You are on page 1of 9

EDITING AND PUBLICATION ASSIGNMENT

WANDA PRATIWI – A12117026

TITLE AND
NO. RESEARCH PROBLEM RESEARCH METHOD FINDING AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSSION
AUTHOR
In this research, observation data The result of the research
Students in junior high school
was elaborated descriptively while revealed that picture book
often find problems in learning
questionnaire data was elaborated helped the teacher and
reading narrative text. Students
statistically since it provided the students in reading narrative
are facing this problem when
calculation results from student's activities. The use of picture
they hardly find appropriate
answer. There were four statements book was observed during
The Use of Picture book for their age and struggle
in the questioners related to the lesson in A and B
Book in Teaching to understand a narrative text
students' responses to the use of classrooms in which students
Reading for Junior (Marchand-Martella & Martella, Qualitative Research
1 picture book, which are: I like achieved better
High School Student 2010). Brown (2004, p.180) (Descriptive Method)
learning to read English books with comprehension to the
points out that using a variation
pictures, I like learning to read narrative story in the reading
Maulana Restanto of media will rise the chance that
English using "The Lorax", The use activities. The use of "The
the learners will learn more and
of "The Lorax" book to learn Lorax" book as the tool of
recall better what they learn in
English vocabulary is more picture book facilitated
developing the performance of
interesting, the use of "The Lorax" teacher and students to carry
ability they are projected to
book expand my English out all of the steps in reading
improve.
vocabulary. narrative activities.
2 An Analysis of Teaching and learning process Qualitative Research Based on interview result, teacher The fear of the teachers and
Teachers’ between teacher and student in (Descriptive Method) applied teacher’s questioning as some people that teacher’s
Questioning the classroom need a method guide line in implementation of questioning changes will
Strategies During and strategy. Teachers have curriculum. The teacher was trained never give any significant
Interaction in The applied strategy to make student previously by teacher training on a differences toward the
Classroom: A Case enjoy and active in teaching simulation teacher’s questioning student might be happened
Of The Eight Grade learning process, unfortunately that was held by the Rule and but it might also be not.
SMP PGRI 01 sometimes student do not Regulation Ministry of Education. Because it goes to the
Semarang understand whether topic was But there are several mistakes when teachers again, if they can
given by the teacher. This study observation the implementation of change their mindset and
A.B. Prabowo K.A., thoroughly examined the teacher’s questioning in teaching views through changing their
Alfiyanti teachers ‘questioning strategies learning process made by teacher old views of teacher’s
during the classroom that she forgot to apply in teaching questioning with the new
interaction.This study aimed to those are teacher were not present one that is modern
describe teacher’s questioning the real object when explaining the pedagogic dimension, it is
strategies during the classroom materials about recount text, teacher sure that they would be able
interaction. The reason why the were not guide the students to to teacher’s questioning and
writer would like to analyze perform their experiment and conduct the teaching and
teachers questioning strategies teachers were not giving feedback learning process by using
are student still confusing about and appraisal for students writing teacher’s questioning in a
the topic that teacher given, the recount text. correct way of
student are shy to ask question implementation.
and sometime student feel so
silent when teacher explain the
topic.
3 An Analysis of The purpose of teaching Qualitative Research The Way Teacher Teach Writing From the results of the
Student Ability In writing is that students can (Descriptive Method) Descriptive Text in the Class. study there were three
Writing Descriptive write what is in their The data classifications of students'
Text thinking creatively. Students generated by researchers through writing abilities, namely
can interact with academic observing the way English the low, medium and high
Yusri Apriani
writing, especially language teachers categories. there are still
Margaretha Turnip
descriptive texts. In teach the process of writing many
descriptive writing, students descriptive text and researchers students who have
can master the generic get information on the difficulty in writing
structure, language features, condition and situation of descriptive text in
vocabulary and mechanics. students learning in class. The accordance with a good
Students are able to Way Teacher Teach Writing and correct generic
understand the Descriptive Text in the Class. structure so this should be
function of writing. The data generated by a concern for teachers at
Researchers concluded that researchers through observing school,
students' ability to write the way English language and students also need to
descriptive text at ten grade teachers teach the process of improve their vocabulary,
students of SMAN 11 Jambi writing descriptive text and as well as a lot of
is good. Another research researchers get information on exercises to
conducted by Siahaan the condition and situation of write descriptive text
(2013), the results found by students learning in class. fter 20 properly and correctly, not
researchers some students minutes, the researcher collects only at school but at home
student work, then the researcher
asks any difficulties and
constraints in writing descriptive
text. The Second Grade
Ability in Writing
DescriptiveText. The data
generated by researchers based
on analysis and assessment of
scores on student worksheets
after researchers collected the
worksheets. In this study, many
have been able to write a students write texts but are not
semantic structure of coherent between one
descriptive text using sentence with the next sentence,
appropriate linguistic so the conversation sentences
and
features. But taken by students
other courses.
there are still students who have no meaning. 10% of
are confused, so that it is students who are able to write
needed to improve their skills appropriately, 13% of
to write descriptive text. students who are able to write at
a moderate level, and receive
more than 77% of
students fail to write about
sapher coherence. Based on the
results of the study, the
researchers concluded that there
were
still many students who had
difficulty writing descriptive
texts properly and
correctly.
An Analysis of In teaching and learning Qualitative Research The researcher has 15 Teacher questioning is
4
Teachers’ process, sometimes teacher (Descriptive Method) interviewees and asked 6 one of the keys to
Questioning only teach without question related to the teacher obtaining a successful
Strategies in ELT questioning. Some factors for questioning strategies in ELT teaching and learning
(English Language it because they are in hurry, classroom interaction. From the process, this study was set
Teaching) The they do not well understand student, the researcher found that out to identify the types of
Classroom the material, they do not care some of the students agree with teacher question, ask at
Interaction At about the students or they are the researcher question which is SMA Muhammadiyah 1
Eleventh Grade lazy. Based on the experience asked. The researcher asked a UNISMUH Makassar. In
SMA of the researcher when doing close question but with an this case,eleventh-grade
Muhammadiyah 1 a Magang III, a researcher addition in some part of the students were chosen for
Unismuh Makassar found that students will more question, so the interviewing observation. It is
interactive when their teacher form consists of an open and checking students
ask more question. That the close question. The result understanding, arousing
reason why researcher will try revealed that display question interest and curiosity
to do the research in SMA was the most common and concerning a topic,
Muhammadiyah 1 Unismuh frequently asked questions in the eliciting information and
Makassar. According to Inan 2 class with one meeting each controlling the class.
& Fidan in Prasetyawati class. First problem statement Meanwhile the effect of
(2015) asking questions to the reveals in the observed in this student response in
students is an important research, there was a tendency interaction class analyzed
part of the teaching and for the teacher to employ more by the percentage of agree
learning process because it display question (74%) than nd disagree with a student
can stimulate students to procedural (13%) and referential toward some interviewing
learn, gain knowledge and (13%) question. Therefore, the form that researcher ask to
improve their critical case is eliciting language from them. And the result is the
thinking. the student. Is not merely about question can affect the
asking display, procedural or interaction of the
referential question but how to classroom.
getting the student speak up in
the interaction at class.
Additionally, in terms of
question types, this study
suggests that display question
can increase the students'
knowledge because all the
question related to the material
that their teacher provided and
also most of the students like if
the teacher asks something
related to the material. For the
third problem statement, the
result of this study reveals that
from 15 interviewing students
they are like for answering the
teacher ask but some of them
also dislike. Based on the
response the student afraid if
their teacher asks because they
not confidently about the
correctness of their answer,
however, the teacher did not
nominate or point certain
students to answer her question.
5 The Use of Small In the pre-research at the ninth The Researcher used two The finding of the research shows The result of the research
Group Discussion to grade students of SMP Negeri 1 kind of data collection. that the use of small-group shows that the use of SGD
Improve Students' Wuryantoro, the researcher There are Qualitative discussion can improve all improve students' reading
Reading could identify problems faced by Research which contain indicators of students' reading comprehension skills. The
Comprehenssion the ninth grade students of IXB of Inteview, Observation comprehension. SGD can improve proof of students' reading
in learning reading and Questioner. And the student's skill findin main idea. comprehension improvement
Fibrina Hanung comprehension. The researcher Quantitative Research The students' achievement in can be found from the
Siswanti, Ngadiso, also directly asked the classroom which contain pretest and finding main idea improves. It can computation of the test
Endang Setyaningsih teacher whether reading is a real post test. be seen from the result of test. The scores. It shows a significant
problem in her classroom average score increases from 53.75 increase. The students' main
activity. From the students' in pre-test, 75 in post-test of cycle score in the test which is
competence aspect, they still got 1, 78.33 in post-test 2. In addition, only 58.50 turns into 71.40
difficulties in five aspects of the results of interview and in the first post-test. Then, it
reading comprehension as questionnaire also show gets higher again in the
follows: (1) the students got improvement on the students' skill second post-test that reached
difficulty in finding the main in finding main idea. 78.45. Their main score of
idea; (2) the students got five indicators are above the
difficulty in finding meaning of KKM (70). It means that all
certain word; (3) the students got students are successful in
difficulty in finding detail understanding of five
information; (4) the students got indicators of reading
difficulty in locating reference; comprehension.
(5) students got difficulty in
understanding text organization
(social function and generic
structure of text).
Reading is one of the important Referring to the findings and
language skills. By reading, After calculating the data, the discussions that have been
people may get a lot of researcher was found that the elaborated in the previous
information. In order to gain correlation coefficient (r) is 0.7205, chapter, it is found that there
specific information, students at and then it was necessary to find is strong correlation between
Correlation Between school should be taught how to out its strength to follow Arikunto students' reading
Quantitative Method and
Students' Vocabulary read effectively and efficiently. (2003). The correlation coefficient comprehension and their
Correlational Research
Mastery and Their Another way to help the students is 0.7205, it could be considered as vocabulary mastery.
Design with Achievment
6 Reading to understand the text without a strong correlation since the result Although the scores of
Test Data Collection
Comprehenssion knowing all the vocabulary in was included into strong category reading and vocabulary test
Technique
the text is by finding the key (Arikunto, 2003). In addition to are different but the
Fajar Furqon words. By doing this strategy, ability students' vocabulary correlation is strong. It may
students can cover their mastery, the strategy and be caused by the difficult
vocabulary weaknesses since background knowledge of the text vocabulary in test items.
vocabulary knowledge is one of help students comprehend the text. Students who have high
the major factors that influence scores in reading also have
reading comprehension. high score in vocabulary.
7 Improving The From the researcher experience, Quantitative Research After conducting the pretest and Based on the results of the
Students' Vocabulary it was found that most of student which used one group three times treatments, the data analysis and discussion,
Achievment through could not answer the question in pretest and posttest researcher administered the posttest. the researcher concludes that
Intensive Reading English. Beside that, the other research design The posttest was administered to there was a significant
reason that cause the problem measure the students' vocabulary improvement of the students'
Eva Mayang Sari, was that the teacher did not use mastery after the treatments by vocabulary achievement
Ujang Suparman, the appropriate technique in using Intensive Reading. From the from the pretest and posttest
Huzairin learning vocabulary. The teacher statistical calculation by using SPSS after they were taught by
just asked the students to read 20, it was also found that the lower using Intensive Reading.
the material and to find the value is positive and the upper
positive too. So, it means that this
technique gives significant
meaning from the dictionary. It
difference after the treatment was
made the students feel bored in
implemented. The result of
learning English vocabulary.
hypothesis testing showed that the
Considering the fact above, the
significant 2 tailed is p=0.000 and
teacher should provide the
the level of significant is if p<0.05
interesting technique to develop
so it's means that there is a
the students' activity in learning
significant improvement of
vocabulary. One important way
students' vocabulary achievement
to develop vocabulary
after they were taught by using
knowledge is through intensive
Intensive Reading.
reading.

There was significant


Based on the result of the analyses
correlation between TS and
of the questionnaires, the External
LLS. Findings of correlation
TS and Metacognitive LLS are the
analysis showed that most of
prefered and most often used by
Language learning strategies are the category of TS had
students. It means that learning
very important because they can significant correlation with
processes are more likely to be
help students learn the language. each category of LLS.
influenced by External TS rather
Students may find that some of Among thirteen categories of
than by other TS and by
Students' Thingking language learning strategies are TS, there is Monarchic TS
Metacognitive LLS rather than by
Style and It's relevant for their learning and Quantitative Method and and Compensation LLS
other aspects of LLS. Some of the
8 Relation to Their some may not. The students’ Correlational Research which did not have
correlation coefficients are above
Language Learning preferences may be influenced Design significant. A further
0.5, it means that there are strong
Strategy by their own thought. In other analysis using stepwise
correlations. In addition, the
words, students’ ways of procedure for the multiple
probability values higher than than
thinking can determine their regression analysis revealed
the alpha level .05 suggested that
choice of language learning that TS gave contribution
significant correlation between each
strategies. 38.5% to LLS. It means that
of category of students’ TS and
there must be other factors
their language learning category
besides TS that can explain a
existed.
lot of variations in the
students’ LLS.
9 The Correlation The importance of grammar and Descriptive Quantitative From the application of the Pearson Based on the research
findings and discussions in
previous chapter, the
r formula in analyzing the following conclusions are
correlation between the students’ presented:
grammar and writing ability it is 1. The students have well of
writing cannot be overstated.
found in moderate correlation. grammar ability and good
While certain parts of a society
Namely 0, 43 which lies between 0, writing skill, it was proved
may adapt their own dialectal
40 – 0, 60. To investigate whether by the result of the mean
variations as a part of their
this value (r) is significant or not, score which stays 66, 00 and
cultural identity, a failure to also
the writer consulted with the (r 74, 69 of the test referenced.
be able to follow the
Between Students’ table) of critical value (r) product 2. There was a significant
conventional grammar rules will Research and
Grammar moment of this 5% of the standard correlation between the
greatly limits a person's Correlational Research
Knowledge and significance, with sample (N) =23, students’ grammar and their
opportunity to communicate Design
Writing Ability it is found that the critical value of writing ability. Since the two
with a wider audience. Someone
(r table) is 0,413. The coefficient variables correlates
may be a very talented writer
correlation that is, r=0, 43 and r significantly, the position of
with a lot of great ideas, but if
table is 0,413 it means that, r is their significant is moderate
they have poor grammar, they
greater than r table (r > r table) it is which lies between 0, 40 – 0,
will have trouble communicating
stated that there is a significant 60. It showed that the
those ideas to other people.
correlation between the students’ mastery of compound
grammar ability and their writing sentence supports the
skill in learning English. students to produce a
grammatically correct in
paragraph.
10 Using Mind Reading is an important role in Pre-Experimental Before giving treatment, the After analyzing the data
Mapping Technique human being context. In learning Research Design researcher examined the students’ descriptively and
to Improve Reading reading comprehension the ability in reading comprehension statistically, the researcher
Comprehension of students are expected to be able using a test called pre-test. It was draws some conclusions.
The Second Year to get meaning from the written applied to measure the students’ Firstly, the result of the data
Students language and enhance their reading comprehension before they analysis shows that the use
English. However, teaching and got treatment. The result of the pre- of mind mapping technique
learning reading is not easy test above shows that the highest can improve students’
because there is some factors score is 76.67 and the lowest score reading comprehension of
which influence it. Mind is 33.33. After conducting the the second year of SMP
mapping technique is one of the treatment to students, the researcher Negeri 2 Kasimbar
techniques that can improve the gave post-test in order to know their especially year XIII B.
progress as well as to find whether
or not the students’ ability in
reading comprehension can be
improved through the use of mind
mapping technique. The result of
the above calculation showed that
there was significant difference
between the students’ mean score
on pre-test and post-test. The
students’ mean score on pre-test
59.52 was lower than that of on the Secondly, the researcher
post-test 68.88. In other words, the concludes that the
english ability of the students. students’ achievement got hypothesis of the research
Mind mapping itself is improved. After counting the was accepted. This case
popularized by Buzan in 1964. students mean score of both pre-test shows there is significant
Buzan (2007:19) states, “Mind- and post-test, the researcher difference between the pre-
map is the chosen instrument calculated the deviation and square test and post-test result. The
that could help a person to sharp deviation of the students’ scores on last is, the students responses
the memory.” It is a useful pre-test and post-test as shown in are the students involve in
technique that help the students the following table. comprehending the idea and
learn more effectively, improves The result of research above shows the meaning context of
the way that we record that the students’ ability in reading reading and they acquire
information. comprehension can be improved by information explicitly stated
using of mind mapping technique. in the text.
In other words, the results can be
found that there was significant
difference between this research
with previously research. It has
been found that mind mapping
technique was effective to improve
the students’ reading
comprehension of the second year
students of SMP Negeri 2
Kasimbar.

You might also like