Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The National Academies Press: Manual On Subsurface Investigations (2019)
The National Academies Press: Manual On Subsurface Investigations (2019)
DETAILS
CONTRIBUTORS
GET THIS BOOK Glenn J. Rix, Njoroge Wainaina, Ali Ebrahimi, Robert C. Bachus, Maria Limas,
Rodolfo Sancio, Brooke Fait, and Paul W. Mayne; National Cooperative Highway
Research Program; Transportation Research Board; National Academies of
FIND RELATED TITLES Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
SUGGESTED CITATION
Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get:
Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press.
(Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences.
CHAPTER 6
Introduction
When formulating a plan for the subsurface exploration program, the geotechnical engineer or project
geologist must carefully evaluate the variety of equipment, methods, and procedures available for drilling
and sampling soil and rock. This careful evaluation of drilling and sampling options will assist with
optimizing this phase of the subsurface exploration program to acquire the required information at the least
cost. This chapter presents the information geoprofessionals need to accomplish this objective, focusing on
the following topics:
• Field equipment
• Methods for advancing boreholes
• Soil sampling
• Rock coring methods
• Logging borings
• Boring closure
Field Equipment
A wide variety of conventional and modified drilling equipment is available—ranging from small,
handheld portable drills and augers to large equipment for offshore use. The most common types of
equipment for geotechnical explorations include rotary drills, percussive, hydraulic push, and sonic type
systems. Selecting the most appropriate drilling equipment is an important aspect of any subsurface
exploration program. The equipment must be capable of meeting the project requirements, have sufficient
mobility, and be able to convert rapidly from one drilling technique to another. Consideration should be
given to the nature of the formations to be penetrated (e.g., soft clay, dense sand, hard rock) and the type of
sample that is required (e.g., bulk, disturbed, undisturbed). Hydraulic-feed machines are usually preferable
because they can maintain a constant advance pressure through varying formations, which minimizes
erosion and disturbance of the surrounding material. No single method of drilling is likely to prove
satisfactory and economical for all geological formations and sampling requirements. Local practices and
equipment availability will often dictate the method(s) used for many subsurface exploration programs.
94
With conventional rotary methods, the drill rods are lowered down the borehole and removed repeatedly
to change drill bits and obtain samples. Drill rod lengths of 5 ft (1.5 m) and 10 ft (3 m) are common. As the
borehole advances deeper, considerable time and effort are required to repeatedly lower and remove rods
in sectional lengths not exceeding 30 ft (9 m). Wireline drilling helps facilitate field operations by using a
special cable tool to rapidly swap samplers, bits, and cores as the boring advances. An outer temporary
casing is used to maintain borehole stability, and the cable system is located internal to this casing. The
cable also transmits the rotary cutting action from the rig to the special drilling head at the bottom of the
borehole. This is especially advantageous for deep boreholes to save time and effort.
Percussive-type borings are made by repeated mechanical impacts that are transmitted to the bit. These
impacts break up soil and rock into small particles that are removed by high air pressure. An air-track-type
rig is used to quickly produce an open borehole. Percussive-type borings are often employed to define the
top of bedrock.
Direct-push sampling of soil is accomplished using special hydraulic rigs that use an internal plastic-
lined steel mandrel to capture continuous samples. Samples are obtained in incremental strokes of 5 or 10
ft (1.5 or 3 m). Two types of direct-push hydraulic rigs are shown in Figure 6-3. These rigs often have twin
anchors to provide the necessary reaction forces for thrust pushes. A single person can usually operate a
direct-push rig and achieve depths of 100 ft (30 m) in approximately one hour. Depths greater than 150 ft
(45 m) have also been achieved using direct-push rigs.
Sonic drilling rigs can obtain continuous samples of both soil and rock rapidly and efficiently,
considerably faster than rotary drilling methods. The sonic heads provide a range of vibratory motions and
vertical forces down the rods to a special cutting shoe that cuts into a wide variety of geologic materials.
The repeated cyclic loading prevents undisturbed samples from being obtained. But, continuous logging
and recovery of soil layers, lenses, and strata are possible, and penetration through hard, cemented, or
calcified seams is not hindered. With sonic drilling in soils, there is no need to introduce fluids, water, or
air during soil sampling. This can be beneficial for explorations into earth dams, levees, and embankments
where rotary drilling fluids can damage or erode the soils or in environmentally sensitive areas where water
may aggravate contaminant transport.
95
This section will define the following commonly used borehole advancement and exploratory techniques:
• Manual methods
• Test pits
• Auger drilling
• Rotary drilling
• Drilling over water
The quality of information obtained from the various methods varies with the character of the subsurface
geologic conditions; therefore, careful consideration must be given when selecting a method. It may be
necessary to use more than one method in advancing a particular borehole.
96
97
98
Several types of drill rods and bits are available for different types of overburden and rock materials
encountered, and the driller can change drill rods and bits as the situation demands. Two-, three-, and four-
wing carbide insert drag bits are usually used in relatively soft or loose soils, and heavier, tri-cone roller
bits are used in denser soils and several types of bedrock.
The Diamond Core Drill Manufacturers Association (DCDMA) has established standard drill rod sizes
and couplings. The sizes for some of the more common rod types are summarized in Table 6-2.
99
used in Europe than in the United States at present and is described in an International Organization for
Standards (ISO) standard (ISO 22476-15).
MWD is predominantly used with rotary or rotary-percussive drilling methods. The measurements are
performed using a drill parameter recorder (DPR) installed on a drill rig. The DPR comprises sensors that
measure the following:
• Downward axial force (or crowd),
• Torque,
• Vertical penetration rate,
• Rotation speed,
• Fluid (or mud) pressure ( ) and flow rate ( )
These quantities are typically plotted as a continuous function of penetration depth. It is also possible to
calculate compound parameters that are derived from the basic measurements. For example, the specific
energy (i.e., the amount of energy required to remove a unit volume of material) can be calculated (Teale
1965):
2
= +
where
= cross-sectional area of the borehole
64
=
where
= diameter of the borehole
Laudanski et al. (2012) provide a summary of additional compound parameters developed for use with
MWD.
Because MWD provides continuous profiles of measured and compound parameters, it is useful for more
accurately defining subsurface stratigraphy and evaluating variability in site conditions. In soils, Sadkowski
et al. (2010) found that MWD was able to reduce the frequency and number of split spoon samples taken
and ultimately increased the efficiency with which the borings were completed. MWD is also useful for
identifying voids and thin, weak layers that may be missed during conventional drilling, and it can provide
a continuous profile in ground conditions where CPT tests are infeasible, such as partially weathered rock.
In rocks, variations in MWD drilling parameters may be interpreted to indicate the presence of fractures,
changes in lithology, and competency of the bedrock. For example, Sadkowski et al. (2010) used MWD
data collected during bedrock coring to select zones in fractured rock to conduct packer tests to measure
the hydraulic conductivity of the fractured bedrock formation.
MWD parameters can also be used to estimate soil and rock engineering properties. For example,
Rodgers et al. (2018a, 2018b) used MWD to evaluate the unconfined compressive strength of limestone
during drilled shaft construction for quality control purposes. They suggested that the MWD-based
estimates unconfined compressive strength may lead to higher LRFD resistance factors and decreased
construction costs compared to the use of conventional strength tests on cores. MWD parameters have also
been empirically correlated to components of the RMR system (Lindenbach 2016).
100
Soil Sampling
Soil sampling devices are divided into two broad categories based on the condition of the samples they
recover:
• Disturbed samples
• Undisturbed samples
Split-spoon (split-barrel) sampling and the SPT are conducted per AASHTO T 206 (ASTM D1586). An
impact hammer system having a weight of 140 lb (623 Newtons [N]) and a drop height of 30 in. (76 cm) is
used to drive the split spoon three successive increments of 6 in. (15 cm), for a total driven vertical distance
of 18 in. (45 cm). Occasionally, four increments are driven for a total of 24 in. (61 cm) so that additional
soil material can be recovered for laboratory testing.
Split-barrel samplers can be outfitted with a plastic liner to help collect representative soil particles. In
the United States, however, it has become standard practice to not use these liners. If necessary, a plastic
basket or catcher sleeve can be added within the shoe of the sampler to assist with retaining the sample
during recovery, which is often helpful for sampling loose sands.
The principal advantages of using split-spoon samplers are their simplicity of construction and operation
and their relative economy for estimating in situ soil parameters through empirical correlations with the
SPT N-value. In addition, split-spoon samplers recover representative specimens suitable for classification
and for certain simple laboratory testing, such as grain size and plasticity.
101
102
103
• Laval samplers
• Piston samplers
• Rotary core samplers
Fixed (Stationary) Piston Sampler. The fixed (or stationary) piston sampler is a significant
improvement over conventional Shelby tubes in that it decreases sample disturbance and improves recovery
(Long 2002). Procedures are given in ASTM D6519. A fixed or stationary piston sampler is constructed
similarly to the thin-wall open-tube sampler but includes a sealed piston and locking cone in the head
assembly to prevent the piston from moving downward (Figure 6-7). The apparatus is more complicated
and time consuming to operate than open-tube samplers. However, samples can be taken in uncased
boreholes.
104
Source: AASHTO
Figure 6-7. Components of a fixed-piston sampler
The piston can be locked and fully sealed at the bottom of the thin-wall tube so that it can be lowered
into the borehole without contamination. Once the sampler is in position, the piston, through a series of
small-diameter inner actuating rods, is locked to the drill rig or the casing, and pressure is applied to the
outer drill rods. The pressure forces the thin-walled tube down from the stationary piston. When the full
press is completed following a stroke of 24 in. (61 cm), any pressure buildup is released through a small
hole in the actuating rods. The tight seal of the piston also creates a vacuum on the sample that helps retain
the sample. The sampler is rotated two full turns to shear off the soil at the bottom of the tube and then
withdrawn very carefully from the borehole. A short waiting period before and after shearing allows
105
additional skin friction to develop between the sample and the tube, which minimizes potential for sample
loss during recovery.
Osterberg Sampler. The hydraulic Osterberg sampler is a fixed-piston sampler designed to obtain
undisturbed samples of soft and potentially sensitive soils in uncased boreholes. The internal design of the
sampler is considerably more complex than a standard fixed-piston sampler, in that it consists of an inner
thin-wall sampler tube and outer pressure cylinder (Figure 6-8). In the sampling position, a movable piston
is attached to the top of the sampling tube, and a fixed piston rests on the soil to be sampled. The sampler
is activated by pumping fluids or gas through the pressure cylinder, which drives the upper piston and
sampling tube down over the lower piston into the soil a fixed distance. Then the piston and the sample are
withdrawn from the borehole.
The Osterberg sampler is available with specially designed thin-wall sampling tubes with a diameter of
either 3.2 or 5.1 in. (8 or 13 cm). The self-contained and very portable aspects of this hydraulic piston
sampler make it an ideal sampling device in swamps and areas where access would be difficult for large
conventional drilling equipment.
106
and mechanics of these core barrels, which are commercially available under a variety of trade names.
Denison and Pitcher samplers are discussed in the following sections.
Denison Sampler. The Denison sampler is designed to recover undisturbed thin-wall samples in dense
sand and gravel soils, hard clays, partially cemented soils, or soft weathered rock. The sampler consists of
a double- or triple-tube, swivel-type core barrel with a nonrotating inner steel or brass thin-wall liner
designed to retain the sample during penetration and subsequent transport to the laboratory. The basic
components are shown in Figure 6-9. The Denison sampler is designed for use with water, mud, or air with
rotary drilling and is available in five outside diameter sizes, ranging from 2.94 to 7.75 in. (7.5 to 20 cm)
The inner liner tube of the Denison has a sharp cutting edge that can be varied to extend up to about 3 in.
(7.6 cm) beyond the outer rotating cutter bit. The extension variation is achieved by the options of
interchangeable sawtooth cutter bits. These sawtooth cutter bits are preselected depending on the
anticipated formation that will be sampled. The maximum extension is used in relatively soft or loose soils,
and a cutting-edge flush with the coring bit is used in hard or cemented formations.
An important feature of the Denison sampler is a system of check valves and release vents that bypass
the hydrostatic pressure buildup within the inner sampling tube. These check valves and release vents
improve sample recovery and minimize pressure disturbance of the sample.
The Denison sampler is not practical for sampling loose sands or soft clays; the sample retention devices
are usually inadequate for these materials. Cobbles and boulders will present major difficulties for
penetration and recovery. Moreover, the sawtooth bit, with which the Denison is usually equipped, is not
capable of coring hard boulders that may collapse the inner sampler tube if it is in an extended position.
107
Pitcher Sampler. The Pitcher rotary core barrel sampler is a modification of the Denison sampler and
consists of a single-tube, swivel-type core barrel with a self-adjusting, spring-loaded inner thin-wall sample
tube that telescopes in and out of the cutter bit as the hardness of the material varies. This telescoping aspect
eliminates the need to preselect a fixed inner barrel shoe length as is necessary with the Denison sampler.
The inner steel or brass thin-wall liner tube has a sharp cutting edge that projects a maximum of 6 in. (15
cm) beyond the sawtooth cutter bit in its normal assembled position.
As the sampler enters the borehole, a sliding valve directs the drilling fluid through the thin-wall sample
tube to thoroughly flush the borehole. When the sample tube contacts the bottom of the borehole, it
telescopes into the cutter barrel and closes the sliding valve. The closed sliding valve diverts the drilling
fluid to an annular space between the sample tube and the cutter barrel. This sliding valve arrangement
allows the drilling fluid to circulate which removes the borehole cuttings during sampling and prevents the
drilling fluid from disturbing the recovered sample.
The spring-loaded inner sample tube automatically adjusts to the density of the formation being
penetrated. In very soft materials, the tube will extend as much as 6 in. (15 cm) beyond the cutter bit. As
the formation density increases, the sample tube telescopes into the outer core barrel and compresses the
control spring, which in turn, exerts a greater force on the tube to ensure adequate penetration.
The Pitcher sampler is rotated into the formation in the same manner as conventional rock coring in either
a cased or mudded borehole. The sampler is designed to be used with either water or mud and is available
in four sizes that have outside diameters ranging from 2.5 to 5.8 in. (6 to 14.7 cm).
In extremely dense formations or obstructions, the sample tube will retract completely into the outer core
barrel to allow the cutter bit to penetrate the obstruction. The Pitcher sample’s telescoping liner is a major
advantage in highly variable formations, since it prevents the sample tube from collapsing. The Pitcher
sampler, like the Denison, is not capable of coring hard cobbles and boulders.
108
109
to the core barrel system minimizes the amount of drilling fluid and its contact with the sample which
further decreases sample disturbance.
Numerous sizes of cores can be obtained in rock, with the most common size for geotechnical
explorations from rotary wash being NX with a diameter of 2.16 in. (5.5 cm) and wireline drilling at NQ
with a diameter of 1.87 in. (4.7 cm). Figure 6-11 shows a section of rock core that is 10 ft (3 m) long
obtained from rock coring operations. The recovered core is contained in a cardboard box for storage.
A wide variety of core barrel designs and sizes are available. Table 6-3 provides a listing of several
common sizes available for the swivel type double-tube core barrel design.
Table 6-3. Core sizes from WG swivel type double-tube core barrel
110
of samples taken, types of samples (drive or tube), how the boring was advanced (auger, rotary wash, or
direct push), hammer type, raw SPT N-values, and personnel on-site, as well as any other information that
is deemed pertinent. In the field log, each sample is also identified by a unique designation, labeled, and
classified per the visual-manual method ASTM D2488. While field logs have traditionally been recorded
on standardized paper forms, commercial products are available that use an electronic tablet for digital entry
of information. The digital entry of field information avoids the need to re-enter the same information later
and is an important component of an effective strategy to manage geotechnical site characterization data as
described in Appendix D.
111
112
When coring rock, an attempt is usually made to collect a certain length of rock in the core barrel. This
is called the core run and is often done in 5-ft or 10-ft lengths. The total length of the rock recovered divided
by the core run is the core recovery, typically reported as a percentage.
The RQD is a modified core recovery and is the sum of all pieces of rock that are at least 4 in. long,
divided by the total core recovered, also reported as a percent. Thus, core recovery ≥ RQD. The RQD is
normally obtained on core having a nominal diameter of about 2 in. and thus includes NX, NQ, and NW
core bits. The RQD serves as a simple measure of the quality of the rock mass comprising the intact pieces
of (often) hard rock material and the network of joints, fissures, and discontinuities in the native formation.
Table 6-5 provides a rating system for the rock mass based on the measured RQD. Figure 6-13 presents a
rendering of the determination on RQD from a hypothetical section of recovered rock core.
113
In addition to its use in field logging of rock cores, RQD is also used as an input parameter for rock mass
classification schemes as described in Section 10.4.
Boring Closure
Upon completion, the drilled borehole should be sealed in accordance with local, state, or federal
regulations. In some instances, specific borehole closure laws mandate the borehole be sealed to protect
against groundwater contamination and to provide protection for aquifer resources. The closure methods
generally involve placing or injecting sealants (e.g., grouts, bentonites, concrete, other additives) into the
open hole by means of freefall drop, tremie pipe placement, pressurized pumping, or use of special probes
114
with expendable tips and other technologies. A review of the various techniques is given by Lutenegger et
al. (1995).
115
Chapter 6 References
Clayton, C.R.I., N.E. Simons, and M.C. Matthews. 2008. Site Investigation. Second Edition, Halsted Press, Technology &
Engineering, London.
Farrar, J. 1999. Standard Penetration Test: Driller's/Operator's Guide. Report DSO-98-17, Bureau of Reclamation, Dam
Safety Office, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Denver, Colorado.
Goodman, R.E. 1989. Introduction to Rock Mechanics. Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Karasawa, H., T. Ohno, M. Kosugi, and J.C. Rowley. 2002a. “Methods to estimate the rock strength and tooth wear while
drilling with rollerbits. 1: Milled-tooth bits.” Journal of Energy Resource Technology, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 125–132.
Karasawa, H., T. Ohno, M. Kosugi, and J.C. Rowley. 2002b. “Methods to estimate the rock strength and tooth wear while
drilling with rollerbits. 2: Insert bits.” Journal of Energy Resource Technology, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 133–140.
Kulhawy, F.H. and Mayne, P.W. 1990. Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design. Report EL-6800,
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
La Rochelle, P., J. Sarrailh, F. Tavenas, M. Roy, and S. Leroueil. 1981. "Causes of Sampling Disturbance and Design of a
New Sampler for Sensitive Soils." Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.52–66.
Laudanski, G., P. Reiffsteck, J.-L. Tacita, G. Desanneaux, and J. Benoît. 2012. “Experimental Study of Drilling Parameters
Using a Test Embankment.” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site
Characterization, ISC’4, Porto de Galinhas-Pernambuco, Brasil, pp. 435–440.
Lindenbach, E.J. 2016. “Improving Investigations with Drill Parameter Recorder Technology.” American Society of Civil
Engineers, Biennial Rocky Mountain Geo-Conference, Golden, Colorado.
Long, M. 2002. “Quality of Continuous Soil Samples.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 234–253.
Lutenegger, A.J., D.J. DeGroot, C. Mirza, and M. Bozozuk. 1995. NCHRP Report No. 378: Recommended Guidelines for
Sealing Geotechnical Exploratory Holes. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Rodgers, M., M. McVay, C. Ferraro, D. Horhota, C. Tibbetts, and S. Crawford. 2018a. “Measuring Rock Strength While
Drilling Shafts Socketed into Florida Limestone.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.
144, No. 3.
Rodgers, M., M. McVay, D. Horhota, and J. Hernando. 2018b. “Assessment of Rock Strength from Measuring While
Drilling Shafts in Florida Limestone.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 1154–1167.
Sadkowski, S.S., K.P. Stetson, J. Benoît, and J.T. Roche. 2010. "Characterizing Subsurface Conditions Using Drilling
Parameters for a Deep Foundation Project in Boston, MA, USA." Proceedings of GeoFlorida: Advances in Analysis,
Modeling, and Design (GSP 199), ASCE, Reston, Virginia. pp. 1132–1141.
Sowers, G.F. 1996. Building on Sinkholes: Design and Construction of Foundations in Karst Terrain. ASCE Press, Reston,
Virginia.
Teale, R. 1965. “The Concept of Specific Energy in Rock Drilling.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining
Sciences. Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 57–73.
116