Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microbial Pathogenesis
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/micpath
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Ethnopharmacological relevance: Oral candidiasis is an opportunistic infection of the oral cavity which
Received 13 December 2015 usually occurs in the immunocompromised individuals. Candida albicans (C. albicans) is the most com-
Received in revised form mon species of yeast responsible for oral candidiasis. This study investigated the effects of Satureja
10 April 2016
hortensis L. essentiall oil (EO) on the planktonic, biofilm formation and mature biofilms of C. albicans
Accepted 21 April 2016
Available online 25 April 2016
isolates from buccal lesions of HIVþ individuals.
Materials and methods: MTT reduction assay, broth micro-dilution method and scanning electron mi-
croscopy (SEM) were employed to determine the effect of mentioned EO on the C. albicans planktonic
Keywords:
Candida albicans
and biofilm forms. GC-GC/MS was used to detect the major active compounds of EO.
Biofilm Results: Thymol (45.9%), gamma-terpinen (16.71%), carvacrol (12.81%) and p-cymene (9.61%) were found
Satureja hortensis L. essentiall oil as the most abundant constituents. MIC values ranged from 250 to 400 mg/ml and MFC values ranged
HIV individuals from 350 to 500 mg/ml. All C. albicans isolates formed biofilm on polystyrene plats but the quantity of
biofilm mass (optical density) was different for the isolates ranging from 0.850 to 0.559 nm. The mean of
biofilm formation by C. albicans isolates was reduced by 87.1 ± 3.7%, 73.6 ± 5.1%, 69.4 ± 5.3% and
67 ± 4.2% at 4800, 3200, 2400 and 1600 mg/ml, respectively. In sub-MIC concentration, SEM analysis
revealed loosening of cells, deformity of three dimensional structures of biofilms and shrinkage in cell
membranes of sessile cells.
Conclusions: In conclusion, the substantial anti-fungal activity showed by S. hortensis L. EO suggests
exploitation of this oil as potential natural anti-biofilm product to deal with the problem of buccal cavity
lesion associated with C. albicans.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.04.014
0882-4010/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2 A. Sharifzadeh et al. / Microbial Pathogenesis 96 (2016) 1e9
Table 2
Susceptibility of planktonic and sessile C. albicans cells isolated from buccal lesions 0.9
of HIV þ individuals to S. hortensis L. EO (SMIC; MIC of sessile or biofilm cells).
Fig. 1. Kinetics of biofilm development by C. albicans isolates in wells of microtiter plates as determined by the colorimetric MTT-reduction assay. The X axis represents the time
intervals; the Y axis represents metabolic activity (colorimetric reading at 550 nm) of C. albicans biofilms.
4
Table 3
Effects of different concentrations of S. hortensis L. EO on biofilm formation (%) in C. albicans isolates.
C. F87 F94 F81 F49 F82 F95 F91 F60 F86 F92 F69 F1 F34 F78 F19
50 4 ± 2.8 2 ± 2.2 1 ± 6.8 4 ± 2.8 4 ± 8.4 8 ± 6.1 2 ± 1.4 1 ± 0.2 3 ± 2.6 3 ± 1.4 7 ± 2.1 3 ± 0.9 1 ± 3.1 1 ± 0.7 2 ± 1.3
100 7 ± 0.5 4 ± 5.6 8 ± 3.8 7 ± 5.3 9 ± 5.3 10 ± 5.2 6 ± 1.0 20 ± 6.1 12 ± 1.1 8 ± 5.3 27 ± 1.6 16 ± 1.4 3 ± 0.8 9 ± 1.4 12 ± 0.9
200 8 ± 0.5 16 ± 0.8 16 ± 8.3 14 ± 8.1 15 ± 2.5 15 ± 7.2 9 ± 1.5 21 ± 5.0 20 ± 8.1 16 ± 8.0 36 ± 1.1 20 ± 0.9 7 ± 1.7 17 ± 2.4 23 ± 4
300 12 ± 1.3 19 ± 3.4 33 ± 6.1 17 ± 7.3 19 ± 4.1 22 ± 5.0 16 ± 3.6 22 ± 3.4 24 ± 5.5 19 ± 3.5 44 ± 1.6 23 ± 0.7 25 ± 1.5 23 ± 0.9 31 ± 0.8
400 28 ± 1.7 20 ± 1.6 34 ± 5.6 33 ± 1.6 30 ± 3.3 26 ± 3.2 21 ± 7.2 51 ± 8.2 27 ± 7.3 21 ± 5.1 46 ± 2.8 26 ± 1.6 38 ± 4.6 31 ± 1.1 36 ± 2.5
600 36 ± 0.5 28 ± 7.1 35 ± 3.3 44 ± 6.2 43 ± 4.2 33 ± 4.2 28 ± 7.1 53 ± 2.4 29 ± 7.0 26 ± 7.7 48 ± 1.1 34 ± 7.2 45 ± 3.1 40 ± 0.9 46 ± 1.8
800 38 ± 2.7 44 ± 1.4 49 ± 8.4 46 ± 8.3 50 ± 2.5 52 ± 5.4 31 ± 8.4 58 ± 5.1 37 ± 1.4 32 ± 1.3 57 ± 1.5 49 ± 2.8 51 ± 0.9 58 ± 2.4 49 ± 1.9
1200 46 ± 2.9 60 ± 6.7 60 ± 2.9 58 ± 2.2 61 ± 6.2 60 ± 5.2 58 ± 6.0 59 ± 5.3 52 ± 1.0 58 ± 1.5 66 ± 1.3 63 ± 0.6 57 ± 2.3 64 ± 0.8 68 ± 3.1
1600 64 ± 2.4 68 ± 2.2 65 ± 5.3 63 ± 5.3 70 ± 8.1 64 ± 1.3 70 ± 7.2 62 ± 3.8 66 ± 8.2 66 ± 2.3 71 ± 3.1 70 ± 2.0 61 ± 0.8 69 ± 3.7 77 ± 0.2
2400 66 ± 5.6 69 ± 6.5 67 ± 3.3 65 ± 3.3 73 ± 9 64 ± 8.5 72 ± 4.4 63 ± 3.3 67 ± 4.3 67 ± 8.8 73 ± 2.6 75 ± 0.6 63 ± 3.6 76 ± 1.7 81 ± 4.3
Table 4
Effect of different concentrations of S. hortensis L. EO on mature biofilm in C. albicans isolates.
C. F87 F94 F81 F49 F82 F95 F91 F60 F86 F92 F69 F1 F34 F78 F19
50 31 ± 1.3 2 ± 1.3 1 ± 6.8 4 ± 2.8 4 ± 8.4 8 ± 6.1 2 ± 1.4 1 ± 0.2 3 ± 2.6 3 ± 1.4 2 ± 0.8 7 ± 1.3 3 ± 0.8 8 ± 1.2 3 ± 0.5
100 49 ± 2.1 9 ± 2.2 8 ± 3.8 7 ± 5.3 9 ± 5.3 10 ± 5.2 6 ± 1.0 20 ± 6.1 12 ± 1.1 8 ± 5.3 27 ± 4.1 14 ± 2.0 9 ± 1.2 10 ± 0.8 20 ± 2.3
200 57 ± 0.9 14 ± 2.1 16 ± 8.3 14 ± 8.1 15 ± 2.5 15 ± 7.2 9 ± 1.5 21 ± 5.0 20 ± 8.1 16 ± 8.0 35 ± 2.8 25 ± 1.9 30 ± 1.2 31 ± 3.4 23 ± 3.7
300 62 ± 2.1 28 ± 4.2 33 ± 6.1 17 ± 7.3 19 ± 4.1 22 ± 5.0 16 ± 3.6 22 ± 3.4 24 ± 5.5 19 ± 3.5 45 ± 2.6 25 ± 6.2 46 ± 1.8 43 ± 1.5 38 ± 0.1.6
400 70 ± 0.7 55 ± 2.3 34 ± 5.6 33 ± 1.6 30 ± 3.3 26 ± 3.2 21 ± 7.2 51 ± 8.2 27 ± 7.3 21 ± 5.1 52 ± 3.7 41 ± 3.4 53 ± 0.6 68 ± 1.5 54 ± 3.3
600 72 ± 1.6 66 ± 4.1 35 ± 3.3 44 ± 6.2 43 ± 4.2 33 ± 4.2 28 ± 7.1 53 ± 2.4 29 ± 7.0 26 ± 7.7 58 ± 0.9 49 ± 0.9 64 ± 1.1 40 ± 3.1 74 ± 5.2
800 73 ± 0.7 70 ± 2.3 49 ± 8.4 46 ± 8.3 50 ± 2.5 52 ± 5.4 31 ± 8.4 58 ± 5.1 37 ± 1.4 32 ± 1.3 74 ± 6.7 57 ± 1.1 76 ± 2.4 58 ± 1.1 76 ± 7.1
1200 73 ± 1.4 74 ± 4.4 60 ± 2.9 58 ± 2.2 61 ± 6.2 60 ± 5.2 58 ± 6.0 59 ± 5.3 52 ± 1.0 58 ± 1.5 77 ± 1.1 72 ± 2.6 78 ± 4.4 64 ± 0.7 81 ± 5.4
1600 74 ± 1.1 75 ± 5.3 65 ± 5.3 63 ± 5.3 70 ± 8.1 64 ± 1.3 70 ± 7.2 62 ± 3.8 66 ± 8.2 66 ± 2.3 78 ± 4.1 76 ± 0.8 81 ± 0.9 69 ± 2.1 81 ± 6.2
2400 74 ± 3.8 75 ± 6.2 67 ± 3.3 65 ± 3.3 73 ± 9 64 ± 8.5 72 ± 4.4 63 ± 3.3 67 ± 4.3 67 ± 8.8 78 ± 4.4 76 ± 1.4 82 ± 1.6 76 ± 3.2 81 ± 6.9
3200 74 ± 5.3 76 ± 4.8 71 ± 8.1 69 ± 8.4 75 ± 5.3 66 ± 3.2 76 ± 6.1 75 ± 6.2 69 ± 4.4 69 ± 6.3 78 ± 7.5 77 ± 3.9 86 ± 3.8 79 ± 2.1 82 ± 5.6
4800 76 ± 5.6 80 ± 6.7 91 ± 1.2 92 ± 7.1 89 ± 1.6 81 ± 1.8 83 ± 8.4 80 ± 0.8 87 ± 2.2 90 ± 2.2 80 ± 6.8 79 ± 5.4 91 ± 2.5 84 ± 5.4 85 ± 4.8
A. Sharifzadeh et al. / Microbial Pathogenesis 96 (2016) 1e9 5
Mature biofilm The biofilm formation in 96-well microtiter plates was per-
100 formed as described previously [20]. Briefly, 100 ml of the various
concentration including 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1200,
90 1600, 2400, 3200 and 4800 mg/ml of S. hortensis L. EO diluted with
Reduction in metabolic activity %
Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscopy of C. albicans isolates biofilms formed at 48 h. This figure indicate the structural difference among C. albicans isolates biofilms.
A. Sharifzadeh et al. / Microbial Pathogenesis 96 (2016) 1e9 7
comparison of their mass spectra with those reported in literature. followed by F19 and F49 isolates (Fig. 2). However, no significant
Based on GC-MS results, 21 components were identified, repre- differences were observed between biofilm mass of C. albicans
senting 99.4% of the S. hortensis L. EO. As Table 1, thymol (45.9%), isolates (p ¼ 0.095). The inhibitory effect of EO on biofilm formation
gamma-terpinen (16.71%), carvacrol (12.81%) and p-cymene is depicted in Table 3. Fig. 3 revealed that the inhibitory effect of EO
(9.61%) were found as the most abundant constituents. on biofilms appeared to be dose dependent. The mean of biofilm
The MICs and MFCs values of S. hortensis L. EO towards formation by C. albicans isolates was reduced by 87.1± 3.7%,
C. albicans isolates using broth microdilution method are illustrated 73.6± 5.1%, 69.4± 5.3% and 67± 4.2% at 4800, 3200, 2400 and
in Table 2. MIC values ranged from 250 to 400 mg/ml 1600 mg/ml, respectively. In less than 1200 mg/ml dilutions, the
(mean ¼ 306.7 ± 53 mg/ml) and MFC values ranged from 350 to metabolic activity reduction rate was less than 50%. The average
500 mg/ml (mean ¼ 407.1 ± 72.8). inhibition percentage of S. hortensis L. EO (50e4800 mg/ml) on
In this study, the kinetics of biofilm formation over a period of metabolic activity of mature C. albicans biofilms ranged from 7.1 ± 7
96 h was determined by quantitative assessment of biofilm mass to 80± 2.8% Table 4. Fig. 3 the analyses of MIC and SMIC indicated
metabolic activity after the attachment of C. albicans cells to the that the SMIC of S. hortensis L. EO for 33.3% (n ¼ 5) isolates of
surface of polystyrene plates. As it shown in Fig. 1, overall, biofilm C. albicans was twofold to the MIC and in 66.7% (n ¼ 10) isolates
formation curves demonstrated that the kinetics of biofilm for- SMIC was three times higher than the MIC (Table 2). The action of
mation among all isolates of C. albicans was similar. In all C. albicans S. hortensis L. EO upon C. albicans biofilm morphology, evaluated by
isolates the maximum cell density or uttermost growth rate of SEM analysis. Results showed that, although some of the differ-
biofilm was performed in 48 h after the cell attachment with the ences were observed in the three-dimensional structure of biofilms
exception of F60 isolate. Afterwards (72e96 h), the cell density of produced by different C. albicans isolates, but there was no evident
biomass began to decrease. Kinetics of biofilm formation showed a different between ultra-structural visages of biofilms. Treated bio-
similar trend in four separate replication. Fig. 2 presents the results film cells with EO showed obvious morpho-structural changes
of biofilm quantification using MTT reduction assay. It was evidence compared to non-treated cells (Fig. 4). Untreated sessile cells
that all C. albicans isolates formed biofilm on polystyrene plats after showed smooth cell membrane whereas treatment with EO
48 h but the quantity of biofilm mass (OD at 550 nm) was different exhibited shrinkage in cell membranes of sessile cells. in treated
for the isolates ranging from 0.850 to 0.559 nm (average groups, filamentation is inhibited and destruction of three-
Abs ¼ 0.668 ± 0.06). dimensional structure of biofilm was observed (Fig. 5).
Biofilm formation was highest in C. albicans F87 and F94 Untreated sessile cells resulted in intact biofilm formation with
Fig. 5. Scanning electron micrographs of mature C. albicans biofilms in the presence S. hortensis L. EO.
8 A. Sharifzadeh et al. / Microbial Pathogenesis 96 (2016) 1e9
a dense one or multilayered network (depending on isolate) of ingredient of S. hortensis L. EO. This indicates that inhibitory activity
yeast cells and filamentous forms scaffold “true and pseudo-hy- of this oil is largely due to the thymol. However, minor constituents
phae” (Fig. 3) (see Fig. 5). Some of which was covered with dense may also play a key role in the biological activities of this EO. Braga
extracellular matrix leading to a compact three-dimensional et al. demonstrated that thymol interfered with the starting phases
structure that covered the entire surface of the polyvinyl chloride of biofilm formation by reducing the amount of metabolically active
coverslips (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, in treated cells with EO the biofilm yeast as well as the dimorphic switching from yeast to filamentous
mass density was reduced and in any of isolates extracellular ma- forms [32,33]. In summary, the current study demonstrated that
trix was not observed (Fig. 3). Untreated sessile cells showed S. hortensis L. EO has potential antifungal activity against biofilm or
smooth cell membrane whereas treatment with EO exhibited planktonic cultures of C. albicans obtained from patients with HIV
shrinkage in cell membranes of sessile cells the treated cells and may find use in future therapeutic strategies. Finally, further
exhibited loosening of cells and disappearance of matrix. Fila- work involving In vitro and In vivo experiments is needed in order
mentation is inhibited and destruction of three-dimensional to determine the validity of our observations.
structure of biofilms were observed. S. hortensis L. EO led to
sorely destruction of 3D biofilm network leaving only a few wrinkle Acknowledgments
yeasts and sometimes disintegrated filamentous forms.
This work was supported by the Research Council of the Uni-
4. Discussion versity of Tehran. The authors would like to thanks Mr. Ali Ghayour
who helped us in this study.
C. albicans is one of the most frequently isolated human fungal
pathogen from oral cavity lesions especially in HIVþ patients [1,2].
References
Ability to formation of structured surface-attached microbial
communities known as biofilm is one of the major contributions [1] O.J. Hamza, M.I. Matee, M.J. Moshi, E.N. Simon, F. Mugusi, F.H. Mikx,
virulence factors related to the C. albicans. Biofilms can increase the W.H. Helderman, A.J. Rijs, A.J. Van der Ven, P.E. Verweij, Species distribution
resistance to antifungal drugs, blocking or preventing the access of and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of oral yeast isolates from Tanzanian HIV-
infected patients with primary and recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis, BMC.
antifungals to the more internal biofilm tree dimensional structure Microbiol. 8 (2008) 135.
[5,6,22]. In this context, new agents such as plant essential oils can [2] J.C. Junqueira, B.B. Fuchs, M. Muhammed, J.J. Coleman, J.M. Suleiman,
inhibit the growth of microorganisms with ability of biofilm S.F. Vilela, A.C. Costa, V.M. Rasteiro, A.O. Jorge, E. Mylonakis, Oral Candida
albicans isolates from HIV-positive individuals have similar in vitro biofilm-
development are greatly needed and would enhance the number of
forming ability and pathogenicity as invasive Candida isolates, BMC. Micro-
effective therapeutic alternative strategies [17,23,24]. Taking into biol. 11 (2011) 247.
account this, the present study was carried out to assess the ki- [3] M.S. Khan, I. Ahmad, S.S. Cameotra, F. Botha, Sub-MICs of Carum copticum and
netics, ability of biofilm formation and antifungal properties of Thymus vulgaris influence virulence factors and biofilm formation in Candida
spp. BMC. Complement. Altern. Med. 14 (2014) 337.
S. hortensis L. EO upon planktonic and sessile cells of C. albicans oral [4] R.M. Donlan, Biofilm formation: a clinically relevant microbiological process,
isolates. In this study, the biofilm formation ability of different Clin. Infect. Dis. 33 (2001) 1387e1392.
isolates of C. albicans was evaluated and the results demonstrated [5] V. Furletti, I. Teixeira, G. Obando-Pereda, R. . Mardegan, A. Sartoratto,
G. Figueira, R. Duarte, V. Rehder, M. Duarte, J. Ho € fling, Action of Coriandrum
that all isolates studied formed biofilms, although the biofilm for- sativum L. essential oil upon oral Candida albicans biofilm formation, Evid.
mation ability varied among C. albicans isolates. These results were Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2 (2011) 1e8.
in agreement with those of other authors, who reported that ability [6] D. Kuhn, T. George, J. Chandra, P. Mukherjee, M. Ghannoum, Antifungal sus-
ceptibility of Candida biofilms: unique efficacy of amphotericin B lipid for-
of candida species to develop biofilm structures [24e26]. Results of mulations and echinocandins, Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 46 (2002)
current study demonstrated that biofilm forming potential of 1773e1780.
C. albicans species was highly strain dependent. SEM analysis also [7] R.B. Shinde, J.S. Raut, M.S. Karuppayil, Biofilm formation by Candida albicans
on various prosthetic materials and its fluconazole sensitivity: a kinetic study,
demonstrated structural and morphological differences among
Mycoscience 53 (2012) 220e226.
biofilms of the studied isolates. Biofilms of C. albicans oral isolates [8] A.C. Tavares, M.J. Gonçalves, C. Cavaleiro, M.T. Cruz, M.C. Lopes, J. Canhoto,
consisted of a compact network cells with different morphological L.R. Salgueiro, Essential oil of Daucus carota subsp. halophilus: composition,
antifungal activity and cytotoxicity, J. Ethnopharmacol. 119 (2008) 129e134.
characteristics. All C. albicans isolates expect F60 were constructed
[9] M.M. Cowan, Plant products as antimicrobial agents, Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12
yeasts, pseudo and true hyphae but, biofilm of F60 was subtended (1999) 564e582.
only of yeast and pseudo hyphae cells. It is known that biofilm [10] M.S. Khan, I. Ahmad, Biofilm inhibition by Cymbopogon citratus and Syzygium
structures is dependent on several environmental including growth aromaticum essential oils in the isolates of Candida albicans,
J. Ethnopharmacol. 140 (2012) 416e423.
conditions, nature of surface colonization and microbial species [11] J. Rios, M. Recio, Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity,
[25,27e29]. Such finding probably reflects inherent physiological J. Ethnopharmacol. 100 (2005) 80e84.
differences among isolates and could have significance with respect [12] J.S. Raut, S.M. Karuppayil, A status review on the medicinal properties of
essential oils, Ind. Crops. Prod. 62 (2014) 250e264.
to pathogenic potential. [13] W.S. Alviano, R.R. Mendonça-Filho, D.S. Alviano, H.R. Bizzo, T. Souto-Padro n,
As revealed by GC-MS analysis, thymol was the major com- M.L. Rodrigues, A. Bolognese, C. Alviano, M.M.G. Souza, Antimicrobial activity
pounds of S. hortensis L. EO followed by g-Terpinene, carvacrol and of Croton cajucara Benth linalool-rich essential oil on artificial biofilms and
planktonic microorganisms, Oral. Microbiol. Immunol. 20 (2005) 101e105.
P-cymene. These results found to be in agreement with the litera- [14] D.R. Oliveira, G.G. Leitao, S.S. Santos, H.R. Bizzo, D. Lopes, C.S. Alviano,
ture [30,31]. D.S. Alviano, S.G. Leitao, Ethnopharmacological study of two Lippia species
In this study, we used the MTT reduction assay to measure the from Oriximin a, Brazil, J. Ethnopharmacol. 108 (2006) 103e108.
[15] R.H. Pires, L.B. Montanari, C.H.G. Martins, J.E. Zaia, A.M.F. Almeida,
metabolic activity of C. albicans biofilms treated with S. hortensis L. M.T. Matsumoto, M.J. Mendes-Giannini, Anticandidal efficacy of cinnamon oil
EO. According to the results this EO inhibited all C. albicans isolates against planktonic and biofilm cultures of Candida parapsilosis and Candida
in planktonic and sessile forms with different concentrations in a orthopsilosis, Mycopathologia 172 (2011) 453e464.
[16] S. Singh, G. Tewari, C. Pande, C. Singh, Variation in essential oil composition of
dose dependent manner (mean of MIC, MFC and SMIC50 were
Ocimum americanum L. from north-western Himalayan region, J. Essent. Oil
306 ± 53, 407 ± 72 and 1040 ± 202.8 mg/ml, respectively). Res. 25 (2013) 278e290.
These results can be explained on the basis of chemical [17] V. Agarwal, P. Lal, V. Pruthi, Prevention of Candida albicans biofilm by plant
composition of this EO. High standard deviations in relation to oils, Mycopathologia 165 (2008) 13e19.
[18] S. Sangetha, Z. Zuraini, S. Suryani, S. Sasidharan, In situ TEM and SEM studies
SMIC might be due to the difference in biofilm mass created by on the antimicrobial activity and prevention of Candida albicans biofilm by
different C. albicans isolates. Thymol was the major active Cassia spectabilis extract, Micron 40 (2009) 439e443.
A. Sharifzadeh et al. / Microbial Pathogenesis 96 (2016) 1e9 9
[19] A. Sharifzadeh, A.R. Khosravi, H. Shokri, G. Sharafi, Antifungal effect of Tra- origin inhibit morphogenesis, adhesion, and biofilm formation by Candida
chyspermum ammi against susceptible and fluconazole-resistant isolates of albicans, Biofouling 29 (2013) 87e96.
Candida albicans, J. Mycol. Med. 25 (2015) 143e150. [27] M.E. Davey, G.A. O'toole, Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular ge-
[20] C.G. Pierce, P. Uppuluri, A.R. Tristan, F.L. Wormley, E. Mowat, G. Ramage, netics, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64 (2000) 847e867.
J.L. Lopez-Ribot, A simple and reproducible 96-well plate-based method for [28] S.P. Hawser, L.J. Douglas, Biofilm formation by Candida species on the surface
the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal susceptibility of catheter materials in vitro, Infect. Immun. 62 (1994) 915e921.
testing, Nat. Protoc. 3 (2008) 1494e1500. [29] N. Jain, R. Kohli, E. Cook, P. Gialanella, T. Chang, B. Fries, Biofilm formation by
[21] J.H. Priester, A.M. Horst, L.C. Van De Werfhorst, J.L. Saleta, L.A. Mertes, and antifungal susceptibility of Candida isolates from urine, Appl. Environ.
P.A. Holden, Enhanced visualization of microbial biofilms by staining and Microbiol. 73 (2007) 1697e1703.
environmental scanning electron microscopy, J. Microbiol. Methods 68 (2007) [30] D. Djenane, J. Yangüela, P. Roncale s, M. Aider, Use of essential oils as natural
577e587. food preservatives: effect on the growth of Salmonella enteritidis in liquid
[22] G. Ramage, S.P. Saville, B.L. Wickes, J.L. Lo pez-Ribot, Inhibition of Candida whole eggs stored under abuse refrigerated conditions, J. Food. Res. 2 (2013)
albicans biofilm formation by farnesol, a quorum-sensing molecule, Appl. 65.
Environ. Microbiol. 68 (2002) 5459e5463. [31] H. Miladi, R. Ben Slama, D. Mili, S. Zouari, A. Bakhrouf, E. Ammar, Chemical
[23] M.S. Khan, I. Ahmad, Antibiofilm activity of certain phytocompounds and their composition and cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of Satureja montana L.
synergy with fluconazole against Candida albicans biofilms, J. Antimicrob. essential oil and its antibacterial potential against Salmonella spp. Isolates,
Chemother. 67 (2012) 618e621. J. Chem. 2 (2013) 1e9.
[24] J. Ferreira, J. Carr, C. Starling, M. De Resende, R. Donlan, Biofilm formation and [32] P. Braga, M. Alfieri, M. Culici, M. Dal Sasso, Inhibitory activity of thymol against
effect of caspofungin on biofilm structure of Candida species bloodstream the formation and viability of Candida albicans hyphae, Mycoses 50 (2007)
isolates, Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 53 (2009) 4377e4384. 502e506.
[25] S. Silva, M. Henriques, A. Martins, R. Oliveira, D. Williams, J. Azeredo, Biofilms [33] P.C. Braga, M. Culici, M. Alfieri, M. Dal Sasso, Thymol inhibits Candida albicans
of non-Candida albicans Candida species: quantification, structure and matrix biofilm formation and mature biofilm, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 31 (2008)
composition, Med. Mycol. 47 (2009) 681e689. 472e477.
[26] J.S. Raut, R.B. Shinde, N.M. Chauhan, S. Mohan Karuppayil, Terpenoids of plant