Professional Documents
Culture Documents
’ Give reasons
why you might agree and disagree with this statement. (J/2013/41/Q3c)
How successful were negotiations aimed at Independence during the Second World War?
Failures
1942, Sir Stafford Cripps, in exchange for full support for war effort he promised full and complete independence at
end of war. Constitution to be drawn up by Indians and Indian political parties to join Executive Council with control
of all government departments except armed forces during war. Congress rejected it as wanting full control of India’s
affairs then. Muslim League rejected it because no mention of separate state. Failed bank etc, Quit India Movement
etc (Gandhi).
1942, British wanted support for the war effort, after war India would be given Dominion status, a Constituent
Assembly to draw up new constitution, elections for the CA, reaction of Muslims (no Pakistan in plan), Hindus
wanted immediate control, post-dated cheque on failing bank, led to ‘Quit India’ Resolution by Gandhi.
The Muslim League rejected the Mission’s proposals because the British did not agree to Partition.
Congress rejected the Plan because it did not go far enough, demanding instead immediate and full control over the
central government.
The British were also negotiating from a weak position which Congress exploited by demanding Britain leave the sub-
continent immediately (‘Quit India’ movement)
The ML insisited on a firm promise of an independent state of Pakistan.Anything else would lead to an Hindu
majority which they thought would deny Muslim rights
Why was the ‘Quit India’ Movement formed in 1942? [7] (J2005/Q/4b)
Examiner Comments: In part (b) candidates had to explain why the Quit India Movement was formed. For those
weaker candidates that answered this question their answers tended to be a description of the events that led up to
and followed the Cripps Mission of 1942. It was more by chance that these candidates scored any marks since their
chronological description eventually reached the Quit India Movement. However, once again those candidates who
were aware of the demands of the question were able to concisely focus their answers.
Marking Scheme: Explains reasons Both Muslims and Hindus were to some extent united in their opposition to the
Cripps Mission’s proposals. The Muslims rejected them because the British would not agree to Partition and the
Congress Party wanted immediate and full control over the central government. The British were also negotiating
from a weak position which the Congress Party exploited by demanding Britain leave the sub-continent immediately.
As a result Gandhi began the Movement.
Marking Scheme: Explains reasons. Gandhi only wanted to achieve independence first and foremost – partition
discussions could follow later, whereas Jinnah wanted to settle the issue of partition first and before the British left.
He knew that his bargaining position would be much weaker if he went along with Gandhi’s plan. Gandhi insisted
that he spoke for all Indians and couldn’t accept the position of Muslims as being a separate nation. Hence
independence for all Indians as a united nation was on his agenda. Jinnah was at odds with Gandhi and accused him
of only speaking for Hindus, otherwise he would accept the idea of partition. He accused Gandhi of not accepting the
two nation idea of partition. Gandhi also wanted the central government to have control of key areas such as
defence and foreign policy, whereas Jinnah wanted these issues to be dealt with by the provinces.
1946 Pethick-Lawrence (Secretary of State for India), Cripps (President of the Board of Trade), Alexander (First Lord
of the Admiralty) sent to India to find a settlement acceptable to all. Met with Muslim League, Congress, Sikhs and
HMahasabha. Found little common ground between Congress and the Muslim League. Cabinet Mission Plan
proposed an interim government whilst British withdrawal organised. Would form an All-India Commission. Proposal
rejected and modifications made which Congress rejected. Cabinet Mission Plan dropped.
Cripps went to India to gain support for the war effort in return for a number of promises including Dominion
Status after the War had ended. The Muslim League rejected the plan because the British would not agree to
Partition while Congress wanted immediate and full control over the central government. The British were also
negotiating from a weak position which Congress exploited by demanding that Britain leave the sub-continent
immediately.
Gandhi and Jinnah held talks about a Muslim homeland but failed to reach agreement since Jinnah wanted six
provinces included in Pakistan whereas Gandhi only agreed to three. Nevertheless, it was an important meeting
since Gandhi had negotiated with the Muslim League on an equal footing for the first time.
However, Cripps was not the only factor which was important in leading to eventual Partition.
At the Simla Conference, the Viceroy realised that the two parties were unable to reach agreement on anything.
Although all parties agreed to the principle of the Executive Council, the sticking point was the method of
selection.
Following the Conference, Lord Wavell announced new elections. The results demonstrated that Congress had
control of the non-Muslim vote, but that the League had gained control of the Muslim vote. It was clear that the
League was an equal player to Congress and that the demand for Partition could no longer be ignored by
Congress or the British Government.
However, it was following the announcement by Attlee that the British would leave the sub- continent by 1948,
and the subsequent violence in the Punjab in March 1947, that convinced Nehru that Partition should take place.
This was formalised in the 3 June Plan.