Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Period 3
26 March 2019
In elementary school, we all knew that kid who sat at the “food allergy” lunch table
in the back of the cafeteria. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology tells us that as
of 2017, 4% of Americans have food allergies, 3 million of which are peanut allergies. In
fact, the New York Times tells us that the prevalence of peanut allergies has increased more
than threefold in children just from 1997-2010. Food allergies require constant vigilance
whenever eating, along with carrying an Epi-Pen and some allergy medication whenever
leaving the home. Children with food allergies grow up the same way any child does, save
the fact that when they enter the world, they have to be conscious of every morsel of food in
front of them. The risk of having to handle allergic reactions from unknown sources is an
(epicutaneous immunotherapy), and SLIT (sublingual immunotherapy). These forms are all at
different levels of safety. For those who aren’t ready to consume peanut protein despite being
patch that releases micrograms of peanut protein into the skin. For those who aren’t ready for
directly consuming peanut protein, there is the recent sublingual immunotherapy, which takes
longer but has the same results as oral immunotherapy. In sublingual immunotherapy, peanut
protein is dissolved in a liquid extract and placed under the patient’s tongue. Oral
immunotherapy is, so far, the most successful because it takes the least amount of time. In
oral immunotherapy, patients are given a gradually increasing amount (milligrams to grams)
of peanut protein to ingest in a doctor’s office. According to FARE (Food Allergy Research
Immunotherapy, however, is not yet FDA approved. It’s not a flawless process-
FARE reported that there were 4 cases of epinephrine-treated anaphylaxis in a 2017 AAAAI
immunotherapy conference. However, it’s not as though patients are merely handed peanuts
and sent on their way. On the contrary, doctors oversee the every move of patients
participating in a trial. Just because the process is non-FDA-approved doesn’t mean that it’s
not life-changing and lifesaving. In the end, the greatest obstacle a patient has to overcome is
their own fear. They must consider the benefits of a life without paranoia and carrying an