You are on page 1of 25

19-­‐11-­‐01

Weaving  the  Right  Hemisphere  


into  Prac8ce:    
Soma8c  Art  Therapy  

Sylvie  Co@ell,  BFA,  MA,  DVATI,  RCC  


BCACC  Conference,  Vancouver,  BC  
November,  2019  
 
©  2019  Sylvie  Co@ell  

The  synergy  between  the  arts  and  science  has  


never  been  more  evident  as  it  is  in  current  
discussions  about  how  our  minds  heal,  grow  and  
transform.  

~  Frances  Kaplan,  “Art,  Science  and  Art  Therapy,”  2000.  


 

1  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Out of Darkness comes a SPARK.


Brought into being by gesture,
An image unfolds with increasing clarity.

Oil pastel in hand,


Sweeping movements dance across the page.
The marks slow and we attend to sensations.
Tingling starts in the toes,
Welcoming her back into her body.

A new movement arrives.


A gentle rocking.
Sitting alongside each other,
Our companionship is the anchor and witness.

Rest arrives in this moment together.

2  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Integra8on  of  Prac8ce  

Art  Making   Therapeu8c  


&  Imagery   Rela8onship  

Soma8c  
A@unement    

Phenomenology    
A  process  of  orien8ng  to  and  exploring  lived  
experience  in  the  moment  while  being  curious  
about  emergent  meanings  and  resis8ng  the  
draw  to  explicate  experience  or  develop  theory  
     (Van  Manen,  Higgins,  &  van  der  Riet,  2016)  

3  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

“In  order  for  shape  and  form  to  gather  together  


in  a  par8cular  ar8s8c  container,  experience  
must  begin  in  formlessness.”        
   
~  Ellen  Levine,  “Tending  the  Fire:  Studies  in  Art,  Therapy  and  Crea8vity,”  2003  

Ac8vity  
Make  sure  you  have  at  least  two  markers  and  one  piece  of  paper  
During  this  exercise,  gently  hold  in  awareness  your  sensory  
experience  
1.  First  side:  make  marks  while  considering  “peace”  or  “calm”  
2.  Second  side:  make  marks  while  considering  “joy”  or  “beauty”  
3.  Chose  one  side  to  discuss  with  the  person  beside  you  for  5  min    
Ø  “What  did  you  no8ce  as  you  were  crea8ng  this  
piece?”  (note:  focus  on  sensa8on/felt  sense)    
Ø  “What  do  see  as  you  look  at  your  image?”  (note:  describe  
structural  components  like  line,  shapes,  colour,  textures  -­‐
rather  than  interpreta8on  of  imagery)  

4  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Integra8on  of  Theory  

Phenomenological     Interpersonal    
Art  Therapy   Neurobiology  

Soma8c  Transforma8on  

5  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Interpersonal  Neurobiology  

Brain  Lateraliza8on  
Neurocep8on  
Polyvagal  Theory  
Regula8on  Theory  

Brain  Lateraliza8on  (McGilchrist,  2009)    


•  unique  physical  characteris8cs,  func8ons  and  
contribu8ons  that  dis8nguish  between  the  right  and  
lef  hemispheres.  
•  Lef  Hemisphere:  ability  to  hold  selec8ve,  highly  
focused  a@en8on;  plays  a  role  in  the  to  the  process  of  
crea8vity  

•  Right  Hemisphere:  ability  to  hold  a@en8on  that  is  more  


broad  in  focus  and  open  to  novel  s8muli  without  
preconcep8ons;  essen$al  to  the  presence  of  crea8vity  

6  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Hemisphericity  (Schore,  2019)  


“The  ul8mate  expression  of  the  right  brain  is  conscious  
emo8on.  The  ul8mate  expression  of  the  lef  brain  is  
conscious  thought.  Becoming  aware  of  our  bodily-­‐
based  emo8ons  is  more  essen8al  than    becoming  
aware  of  our  thoughts.”    
         ~  Schore,  2019,  p.  264  
 

7  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Art  &  Brain  Lateraliza8on  


•  The  graphic  representa8on  of  images  is  a  complex  
ac8vity  that  involves  several  areas  of  the  brain    
•  Both  right  and  lef  hemisphere  are  important      
•  Rendering  of  detailed  subject  relies  on  lef  hemisphere  
for  detail  and  right  hemisphere  for  contour  (Kaplan,  2000)    
•  the  right  frontal  area  of  the  brain  facilitates  crea8vity,  
while  the  lef  tends  to  interfere  with  any  original  crea8ve  
responses  and  processes  (Mayseless,  Eran  &  Shamay-­‐Tsoory,  2015)  
•  condi8ons  that  facilitate  crea8vity  must  find  ways  to  
circumvent  the  tendency  of  the  lef  hemisphere  to  limit  
the  crea8ve  possibili8es  offered  by  the  right  hemisphere.  
 
 

My  right  hemisphere  gets  


this  stuff  in  a  way  that  my  lef  
does  not.  I  pick  up  the  pencil  
crayon  in  my  non-­‐dominant  
hand  and  invite  it  to  take  the  
lead.  I  hear  the  internal  
judgments  and  impa8ence  as  
my  lef-­‐brain  waits  for  my  
right  to  express  it’s  
understanding.  I  am  
surprised  when  my  lef  hand  
completely  ignores  my  
conscious  thoughts  about  
colour  choices  and  mark  
placement.    
 
My  non-­‐dominant  hand  
seems  intent  on  making  
s8ch-­‐like  marks.  The  direc8ve  
thoughts  finally  give  in  and  
no8ce  the  s8tch-­‐like  marks  
without  judgment.    A  
thought  arrives  from  a  
different  source,  “You  are  
finally  listening.”    

8  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Neurocep8on  (Porges,  2011)  


•  our  nervous  system  unconsciously  receives  and  
interprets  sensory  input  from  our  environment  
–   both  inside  and  outside  of  the  body  
•  Takes  place  in  evolu8onary  old  parts  of  the  brain  
•  Central  to  our  evalua8on  of  safety,  danger  or  life  
threat  
•  Faulty  Neurocep$on  can  be  characterized  as  “an  
inability  to  detect  accurately  whether  the  
environment  is  safe  or  another  person  is  trust  
worthy”  (p.  17)    

9  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Polyvagal  Theory    
(Porges,  1995;  2011)  
•  Proposes  that  the  autonomic  nervous  system  is  
–  More  complex  than  originally  thought  
–  Has  developed  in  context  of  our  evolu8onary  history    
•  Offers  understanding  of  how  we    
–  perceive  &  respond  to  threat  
–  develop  social  bonds  
–  harness  physiological  resources  for  restora8on  and  
growth  
•  Offers  insights  into  previously  misunderstood  
reac8ons  to  trauma  

Polyvagal  Theory  cont’    


(Porges,  1995;  2011)  

ANS  is  composed  of  3  neural  circuits  that;  


•  are  hierarchical,  based  on  evolu8onary  development  
•  Support  unique  defensive  responses  to  perceived  
safety  or  threat  
•  Include;    
•  Social  engagement  system  
•  Mobiliza8on  response  (fight  or  flight)  I  
•  Immobiliza8on  response  (freeze)  

10  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Vagal  System    
(Porges,  2011)    

•  The  vagas  nerve  has  2  key  branches  extend  


from  the  brain  stem  to  organs  in  the  viscera  
•  Ventral  Vagus  
•  recent  evolu8onary  development  that  plays  central  role  in  social  
engagement  system    
•  heart,  regulates  breathing,  striated  muscles  of  the  face  and  inner  ear    

•  Dorsal  Vagus    
•  Early  in  our  evolu8onary  history  (rep8lian  ancestors)  
•  plays  main  role  in  immobiliza8on  to  support  rest  &  rejuvena8on  

11  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

A@achment  &  Regula8on  Theory  


(Schore  &  Schore,  2008)  

•  A@achment  Theory  è  Regula8on  Theory  


•  Early  a@achment  experiences  exert  las8ng  
impacts  on  right  hemispheric  development  and  
the  regula8on  of  emo8ons  
•  The  presence  of  caregiver  who  can  interact  to  
regulate  the  infant’s  emo8onal  state  builds  the  
infant’s  capacity  to  regulate  emo8ons  more  
autonomously  in  later  childhood/adulthood    
•  Cri8cal  period  starts  in  3rd  trimester  &  extends  
through  1st  year    

Co-­‐Regula8on  
•  Occurs  through  right-­‐brain-­‐to-­‐right-­‐brain  
nonverbal  emo8onally  based  communica8ons  
•  Caregiver  and  infant  become  familiar  with  the  
rhythm  of  the  other’s  nervous  system  
•  Includes  both  processes  of:  
–   “down-­‐regula8on”  (distress)    
–  and  “up-­‐regula8on”  (play/joy)  

12  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

13  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Regula8on  Theory  &  Therapy    


•  Early  a@achment  experiences  exert  significant  influence  
on  emo8onal  regula8on  throughout  life  span    
•  Therapeu8c  prac8ce  can  draw  on  neuroplas$city;  the  
capacity  of  our  brains  to  grow  and  change  (Doidge,  
2007)  
•  Therapeu8c  techniques  that  replicate  right  hemispheric  
a@achment  are  most  important  (Schore,  2014;  2019)  
•  include  nonverbal,  implicit  right-­‐brain-­‐to-­‐right-­‐brain  
emo8onal  tracking  &  co-­‐regula8on  in  context  of  
therapist/client  rela8onship    
•  Insecure  A@achment  style  è  Earned  Secure  A@achment  

14  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Right  Hemisphere  in  Therapy  

Soma8c  Transforma8on  
Phenomenological  Art  Therapy  
Integra8on  

 
“The  growth-­‐  facilita8ng  rela8onal  environment  
of  a  deeper  therapeu8c  explora8on  of  the  
rela8onal–emo8onal  unconscious  mind  can  
induce  plas8city  in  both  the  cor8cal  and  
subcor8cal  systems  of  the  pa8ent’s  right  brain.”      
 
 ~  Schore,  The  Right  Brain  is  Dominant  in  Psychotherapy,  2014  

15  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Soma8c  Transforma8on    
(Stanley,  2016)  
 
•  Soma8c  transforma8on  is  “a  body-­‐centered,  
rela8onal  methodology  based  in  interpersonal  
neural  psychology,  ancient  wisdom,  and  the  
soma8c-­‐emo8onal  lived  experience”    
•  ST  is  informed  by  scien8fic  research  and  
phenomenological  ways  of  knowing  
•  Embodiment  is  of  central  importance  to  the  
work  of  therapist  &  client  

 
16  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Key  ST  Concepts    


•  Embodiment    
•  Soma8c  Awareness  
•  Soma8c  Empathy  
–  Inter-­‐subjec8ve  field    
•  Soma8c  inquiry  
•  Soma8c  interven8ons  
•  Contribute  to  regula8on  of  ANS  
•  Examples:  orien8ng  to  present  moment,  use  of  facial  
expression,  eye  connec8on,  touch,  explora8on  of  gestures  
•  Soma8c  reflec8on  
•  Regula8on  of  pre-­‐reflec8ve  processing  of  visceral  data  
(sensa8ons,  emo8ons,  movements)  can  lead  to  integra8on  
with  higher  cor8cal  symbolic  representa8ons  (i.e.  imagery)  

17  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

“…a  large  body  of  research  implicates  the  right  


brain  in  crea8ve  processes,  especially  in  the  
earliest  stages  where  informa8on  is  processed  
rapidly  beneath  conscious  awareness”  (Schore,  
2017,  p.141).  

“Imagery  exists  at  the  intersec8on  of  mind  and  body.”    


 
   ~  Noah  Hass-­‐Cohen  &  Joanna  Findlay,  2015    

18  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

“Neuroscience  is  the  clay,  offering  an  inherent  


structured  medium  that  art  therapists  can  then  
sculpt  and  develop  into  form  as  we  forage  the  
liminal  space  on  the  way  to  imago  of  growth”  (p.  9).  
 
Juliet  King,  (2015).  Art  therapy,  Trauma  and  Neuroscience:  
Theore$cal  and  Prac$cal  Perspec$ves.  

19  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Phenomenological  Art  Therapy  


(Betensky,  1977;  1995)  
•  Experience  of  seeing  is  of  central  importance  
•  Focus  is  on  the  process  of  looking,  seeing  and  
suppor8ng  the  emergence  &  integra8on  of  new  
personal  meaning  into  consciousness  
•  Authen8c  experience  of  client  is  a@uned  to  
through;  
•  the  produc8on  of  art  expression    
•  witnessing  of  the  completed  art  crea8on(s)  
•  To  truly  SEE  client’s  inner  experience  &  the  
expression  of  this  experience  symbolically  
through  the  art  

Process  of    
Phenomenological  Art  Therapy  
  –  Intui$ng  
•  Seeing  with  inten8onality  
•  Art  therapist  acts  as  a  guide  to  client’s  
expanding  ability  to  see  with  inten8on  
•  Central  validity  of  client’s  experiences  &  
perspec8ves  
•  4  dis8nct  sequences;    
1.  Pre-­‐Art  Play  with  Art  Materials  
2.  The  Process  of  Art  Work  
3.  Phenomenological  Intui8ng  
4.  The  “What  Do  You  See?”  Procedure    

20  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Betensky  (1995)  notes  that  “when  our  eyes  see  


and  our  ears  hear,  it  is  not  a  func8on  of  the  eyes  
or  ears  alone;  it  is  the  whole  body  that  is  
conscious  of  what  the  eye  discerns  in  the  visible  
world  and  what  the  ear  hears  in  the  sonorous  
world.”  (p.7)  

21  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Aesthe8cs  &  the  Body  


Hyland  Moon  (2002)  talks  about  the  inherent  
integra8on  of  sensa8on  and  aesthe8cs,  
clarifying  that,  “the  term  “aesthe8c”  relates  to  
sensory  percep8ons”  (p.133)  
 
Knill,  Levin  &  Levin  (2005)  discuss  the  Aesthe$c  
Response  as  a  body-­‐based  response  to  a  work  of  
art  and/or  ar8s8c  act  
 

Art  Therapy  &  Containment  

“…emo8on-­‐laden  images  can  intensify  


unpleasant  feelings  through  the  tendency  of  our  
bodies  to  respond  to  all  percep8ons  as  if  they  
originated  from  something  real.”  
 
   ~  Frances  Kaplan,  Art,  Science  and  Art  Therapy,  2000  

22  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

Integra8on  
•  Right  Brain  Therapeu8c  Context    
•  Co-­‐regula8on  with  a@uned  clinician  throughout  process    
•  Dialogue  between  sensa8on  and  imagery  through  
soma8cally  oriented  art  making/processing  
•  Enhancement  of  embodiment  &  ability  to  “see”  with  
inten8on  
•  Renewed  access  to  life  energy/vitality    
•  Ability  to  respond  to  problems  with  crea8vity  
•  Ability  to  channel  vitality  into  crea8ve  expression/living  
•  FLEXIBILITY  &  POSSIBILITY  in  rela8onships  with  self  
&  other  

23  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

“The  use  of  the  arts  in  therapy,  then,  has  the  
poten8al  to  unite  the  a@en8on  to  the  primary  
aliveness  of  the  self  in  the  form  of  the  work  of  the  
art.  The  work  of  art  becomes  the  embodiment  of  
the  alive  self  because  its  form  has  been  generated  
from  crea8ve,  alive  ac8vity.  The  work  of  art  also  
stands  on  its  own  and  can  enliven  and  s8mulate  
others  as  they  witness  the  work  and  get  drawn  
into  it,  provoked  or  moved  by  it.”    
   
~  Ellen  Levin,  “Tending  the  Fire:  Studies  in  Art,  Therapy  &  Crea8vity,”  
2003  
 

24  
19-­‐11-­‐01  

References    
Betensky,  M.  (1977).  The  phenomenological  approach  to  art  expression  and  art  therapy.  
 Art  Psychotherapy,  4,  173-­‐179.  
Betensky,  M.  (1995).  What  do  you  see?:  Phenomenology  of  therapeu$c  art  expression.  
 London,  England:  Jessica  Kingsley  Publisher  
Gan@,  L.  &  Tripp,  T.  (2016).  The  image  comes  first:  Trea8ng  preverbal  trauma  with  art  
 therapy.  In  Juliet  L.  King  (Ed),  Art  therapy,  trauma  and  neuroscience:  Theore$cal  
 and  prac$cal  perspec$ves  (67-­‐99).  New  York,  NY:  Routledge.  
Hass-­‐Cohen,  N.  &  Findlay,  J.  C.  (2015).  Art  therapy  &  the  neuroscience  of  rela$onships,  
 crea$vity,  &  resiliency:  Skills  and  prac$ces.  New  York,  NY:  Norton  &  Company.  
Hyland  Moon,  C.  (2002).  Studio  art  therapy:  Cul8va8ng  the  ar8st  iden8ty  in  the  art  
 therapist.  London,  UK:  Jessica  Kingsley  Publishers.  
Kaplan,  F.  F.  (2000).  Art,  science  and  art  therapy:  Repain8ng  the  picture.  London,  UK:  
 Jessica  Kingsley  Publishers.    
King,  J.  L.  (2016).  Introduc8on.  In  Juliet  L.  King  (Ed),  Art  therapy,  trauma  and  neuroscience:  
 Theore8cal  and  prac8cal  perspec8ves  (pp.1-­‐10).  New  York,  NY:  Routledge.  
Knill,  P.J.,  Levin,  E.G.  &  Levin,  S.K.  (2005).  Principles  and  prac8ce  of  expressive  arts  therapy.  
 London,  UK:  Jessica  Kingsley  Publishers.  
Levine,  E.  (2003).  Tending  the  fire:  Studies  in  art,  therapy  and  crea8vity  (2nd  Ed).  Toronto,  
ON:    E.G.S.  Press.    
McGilchrist,  I.  (2009).  The  master  and  his  emissary.  New  Haven,  CT:  Yale  University  Press.    
Porges,  S.W.  (1995).  Orien8ng  in  a  defensive  world:  Mammalian  modifica8ons  of  our  
 evolu8onary  heritage.  A  polyvagal  theory.  Psychophysiology,  32,  301-­‐318.  

References  
Porges,  S.  W.  (2004).  Neurocep8on:  A  subconscious  system  for  detec8ng  threats  and  safety.  Zero  to  
 Three,  24(5),19-­‐24.  
Porges,  S.  W.  (2011).  The  polyvagal  theory:  Neurophysiological  founda$ons  of  emo$ons,  aLachment,  
 communica$on,  and  self-­‐regula$on.  New  York,  NY:  Norton  &  Company  Inc.      
Roots  of  Empathy  (2016,  October  27).  Dr.  Allan  N.  Schore  -­‐  Modern  aLachment  theory;  the  enduring  
 impact  of  early  right-­‐brain  development  [Video  file].  Retrieved  from  h@ps://
 www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0sKY86Qmzo  
Schore,  A.  (2019).  Right  brain  psychotherapy.  New  York,  NY:  Norton  &  Company  Inc.  
Schore,  A.  (2017).  Playing  on  the  right  side  of  the  brain:  An  Interview  with  Allan  N.  Schore.  American  
 Journal  of  Play,  Winter  2017.    
Schore,  A.  (2014).  The  right  brain  is  dominant  in  psychotherapy.  Psychotherapy  51,3.  388–397.  
Schore,  J.  R.,  &  Schore,  A.  N.  (2008).  Modern  a@achment  theory:  The  central  role  of  affect  regula8on  in  
 development  and  treatment.  Clinical  Social  Work  Journal,  36,  9–20.    
Schore,  A.  (2001a).  The  effects  of  a  secure  a@achment  rela8onship  on  right  brain  development,  affect  
 regula8on  and  infant  mental  health.  Infant  Mental  Health  Journal,  22(1–2),  7–66.    
Schore,  A.  (2001b).  The  effects  of  early  rela8onal  trauma  on  right  brain  development,  affect  regula8on,  
 and  infant  mental  health.  Infant  Mental  Health  Journal,  22(1–2),  201–269.  
Stanley,  S.  (2018).  Soma8c  transforma8on.  Retrieved  June  25th,  2018  from  h@p://
 soma8ctransforma8on.com/  
Stanley,  S.  (2016).  Rela8onal  and  body-­‐centered  prac8ces  for  healing  trauma:  Lifing  the  burdens  of  the  
 past.  New  York,  NY:  Routledge.  
van  Manen,  M.,  Higgins,  I.  &  van  der  Riet,  P.  (2016).  A  conversa8on  with  Max  van  Manen  on  
 phenomenology  in  its  original  sense.  Nursing  and  Health  Sciences,  18,  4-­‐7.  
 

25  

You might also like