Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 2
SCI CONCRETUS • Vol 3 No 1
SCI Concretus
Issue 3.1 Nov 2011 Changi Airport 10
www.SCI-Concretus.com
NOTE :
SCI Concretus welcomes articles relating to use SCI MEMBERSHIP 63
of Concrete in its various forms. Publication is at
the discretion of the Editorial Board. The views
expressed are not necessarily those of Singapore DIRECTORY LISTINGS 64
Concrete Institute. While care has been taken to
ensure that the information contained in this
magazine is accurate, SCI assume no responsibil- UPCOMING CONFERENCE 72
ity for any errors in or misrepresentation of such HON SECRETARY HON TREASURER
1ST VICEneither
information, PRESIDENT 2ND VICE PRESIDENT
for any loss or damage. Mr Arnold De Silva Mr Tan Yew Meng
Er Koh Beng Thong Mr Loh Kah Soon Head of Business Management, Deputy Director
Executive Vice President Executive Director Construction Chemicals - Singapore School of Architecture & the Built
Surbana
No part of Consultants Pte Ltd can be reproduced
this publication Pan-United Concrete Pte Ltd BASF South East Asia Pte Ltd Environment
without the express written permission of Singa-
Singapore Polytechnic SCI CONCRETUS 1
pore Concrete Institute.
President’s Message
As we celebrate our 33rd Anniversary of the Singapore Concrete Institute, we would
like to remind ourselves and everyone in the construction industry on the need of our
nation’s drive towards higher productivity. It is even more relevant than ever before as
the demand for more foreign workers in our industry continues unabated.
It is with this concern in mind that SCI has decided to set the theme “The Path To-
wards Productivity” for this year’s 33rd Anniversary Gala Dinner together with the
fourth issue of the SCI Concretus.
The Board has also decided that, starting from this year, SCI shall give recognition
to those outstanding organizations who have contributed towards the productivity
movement in the construction industry by awarding them the SCI Excellence Awards
annually. This is to serve as a constant reminder for all stakeholders of the industry
on the need for higher productivity and efficiency.
This fourth issue of SCI Concretus, also sets in the productivity theme, will provide
our readers and supporters with the latest information on concrete technology and
issues related to productivity improvement in the concrete industry.
In heeding the global call for environmental protection and sustainability, SCI, in
partnership with Professor Ravindra K Dhir of Applying Concrete Knowledge
(Consultant) and with funding from the Building and Construction Authority and a
group of industry sponsors, has embarked on a project entitled “Recycled and Sec-
ondary Aggregates for use in Construction: A State of the Art Review”. Our readers will be able to read more about this important mile-
stone project in the next few issues of the magazine. Through this project, SCI is doing its part in promoting sustainable construction by
taking affirmative action in saving our environment.
On behalf of the SCI Board of Directors, I would like to thank all our sponsors, friends and supporters for their continuing support of this
publication. We look forward to all your future contributions for SCI Concretus in creating a well recognized platform in environmental
sustainability and construction excellence.
Thank you.
Oh Lock Soon
President
Singapore Concrete Institute
16 November 2011
2 SCI CONCRETUS
SINGAPORE Board of Directors
Directors
CONCRETE
INSTITUTE 2009/2010
2011/2012
1. INTRODUCTION
The use of high flow concrete mixes has
been around for a long time since the mid
80’s. However, there are several hurdles in
the use of SCC. First SCC is designed for
its rheological property. In order to achieve
high flowability and to be cohesive (to
avoid segregation and bleeding), it is nec-
essary to increase the powder content of
the mix. It requires about 500 to 580 kg of
total fines to ensure that that mix will not
segregate or bleed while achieving high Fig.1: Smart Dynamic Concrete (SDC), a low-fines self consolidating concrete incor-
flowability thus self consolidating prop- porates the ideal properties of cost effectiveness of regular ready mix concrete and the
erty. In this 500 to 580 kg of total fines, flowability of conventional SCC.
no less than 450kg is made up of cementi-
tious content. The resultant mix is that the
compressive strength is very high in the
order to 60 to 75MPa.
4 SCI CONCRETUS
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development & Green Technologies
Fig 4: Field demonstration of the savings in labour and in time for placement of conventional vibratable concrete vs. low fines self
consolidating concrete (Smart Dynamic Concrete)
3. CASE STUDIES workers with the help of a vibrator. This was a test case and demonstration for
SDC. A small slab of about 100m3 was
ACROSS ASIA PACIFIC 3.2 COMPLETED AND CUR-
first cast. After seeing the benefits of less
manpower and the highly flowable mix,
RENT PROJECTS IN ASEAN the contractor proceeded to cast nine num-
3.1 ASEAN ber of 9m high columns. Through this ex-
3.2.1 Malaysia ercise, it was found that the concrete has
The SDC technology has been successful-
better finish, noise reduction as there was
ly tested at lab scale and plant scale prior
SDC is currently in use for the construc- no need for vibration and faster placing
to undertaking some significant projects
tion of a factory to produce PV cell tech- time. Various other concrete elements of
in ASEAN countries. Similar comparison
nology in Penang with an estimated total the projects were also cast using SDC. The
between conventional pumpable concrete
quantity of about 8,000 m3. The readymix total SDC quantity was about 1000m3.
(vibrated for compaction) and Smart Dy-
company producing the SDC is market-
namic Concrete at similar cementitious
ing this concept as ‘Green Concrete’ due Other projects using SDC in Singapore
contents have shown reduction in man-
to its lower cementitious content and ease
power and vibration with higher produc-
of placing the concrete. The main reason The other projects that have used or cur-
tivity.
for its use compared to the conventional rently using SDC are:
concrete is the tight schedule of the project a. JEC – Jurong Entertainment Centre
As an example of a site demonstration car-
and the requirement for better surface off (estimated about 800m3)
ried out ( Fig 4), two panels were cast with
form finish. b. Alba Condominium at Cairnhill Rise
conventional pumpable concrete (or tradi-
(about 8000m3)
tional vibratable concrete) and Smart Dy-
There is a growing interest in SDC across c. Lush @ Holland Hill Condominium
namic Concrete respectively – these panels
Malaysia and there are quite a few major (about 10,000m3)
were 12’ x 8 ‘ and approx 250 mm thick.
projects opting for such a concrete in the
The panel cast with SDC using a PCE
near future. With the Singapore government’s push to-
based superplasticizer integrated with the
wards higher productivity for the construc-
special VMA was completed in 1’40” by a
3.2.2 Singapore tion industry and the tight labour market,
single worker with no vibrator against the
SDC will definitely be a growing trend in
other panel cast with traditional vibratable
Wharf Residences the coming years.
concrete of slump approx 14 cm by three
SCI CONCRETUS 5
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development & Green Technologies
The concept of Smart Dynamic Concrete [2] Kluegge, J., Kar, N., Asmus, S., Chris-
(low fines self consolidating concrete) was tensen, B., - A new viscosity modifying
first started in China in 2009 for Asia Pa- agent (VMA) for low fines self consoli-
cific. The first biggest pour using the Smart Fig 5.: Aerial view of the raft foundation dating concrete (SCC) – Proceedings of
Dynamic Concrete technology incorpo- placement of a major high rise in China the Second International Symposium on
rating the unique and versatile viscosity Design, Performance and Use of Self Con-
modifying agent in PCE technology was solidating Concrete, Beijing, China, 5 – 7
executed in a single pour of 60,000 cubic 4. CONCLUSIONS June, 2009.
metres of concrete for the raft foundation
of proposed 632 metre high rise tower, Low fines SCC addresses the needs of the
early this year. The raft foundation is 121 ready mix concrete industry and projects
m in diameter and 6 m thick. where more than 80% of the concrete
6 SCI CONCRETUS
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development & Green Technologies
1. INTRODUCTION Table 1: Chemical composition of cement, silica fume, and lightweight filler
Elements (wt.%) Al2O3 SiO2 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O SO3 LOI
An ultra lightweight cement composite SCI CONCRETUS
(ULCC) with density 0.6 times that of con- Portland cement 4.2 20.5 3.2 65.3 4.1 0.17 0.50 2.1 2.2
ventional concrete and strength exceeding Silica fume 95.5 2.4
60 MPa was developed. This paper pres- Lightweight filler 29.5 59.7 4.3 0.8 1.5 0.85 3.32 0.02 -
ents experimental results from material
characterisation of the novel ULCC as a
potential structural material. The ULCC
was produced with porous filler obtained
as by-product from ash ponds of coal-fired
thermal power plants [1]. Particles of the
filler have spherical shape consisting of a
hollow interior that is covered by a thin
shell with typical thickness 5-10% of its
diameter. Due to its hollow structure, the
filler has low particle density typically
ranging from 600 to 900 kg/m3. Particle
size is usually between 100 – 300 μm with
top size at ~600 μm. In this paper, proper-
ties of the ULCC is benchmarked with two
control concretes – a normal weight and a Fig. Fig. 1: Particle
1: Particle size distribution
size distribution of Portland
of Portland cement
cement and and lightweight
lightweight filler filler
lightweight concrete, which are designed
to possess similar 28-day cube compres- A normal
similar weight
ingredients as theaggregate concrete
NWAC, except that the(NWAC) and awas
coarse aggregate lightweight aggregate concrete
4-8 mm expanded
sive strength. clay type lightweight aggregate, and silica fume was used to achieve
(LWAC) with 28-day cube compressive strength similar to that of the required strength.
ULCC were included
for comparison. Ingredients of the NWAC (w/b = 0.45) were water, Portland cement, quartz
2.2 Test methods
sand as fine aggregate and granite of 20 mm as coarse aggregate. The LWAC (w/b = 0.35)
2. EXPERIMENTAL consisted of ofsimilar ingredients as the NWAC, except
Table 2: List material properties evaluated and relevant test that the coarse aggregate was 4-8 mm
methods
PROGRAM expanded clay type lightweight aggregate, and silica fume was used to achieve required
Property Test standard Specimen type & size
strength.
2.1 Materials Flow consistency BS EN 1015-3:1999 --
2.2 Test
Density methodsspecimens
of hardened BS EN 12390-7:2009 All specimens
The ULCC was produced with water, Table 2 shows
Compressive strength list of the ULCCBS
material properties evaluated,
EN 12390-3:2009 100-mm cubetest
andstandards and type of
binder, and lightweight filler. Cementi- specimens used. Ø100 x 200 mm cylinder
tious binder included ordinary Portland Splitting tensile strength BS EN 12390-6:2009 Ø100 x 200 mm cylinder
cement and silica fume. Water-to-binder Static Young’s modulus & Poisson’s BS 1881-121:1983
Table 2: List of material properties evaluated and relevantØ100 x 200 mm cylinder
test methods
ratio (w/b) was 0.35. The ULCC was fibre- ratio
reinforced with 6-mm polyvinyl alcohol Property Test standard Ø100 x 50Specimen
Resistance to chloride-ion penetration ASTM C1202-05
type & size
mm cylinder
(PVA) fibres (aspect ratio = 220). Chemi- Flow consistency BS EN 1015-3:1999 --
cal compositions of the main ingredients Density of
3. RESULTS hardened specimens
AND DISCUSSION BS EN 12390-7:2009 All specimens
in the ULCC are given in Table 1. Particle Compressive strength
Properties of the BS ENin12390-3:2009
ULCC are presented and discussed 100-mm
this section in comparison to cube
those and
density of the filler was found to be about of the control NWAC and LWAC (Table 3). Ø100 x 200 mm cylinder
850 kg/m3 determined by a helium pyc- Splitting tensile strength
Table 3: Comparison BS EN at12390-6:2009
of ULCC with control mixtures 7 and 28 days Ø100 x 200 mm cylinder
nometer. Particle size distribution of the Static Young’s modulus & Poisson’s BS 1881-121:1983 Ø100 x 200 mm cylinder
filler was obtained by dry sieving (ASTM Material property ULCC LWAC NWAC
ratio
C136) and is shown in Fig. 1 in compari-
son to that of Portland cement (by laser
Resistance
Slump (mm) to chloride-ion penetration ASTM
--* C1202-05 100 Ø100 x 50
100mm cylinder
diffraction) used. Density after de-mould (kg/m3) 1450 1860 2350
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
7d 28d 7d 28d 7d 28d
A normal weight aggregate concrete Properties of the ULCC are presented and discussed in this section in comparison to those
(NWAC) and a lightweight aggregate con- Compressive strength, cube fcu (MPa) 55.7 64.0 54.2 57.8 55.4 68.0
of the control NWAC and LWAC (Table 3).
Compressive strength, cylinder fc’ (MPa) 51.1 64.6 51.2 63.4 43.2 55.7
crete (LWAC) with 28-day cube compres-
sive strength similar to that of the ULCC Ratio fc’/ fcu 0.92 1.01 0.94 1.10 0.78 0.82
were included for comparison. Ingredients
Table 3: tensile
Splitting Comparison
strengthof(MPa)
ULCC with control
3.9 mixtures
4.4 at 7 and--28 days--
-- --
of the NWAC (w/b = 0.45) were water, Material property
Static modulus of elasticity (GPa) 16.0 ULCC --
16.8 LWAC
23.4 -- NWAC
28.2
Portland cement, quartz sand as fine aggre- Static Poisson’s
Slump (mm) ratio 0.24 0.26 --* -- 0.20
100 -- 0.16
100
gate and granite of 20 mm as coarse aggre- Electrical charge passed (C) 3 -- 153 -- 242 -- 2890
Density after de-mould (kg/m ) 1450 1860 2350
gate. The LWAC (w/b = 0.35) consisted of *Flow consistency =180 mm
SCI CONCRETUS 7
Page 2
Density of the hardened ULCC was 1,450 kg/m3, about 60 and 80% that of
NWAC and LWAC, respectively. Average 100-mm cube compressive strengths
mixtures
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development wereTechnologies
& Green similar both at the 7 and 28 days, except for the LWAC which wa
at 28 days. Cylinder compressive strength (fc’) of the ULCC shows, in general,
in strength development as the cubical specimens. For normal weight concrete
80% that of fcu. Ratio (fc’/fcu) of the NWAC in this study (Table 3) was in ag
3.1 Density and compressive strength
concrete strength classes defined in Table 7 of BS EN 206-1:2000. However
3.9 MPa at 7 days, and 4.4 MPa at 28 days. The 28-day static Poisson’s ratio of the
On trend
average,could
ratio be observed
of splitting for tothe ratio
tensile ULCC(fwas c’/f0.26
cu) of theseems
which ULCC. Similar observation w
to be higher
Density of the hardened ULCC was 1,450 the LWAC
compressive strengthwhere
(fst / fc’)the ratio
of the ULCC (fc’/fcu ) was
than 0.94
that of and 1.10
the LWAC at ages
and NWAC of 7 and 28 days,
(Table
kg/m3, about 60 and 80% that of the con- was(Table
about 0.073). A study by Hammer et al. [2] also reported this with the ratio ranging
at the different ages. From 3). Static Poisson’s ratio of the NWAC and
trols NWAC and LWAC, respectively. Av- Fig. 2, it is estimated that fst / fc’ for nor- LWAC in this study agrees with that of
erage 100-mm cube compressive strengths 1.05 for LWAC
mal weight concrete also haswith fcu, 28d
similar value= 50typical
MPa.LWAC However,
and NWAC others [3-4]
reported whichreported consisten
(fcu) for the 3 mixtures were similar both than0.07fcutowith
within the ratio
0.08, based on theranging
similar from 0.900.15
is between to and
0.930.25(LWAC fcu, 28d = 80 MPa). D
with an averaging
at the 7 and 28 days, except for the LWAC disagreement
strength of 60 MPa asofthedata, ULCC ain ratio
this of 0.91[7].was
of 0.20 used
Limited in Table
experimental 8 of BS EN 20
results
which was 10% lower at 28 days. Cylin- study. seem to indicate that the static Poisson’s
der compressive strength (fc’) of the ULCC lightweight concrete. ratio was increased with the reduction in
shows, in general, similar trend in strength 3.3 Modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s the density of the material. However, it
development as the cubical specimens. For 3.2 Splitting tensile strength should be noted that the ULCC was fibre-
ratio
normal weight concrete, fc’ is about 80%
that of fcu. Ratio (fc’/fcu) of the NWAC in
Splitting tensile strength of thereinforced ULCCwith wasno3.9 MPa
coarse at 7 days, and 4.4 MPa at
aggregate.
Modulus of elasticity of lightweight con-
this study (Table 3) was in agreement with average, ratio of splitting tensile
crete is affected by its strength and density, 3.4 Resistance to chloride-ion (fst / fc’) of the ULCC w
to compressive strength
concrete strength classes defined in Table 7 at the different ages. From
and is generally lower than that of nor- Fig. 2, it is estimated that fst/fc’ for normal weight conc
penetration
of BS EN 206-1:2000. However, no obvi- similar value within 0.07 to 0.08, based on the similar strength of 60 MPa as the U
malweight concrete of the same strength.
ous trend could be observed for the ratio At 28 days, the ULCC had a Ec of 16.8 Total charge passed through the ULCC
(fc’/fcu) of the ULCC. Similar observation study.
GPa, whereas Ec of the controls LWAC according to ASTM C 1202 test was 153
was noted for the LWAC where the ratio and NWAC were 23.4 and 28.2 GPa, re- coulombs (Table 3), which was compara-
(fc’/fcu) was 0.94 and 1.10 at ages of 7 and 3.3 Modulus
spectively. It is noted thatofEcelasticity
of the NWACand ble Poisson’s ratio
to that of the control LWAC, but much
28 days, respectively (Table 3). A study by in this Modulus
Hammer et al. [2] also reported this with
study is lower ofthan
elasticity of lightweight
that calculated lower thanconcrete is affected
that of the control NWAC.by its strength and d
Both
from Formula (1) (~36 GPa). This indi- the ULCC and LWAC were classified as
the ratio ranging from 0.84 to 1.05 for generally
cates lowerweight
that the normal than aggregate
that of normalweight concrete
“very low” chloride of the
penetrability, same strength. At
whereas
LWAC with fcu, 28d = 50 MPa. However, usedULCC
in the NWAC Ec of has
had aprobably 16.8lowGPa,
elas- whereas
the NWAC Ec was
of the controls
classified LWAC and NWAC w
as ‘moderate’
others [3-4] reported consistently lower 28.2 GPa, respectively. It is noted
tic modulus. chloride Ec of theTheNWAC
thatpenetrability. in this study is low
lower charges
fc’ than fcu with the ratio ranging from 0.90 passed in the ULCC and the LWAC may
(LWAC fcu, 28d = 80 MPa). Despite calculated from Formula (1) (~36 GPa). This indicates that the normal weight ag
SCI
to 0.93CONCRETUS The formula (1) is used to predict static be attributed to the dense matrices due to
of the disagreement of data, a ratio of 0.91 in theofNWAC
modulus concrete Eprobably
c, based on has low elastic
density modulus.
incorporation of silica fume and lower w/b
was used in Table 8 of BS EN 206-1:2000 ρc (1440The formula
to 2560 kg/m3) (1) is used
in ACI Code 318to predict static
in these modulus
two materials. Thisofalso indicatesEc, based on den
concrete
for lightweight concrete. [6]: 3 that high resistance to chloride-ion pen-
to 2560 kg/m ) in ACI Code 318 etration [6]: can still be achieved in the more
3.2 Splitting tensile strength
Ec = 0.043ρc1.5 f c' porous ULCC and LWAC. A more detailed
discussion on the effect of pore structure
Splitting tensile strength of the ULCC was on chloride penetrability is found in [8].
The 28-day static Poisson’s ratio of the ULCC was 0.26 which seems to be higher th
8 SCI CONCRETUS
of the LWAC and NWAC (Table 3). Static Poisson’s ratio of the NWAC and LWAC
study agrees with that of typical LWAC and NWAC reported which is between 0.15 a
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development & Green Technologies
similar strength but lower density since it Rønne, M., ‘Special Lightweight High
is directly related to specific strength. Im- Performance Concrete’, in ‘Concrete
provement in structural efficiency is most 2000 Economic and durable construc-
pronounced for lightweight structures in tion through excellence’, Proceedings of
submerged conditions. This can be illus- an International Conference, vol. 1, 1993
trated using density ratio, defined as ra- (E&FN Spon, New York) 141-151.
tio of apparent density of normalweight [3] ESCSI (Expanded Shale, Cay and Slate
concrete to lightweight concrete or the Institute), ‘Building bridges and marine
ULCC in this case. Structural efficiency is structures’, (Salt Lake City, Utah, 2001),
increased with higher density ratio when 16 pp.
comparing materials of similar strength [4] FIB (Federation Internationale du Be- Industrial Contracts Marketing (2001) Pte Ltd
grade. ton), ‘Lightweight-Aggregate Concrete’, 711 Geylang Road #02-03
Bulletin 8, (Lausanne, Switzerland, 2000).
For example, density ratio (in air) for [5] Mindess, S., Young, J.F. and Darwin,
Oriental Venture Building
NWAC / ULCC is 1.6 (2.35/1.45), and is D., ‘Concrete’, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Singapore 389626
further increased to 3.0 [(2.35-1.00)/(1.45- USA, 2003), 644 pp.
1.00)] for submerged structures. On the [6] ACI Committee 318, ‘Building Code • Architectural Finishing Products
other hand, density ratio (in air) for NWAC Requirements for Structural Concrete and
• Stone
/ LWAC is lower at 1.3 (2.35/1.86), or 1.6 Commentary (ACI 318M-08)’, ACI Manu-
[(2.35-1.00)/(1.86-1.00)] for submerged al of Concrete Practice, Part 3, (American • Polyurethane/Silicon/Acrylic
structures. Hence, structural efficiency for Concrete Institute, USA, 2010), 479 pp. • Cementitious
ULCC is about twice that of the LWAC [7] ACI Committee 213, ‘Guide for Struc-
• Metallic
and thrice that of the NWAC in submerged tural Lightweight-Aggregate Concrete
condition. (ACI 213R-03)’, ACI Manual of Concrete
Practice, Part 1, (American Concrete Insti- • Eco Coating System
With high structural efficiency, the ULCC tute, USA, 2010), 38 pp.
• Low VOC
is suitable for shipbuilding and marine [8] Liu, X., Chia, K.S. and Zhang, M.-
structures based on sandwich design con- H., ‘Development of lightweight concrete • Heat Shield
cept. Typical lightweight sandwich design with high resistance to water and chloride- • Photo Catalytic
consists of a lightweight core structure ion penetration’, Cement & Concrete
• Anti Bacteria
sandwiched between two surface steel Composites 32 (10) (2010) 757-766.
plates. Such design has been identified as [9] Bergan, P.G. and Bakken, K., ‘Sand- • Water-based PU/Epoxy
feasible in shipbuilding [9]. wich design: A solution for marine struc- • Dirt Resistance
tures?’, in ‘MARINE 2005 Computa-
tional Methods in Marine Engineering’,
4. SUMMARY Proceedings of an International Confer- • Fire Proofing System
ence, Oslo, Norway, June 2005 (CIMNE, • Fire Intumescent mastic coating
Distinct advantages of the ULCC include Barcelona, 2005).
a low density of 1450 kg/m3 (0.6 times of • Cementitious Vermiculite
normal weight concrete) and a high 28-day
compressive strength above 60 MPa. Ratio • Water Proofing System
of splitting tensile-to-compressive strength
of the ULCC was similar to that of normal • Cementitious
weight concrete. However, the ULCC had • Polyurethane
lower Young’s modulus and higher Pois-
son’s ratio than typical concretes used in
practice. Despite of its low unit weight, the • Special Coating system:
ULCC had very low chloride penetrability • Pharmaceutical Wall and Flooring
according to ASTM rapid chloride pen- • Clean room Wall and Flooring
etration test. For structural applications,
drying shrinkage and creep behavior of the For technical and sales enquiries, please contact
ULCC are currently under investigation.
Tel: 6741 7776 or Fax: 6744 0103
ACKNOWLEDGE-
MENTS
Grateful acknowledgement is made to
A*STAR (project no. 0921420044) and
Densit ApS for funding this research.
REFERENCES
[1] Torrey, S., ‘Coal Ash Utilization: Fly
Ash, Bottom Ash and Slag’, (Noyes Data,
Park Ridge, NJ, USA, 1978).
[2] Hammer, T.A., Smeplass, S. and
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development & Green Technologies
10 SCI CONCRETUS
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development & Green Technologies
3. Construction
The aircraft stand rigid pavement com-
prises 435mm thick of the RCA concrete
and 75mm thick of lean concrete. A key
challenge in the construction of the rigid
pavement is that RCA concrete tends to
exhibit higher shrinkage than normal con-
crete which may lead to shrinkage cracks.
Special curing measures were undertaken
1.Production of dance with the requirements for side-form
paving method of construction.
during the casting of RCA concrete. Im-
mediately after casting, the concrete sur-
Recycled Concrete face was applied with a concrete curing
The RCA concrete was designed using compound and then covered with a curing
Aggregate 20% of RCA (by mass of coarse aggre- shelter and polyethylene sheets. Based on
gate). Laboratory tests results have shown site observations, the method was found
The existing aircraft stand rigid pavement that RCA exhibited much higher water ab- to be effective even when the construction
was broken up using hydraulic breakers sorption (about 5%) as compared to granite was conducted in the afternoon. With this
and the concrete waste was transported aggregate (typically less than 1%) which is curing method, it allows casting in the day
to a nearby recycling facility for process- normally used for concreting in Singapore. which eases casting work, improves vis-
ing. The waste contains mainly crushed This would drastically reduce the work- ibility and increases productivity.
concrete, ferrous metals and very small ability of the concrete mix. Many research-
amount of other foreign materials. The ers attempt to address this issue by increas- Stringent quality control was carried out to
waste was processed via a few key pro- ing water and cement contents in order to monitor the workability of the fresh con-
cesses which include crushing, sorting achieve the required workability at a con- crete and the flexural strength. The work-
and sieving of the end product (RCA) into stant water to cement ratio. However, the ability of fresh concrete was monitored for
the required sizes to meet the CAG require- increase in cement content can affect the every batch of concrete delivered to the
ments as shown in the above table. properties of the hardened concrete such site to ensure it meets the slump require-
as shrinkage. To overcome this problem, a ment of 38-65mm. Samples of the RCA
2. Mix Design for RCA rational mix design approach developed by concrete were also obtained and tested
Ho et al. was used without the need to in- for 7- and 28-day flexural strength for ev-
Concrete crease the cement and water contents. The ery concrete mix produced per day or per
method involves adjustments in the coarse pavement construction operation. The fol-
The mix design for the concrete with RCA aggregate to fine aggregate ratio and ad- lowing observations can be drawn from the
(hereinafter known as RCA concrete) was dition of some admixtures to achieve the test results.
determined with respect to CAG specifica- required workability. The findings of the
tion requirements which specified a mini- study have been shown that RCA concrete a) 7-day flexural strength – All the test
mum flexural strength of 4.2N/mm2 at 28- provides comparable strength as compared results meet the required strength of 4.2N/
day. The workability was designed based to normal concrete without RCA using this mm2. This implied that the completed air-
on a slump value of 38-65mm in accor- method of mix design. craft stand can be opened to traffic earlier
Samples of RCA
SCI CONCRETUS 11
Category 1: Productivity, Sustainable Development & Green Technologies
completed aircraft
age flexural2 strengthstand can
is in the range be
of 5.1-
Flexural Strength (N/mm 2 )
4.2N/mm
6.3N/mm . .This This
2
implied thatimplied
that RCAthat the
opened to traffic earlier than thecan be
5.4 5.8
completed
concrete can beaircraft stand
Flexural Strength (N/mm 2 )
placement of concrete
stipulated period asof specified 14 days after
4.6
5.0
according 4. to CAG
Conclusions specification. and
placement of concrete as specified Minimum Strength Requirement = 4.2N/mm 4.2
4.6 2
) 28-day Further
flexuraltoStudy
according strength
CAG specification. – The 3.8
4.2
2
Minimum Strength Requirement = 4.2N/mm
average This
flexural strength
project has demonstratedis the in fea-
the
b) 28-day offlexural strength
2 from the – The
3.4
3.8
average
demolition flexural
of the strength
existing aircraft is
stand in the 3.0
implied
even better that
pore Changi
has been than
that
carried outthe
RCA
Airport. To date,
concrete
the project
required
successfully since
can Quality control test results of DateRCA
13-Mar-10
concrete
of Casting
12-Apr-10 12-May-10 11-Jun-10 11-Jul-10 10-Aug-10 9-Sep-10 9-Oct-10 8-Nov-10 8-Dec-10 7-Jan-11
be strength.
flexural designed to achieve or perform
March 2010 and the first phase, compris-
ing 8 aircraft stands, will be completed in footprint of RCA versus Quality control
natural granite test
aggregate. Theresults of RCA
study showed the RCAconcrete
produces
evenDecemberbetter
2011. The thanremaining the aircraftrequired
less carbon emissions than natural granite aggregate. In other words, the use of RCA not
flexural
. Conclusions strength.
stands will
and
be progressively rehabilitated
Further Study
only provides a substitute for natural aggregate, it is also a greener alternative to granite
using the RCA concrete over the next few aggregate. It is envisaged that the project will put Singapore in the forefront of sustainable
years. To further optimize the use of RCA, development in the region.
4. Conclusions and Further Study
This project tohas demonstrated the feasibility of using RCA derived from the demolition of the
Samwoh has carried out extensive research
REFERENCES
evaluate the feasibility of using higher
xisting aircraft
dosagestand
of RCA.rigid pavement
The laboratory for the
tests have reconstruction of the aircraft stand rigid pavement at
This project has demonstrated the feasibility of using RCA derived from the demolition of the
ingapore Changi Airport. To date, the project
shown that it is possible to use up to 40%
Ho, N.Y., Lee, Y. P. K., Lim, W. F., Ting, S. K., Soh, Y. and Low, G. L. (2009). Efficient
utilization ofhas been
recycled carried
concrete aggregateout successfully
for structural since27th
concrete applications. March
Confer-
of RCA in concrete for the aircraft stand
existing aircraft stand rigid pavement for the reconstruction of the aircraft stand rigid pavement at
010 and therigid
first phase,
pavement and comprising 8 aircraft
field trials are being stands, will be completed in December 2011. The
ence of the ASEAN Federation of Engineering Organizations, Singapore. 30 November to
2 December.
Singapore Changi Airport. To date, the project has been carried out successfully since March
emaining aircraft stands
In addition, carbon will beanalysis
footprint progressively
carried out to validate the performance.
was rehabilitated using the RCA concrete over the next
2010 and the first phase, comprising 8 aircraft stands, will be completed in December 2011. The
ew years. Toalsofurther optimize
carried out to evaluate the use of RCA, Samwoh has carried out extensive research to
the carbon
remaining
valuate aircraftofstands
the feasibility
12 SCI CONCRETUS
using will be dosage
higher progressively
of RCA.rehabilitated using
The laboratory thehave
tests RCA concrete
shown that over
it is the next
fewtoyears.
ossible use upTo to further
40% of optimize the usefor
RCA in concrete of the
RCA, Samwoh
aircraft has carried
stand rigid pavement outand
extensive research to
field trials
evaluate
re being theout
carried feasibility of using
to validate higher dosage
the performance. of RCA.carbon
In addition, The laboratory tests have
footprint analysis shown
was also that it is
possible
arried out to to use upthe
evaluate to 40%
carbonof footprint
RCA in concrete for thenatural
of RCA versus aircraftgranite
stand rigid pavement
aggregate. and field trials
The study
Jan-11
the
t at
rch
The
next
h to
it is
ials
Category 2: Concrete Technologies and Standards
P
roductivity is the current catchword dark samfoo dress, in carrying their work are not only costly but heavy to handle.
in all endeavours, with concrete at the level of skill available then! Pride of The opposite situation is the norm when
construction still far from catching work is the best driving force. you adopt my SCC cousin for the same
up in the race to the top. In fact, the current products, lighter moulds and minimal vi-
level of productivity in the local concrete Why do my present day handlers in the bration. In addition, the rate of casting will
construction sector is a long way from that concrete construction have to return to also be increased – productivity! Yes, my
in more industrialised regions. Why am I their home countries after a few years in SCC cousin may well be a bit more cost-
so far behind my overseas cousins? What the industry when they have just about ly, but the overall savings will more than
should I do to catch up? gained enough experience to do a better compensate for this. The experience with
job? They have to learn how to handle me post tensioned precast girders in North
There are at least three areas that I need to on the job, from others often of limited American in the past decade demonstrates
improve. The first is in adopting more ad- training themselves. When I am not given the classic case of a higher materials cost
vanced technologies in construction. The the right treatment, I cannot be expected to often ending with a lower overall product
second is in worker’s training as such tech- perform as intended. However, I am ca- cost. The fact that the issue of defects in
nologies tend to demand better skill and pable of better performance. the anchorage zones being reduced to near
basic knowledge in their implementation. non-existence has been sufficient to pro-
Finally, it is the attitude towards quality For example, let me talk about members of mote changing over to SCC. This is the
assurance so that all things are done right my concrete family with self-compacting case of getting it right the first time, and
the first time. capability, or self-consolidating, if you most of the time, even though may not be
prefer, by their initials, SCC. Why don’t I all the time. Of course, there is the need to
I do not need to go far in shopping for the see them around more often? It is only in train my producer and handlers in working
new technologies in concrete construc- the few cases where my contractor friend with my new cousin, initially.
tion that enable higher productivity. The cannot find other suitable members of my
shopping list is easy to find but in order concrete family to perform the task that my In conclusion, not only productivity is
to acquire any such new ways there is al- cousin, SCC has to be selected to do the improved, my carbon footprint is also re-
ways the first cost to bring them into the job. Why not in more cases where SCC duced through the use of lighter moulds,
local construction industry. (BCA has in- is considered as the alternative? I am the less time, labour and energy in handling
troduced an S$250-million Construction material in precast concrete elements com- the new type of moulds and much less en-
Productivity and Capability Fund (CPCF). monly adopted in housing projects, trans- ergy needed to achieve full compaction at a
portation infrastructures and tunnel seg- short time. I look forward to the day when
I also need the support of far sighted man- ments. In nearly all cases, I am designed my SCC cousin will dominate the precast
agement that has recognised the poor re- with a low slump and heavily compacted concrete sector bringing not only better
turn of employing unskilled labour on long by means of external and at times also in- productivity but also the other concomitant
term productivity increase – remember ternal vibrators. In order for me to accept benefits to the construction industry.
how dedicated were our “samsui” women such high level of vibration, I have to be
with their broad red head dress and blue- confined within very strong moulds which
14 SCI CONCRETUS
Category
Category
2: 2:Concrete
Concrete
Technologies
Technologies
andand
Standards
Standards
Table 2: Physical and chemical characteristic of cement (I), UFGGBS and USF
lts and discussions
Drying test: Fig 2 shows the gravimetric
Table 2: Physical and chemical characteristic of cement (I), UFGGBS and USF
weight loss of the four mixes of concrete
Cement (I) UFGGBS USF samples under indoor drying condition
pressive strength: Compression test results of cube specimens tested on 3, 7, 28, 56 with andrelative
90 dayshumidity at 75 %. After the
Physical properties indoor drying, the same samples were sub-
compiled and plotted in Fig. 1. The inclusion of UFGGBS and USF leads to a higher rate
jected to of oven drying at 105°C
prolonged
Blaine Surface Area (m2/kg) 360 870 -
to measure the total evaporable water con-
ation and pozzolanic
BETreaction. It (m2/kg)
Surface Area also has better filling effects
1466 4968 of the interfacial
20340 transition zone of saturation for the four
tent. The degree
mixes was 89, 98.1, 98.7 and 98.6 % for
s with subsequentParticle
improvement in the
Mean Diameter strength 14.7
(µm) of the concrete.
4.09 < 0.1 Mix A, B, C and D respectively. Mix B, C
Density(kg/m3) 3150 2720 2200 and D have very high degree of saturation,
therefore allowing us to neglect the effect
140.00 Oxide compositions (%) of carbonation.
Compressive Strength
130.00 Mix D
SiO2 21.5 31.2 93
Mix C Chloride penetration: The chloride pen-
120.00 Al2O3 5.5 9 2
etration is modelled by chloride binding
110.00 Fe2O3 4.5 Mix B 1 1 capacity through adsorption isotherm and
Results and discussions chloride diffusivity [5]. For Mix B, C and
100.00 CaO 63 35.1 1 D, considering diffusion alone will allow
SO 2.5 0.1 Mix A
0.3 us to yield good prediction of the chloride
90.00
Compressive strength: Compression test results of cube specimens tested on 3, 7, 28, 56 and 90 days
3
penetration. By using the law of diffusion
80.00 and plottedMgO
were compiled
2 11.8 1
in Fig. 1. The inclusion of UFGGBS and USF leads to a higher rate [6],ofa time-dependent chloride diffusion
coefficient [7] and a Monte Carlo Simula-
hydration70.00
and pozzolanic reaction. It also has better filling effects of the interfacial transition tion,
zonethe probability of failure of the con-
60.00 crete can be calculated through analysis
pores with subsequent improvement in the strength of the concrete.
0 20 40 60 80 [8].
100 In addition to the empirical age factor
(α-values) of the concrete, the diffusivity
140.00 Time (Days) coefficients for 28 day water cured sam-
Compressive Strength
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Mix B
35
0.997 Time (Days) Mix C
Mix D
0.996
Fig 2: Weight loss ratio under normal drying condition
Fig 2: Weight loss ratio under normal drying condition
0.995
16 SCI CONCRETUS0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (Days)
TableTable
3: Input parameters
3: Input parametersininprobability
probability of failurecalculation
of failure calculation References
Mix design A B C D [1] Sabet Divsholi B., Lim T.Y.D.
and Teng S., “Ultra Durable Concrete for
Design life 500 years
Sustainable Construction”, Advanced Ma-
Cover depth 50 (2) mm terials Research, Vol. 368-373, 2011, pp.
Temperature 30ºC 553-556.
Dcoef 7.91 (1.22) 0.95 (0.07) 0.16 (0.04) 0.11 (0.01)
t0 (age when tested) 28 days
[2] Persson B., “Experimental Stud-
ies on Shrinkage of High Performance
te (age when exposed) 28 days
Concrete”, Cement and Concrete Re-
α (age factor) 0.4 (0.08) search, Vol. 28, No. 7, 1998, pp. 1023-
Ccr (critical chloride content) 0.4 (0.08) 1036.
Cs (surface chloride content) 3.8 (0.9)
[3] Nakamura N., Sakai M. and
Swamy R.N., “Effect of Slag Fineness on
*standard deviation is presented in bracket
the Development of Concrete Strength and
Microstructure”, ACI SP Vol. 132, No. 2,
100 1993, pp.1343–66.
90
Probabilities of failure (%)
SCI CONCRETUS 17