UNIT 2 Operations Strategy in a Global Environment
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Learning Objectives Explain the key dimensions of competition. Justify why the key dimensions are termed competitive priorities. Differentiate between various types of strategy, namely corporate and/or business, global, functional and operations strategy. Discuss the strategy development procedure. U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Introduction Productivity, Competitiveness and Strategy Better quality, higher productivity, lower cost, and the ability to respond quickly to customer needs are o e i po ta t tha e e a d… the a is getti g higher (Heizer and Render, 2008).
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
What is Strategy? Strategy defines the means by which an organization will achieve organizational objectives and goals. How are we going to compete? Mintzberg (1994) defines strategy as a plan or course of action into the future. Strategy identifies and defines the resources (skills, assets, finance, relationships, technical competence, facilities) that are required in order to be able to compete in the market.
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Strategy and Productivity
Productivity relates to the effective use of resources (little
wastage) in the production process. The productivity ratio is a fraction of output divided input. Operations and production managers are directly responsible for improving productivity to improve competitiveness. Adopting new technologies or concepts, which requires capital expenditures for new equipment, computers, or software. Lean Six Sigma, Process re-engineering, streamlining business/operating U processes, W I process O NIVERSITY OF THEC optimization .A R R EST NDIES . etc. PEN AMPUS LL IGHTS ESERVED Strategy and Competitiveness Organizations compete through a combination of their marketing and operating functions. Competitiveness relates to an organization performance and effectiveness in the market place relative to other organizations that offer similar products or services. How are we doing in our business processes and functions compared to our competitors? Good, Bad, Poor, Superior? Competitiveness is a by-product (output) of an effective and properly executed strategies. Productivity and competitiveness are positively correlated. U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Vision, Mission and Strategy 1. Vision expresses what the organization would like to accomplish and/or where it would like to be in the future. Vision statements are usually brief, appeal to stakeholders, inspire and challenge. 2. Mission statements outline where the organization is going. What do we provide to society? What are our boundaries (service, product offering, geographic area etc.)? 3. Strategy outlines how the organization is going to get there. How are we (the organization is going to compete)?
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Conflicting Objectives Among Functional Areas Each functional area has different interests and goals (Zhao et al. 2008). For example: Marketing/Sales wants: more inventory, fast delivery, many package types, special wishes/promotions Production/Operations wants: bigger batch size, depots at factory, latest ship date, decrease changeovers, stable production plan Finance/Accounting: low inventory and capital cost
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Strategic Plan Development and Deployment Strategic planning is a continuous process St ategi pla s o u i ate the o ga izatio s p io ities throughout De elop e t of st ategi pla s should i ol e e e o e a d ot a few selected managers. (all levels) The development of the strategic plan is affected by various internal (culture, finance, workers skills, type of organizational structure etc. ) and external forces (technology, laws, regulation, political environment etc.) U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Strategy Formulation and Deployment Procedure 1. Plan for Planning 2. Conduct Business Environmental scanning and SWOT Analysis 3. Determine Corporate Mission 4. Form a Strategy (Strategic Goal)
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Strategy Formulation and Deployment Procedure 5. Set Strategic Objectives (multi year) 6. Prepare tactical action plans and deploy/Implement action plans (DO) 7. Tack and measure progress (Check and Act) 8. Evaluate results
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Business Environment Analysis/Scanning SWOT Analysis PESTEL (PESTLE) - Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal A al sis of Ma ket Fo es Po te s Fi e Fo es F a e o k Competitive Analysis Benchmarking (Internal and External) Stakeholder Analysis Technology U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Setting, Deploying, and Tracking Strategic Plans Balanced Score Card Model (Financial Objectives, Customer/Stakeholder, Internal Process, Learning and Growth) Six Sigma and the DMAIC Model Critical Success Factors (6-14 factors) Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Bernard Leong (2011)
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Role of Operations in Strategy Development and Deployment Operations/manufacturing function plays an important role in the fo ulatio a d i ple e tatio of a o ga izatio s st ateg . Operations has significant role in the implementation of strategy by increasing productivity and competitiveness. Market conditions have changed from a mass production era to an emphasis of high volume, low cost production to an environment demanding performance on measures such as quality and speed of delivery as well as cost. The rapid pace of change in markets means the basis of how the organization will compete may change quickly overtime (Sharma, 2010). U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Operational Strategy and Global Strategy The operations strategy is the one that concerns us most in (Production) Operations Management. Given the global perspective that is now necessary to remain competitive in our global village, a firm may develop a global strategy that is supportive of its corporate, business and operations strategy. Firms usually make certain adjustments to its operations strategy to suit cross-border situations. This is referred to as a Global Strategy.
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Considerations in Developing Operations Strategy
Krajewski & Ritzman (n.d.)
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Types of Global Strategy
Some firms may choose to form strategic alliances or arrangements
and joint ventures with local entities rather than to fully and physically locate their operations abroad. 1. Multi-domestic Operations Strategy Focuses on local responsiveness and competitiveness Decisions are decentralized to each country Consumer will perceive them to be domestic company High local responsiveness and low cost reduction consideration 2. Global Operations Strategy- Decisions are centralized at headquarters where standards and training U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Types of Global Strategy 3. Transnational Operations Strategy e pe tise does ot eside e el i the ho e ou t A combination of localization strategy (high responsiveness) with global standardization strategy (low cost)
4. International Operations Strategy
Leveraging home base core competencies Selling the same products or services in both home and foreign market Low local responsiveness and low cost reduction consideration
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Benefits of Going Global New and increase revenue potential Reduction in operating and production cost Greater access to global talent, skills and technology Optimize the supply chain Diversification (a means of reducing various type of risks) Faster growth Relationships with additional companies (joint ventures and alliances ) U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Disadvantages of Going Global Organization may run into costly and complicated regulatory and legal issues Currency and political risks can eliminate profits Increase business and financial risks High upfront cost and investment in not unusual when entering the global market It takes time to understand the dynamics of the new market
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Factors to be Considered in Going Global PESTEL of the host country PESTEL (PESTLE) - Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal Evaluation of the risks involved (Risk Assessment) Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) History (Foreign Firms) O ga izatio s poli a d alue
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
World Class Organization A world class organization is recognized as a benchmark by its industry sector and, for some aspects, by other industry sectors as well (Vaishnav, 2009). A world class organization sets the tone in the market and industry. Consistently Best at what it does. Best of the Bests in the world.
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
World Class Organizations: Are market leaders Focus intensely on customers Focus intensely on quality Are agile and adapt to changes Focus on continuous improvement Value and appreciate employees Make data driven decisions Have strong and knowledgeable leadership and management Take a system and integrative approach Values on research andOFdevelopment U NIVERSITY THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Flexible Organization/Highly Responsive Organization Flexible organization has its roots in agility and lean operations, which results in the organizations ability to cope with continuous and unanticipated changes in their business environment and proactively capture opportunities from the turbulent business environment (Sun, Valota and Zhang, 2014). Fle i le o ga izatio s a e ot stu k i thei a s. Kaizen events (quickly improving a process) are common for flexible organization.
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Flexible Organization/Highly Responsive Organization Flexible organizations have an organic instead of a mechanistic structure. A flexible organization capitalizes on the strengths of its workforce. Flexible organization uses Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS). Flexible organization adopts new technology and integrates business systems and functions such as marketing, operations, accounting.
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Lean Organizations Lean systems tend to achieve greater productivity, lower costs, shorter cycle times, and higher quality than non lean systems. He Fo d defi ed the lea o ept i o e se te e: We ill ot put i to ou esta lish e t a thi g that is useless. http://asq.org/learn-about-quality /lean/overview/overview.html
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
The Link: World Class, Flexible and Lean Organizations Word class, flexible/responsive, and lean organizations share many points of contact and do not exist in mutually exclusive domains. Some authors and industries use the terms interchangeably. World class organizations have many characteristics of lean, flexible/responsive organizations. Lean can be described as a management philosophy derived mostly from the Toyota Production System (TPS).
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Pre Conditions for Competitiveness Lean, highly flexible, highly responsive or world class organizations compete simultaneously along six lines of competitive priorities, namely: quality, cost, timeliness, dependability, flexibility, service. Certain basic preconditions or structural prerequisites are necessary to become a highly competitive firm, namely: Technology adoption Research and development Continuous improvement and waste elimination Integration of activity
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Priorities/ Elements of Competition Competitive priorities of highly successful, world class firms, based on usto e s e pa ded o ept of alue: 1) Quality 2) Cost 3) Timeliness 4) Dependability 5) Service 6) Flexibility
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Priorities/ Elements of Competition Competitive priorities of highly successful, world class firms, based on usto e s e pa ded o ept of alue: 1) Quality 2) Cost 3) Timeliness 4) Dependability 5) Service 6) Flexibility
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Element of Quality Quality Functionality Visual appeal Reliability Ease of use Durability High performance well designed products
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Element of Price/Cost Price/cost Lowest possible price Low maintenance costs Cost-effectiveness (value for money) Payment terms and conditions
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Element of Timeliness Timeliness Quick throughput time in production Quick turnover of new designs, set ups Quick product development cycle Up-to-date and timely product offerings
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Element of Dependability Dependability Ability to deliver as promised on time and with consistent quality Having reliable production facilities
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Element of Service Service Installation Return policies After sales service Warranties Service ability Ongoing relationship and technical advice Being able to respond rapidly to suit customer requirements and at low cost U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED . Competitive Element of Flexibility Flexibility Product/service modification of customization
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Competitive Priorities
Kaplan and Norton (1992)
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Measuring Competitiveness Elements of Competition Some indicators Quality Percentage of defect-free products Price/cost Product cost Timeliness Throughput time [processing time + inspection time + movement time + waiting and /or storage time] Dependability Equipment availability [ratio of hours required to hours available] Flexibility Setup downtime, batch run time Service Respo se ti e to usto e s i ui ies
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
References .
Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2008). Operations management.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Heizer, J. & Render, B. (2014). Operations management (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall Stevenson, W. J. (2012). Operations management.
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
THE END Questions/Comments/Discussion
Thank you for your kind attention and participation
U NIVERSITY OF THE W EST I NDIES O PEN C AMPUS . A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED .
Susan Ariel Aaronson, Ph.d. - Jamie M. Zimmerman - Trade Imbalance - The Struggle To Weigh Human Rights Concerns in Trade Policymaking-Cambridge University Press (2008) PDF