You are on page 1of 3

Journal of Dermatology 2017; 44: e93–e94

LETTER TO THE EDITOR


External chalazion as reddish and intractable lower eyelid
nodules in a child

Dear Editor, (Fig. 1b–d). Caseous necrosis was absent. The bacterial, fungal
A 3-year-old boy was referred to our hospital with a 3-month and mycobacterial cultures were also negative.
history of lesions on his left lower eyelid. He did not have a Considering the clinical and histological findings, we con-
localized trauma at the lesion site. Before he was referred to firmed a diagnosis of chalazion.
our hospital, the patient visited several ophthalmologists, but Chalazion is a foreign body reaction characterized by
the diagnosis was uncertain. Examination of the lesion chronic lipogranulomatous inflammation of the meibomian
revealed two red, elastic, soft nodules with well-defined bor- gland caused by an obstruction of the meibomian gland excre-
ders and decreased mobility of the eyelid; on his left eyelid tory duct, and clinically presents as a single intradermal or
margin, one was 16 mm 9 9 mm and the other below was subcutaneous nodule within the eyelid.1 As the nodule grows,
13 mm 9 9 mm (Fig. 1a). The lesions were neither painful nor if the inflammation spreads into the conjunctiva, a polypoid
itchy. granulomatous tumor develops on the conjunctiva. On the
An excisional biopsy was taken from the nodule including other hand, if the inflammation perforates anteriorly from the
the orbicularis oculi under general anesthesia. Histopathologi- tarsal plate and spreads toward the eyelid surface, a reddish
cal examination revealed lymphohistiocytic granuloma with intradermal nodule develops on the eyelid skin.2 This latter pat-
many form cells and foreign body giant cells in the deep der- tern is rare, and consistent with our case.
mis, the subcutaneous fat and the orbicularis oculi, and some Sometimes, ophthalmologists may fail to diagnose a cha-
of the giant cells had small clear spaces in their cytoplasm lazion showing an unusual clinical presentation. In fact,

(a) (c)

(b)

(d)

Figure 1. (a) Reddish and elastic soft nodules on the patient’s left eyelid margin. The upper nodule was 16 mm 9 9 mm and the
lower nodule was 13 mm 9 9 mm. (b–d) Histopathological examination revealed lymphohistiocytic granuloma with many form cells
and foreign body giant cells in the deep dermis, the subcutaneous fat and the orbicularis oculi, and some of the giant cells had
small clear spaces in their cytoplasm. There is no caseous necrosis (hematoxylin–eosin).

Correspondence: Daisuke Sawamura, M.D., Department of Dermatology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki,
Aomori 036-8562, Japan. Email: m981027@hirosaki-u.ac.jp

© 2016 Japanese Dermatological Association e93


Letter to the Editor

although our patient consulted several ophthalmologists, none diseases must be considered. Even invasive testing methods
were aware of this uncommon type of chalazion. including skin biopsy will be required to diagnose the related
Initially, we ruled out ophthalmological diseases because he diseases such as chalazion and IFAG.
had already visited several ophthalmologists. Because the
diagnosis was not immediately apparent, we considered the CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None declared.
possibilities of pilomatrixoma, tuberculosis or non-tuberculous
mycobacterial infection, bacterial or fungal infective granuloma, Ayumi KOREKAWA, Koji NAKAJIMA, Eiko
and idiopathic facial aseptic granuloma (IFAG). Then, we per-
MAKITA, Hajime NAKANO, Daisuke SAWAMURA
formed an excisional biopsy and had to select a general anes- Department of Dermatology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of
thesia because of the patient’s young age and periorbital lesion. Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
When encountering a case of eyelid nodules, distinguishing
a chalazion from IFAG is often difficult. IFAG is an unexplained doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13650
dermatological disease that commonly presents specifically in
childhood as one or a few nodules on the cheeks or eyelids, REFERENCES
and the histopathological findings of IFAG resemble that of 1 Williams HC, Aclimandos WA, Salisbury J. Bilateral external chalazia
chalazion.3–5 Histopathological findings of IFAG are neu- presenting as granulomas of the lower eyelids. Clin Exp Dermatol
trophilic, lymphohistiocytic granulomas with foreign body reac- 1992; 17 (6): 441–442.
tion in the dermis only. In contrast, the histopathological 2 Shuichiro E. Hordeolum and chalazion. Ganka 2013; 55 (5): 549–554.
(Japanese)
inflammation of a chalazion is not restricted to the dermis but
3 Prey S, Ezzedine K, Mazereeuw-Hautier J et al. IFAG and childhood
spreads widely in the subcutaneous tissue5 and that was con- rosacea: a possible link? Pediatr Dermatol 2013; 30 (4): 429–432.
sistent with our case. 4 Ozer PA, Gurkan A. Eyelid nodule in a child: a chalazion or idiopathic
In conclusion, when intractable nodular eruption on the facial aseptic granuloma? Eye (Lond) 2014; 28 (9): 1146–1147.
5 Boralevi F, Leaute
-Labre
ze C, Lepreux S et al. Idiopathic facial asep-
lower eyelids is observed, both dermatological and ophthalmic
tic granuloma: a multicentre prospective study of 30 cases. Br J Der-
matol 2007; 156 (4): 705–708.

e94 © 2016 Japanese Dermatological Association


Copyright of Journal of Dermatology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.

You might also like