Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/301754596
CITATIONS READS
23 1,229
3 authors, including:
Abdolreza Gilavand
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
84 PUBLICATIONS 461 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Abdolreza Gilavand on 01 May 2016.
Abstract
Background
In modern education, physical space is considered as a dynamic factor in students' educational
activities. This study was conducted to investigating the impact of lighting educational spaces on
learning and academic achievement of elementary students.
Materials and Methods
At a cross-sectional study (2015-2016), a total of 210 students were selected randomly as sample of
study. Cluster sampling was done by appropriate allocation and questionnaires were randomly divided
among students. Data collection tools included Hermance’s achievement motivation questionnaire and
researcher-constructed questionnaire (observation checklist to examine the physical parameters of
learning environment lighting) and interviews with students. Data of study were analyzed using
SPSS- 21 software.
Results
Results of this study showed that lighting educational spaces has a significant impact on learning and
academic achievement of elementary school students in Ahvaz, Iran (P<0.05).
Conclusion
Since light is most available factor in life, attention to it at schools, best use of it to increase the
quality of educational space is a necessary work. Therefore, it is recommended that lightning of class
to be provided through natural light (windows, valves, etc) or artificial light (lamps or various kinds
of lights) in designing and equipping educational spaces.
Key Words: Educational achievement, Impact, Lighting educational spaces, Learning, Students.
*Please cite this article as: Gilavand A, Gilavand M, Gilavand S. Investigating the Impact of Lighting
Educational Spaces on Learning and Academic Achievement of Elementary Students. Int J Pediatr 2016; 4(5):
1819-28.
*Corresponding Author:
Abdolreza Gilavand , Employed Expert on Faculty Appointments, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Email: gilavanda@gmail.com
Received date Feb23, 2016; Accepted date: Mar 22, 2016
found no significant differences among all any kind of educational planning (6-8). On
dependent variables with respect to the the other hand, in applied area,
type of lighting used. The researchers understanding environmental factors
could only conclude that management affecting the educational process and
prefers warm white or cool white over full- considering them in planning increases
spectrum light, chiefly because the first mental health of students and reduces their
two are less costly to buy and maintain. A stress, resulting in enhanced educational
natural assumption might be that more performance. In Iran’s old architecture, it
light always creates a better, more positive can see the dependent of building and light
impression of a classroom’s qualities. in the role of body and spirit; one for
However, one study clearly shows an physical presence and one for spiritual
upper limit to classroom lighting, above presence. This is the same thinking and
which the lighting has negative effects (14) insight that makes everlasting our old
conducted a study in Brazil comparing architecture. Since light is most available
luminance in classrooms throughout the factor in life, attention to it at schools, best
course of several days in August 2000. use of it to increase the quality of
One room was equipped with windows educational space is a necessary work. The
with light shelves; another was not. aim of this study was to investigate the
Classrooms were on the same side of the effect of lighting educational spaces on
building, and all other variables were held learning and academic achievement of
constant. Interestingly, these studies elementary students of Ahvaz, Iran.
showed that rooms with light shelves and
without light shelves condition had 2-MATERIALS AND METHODS
advantages and disadvantages. In late 2-1. Study design and population
afternoon, windows with light shelves
produced light below prescribed At a cross-sectional study in2015-to
luminance, whereas windows without light 2016, the population of the study included
shelves created high luminance values all male elementary school students in
throughout the day, which can lead to Ahvaz, (South-west of Iran), of whom 210
gradual furniture and fixture damage—and students were selected randomly as the
distract students and teachers—as well as sample of the study. Questionnaires were
increase thermal discomfort. This research randomly distributed among students.
showed that even such feature like light Also, in this research, the sample data
shelves might have some drawbacks. were selected from the different
educational areas including educational
In recent years, the curriculum and area no. 1: 50 students, No. 2: 41 students,
textbooks has been considered, but this No.3: 59 students and No. 4: 60 students.
principle, the physical characteristics of
educational environment and its impact on 2-2. Ethical considerations
students' performance and spirit have not The ethical considerations necessary to
been investigated so much and only a few satisfy the respondents were observed
of studies have been carried out at this and they were ensured that their views will
regard. Theoretically, paying attention to be kept confidential. Also, participation
environmental factors affecting the in the study was voluntary.
educational environments and foresight on
supplying facilities and needs of 2-3. Measuring tools
educational spaces not only help managers 2-3-1. Construction Observation
and planners in adopting right and realistic checklist
decisions, but also they are necessity of
(1): If the school has met the standard Hermans’ standard questionnaire was used
principles relatively in the studied as a research tool and for studying physical
component (semi-standard); variables of lighting educational spaces
(2): If the school has met the standard (including 6-question of the standard,
principles fully in the studied component semi-standard and non-standard of 3-
(standard). option) a researcher-made questionnaire;
given the age of the respondents, the
Given the number of questions in
method of interview was used in
observation checklist (5), the minimum
completing questionnaires. By completing
score obtained by each school (completely
questionnaires and interview, some parents
non-standard), and the maximum obtained
or teachers of students were also present.
score by in terms of studied components,
Based on (Table.1) in which the
researcher marks each item in terms of
demographic characteristics of the students
meeting the standards according to three
have been specifically mentioned, from
standard option of standard, semi-standard
between 210 elementary students samples
and non-standard. According to the
under study, 11(5%) students were from
observation checklist, standard schools
elementary second grade, 25(12%)
were those schools which required the min
students were from elementary third grade
score based on confirmation of
38(18%) students from third grade,
modernization, development and
63(30%) students from fifth grade and
equipping of schools organization.
73(35%) students from sixth grade. Also
2-4. Data analyses in terms of age characteristics of the
The data of the study were analyzed using students under question, 15(7%) students
descriptive statistics (frequency, were 7-year old, 21 (10%) students 8-year
percentage, mean, standard deviation) and old, 38 (18%) students 9-year old, 63
inferential statistics (factor analysis, t-test, (30%) students 10-year old, and 73 (35%)
Kolmogorov - Smirnov test and one-way students 11-year old. For investigating the
ANOVA analysis) using SPSS-21. In this normality of the distribution of data related
section, the descriptive statistics related to to the lighting educational spaces, amount
observation, a checklist to examine the of learning and academic achievement, in
impact of physical variables of light ing on (Table.2) the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
learning and achievement questionnaire of (by accepting the null hypothesis at the
students was provided. Then, statistical error level of 5%) has been used. Results
hypotheses were examined in the data showed that the lighting in educational
analysis section. To examine the normal institutions was equal to 1.16±0.135,
distribution of data, Kolmogorov-Smirnov learning 0.34±1.04 and academic
test was used. Then, to examine the achievement 0.42±1.09. In (Table.3),
hypothesis of study, structural equation regarding 6 questions related to the check-
and Pearson correlation coefficient were list of variables of lighting educational
used, while single-sample t-test, institutions with three options standard,
independent two-sample t-test and medium and non-standard, the amount of
ANOVA were used to examine the sub- point and score of students has been stated.
hypotheses of study. The first question was about Natural
3-RESULTS source of light in class, so that it does not
cause eye dazing in students; 32(13.5%)
For investigating students’ amount of students have selected the standard option,
learning and academic achievement 53(22.4%) students the medium option and
(including 29 questions of 4 options), the 72(30.4%) students non-standard option.
The mean and standard deviation (SD) of The fifth question asked was about the
this question have been 2.95±1.20. Ceiling lams of class are attached to
ceiling or they are placed in high altitude
The second question asked Class natural
(near to main street, highway); 24(10.1%)
light can be adjusted by curtain; 19(8.0%)
individuals have selected the option
individuals have selected the option
standard, 33(13.9%) individuals the option
standard, 55(23.2%) individuals the option
medium and 85(35.9%) individuals the
medium and 93(39.2%) individuals the
option non-standard. The mean and
option non-standard. The mean and
standard deviation of this question have
standard deviation of this question have
been also 3.13±1.08.
been also 2.97±1.03.
The sixth question asked was about the
The third question asked Artificial light
Light distribution in class appropriately
source in class, so that it does not cause
and uniformly spread; 33(13.9%)
eye dazing in students; 34(14.3%)
individuals have selected the option
individuals have selected the option
standard, 48(20.3%) individuals the option
standard, 64(27.0%) individuals the option
medium and 88(37.1%) individuals the
medium and 94(39.7%) individuals the
option non-standard. The mean and
option non-standard. The mean and
standard deviation of this question have
standard deviation of this question have
been also 2.84±1.06.
been also 2.67±1.03.
Table.3, shown that, there was a
The fourth question asked was about the
significant relationship between the impact
Classroom artificial light can be provided
of lighting educational spaces, and
by fluorescent lamps; 38(16.0%)
educational achievement of elementary
individuals have selected the option
students (P<0.05). Also in this research
standard, 51(21.5%) individuals the option
there was not observed any relationship
medium and 98(41.4%) individuals the
between amount of learning and academic
option non-standard. The mean and
achievement and the demographic
standard deviation of this question have
variables under investigation such as age,
been also 2.71±1.05.
education level, education district of
education place etc. (P>0.05).
Table 1: Examination of normal distribution of data
Variables Z Kolmogorov – Smirnov statistic P- value
Table 3: The relationship between the impact of lighting of educational spaces on learning and
academic achievement
Variables Observed Expected Remaining P-value
frequency frequency
Standard 82 79 3.0
Students’ Moderate 83 79 31.0 0.001
perspective Non-standard 45 79 -34.0
Total 210
total of 84 third graders were exposed to should be reminded that in doing any
either focus or normal lighting. Focus activity, the required amount of light is
lighting led to a higher percentage increase different. Class lighting is provided
in oral reading fluency performance (36%) through natural light (windows, valves) or
than did control lighting (17%). No artificial light (lamps and lights). In any
lighting effects were found for motivation case, the amount, direction and quality of
or concentration, possibly attributable to light must be considered. Numerous
the younger age level of respondents as experiments have shown that the area of
compared with European studies. the glassy windows must be at least one-
fifth of room surface so that minimum
Ahmadpoor Samani et al (2012), aimed to
lightening to be provided for reading and
identify the influence of indoor lighting on
writing. On the other hand, any action that
students’ learning performance within
would equalize lightening for all students
learning environments from knowledge
should not be ignored. The light must be
internalization perspective. This study was
desirable in terms of distribution and it
a comprehensive review of literatures base
should be distributed uniformly so that
on the influence of indoor lighting on
does not cause eye discomfort. In addition,
people’s productivity and performance
amount of light should be sufficient and
especially students’ learning performance.
annoying shadows should be avoided. In
The result showed that it is essential to
this regard, Noifert states: "The direct and
improve lighting in learning environments
bubbled fluorescent light is very normal
to enhance students’ learning performance
producing proper for blackboard". In
and also motivate them to learn more. This
America, the artificial lighting is
study found significant impact between
automatically controlled by photoelectric
lighting quality and students’ learning
cells (4).
performance (17).
Safak Yacan (2014) assessed infants’ 5-1. Recommendations
social and cognitive developments, and Finally, 4 recommendations were
daylight in preschool classrooms. Results provided as follows:
revealed that there was a crucial 1. Due to relationship between components
correlation between preschool students’ of lighting of educational spaces and
social behavior and cognitive skills and increased behavioral disorder among
daylight in preschool classrooms. Also, the
students, it is recommended that
results showed that there was a significant educational managers of country pay
correlation between students’ social attention to psychological advices on
behaviors and preschools’ classrooms colors, lighting and sounds.
daylight conditions. Furthermore, students’
cognitive skills were also crucially 2. It is recommended that particular
correlated with classrooms’ daylight attention should be paid to educational
conditions in preschools. (18). space of schools in terms of designing and
building. The physical environment spaces
If seeing action faces with problem, should be designed and built so that they
learning will reduce. The purpose of can be compatible with inherent tendency
school lighting is to create an environment and nature of students. In addition,
in which the act of seeing is done in best solutions should be found for educational
way with minimal discomfort and effort so spaces requiring major repairs.
that energy of students to be spent on
information and learning process, rather 3. As standards and criteria determine the
than to combat with seeing problems. It desired level, and since the desired level of
one region might be different from other
2. Noorbakhsh S. Light in the wisdom of 12. Bright ideas: Exploring the importance of
Sohrevardi. Second Edition. Tehran: Saeed light on learning. Available at:
Mohebi Publication; 2005. http://www.euronews.com/2016/02/05/bright-
3. Sleegers P, Moolenaar N, Galetzka M, ideas-exploring-the-importance-of-light-on-
Pruyn A, Sarroukh B, Zande B. Lighting learning/.
affects students’ concentration positively: 13. Boray PF, Gifford R, Rosenblood L.
Findings from three Dutch studies. Lighting Effects of warm white, cool white and full-
Res. Technol 2013; 45: 159-75. spectrum fluorescent lighting on simple
4. Sapna Ch, Sianna A, Victoria C, Andrew N. cognitive performance, mood and ratings of
Designing Classrooms to Maximize Student others. J. Environ. Psychol1989; 9: 297–307.
Achievement. Policy Insights from the 14. Kruger EL, Zannin PHT. Acoustic, thermal
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2014; 1(1): 4- and luminous comfort in classrooms. Build.
12. Environ 2004; 39: 1055–63.
5. Lewinski P. Effects of classrooms’ 15. Akbari B. Validity of motivation
architecture on academic performance in view questionnaire of Heremence on students of
of telic versus paratelic motivation: a review. high school in Guilan Providence
Front Psychol 2015; 6: 746. knowledge and research in educational
6. Gilavand A, Hosseinpour M. Investigating sciences 2007;16:73-96.
the Impact of Educational Spaces Painted on 16. Barrett P, Davies F, Zhang Y, Barrett L.
Learning and Educational Achievement of The impact of classroom design on pupils'
Elementary Students in Ahvaz, Southwest of learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level
Iran. Int J Pediatr 2016; 4(2): 1387-96. analysis. Building and Environment
2015;89(2015):118-133.
7. Gilavand A, Jamshidnezhad A. The Effect
of Noise in Educational Institutions on 17. Mott M, Daniel H. Robinson, Walden A,
Learning and Academic Achievement of Burnette J, Angela S. Rutherford. Illuminating
Elementary Students in Ahvaz, South West of the Effects of Dynamic Lighting on Student
Iran. Int J Pediatr 2016; 4(3): 1453-63. Learning. SAGE Open 2012: 1–9. DOI:
10.1177/2158244012445585 Published 6 May
8.Gilavand A, Espidkar F, Gilavand M.
2012.
Investigating the Impact of Schools' Open
Space on Learning and Educational 18. Samani AS. The Impact of Indoor Lighting
Achievement of Elementary Students in on Students’ Learning Performance in
Ahvaz, Southwest of Iran. Int J Pediatr 2016; Learning Environments: A Knowledge
4(4): 1663-70. Internalization Perspective. International
Journal of Business and Social Science 2012;
9. Erin C. Schafer and Melissa Sweeney, A 24:127-36.
Sound Classroom Environment. ASHA Leader
19. Yacan S. Impacts of Daylighting on
2012;17 (4): 14-17.
Preschool Students' Social and Cognitive
10. Gilavand A, Barekat Gh, Hosseinpour Skills. Interior Design Program: Theses; 2014.
M. Evaluation of Dental Students’ Motives Paper11. Available at:
and Viewpoints on their Career Choice in http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/arch_id_theses/
Ahvaz. Jentashapir Journal of Health 11.
Research 2015; 6(6): 45-9.
20. Bellia L, Pedace F, Spada G. Lighting in
11. Gilavand A, Espidkar F, Fakhri A. A Educational Environments: An Example of A
comparative evaluation of depression and Complete Analysis of The Effecys of
anxiety rate among native and non-native Daylighting and Electric. Light on Occupants.
students of Dentistry School at Ahvaz Building and Environment 2013;68:50-65.
Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences.
Journal of Medical Science Educational
Development Center 2015; 6(2): 186-90.