One of the cases assigned to us involves the fiduciary relationship that exists between an agent and a

principal and what are the basis for its revocation. Another case talks about the act that an agent is
precluded to do especially if it involves the ability of the principal to perform his obligation. And three of
the cases involved instances where an agent is alleged to have exceeded his authority.

Bacaling v. Muya – Adrienne

IN THE NEXT CASES, WHAT IS INVOLVED IS THE QUESTION ON WHETHER OR NOT THE AGENTS COULD
BE HELD PERSONALLY LIABLE

National Bank v. Welch, Fairchild & Co. - Sir Amil

ON THE NEXT THREE CASES, ASIDE FROM THE ISSUE ON WHETHER OR NOT AN AGENT CAN BE HELD
PERSONALLY LIABLE, THEY ALSO ANSWERS TO THE EFFECTS WHEN THE AGENT IS ALLEGED TO HAVE
EXCEEDED HIS AUTHORITY

NPC v. National Merchandising – Elaine

THE NEXT CASE STILL INVOLVES THE EFFECTS OF THE ALLEGED EXCEEDING OF AUTHORITY BY THE
AGENT. BUT IN THIS CASE, IT CONSIDERS ON WHETHER OT NOT THE THIRD PERSON KNOWS ABOUT THE
AUTHORITY OF THE AGENT.
Cervantes v. CA - BEA

Philippine Products v. Primateria