Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESOLUTION
This resolves the Motion for Reconsideration (MR) filed by PO1 Jayson D
Gano (Movant), assailing the Decision of the Regional Director, PRO 3 dated April
15, 2018, the dispositive portion of which states:
Records show that movant was assigned at the Regional Public Safety
Battalion (RPSB), PRO3 and was subsequently detailed at Angeles City Police
Office. However, he failed to report for duty on March 13, 2017 to October 18, 2017,
incurring a total of Two Hundred Twenty (220) days unauthorized absences. He was
likewise charged of Less Grave Neglect of Duty (Failure to comply with any lawful
order or instruction of a Superior or Chief of Police) for failure to report for drug
testing. He was found guilty of both offenses and meted the penalty of Dismissal
from the service. Hence, this MR claiming that he was sick and that of his wife during
his absences, thus, he should have been penalized with a lesser penalty.”
This Office finds that the MR is not meritorious. It does not raise valid ground
to warrant the reversal or modification of the Decision sought to be reconsidered.
The ground raised by the movant does not fall under any of the following
valid/legal grounds above-cited.
Movant claimed that his wife incurred serious illness during her pregnancy so
he hurriedly headed home to take care of her and that of their two (2) children aged
8 and 4. On the process, he also got sick. He attached photocopies of medical
certificates showing that his wife, Jonabel Gano, consulted a medical doctor on
several occasions. However, there is no showing that she was confined in a clinic or
hospital. Movant further attached medals and commendation to support his plea for a
lesser/lower penalty.
The above circumstances are not sufficient excuse for him to inform his unit/
situation of his predicament. He could have exerted efforts to report to his unit to file
an application for leave, or to inform his superior of his inability to report for duty thru
other means of communications. He failed in this aspect and chooses to be on
AWOL for a long period of time (220 days). It would have been excusable if the
period of AWOL is less than thirty (30) days but he went on AWOL for such a long
period without informing his unit of his predicament and without giving importance to
his employment. Thus, there is no valid reason to disturb the decision rendered
based on substantial evidence.
SO RESOLVED.
Done this _____ day of ____________ at Camp Captain Julian Olivas, City of
San Fernando, Pampanga.
AMADOR V CORPUS
Police Chief Superintendent
Regional Director, PRO 3
Republic of the Philippines
NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
POLICE REGIONAL OFFICE 3
REGIONAL LEGAL OFFICE 3
Camp Captain Julian Olivas, City of San Fernando, Pampanga
MEMORANDUM
FOR : RD, PRO3
1. Reference: AC, RPHRDD memorandum dated May 17, 2018 with attached
records of the case.
2. This pertains to the motion for reconsideration (MR) filed by PO1 Jayson D
Gano, assailing the Decision of the Regional Director, PRO 3 dated April 15, 2018,
the dispositive portion of which states:
ANSELMO E ANDAYAN
Police Superintendent