The apparatus includes a horizontal Venturi tube, a downstream
flow-control valve and manometer tubes. A manometer panel holds the manometer tubes vertically. A common manifold above the tubes has an air pressure-control valve. The base has adjustable feet. The manometer panel has a scale behind the manometer tubes for direct reading of the water levels in the tubes. Plastic materials and corrosion-resistant finishes throughout the equipment protect against corrosion. Water enters the Venturi meter and its flow-control valve sets the flow rate. This valve is downstream, so it does not cause any upstream turbulence. To adjust the datum water level in the manometer tubes, students connect a hand-pump (included) to the air valve above the manometer tubes. To perform experiments, students set and measure the flow rate through the Venturi. They measure the head at the cross- sectional area at the upstream section, and the head at the throat section. They also note the pressure distribution along the rest of the meter. They then repeat the procedure, reducing the flow rate in increments and taking similar readings each time. Students can compare ideal pressure distribution to measured pressure distribution and calculate the coefficients of discharge for the meter. OBJECTIVE: In this experiment you will be able to analyze the effect of viscosity on pressure loss and also to understand the measurement of discharge from a pipe. As we will be using the Venturi Meter in order to measure flow, the Bernoulli equation is an important relation that can help getting velocities from fluid pressures and vice versa. The purpose of this experiment is also to calculate Q and 𝐶𝐷 at different head pressures. Then drawing a relationship between all these properties and head pressure will be discussed in this report. Discussion the results:
From table 1 if we compare the value of the
head pressure on the inlet and on the throat with the other sections ,we will find that the head pressure on the inlet section is the maximum and on the throat is the min, and it’s refers to the increase of the velocity of the flowing fluid when the cross section area decreases, so since the inlet has the maximum cross section area and the velocity will be min, but the head pressure will be maximum, and for the throat the cross section area is min so the velocity will be max but the head pressure will be min. From figure 1 which represent the theoretical values versus the experimental values of the mass flow rate ,and it’s obvious that the values(theoretical, experimental) are close to each other and the relationship between the two values are linear, so when the experimental values of the mass flow rate increases the theoretical value will increase.
From figure 2 it’s obvious that there are no
relationship between the Venturi-meter coefficient C and the experimental value of the mass flow rate, and that’s because C is equals the experimental value over the theoretical value of the mass flow rate and its representing the energy losses in the venturi- meter. The value of the Venturi-meter coefficient C was found to be almost equals to 1 and that’s proof that the values (theoretical, experimental) of the volume and the mass flow rate both areclose to each other due to accurate measurements we tried to take as possible as we can . Conclusion: The Venturi meter helped us understand measurement of discharge from a pipe and to define relationships between different properties of fluid: effect of viscosity on pressure losses, variation of pressure and velocity on different cross- sections… This experiment gave us a real understand of how to apply both Bernoulli equation and Continuity equation and to study the Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) and Energy Line (EL) by plotting these results. Objectives were all achieved but many errors were encountered during the experiment and thus affected results.