You are on page 1of 6

JFS C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology

Characterization of Edible Film Fabricated


with Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) Gelatin
Extract Using Selected Pretreatment Methods
S. ZHANG, Y. WANG, J.L. HERRING, AND J.-H. OH
C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology

ABSTRACT: Farm-raised catfish are important to the economy of the southeastern states in the United States, and
catfish processing produces about 55% of by-products for inexpensive sale. Therefore, the utilization of catfish by-
products is of great interest to the catfish industry. The objectives of this research were to determine the optimum
pretreatment method to extract catfish gelatin for edible film application, and to characterize physical, mechanical,
and barrier properties of edible films fabricated with catfish skin gelatin. Catfish skins obtained from a local plant
were treated with 6 selected pretreatment methods. The main extraction was performed with deionized water at 50 ◦ C
after pretreatment. The gelatin yield was calculated and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) was performed to characterize molecular weight (MW) profile. Color, tensile strength (TS), elongation,
and water barrier property were determined to characterize the fabricated catfish gelatin films. From the results of
gelatin yield, color, SDS-PAGE, as well as mechanical and barrier properties of the film, the pretreatment method with
0.25 M NaOH and 0.09 M acetic acid, followed by extraction at 50 ◦ C for 3 h, was determined as the optimum extraction
method. The catfish gelatin exhibited higher MW fractions than commercial mammalian gelatin. The catfish gelatin
extracts possessed film-forming properties determined by TS, elongation, and water vapor permeability (WVP)
comparable to those of commercial mammalian gelatin. The selected formula for catfish gelatin film was determined
as 1% gelatin and 20% glycerol, resulting in greatest TS and lowest WVP.
Keywords: catfish, extraction, gelatin, gelatin film, pretreatment

Introduction Due to the outbreaks of transmissible spongiform encephalopa-

G elatin is one of the important biopolymers widely used in the


manufacture of gel desserts, edible films in food industries,
and hard/soft capsules in pharmaceutical industries (Choi and Re-
thy and religious concerns, the alternative gelatins to replace mam-
malian gelatin obtained from bovine or porcine skin and bones
are gaining increasing attention (Muyonga and others 2004; Zhou
genstein 2000; Baziwane and He 2003). Gelatin possesses excellent and Regenstein 2004). Fish gelatin is an excellent alternative gelatin
film-forming properties, and is one of the 1st materials applied to ed- source, especially for specific religious populations, as a kosher or
ible coatings and films (Klose and others 1952; Gennadios and oth- halal food (Muyonga and others 2004). Therefore, the utilization of
ers 1994). Collagen, the parental form of gelatin, is abundant in the fish gelatin can broaden the applications of gelatin to diverse food
skins and bones of animals and fish. The extraction of gelatin from products as an alternative gelatin source (Gudmundsson and Haf-
collagen involves several steps such as alkali and/or acid pretreat- steinsson 1997).
ments for collagen hydrolysis, followed by the main extraction in The major challenges in utilizing fish gelatins are the dark color,
water above 45 ◦ C (Wainerwright 1977; Montero and Gòmez-Guillèn strong fishy odor, and poor gel and film properties of the fish gelatins
2000). The method of pretreatment and extraction greatly affects the (Montero and Gòmez-Guillèn 2000). There are extensive reports on
physicochemical properties of the extracted gelatin (Montero and extraction of gelatins from fish skins such as tilapia (Grossman and
Gòmez-Guillèn 2000). Two types of gelatins are obtained from se- Bergman 1992), cod (Gudmundsson and Hafsteinsson 1997), hake
lected treatments: acid pretreatment yields Type A gelatin, whereas (Montero and others 1999), megrim (Montero and Gòmez-Guillèn
alkaline pretreatment yields Type B gelatin (Gennadios and oth- 2000), and pollock (Zhou and Regenstein 2004). Since the amino
ers 1994). Industrial and commercial gelatins are mainly produced acid compositions of gelatin from selected fish species are signif-
from mammalian sources such as bovine hide, pigskin, and bones icantly different, the functionality of selected fish gelatins such as
(Johnston-Banks 1990; Venien and Levieux 2005). The source, age film-forming properties may be also different (Avena-Bustillos and
of the animal, and type of collagen influence the physicochemical others 2006). Few studies indicated that the warm-water fish gelatins
properties of the gelatin. exhibited better functional properties than cold-water fish gelatins
(Muyonga and others 2004; Avena-Bustillos and others 2006). There
is limited research with respect to the physical and mechanical
MS 20070284 Submitted 4/17/2007, Accepted 8/7/2007. Authors Zhang and characteristics of edible films fabricated from fish gelatins. Avena-
Oh are with Dept. of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Tuskegee Univ., Bustillos and others (2006) reported that the edible film fabricated
Tuskegee, AL 36088, U.S.A. Author Wang is with Dept. of Biosystems En-
gineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A. Author Herring is from fish gelatin exhibited lower water vapor permeability (WVP)
with Dept. of Food and Animal Sciences, Alabama A&M Univ., P.O. Box than that of edible film fabricated from mammalian gelatin.
1682, Normal, AL 35762, U.S.A. Direct inquiries to author Oh (E-mail: Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) is one of the warm-water
jhoh@tuskegee.edu).
catfish species, and widely produced in the southern areas in the

C498 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 72, Nr. 9, 2007 


C 2007 Institute of Food Technologists
doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00515.x
Further reproduction without permission is prohibited
Characterization of catfish gelatin film . . .

United States. Farm-raised catfish production in the United States water at 50 ◦ C for 16 h in a water bath. The catfish gelatin extracts were
is approximately 300,000 tons per year (NASS 2006), and catfish filtered through glass wool, and freeze-dried prior to further work.
processing produces about 55% of by-products for inexpensive sale
(Prinyawiwatkul and others 2002). Catfish skins, which account for Gelatin yield
about 6% of live weight, are presently rendered with little added The protein concentration of catfish gelatin extracts was deter-
value. Little research was conducted on extracting gelatin from cat- mined by the Biuret method using bovine serum albumin as a stan-
fish skins, evaluating the physicochemical properties of catfish skin dard. The gelatin yield expressed by protein yield was calculated
gelatin, or applying catfish gelatin to edible coating or films (Yang using the following Eq. (1) (Zhou and Regenstein 2005):
and others 2007). Therefore, the objectives of this study were to
determine the optimum pretreatment method for catfish gelatin Protein yield (%) =
extraction, and to characterize physical, mechanical, and barrier protein concentration (g/mL) × volume of extract (mL)
× 100
properties of edible films fabricated from catfish skin gelatin. weight of catfish skin (g)
(1)
Materials and Methods

C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology


SDS-PAGE
Preparation and cleaning catfish skins Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
Frozen catfish skins were obtained from the Harvest Se- (SDS-PAGE) was performed with a Ready Gel Precast Gel System
lect Inc. plant (Uniontown, Ala., U.S.A.). Catfish skins were (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, Calif., U.S.A.) to determine
trimmed to remove the residual fish meat and fin, cut into small the molecular weight (MW) profile of the catfish gelatin extracts
pieces (approximately 20 × 20 mm2 ), and washed with 4 ◦ C (Laemmli 1970). A precast 4% stacking gel and 10% to 20% con-
deionized (D.I.) water 3 times. The cleaned fish skins were drained tinuous gradient separating gel (Sigma Chemical Co., Saint Louis,
and squeezed using cheesecloth for 5 min to remove excessive water Mo., U.S.A.) were used. After measuring the protein concentrations,
(Zhou and Regenstein 2004). the gelatin extracts were diluted to approximately 1.0 mg/mL with
62.5 mM Tris buffer and boiled for 3 min in a water bath. An aliquot of
Pretreatment of catfish skins prior to main extraction 15 μL from each catfish gelatin diluent was loaded onto the stacking
Six pretreatment methods with selected conditions were applied gel. The PageRulerTM Prestained Protein Ladder Plus MW marker
to the catfish skins prior to the extraction. Pretreatment Method A mix (Fermentas, Hanover, Md., U.S.A.) with MW ranging from 10 to
was performed with acid treatment; 40 g of cleaned catfish skin were 250 kDa was used as a standard to determine the MW profiles of
soaked in 240 mL of 0.09 M acetic acid at 4 ◦ C for 1 h. Pretreatment catfish gelatin extracts. An electrical field of 0.4 V/mm was applied
Methods B and C were performed with acid and alkali treatments; to the gel, and increased to 0.75 V/mm once the dye fronts reach the
40 g of cleaned catfish skin were soaked in 240 mL of 0.09 M acetic separating gel.
acid at 4 ◦ C for 1 h and washed with 4 ◦ C D.I. water 5 times, followed
by soaking in 240 mL of 0.25 M sodium hydroxide at 4 ◦ C for 1 h
Preparation of catfish gelatin film
(Pretreatment Method B); and 40 g of catfish skins were soaked in
The film-forming solutions of catfish gelatin were prepared by
240 mL of 0.25 M sodium hydroxide at 4 ◦ C for 1 h and washed with
dissolving designated amounts of gelatin extracts in distilled water
4 ◦ C D.I. water 5 times, followed by soaking in 240 mL of 0.09 M acetic
at 55 ◦ C with designated amounts of glycerol as a plasticizer. Com-
acid at 4 ◦ C for 1 h (Pretreatment Method C). Pretreatment Method
mercial mammalian gelatin of 275 bloom (Gelatin Type A, Fisher
D involved alkali treatment; 40 g of catfish skins were soaked in 240
Scientific Ltd., Pittsburgh, Pa., U.S.A.) as a control was also used
mL of 0.25 M sodium hydroxide at 4 ◦ C for 1 h.
for film fabrication. The catfish films were cast from 1% gelatin and
Pretreatment Methods E and F were adopted from the procedures
20% glycerol in film-forming solutions to determine the effects of
developed by Grossman and Bergman (1992) with minor modifica-
pretreatment methods on the functional properties of catfish film.
tions. Cleaned catfish skins (25 g) were soaked in 350 mL of 0.05 M
The selective gelatin concentrations ranging from 0.5% to 2.5% at
sodium hydroxide solution for 2 h, and fresh sodium hydroxide solu-
0.5% intervals with 20% glycerol were used to determine the opti-
tion was replaced 3 times at 40-min intervals during alkali soaking.
mum gelatin concentration for film fabrication. The selective glyc-
After alkali treatment, the catfish skins were washed with D.I. water
erol contents ranging from 0% to 70% with 10% intervals were also
5 times, and then soaked in 350 mL of 0.02 M sulfuric acid solution
tested to determine the optimum glycerol content for film fabri-
for 2 h with 3 changes of sulfuric acid solution at 40-min intervals.
cation. The catfish gelatin films were cast and dried following the
The catfish skins were washed with D.I. water 5 times, and soaked
similar procedures developed by Oh and others (2004) with minor
in 350 mL of 0.05 M citric acid for 2 h with 3 changes of citric acid
modifications. The film-forming solution (50 mL) of catfish extracts
solution at 40-min intervals. All procedures were carried out at 4 ◦ C
was cast into a 140-mm-diameter glass Petri dish coated with Teflon
(Pretreatment Method E). For Pretreatment Method F, similar pro-
tape, leveled, and dehydrated in an environmental chamber (Model
cedures as Pretreatment Method E were applied except that all the
435314, Hotpack Corp., Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.A.) at 25 ◦ C and 50%
procedures were performed at room temperature instead of 4 ◦ C. Af-
relative humidity for 48 h. The catfish films were carefully peeled off
ter applying the pretreatment methods described above, the catfish
and conditioned in the same environmental chamber for 24 h prior
skins were washed with D.I. water 5 times, drained, and squeezed
to further characterization.
using cheesecloth prior to the extraction.

Gelatin extraction Color determination of gelatin film


The pretreated catfish skins were placed into a flask for gelatin ex- Hunter color scale of L, a, and b of catfish films was determined
traction. The gelatin extraction of catfish skins pretreated with Pre- using a CR-300 Minolta Chromameter (Minolta Camera Co., Osaka,
treatment Methods A, B, C, and D was conducted with 120 mL of D.I. Japan). The light source was illuminant C and the white plate (CR-
water at 50 ◦ C for 3 h in a water bath. The catfish skins pretreated with A43; L = 96.86, a = −0.02, and b = 1.99) provided by the manufacturer
Pretreatment Methods E and F were extracted with 250 mL of D.I. was used for calibration and background.

Vol. 72, Nr. 9, 2007—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE C499


Characterization of catfish gelatin film . . .

Mechanical properties extraction time. The gelatin yield extracted from Alaskan pollock
Tensile strength (TS) and percent elongation (%E) of catfish skin using the pretreatment method similar to Pretreatment Method
gelatin films were determined by following the standard procedures C was approximately 18% (Zhou and Regenstein 2004). Gudmunds-
of ASTM D 882-97 (ASTM 1998) using a Mini-44 Instron (Instron Co., son and Hafsteinsson (1997) also obtained gelatin yields of 11% to
Canton, Mass., U.S.A.). The catfish gelatin films conditioned in an 14% from cod skin using a similar Pretreatment Method of F with
environmental chamber at 25 ◦ C and 50% relative humidity for 16 h selected alkaline and acid concentrations.
were cut into 20 × 50 mm2 strips, and the thickness of each strip at
3 locations (top, center, and bottom) was measured and recorded Color of catfish gelatin film
using a hand-held electronic digital micrometer (Marathon Watch The gelatin solutions extracted from Pretreatment Methods A,
Co. Ltd., Ontario, Canada). The mean of the 3 thickness measure- C, E, and F, in which acid pretreatments were applied prior to the
ments of each strip was used to calculate TS and %E of the film. Each main extraction, were transparent. However, the gelatin solutions
strip was fastened onto screw-action grips with 20-mm initial gap obtained from Pretreatment Methods B and D, that involved in al-
(the distance between the top and bottom grip), and the strip was kali treatments prior to the main extraction, exhibited dark colors
C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology

stretched by the grips at a head speed of 50 mm/min until broken. when checked visually. The edible films fabricated with the catfish
TS of catfish gelatin films was calculated using the following Eq. (2): gelatins extracted using Pretreatment Methods A, C, E, and F were
transparent accordingly, and exhibited similar L, a, and b values
Peak load(N) to the edible film fabricated with commercial mammalian gelatin
TS = (2)
Initial cross − sectional area (m2 ) (Table 1). The catfish films fabricated with the gelatins using Pre-
treatment Method B and D exhibited darker colors than the catfish
Percent elongation (%E) was calculated using the following Eq. (3): films fabricated from other gelatin extracts or commercial mam-
malian gelatin (P < 0.05). Gudmundsson and Hafsteinsson (1997)
Final gap (mm)
%E = × 100 (3) reported that the gelatin extracts with sulfuric acid and sodium
Initial gap (mm)
hydroxide at less than 0.2% exhibited unacceptable in clarity and
color. Our results indicated that pretreatments at acidic solution
Water vapor permeability with low pH prior to the main extraction resulted in transparent
WVP was determined following the ASTM E96-95 standard gelatin, whereas pretreatments at basic solution with high pH prior
method (ASTM 1999) using Fisher permeability cups (Fisher Scien- to main extraction resulted in dark-colored gelatin.
tific Ltd.). The catfish gelatin films were cut into 55-mm-diameter
circles, and the thickness of the film cut was measured at 5 selected SDS-PAGE
locations in the circle (top, bottom, left, and right 10 mm from the The electrophoretic profile of catfish gelatins extracted using 6
edge and center). The mean of the film thickness was used to cal- selected pretreatment methods is presented in Figure 1. The SDS-
culate WVP. Each circle was mounted on the test cell and tightly PAGE band profiles of catfish gelatins, except for those of gelatin ob-
screwed with the top cover. A thin layer of silicone high vacuum tained using Pretreatment Method C, indicated similar MW ranges
grease (Dow Corning, Midland, Mich., U.S.A.) was used as sealant to the commercial mammalian gelatin (lane G), exhibiting a typi-
to avoid vapor leaks through cup joints. After measuring the ini- cal darker band at the MW of 120 to 130 kDa. The catfish gelatin
tial weight, the test cups were placed in an environmental chamber extracted using Pretreatment Method C exhibited 2 major protein
(Model 435314, Hotpack Corp.) at 25 ◦ C and 50% relative humidity bands at approximately 250 kDa and 120 kDa and several minor
for 24 h, and then the weight changes of the cups were recorded. bands above the MW of 250 kDa. According to Zhou and Regen-
The WVP of the films was calculated using the following Eq. (4): stein (2005), the band at 250 kDa is the β-chain of collagen and the
band at 120 kDa is the α-chain of collagen. The gelatins extracted
WVP (g/Pa/S/m) by the pretreatments methods other than Pretreatment Method C
(4) exhibited very weak and broad bands around 120 kDa, indicat-
= water permeance (g/Pa/S/m2 ) × thickness (m)
ing the α-chains might be broken to smaller sizes during extrac-
where water permeance = WVT/P, WVT = weight change/[time tion. In the process of converting collagen to gelatin, the breakage
(h) × area (m2 )], and P = vapor pressure difference across the film of the interchain chemical bonds and to some degree of intra-
(mmHg). chain polypeptide bonds occurs, which results in gelatins of a wide
range of MW (Zhou and others 2006). Gelatin with high contents of
α-chain molecules possesses better functional properties (Gòmez-
Statistical analysis
Guillèn and others 2002). Therefore, it is predicted that the
Each experiment was repeated 6 times. One-way analysis of vari-
gelatin extracted using Pretreatment Method C may exhibit better
ance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS software (version 11.5,
SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., U.S.A.). The differences among means were Table 1 --- The color of catfish gelatin films fabricated from
analyzed using least significant difference, and the significance level the gelatin extracted using selected pretreatment meth-
was defined at P < 0.05. ods.
Pretreatment method L a b
Results and Discussion Commercial gelatin 98.40 ± 0.46a∗ −0.04 ± 0.04a 2.30 ± 0.11a
A 98.31 ± 0.38a −0.05 ± 0.03a 2.41 ± 0.13a
Gelatin yield B 93.21 ± 0.96b 0.72 ± 0.11b 4.17 ± 0.44b
The gelatin yields expressed by protein yields from the selected C 97.89 ± 0.18a −0.10 ± 0.02a 2.60 ± 0.09a
D 90.85 ± 0.93c 0.89 ± 0.16c 4.94 ± 0.47b
Pretreatment Methods, A, B, C, D, E, and F, were 20.73%, 20.77%, E 98.19 ± 0.40a 0.04 ± 0.02a 1.87 ± 0.18a
18.22%, 19.59%, 23.32%, and 23.06%, respectively. The Pretreat- F 98.56 ± 0.42a 0.05 ± 0.02a 1.95 ± 0.16a
ment Methods E and F apparently resulted in higher gelatin yields ∗
Different letters within the columns indicate significant differences between the
than other selected pretreatment methods, probably due to longer means obtained by 1-way ANOVA test (P ≤ 0.05).

C500 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 72, Nr. 9, 2007


Characterization of catfish gelatin film . . .

characteristics for edible film than the gelatin extracted using other The %E of catfish gelatin films exhibited an opposite trend to
pretreatment methods. the TS of the film in that the catfish gelatin films with greater TS
exhibited smaller %E. The %E of catfish gelatin fabricated from
Mechanical and barrier properties of films the gelatin with Pretreatment Method C exhibited smaller %E than
with selected pretreatment methods the %E with other pretreatment methods. The results indicate that
Prior to determining the optimum gelatin and glycerol contents Pretreatment Method C is the optimal extraction method to fabri-
for catfish gelatin film, 1% gelatin and 20% glycerol contents were cate catfish gelatin films among the tested pretreatment methods,
chosen for the formula for catfish gelatin films, based on the lit- exhibiting comparable mechanical strength to commercial gelatin
erature (Sobral and others 2001; Jongjareonrak and others 2006). film. This is in agreement with the SDS-PAGE profile in Figure 1, in
The selected pretreatment methods for catfish gelatin extraction re- that the gelatin extracted using Pretreatment Method C contained
sulted in different mechanical properties determined by TS and %E higher MW, resulting in better mechanical strength. There are exten-
(Figure 2). The overall TS ranges of catfish gelatin films fabricated sive reports that the gelatin films with higher MW exhibited better
were between 8 and 62 MPa. The greatest TS was obtained from mechanical strengths determined by TS and elongation (Muyonga

C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology


the catfish gelatin film fabricated from the gelatin with Pretreat- and others 2004; Jongjareonrak and others 2006).
ment Method C, exhibiting comparable TS to the TS of commercial WVP of 1% catfish gelatin films with selected pretreatment meth-
gelatin film (62 MPa). The mechanical strength determined by TS of ods is presented in Figure 3. The WVP of catfish gelatin films was
−10
the film with Pretreatment Method C was better than the strength between 3.2 and 5.8 × 10 g/Pa/s/m, exhibiting greater WVP than
of fish gelatin films fabricated with gelatin extracted from bigeye the WVP of fish gelatin films from bigeye snapper or brownstripe red
−10
snapper or brownstripe red snapper skins (Jongjareonrak and others snapper skins (1.12 to 1.37 × 10 g/Pa/s/m) (Jongjareonrak and
2006). others 2006). The catfish gelatin films fabricated with the gelatin us-
ing Pretreatment Methods B, E, and F exhibited significantly greater
WVP than the films fabricated from the gelatin using Pretreatment
Methods A, C, D, or commercial gelatin (P < 0.05). The WVP of the
latter catfish gelatin films exhibited comparable WVP of commercial
gelatin.
Therefore, based on the results on the mechanical and barrier
properties of catfish gelatin films with selected pretreatment meth-
ods, Pretreatment Method C was determined as the optimum pre-
treatment method to extract catfish gelatin for edible film fabrica-
tion. The catfish gelatin film fabricated from the gelatin extract using
Pretreatment Method C exhibited comparable mechanical and wa-
ter barrier properties to the film fabricated from commercial mam-
malian gelatin.

Mechanical and barrier properties of films


with selected gelatin contents
The TS of catfish gelatin films significantly increased (P < 0.05)
from 27.1 MPa to 61.7 MPa, and elongation also significantly in-
Figure 1 --- Representative SDS-PAGE profile of catfish creased from 105.1% to 115.1%, when the gelatin contents increased
gelatin extracted using 6 selected pretreatment meth- from 0.5% to 1% (Figure 4). There was no further significant increase
ods. A to F: Catfish gelatin from Pretreatment Methods A
in TS beyond the 1% gelatin content. A similar trend observed in the
to F. G: Commercial and mammalian gelatin. S: Molecular
weight standard.
8

80 400
Tensile Strenth
%Elongation
6
Water Vapor Permeability

60 300
(10 -10 g/Pa.s.m)
Tensile Strength (MPa)

% Elongation

4
40 200

2
20 100

0
0 0
A B C D E F G
A B C D E F G
Pretreatment Method Pretreatment Method

Figure 2 --- Tensile strength and percentage elongation of Figure 3 --- Water vapor permeability of 1% catfish gelatin
1% catfish gelatin films with selected pretreatment meth- films with selected pretreatment methods. A to F: Pre-
ods. A to F: Pretreatment Methods A to F. G: Commercial treatment Methods A to F. G: Commercial mammalian
mammalian gelatin. gelatin.

Vol. 72, Nr. 9, 2007—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE C501


Characterization of catfish gelatin film . . .

TS was observed in the %E of the catfish gelatin film as well. The ever, the TS rapidly decreased to 12.7 MPa when the glycerol con-
results indicated that catfish gelatin film exhibited the best TS and tent increased from 20% to 70% (Figure 6). On the contrary, the %E
%E with 1% catfish gelatin content. Both TS and %E of the catfish of the films were increased as the glycerol content was increased.
gelatin film exhibited greater values than the values of fish films from Glycerol as a plasticizer is a hydrophilic small molecule that can
brownstrip red snapper or bigeye snapper skins (Jongjareonrak and self-incorporate into protein chains to form hydrogen bonds with
others 2006). Jongjareonrak and others reported that the greatest proteins (Sobral and others 2001). When glycerol is incorporated
TS and elongation of the films fabricated from bigeye snapper skin into the gelatin film network, the interactions between the protein
gelatin were 44.3 MPa and 107.0%, respectively, and the greatest TS chains are reduced; therefore, the flexibility of the films is increased.
and elongation of the films fabricated from brownstripe red snapper Our results are in agreement with other reports that the decrease in
skin were 58.1 MPa and 108.2%, respectively. TS and increase in elongation due to the increase in glycerol content
WVP increased with the increase in gelatin contents from 0.5% to (Lim and others 1999; Jongjareonrak and others 2006).
2.5% (Figure 5). In general, as the gelatin content increases, the WVP The WVP increased with the increase in glycerol contents as pre-
increases exhibiting poor water barrier properties (McHugh and oth- sented in Figure 7. There was a significant increase in WVP beyond
C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology

ers 1993; Jongjareonrak and others 2006). Jongjareonrak and others 30% glycerol content (P < 0.05). Considering the mechanical prop-
(2006) speculated that since fish gelatin contained large amounts erties and water barrier properties of 1% gelatin film, 20% glycerol
of hydrophilic amino acids, fish gelatin films with large amount of content was determined as the optimum content for catfish film
gelatin could adsorb more water from the environment exhibiting fabrication.
large WVP.
Conclusions
Mechanical and barrier properties of films
with selected glycerol contents T
his study demonstrated significant effects of selected pretreat-
ment methods applied to gelatin extraction on gelatin yield,
The TS of catfish gelatin films was increased from 46.6 MPa to color, MW profiles of catfish gelatin extracts, as well as mechanical
57.5 MPa when the glycerol content increased from 0% to 20%; how- and water barrier properties of catfish gelatin fabricated with the

80 140
Tensile Strenth
%Elongation 300 300
120
Tensile Strenth
60 %Elongation
100 250 250
Tensile Strength (MPa)

% Elongation

Tensile Strength (MPa)

80 200 200

% Elongation
40
60
150 150

40
20 100 100

20
50 50

0 0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Gelatin (%)
Glycerol (%)
Figure 4 --- Tensile strength and percentage elongation of
catfish gelatin films fabricated from selected contents of Figure 6 --- Tensile strength and percentage elongation of
gelatin with Pretreatment Method C. catfish gelatin films fabricated with selected glycerol
contents.

7 7

6 6
Water Vapor Permeability

5
Water Vapor Permeability

5
(10 -10 g/Pa.s.m)

(10 -10 g/Pa.s.m)

4 4

3
3

2
2

1
1

0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0
Gelatin Conent (%) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Glycerol Content (%)
Figure 5 --- Water vapor permeability of catfish gelatin
films fabricated from selected contents of gelatin with Figure 7 --- Water vapor permeability of catfish gelatin
Pretreatment Method C. films fabricated with selected glycerol contents.

C502 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 72, Nr. 9, 2007


Characterization of catfish gelatin film . . .

gelatin extracts using selected pretreatment methods. The catfish Klose AA, Machi EP, Hanson HL. 1952. Use of antioxidants in the frozen storage of
turkeys. Food Technol 6:308–11.
gelatin films fabricated with the gelatin extracted from the optimum Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of
pretreatment methods exhibited comparable film properties to the bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–5.
commercial mammalian gelatin film. The results indicate that cat- Lim LT, Mine Y, Tung MA. 1999. Barrier and tensile properties of transglutaminase
cross-linked gelatin films as affected by relative humidity, temperature and glycerol
fish skin by-products can be utilized to extract catfish gelatin with content. J Food Sci 64:616–22.
potential application to fabrication of gelatin film as an alternative McHugh TH, Avena-Bustillos R, Krochta JM. 1993. Hydrophilic edible films: modified
procedure for water vapor permeability and explanation of thickness effects. J Food
gelatin source to the mammalian gelatin. Sci 58:899–903.
Montero P, Gòmez-Guillèn MC. 2000. Extracting conditions for megrim (Lepidorhom-
bus boscii) skin collagen affect functional properties of the resulting gelatin. J Food
Acknowledgments Sci 65:434–8.
Montero P, Gòmez-Guillèn MC, Borderias AJ. 1999. Functional characterization of
This research project was funded by the Alabama Agricultural Land muscle and skin collagenous material from hake (Merluccius merluccius L.). Food
Grant Alliance (AALGA). Chem 65:55–9.
Muyonga JH, Cole CGB, Duodu KG. 2004. Extraction and physico-chemical charac-
terization of Nile perch (Lates niloticus) skin and bone gelatin. Food Hydrocolloid
References 18:581–92.

C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology


[ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials. 1998. Standard test method for [NASS]. Statistics Services (NASS). 2006. Catfish processing. Little Rock, Ark:
tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. D 882-97. Philadelphia, Pa.: ASTM. USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service.
[ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials. 1999. Standard test method for Oh JH, Wang B, Field PD, Aglan HA. 2004. Characteristics of edible films made from
water vapor transmission of materials. E 96-95. Philadelphia, Pa.: ASTM. dairy proteins and zein hydrolysate cross-linked with translutaminase. Int J Food
Avena-Bustillos RJ, Olsen CW, Chiou B, Yee I, Bechtel PJ, McHugh TH. 2006. Water Sci Tech 39:287–94.
vapor permeability of mammalian and fish gelatin films. J Food Sci 71:E202–7. Prinyawiwatkul W, Suvanich V, Harrison RW, King JM, Sathivel S, Pacheco K, Rout SK,
Baziwane D, He Q. 2003. Gelatin: the paramount food additive. Food Rev Int 9(4):423– Nadarajah K, Sonti S. 2002. Value-added from crawfish and catfish. LA Agr 45(4):20–1.
35. Sobral M, Menegalli FC, Hubinger MD, Roques MA. 2001. Mechanical, water vapor
Choi SS, Regenstein JM. 2000. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of fish barrier and thermal properties of gelatin based edible films. Food Hydrocolloid
gelatin. J Food Sci 65:194–9. 15:423–32.
Gennadios A, McHugh TH, Weller CL, Krochta JM. 1994. Edible coatings and films Venien A, Levieux D. 2005. Differentiation of bovine from porcine gelatins using poly-
based on proteins. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo M, editors. Edible clonal anti-peptide antibodies in indirect and competitive indirect ELISA. J Phar-
coatings and films to improve food quality. Lancaster, N.C.: Technomic Pub. Co. Inc. maceut Biomed 39:418–24.
p 201–78. Wainewright FW. 1977. Physical tests for gelatin and gelatin products. In: Ward AG,
Gòmez-Guillèn MC, Turnay J, Fernández-Diaz MD, Ulmo N, Lizarbe MA, Montero P. Courts A, editors. The science and technology of gelatin. New York: Academic Press.
2002. Structural and physical properties of gelatin extracted from difference marine p 507–34.
species: a comparative study. Food Hydrocolloid 16:25–34. Yang H, Wang Y, Jiang M, Oh JH, Herring J, Zhou P. 2007. Two-step optimization
Grossman S, Bergman M. 1992. Process for the production of gelatin from fish skins. of the extraction and subsequent physical properties of channel catfish (Ictalurus
U.S. Patent 5,093,474. punctatus) skin gelatin. J Food Sci 72(5):C188–95.
Gudmundsson M, Hafsteinsson H. 1997. Gelatin from cod skins as affected by chemical Zhou P, Regenstein JM. 2004. Optimization of extraction conditions for pollock skin
treatment. J Food Sci 62:37–47. gelatin. J Food Sci 69:C393–8.
Johnston-Banks FA. 1990. Gelatin. In: Harris P, editor. Food gels. London: Elsevier Zhou P, Regenstein JM. 2005. Effects of alkaline and acid pretreatments on Alaska
Applied Science Pub. p 233–89. pollock skin gelatin extraction. J Food Sci 70:C392–6.
Jongjareonrak A, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Pridpran T, Tanaka M. 2006. Charac- Zhou P, Mulvaney SJ, Regenstein JM. 2006. Properties of Alaska pollock skin gelatin: a
terization of edible films from skin gelatin of brownstripe red snapper and bigeye comparison with tilapia and pork skin gelatins. J Food Sci 71:C313–21.
snapper. Food Hydrocolloid 20:492–501.

Vol. 72, Nr. 9, 2007—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE C503

You might also like