KUDER-RICHARDSON FORMULA

ITEMS/QUESTIONS
STUDENT
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
1 Anggol 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 Andrade 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 Baroman 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
4 Dialane 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
5 Docallos 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
6 Estrada 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
7 Mendoza 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1
8 Nagit 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
9 Opinggo 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1
10 Pelayo 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
11 Rosete 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
12 Talud 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
13 Ugarte 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
TOTAL CORRECT
RESPONSE 9 9 9 9 7 8 9 9

p 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.54 0.62 0.69 0.69

q 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.46 0.38 0.31 0.31
pq 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.25 0.24 0.21 0.21

SOLUTION (METHOD A)
K 15
Σpq 3.30
var(s˄2) 7.15
KR20 0.58

In obtaining the answer in solution( method A) by following the formula of Kuder-Richardson Formula 20.
RDSON FORMULA 20

EMS/QUESTIONS
TOTAL SCORE
Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 13
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 14
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 12
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 11
1 1 0 1 0 0 1 9
1 1 1 1 0 0 1 8
0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 11
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5
0 1 1 0 0 1 0 8
1 0 0 0 1 1 1 7

9 9 9 8 8 10 7

0.69 0.69 0.69 0.62 0.62 0.77 0.54

0.31 0.31 0.31 0.38 0.38 0.23 0.46
0.21 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.18 0.25 3.30

PROCESS:

Where:
K is the number of test items
p is the proportion of the examinees who got the item correct
q is the proportion of the examinees who got the item incorrect
s2 is the variance (var) of the scores
hardson Formula 20. Σpq is the summation of the product of p and q
orrect
 ITEM ANA

TEST STUDENTS
ITEMS Andrade Anggol Dialane Docallos Baroman Estrada Pelayo Mendoza Nagit
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
5 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
7 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
8 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
9 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
12 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1
13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
15 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
TOTAL 14 13 13 12 11 11 11 9 8

PROCESS
Steps:
1. Score the test. Arrange the scores from highest to lowest.
2. Get the top 27% (upper group) and below 27% (lower group) of the examinees.
3.Count the number of examinees in the upper group (PT) and the lower group (PB) who got each item co
4.Compute the Difficulty Index each item.(It is measure the proportion of examinees who answered the It
5.Compute for the Discrimination Index. (This is a measure of how well in item is able to distinguish betwe
 ITEM ANALYSIS

Upper Group Lower Group

Difficulty Index Discrimination Index
Talud Opinggo Ugarte Rosete PT PB
1 0 0 1 4 2 0.462 AVERAGE 0.5
1 0 1 1 3 3 0.462 AVERAGE 0
1 1 0 0 4 2 0.462 AVERAGE 0.5
1 1 1 0 4 3 0.538 AVERAGE 0.25
0 1 1 0 2 2 0.308 AVERAGE 0
0 1 0 0 4 1 0.385 AVERAGE 0.75
0 0 0 1 4 1 0.385 AVERAGE 0.75
1 1 0 0 3 2 0.385 AVERAGE 0.25
0 0 1 0 3 1 0.308 AVERAGE 0.5
1 0 0 1 4 2 0.462 AVERAGE 0.5
1 0 0 0 4 1 0.385 AVERAGE 0.75
0 1 0 1 3 2 0.385 AVERAGE 0.25
0 0 1 0 4 1 0.385 AVERAGE 0.75
1 1 1 0 4 3 0.538 AVERAGE 0.25
0 0 1 0 2 1 0.231 VERY DIFFICULT 0.25
8 7 7 5

B) who got each item correct.

es who answered the Item correctly.)
ble to distinguish between examinees who are knowledgeable and those
 FORMULA:
Difficulty Index = (PT+PB)/N
Discrimination Index Decision
Discrimination Index= (PT-PB)/n
VERY GOOD RETAIN
POOR ITEM REVISE INTERPRETATION:
VERY GOOD RETAIN
MARGINAL ITEM REVISE Difficulty Index
POOR ITEM REVISE 0.76-1.00 = very easy
VERY GOOD RETAIN 0.25-0.75 = average
VERY GOOD RETAIN 0.00-0.24 = very difficult
MARGINAL ITEM RETAIN
VERY GOOD RETAIN
VERY GOOD RETAIN n=PT=PB= 27% of N = 0.27*13=3.51 4
VERY GOOD RETAIN
MARGINAL ITEM RETAIN
VERY GOOD RETAIN
MARGINAL ITEM RETAIN
MARGINAL ITEM Revise
(N is the total number of examinees )
(n is the number of examinees in each group)

Discrimination Index
0.40 - above = very good
0.30 - 0.39 = reasonably good
0.20 - 0.29 = marginal item
0.19 - below = poor item

The focused of getting the PT and PB