Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation of Potato-Stone-Clod Separation Mechanisms
Evaluation of Potato-Stone-Clod Separation Mechanisms
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, P.O. Box 20280, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 4Z7
Received 28 August, 1986, accepted 16 March, 1987
M^on^QG;^'and C*D'McLeod- mi- Evaluation ofpotato-stone-clod separation mechanisms. Can. Agric. Eng.
^V! lo"— 1 I \.
Methods of separating potatoes from stones and soil clods in storage were evaluated and factors affecting performance
were determined. The three methods ofseparation included a rotating brush separator, an electronic separator and an
impact roller separator. All separators effectively sorted the stones from the potatoes but the brush separator failed to
differentiate between the soil clods and potatoes. Parameters affecting the performance ofthe brush separator were the
feed rate and the brush gap while the performance of the electronic and impact roller separators was affected by the feed
rate and the stone/potato ratio, respectively.
INTRODUCTION ejected from the flow by means of high The objective of the study described in
Thedevelopment of mechanisms to sep speed pneumatic hammers. The basic pro this paper was to quantify the performance
arate potatoes from stones and clods has cess is similar to the roller with the advan of the three types of in-storage separators
been directed towards mechanical devices tage that the impact differences are in terms of their capability to separate
located on the harvesters. These devices amplified electronically as opposed to potatoes from stones and soil clods.
have been designed to separate potatoes on creating larger differences by changing the
the basis of physical differences between contact angle on the roller. Larger dif TEST PROCEDURES
the potato and the associated material. The ferences increase separating sensitivity. The laboratory arrangement included a
differences include rolling resistance, One disadvantage is having to align the feeding conveyor on which the products
elasticity, specific gravity, terminal product in order to optimize the perfor were placed and fed at controlled rates
velocity, resistance to X-ray penetration, mance of the electronic and impact ham onto each of the three separators. The
optical reflectance, and vibrational fre mer systems. A third method of separation three separators are shown schematically
quency response. Sides and Smith (1970) which is less expensive is presently at the in Figs. 1, 2 and 3. Russet Burbank
describe the mechanisms available for sep experimental stage. This method utilizes a potatoes were distributed evenly at a
arating potatoes and stones. Methods transaxial rotary brush separator in which known weight on the conveyor and then
which have been used or investigated over the material flow is across the brush axis. either stones or clods were uniformly
the past several years have also been Separation is achieved by a differential mixed with the potatoes. The conveyor
described by Story and Raghavan (1976). deflection of the bristles caused by the speed was constant during the tests while
More recently several mechanisms have difference in specific gravities of the the weight of material per unit length on
been developed to operate in storages dur potatoes, stones and soil clods as the conveyor was varied to deliver various
ing postharvest potato handling. The described by Eaton and Hansen (1969). loading rates to the separators. Prelimi-
advantage of doing a portion of the separa
tion at storage rather than on the harvester
is to reduce the number of people working
on the harvester under unfavorable condi
tions. Often in Eastern Canada from two to
four people are required to sort the ma
terial on the harvester. Two approaches
for in-storage use appear promising and
have been developed into commercial ma
chines. A commercial separator developed
by Feller et al. (1984) is based on the Figure 1. Cross-sectional view of brush separator.
difference between the coefficient of res
titution of the products being separated.
The device involves bouncing the objects DISTRIBUTION
Brunswick conditions. The field stone/ were conducted at four feed rates of 9.0, Pp + Pr sr + «
potato ratio depends on the soil type as 18.0, 27.0 and 36.0 t/h over a 1.3 m width pr
well as to the extent of the stone removal with three stone/potato ratios of 0.01, (l -z——)d
Pp + Pr Sr + SD (I)
operation. The clod/potato ratio has a 0.055 and 0.1. In order to measure the
higher variability depending on soil type effect that moisture content of soil clods where Pp = potatoes in the product exit;
and moisture as well as tillage practices. going into storage in early fall and leaving = potatoes rejected with the stones;
The feed rate selected during the evalua during winter has on the performance of = stones in the reject exit; and
tion of the separator represents sufficient the electronic separator, soil clods with s„ = stones remaining with the product.
capacity to handle the output from two
harvesters under New Brunswick condi
tions. A large percentage of growers oper Brush Gap
.0
—
Brush Separator L
O
"' •—^^^><^_
The critical parameter affecting ma -H
O
. 9
"^^^ •—-—
chine performance is the gap between CD
li
.8
adjacent pairs of brushes. Eaton and en
"*^-
10.0, 13.0 and 16.0 mm. Due to the small Feed Rate t/h
171
CANADIAN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 29, NO. 2, SUMMER 1987