organizations shall meet the fol- been qualified by an Owner, it is not necessary for another
lowing requirements: party to requalify that Organization for use of NDE person-
(a) The party performing the evaluations shall nel certified by that Organization if those NDE personnel
include the audit frequency in its Quality Assurance will be providing services to an Owner who qualified the
Manual. Third Party NDE Certification Organization. A vendor is
(b) The audit frequency shall be at least once trien- not required to qualify a Third Party NDE Certification
nially during the interval in which NDE personnel certified Organization when using personnel qualified by that Orga-
by the Third Party NDE Certification Organization are nization for services provided to an Owner who has pre-
used. viously qualified that Organization.
NC – SUPP. 1 2 (N-788)
Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.