ASSIGNMENT

Topic: - Privileged Communication:

Submitted By

MOHAMMAD ZIYA ANSARI

BALLB (HONS)
SEMESTER-VI
ENROLLMENT NO- GI- 6492
FACULTY NO- 17BALLB- 72
2nd GCT

Submitted To

PROF. MOHAMMAD ASHRAF SIR

Professor, Faculty of Law

Aligarh Muslim University

ALIGARH-202002 (INDIA)

2019.20

1|Page
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS A DEEP SENSE OF

THANKS & GRATITUDE TO MY PROJECT GUDIE PROFESSOR

MOHAMMAD ASHRAF SIR FOR GUIDING ME IMMENSELY

THROUGH THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT.

I ALSO THANKS TO MY SENIORS FOR THEIR MOTIVATION &

SUPPORT. I MUST THANKS TO MY CLASSMATES FOR THEIR
TIMELY HELP & SUPPORT FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT.

LAST BUT NOT THE LEAST, I WOULD LIKE TO THANKS TO ALL

THOSE WHO HELPED ME DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TOWARDS
THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT.

THANKING YOU

MOHAMMAD ZIYA ANSARI

BALLB-3rd Year GI-6492

17BALLB-72

2|Page
 SYNOPSIS

1-INTRUDUCTION.

1.1- What qualifies as Privileged Communication?

1.2- Why Privileged Communications are not admissible?

2- PRIVILEGES ASSOCIATED WITH LEGAL ADVICE OR CURRENT

OR CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION.

2.1-Exceptions

3- VARIOUS FORMS OF PRIVILEGED COMMNICATIONS.

3.1- Spousal Communications.

3.2- Professional Communications.
3.3- State Privileged.
4-CONCLUSION.

5-BIBLIOGRAPHY.

3|Page
1-INTRODUCTION:
Privileged Communication refers to the confidential conversations or interactions between two
parties who are in a legally recognized protected relationship. The information cannot be leaked
to any third party, not even in the Court. Law can never force an individual or a corporation to
disclose the contents of privileged communications.  When two individuals enter into a legally
recognized relationship, all communication that takes place between them is protected. This
communication is known as privileged communication. It is called so because whatever
information that is disclosed in this kind of setting is protected i.e. the courts cannot force the
individual to disclose the details of such communication. 

Privileged communication is the communication between individuals who are in a protected

relationship by the virtue of which, the details of their communication cannot be disclosed.
Privileged communication exists to protect the disclosure of information during the subsistence
of confidential or protected relationships. These communications are such that they may not be
used as evidence in a court of law against the persons communicating due to the specific nature
of their relationship. The privileged Communication of a witness implies the right of a witness to
hold back evidence in certain matters. The Indian Evidence Act provides certain circumstances
wherein certain persons cannot be compelled to testify i.e. to provide evidence. The right has
been provided on the basis of public policy and convenience.

Illustration: 

 ‘A’, the husband and ‘B’, the wife are undergoing a rough patch in their matrimonial
life. 
 ‘A’ decides to transfer all his property to C via his will and only his lawyer knows
about this. If B ever asks A’s lawyer to disclose it, the lawyer can’t tell as it is a
privileged communication. 
 He can tell only if A gives consent to do so or A himself discloses to a third party.

1.1-What qualifies as Privileged Communication? 

To qualify as privileged communication, there are certain conditions that need to be fulfilled.
These are:

1. The communication should take place between individuals who are in a protected
relationship, and
2. The communication should happen in a private setting, and 
3. The information communicated should not be disclosed to a third party.

4|Page
1.2- Why Privileged Communications are not admissible?

Privileged Communications are made in a private setting and are protected from disclosure to
third parties. The rule of privileged communication exists because privacy of confidential
relationships is valued in the society. This is why they are not admissible as evidence. 

2-PRIVILEGES ASSOCIATED WITH LEGAL ADVICE OR CURRENT

OR CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION:

All communications that takes place between an attorney and his client comes under the ambit of
privileged communication. 
The Attorney-Client privilege in India is governed by provisions under, 

1. The Evidence Act, 1872, and 

2. Bar Council of India Rules, and 
3. Advocates Act, 1961.
Section 126 to 129 of the Indian Evidence Act deal with privileged communication associated
with professional relationship between an attorney and his client. 
This privilege is necessary because if the client cannot trust his lawyer with the information, then
he will not disclose all the facts of his case and the lawyer will not be able to defend the client in
court.

Section 126 states that no legal advisor or a lawyer can be permitted to disclose the confidential
information that,

1. The client revealed to him, or 

2. Any advice that the lawyer gave to his client. 
It also states that, the lawyer cannot disclose any contents of the documents that he became
familiar with during the course of his employment. This privilege exists even after the
termination of employment. 

2.1-Exceptions:
There are certain exceptions to the above stated rule. These are, 

1. Any communication which takes place in furtherance of any illegal purpose;

Illustration: “A”, a lawyer has been asked by his client, “B” to forge some documents so that he
can be granted possession of a property. This communication is made in furtherance of an illegal
purpose, and thus is not protected from disclosure. 

5|Page
 1. Any fact observed by a lawyer in the course of his employment, showing that any
crime or fraud has been committed by the client since the commencement of his
employment. 
2. Express consent of the client. If the client himself gives permission to the lawyer to
disclose the information, then that information will not be protected from disclosure. 
Only those communications which are made with the purpose of getting professional advice
from the lawyer are considered as protected. This privilege exists only when both are in a
confidential relationship and not before that. 
Section 127 broadens the scope of the privilege and extends it to the servants, helpers,
interpreters and clerks of the lawyer. 
Section 128 is the continuation of the privilege, it protects the legal advisor or the lawyer from
disclosing any information which comes under the ambit of section 126, unless the client himself
calls the legal adviser as a witness. 
Section 129 of the Act states that the client is protected from disclosing any confidential
information unless he himself offers to be a witness. 
Rules about Advocate’s duty towards his client are mentioned in The Rules on Professional
Standards, Part VI, Chapter II, Rule 7 & 15 of the Bar Council of India Rules. 
Rule 7 states that no Advocate will disclose, directly or indirectly, any communication which
took place between him and his client. 
Rule 15 states that the Advocate should not take advantage of the confidence that his client has
reposed on him. 

3- VARIOUS FORMS OF PRIVILEGED COMMNICATIONS:

The Indian Evidence Act recognizes various forms of privileged communication, namely:

3.1- Spousal Communication

3.2- Professional Communication
3.3- State Communication

There may not be any disclosure of any exchange of information between parties in such a
relationship without consent of the other party to the court or any other person. This protects the
sanctity of these protected relationships.

(3.1)- Spousal Communications:

Spousal communication refers to the communication between a man and his wife. Any
communication between a married couple is considered confidential. Either party is disallowed
from divulging any such information to any third party made within the confines of a valid,
existing marriage. The origin of this principle may be traced back to English common law which
formalized it in the English Evidence (Amendment) Act, 1853. This concept has been

6|Page
characterized in Indian Jurisprudence as the embodiment of the “expectation” of secrecy between
spouses and the damage such disclosure may have upon the familial structure.

Section 122 however, must be interpreted narrowly because it reduces the scope of admissibility
of evidence which may be crucial to the case of the prosecution. This may be seen as the
rationale for the interpretation of section 122 by Vagyani, J. to mean that only the words said by
a spouse can be treated as privileged communication. If in case a spouse is acting or behaving in
a particular manner, his activities, deviation from any regular practice etc. are not covered under
section 122. This was affirmed when a wife was called on to give testimony against her husband
in a murder case wherein, she was allowed to testify as to his conduct but not to the conversation
that ensued between the spouses.

Additionally, the Supreme Court has also clarified that any and all communication between
spouses must remain confidential if the communication happened during the subsistence of the
marriage. Whilst determining the admissibility of the evidence brought by the way of spousal
testimony, the date of the communication must be the deciding parameter and not the date when
the communication was sought by the court. In the event that said communication happened
during the marriage but now the marriage has subsided, the communication would still be
privileged. Notably, the exception to the provisions of section 122 is when the dispute is between
the married parties. The parties may be allowed to bring communication between them as
evidence.
Marriage is a protected relationship. Thus, communication that takes place between a married
couple is privileged. This protection survives even after the marriage dissolves. The court cannot
compel the husband or wife to disclose information that was exchanged during the course of
marriage. Husband or wife cannot be forced to testify against each other.
 
Section 122 of the Evidence Act deals with communication during marriage. It states that no
person (either husband or wife) can be compelled or permitted to disclose the communication
that happened with the person with whom he is married or has been married. 

Exceptions to this clause:

(a)- Acts or conducts apart from the communication can be disclosed. 

In the case of Ram Bharose v. State of U.P., the husband was accused of theft of jewellery
which he had gifted to her wife. He told his wife that he had obtained it from her previous home.
The wife in the Court discloses the conduct of the accused that he had seen her husband coming
down from the roof and after taking a bath gifted it to her. Court held that the wife could testify
as to the conduct but not the conversation. 

(b)-If the party who made the communication consents to its disclosure i.e. waives the privilege,
then the evidence of privileged communication can be given. 

©-In Suits or criminal proceedings between the two spouses. 

7|Page
(d)-Communications made before marriage or after dissolution of marriage. 

The landmark judgement of Nagraj Alias Kumar v. State of Karnataka, the Court observed
that even though Section 120 of the Evidence Act permits a spouse to tender evidence against the
other spouse except in suits or criminal proceedings between the two spouses. Section122 makes
it clear that privilege extends to all communications, the said communication does not need to be
confidential. Only spouses who made the communication can waive it and not the witness as the
privilege doesn’t extend to them. Even the Court cannot permit the witness to disclose even if
he/she is willing to share. It is incumbent to ask for the consent of the party against who the
evidence is being given under Section122 of the Evidence Act. 

In another landmark case of M.C. Varghese Vs. T.J. Poonam and Anr., the Supreme Court
held that only communications that took place during the marriage are protected under the
privilege mentioned in Section 122 of the Evidence Act. The protection continues even after the
dissolution of marriage or the death of one of the spouses. Communication before the marriage
or after the dissolution of a marriage doesn’t come under the purview of sec 122.

(3.2)-Professional Communication:

Professional privileged communication refers to the communication between a legal advisor and
his client. The communication between two such persons in furtherance of the professional
employment of the advisor is protected and the legal advisor cannot be made to disclose such
information. The protection under this section extends to any person registered as a legal
practitioner in India as the section specifies the category of “barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil”
which in India means an advocate.
This principle is based on the fact that its inexistence would render advocates incapable of
defending their clients. Clients would constantly worry about being exposed by their attorney
and would not be inclined to share the entirety of details of their case. In the absence of such a
prohibition, the solicitation of the best possible legal advice would not be possible.

Just like in the case of spousal privilege, the adjudication of the existence of privilege is done by
looking at the date of the communication. If at the time of the communication, the parties were in
a relationship of Legal Advisor & Advisee, the communication shall be considered privileged. In
the event that the relationship is terminated, the privilege continues to exist.

This privilege however, is not absolute. The act itself states that under certain conditions, the
privilege does not apply. One such case is when the communication was in furtherance of an
illegal purpose. The following illustration may be used to understand the same:
“A, a client, says to B, an attorney — “I wish to obtain possession of property by the use of a
forged deed on which I request you to sue”. This communication, being made in furtherance of a
criminal purpose, is not protected from disclosure.”
Additionally, a disclosure of the privileged communication can be done with the express
authorization of the party making that communication. In case a third person is privy to the
details of that communication, he or she may be compelled to disclose such communication and
would be admissible as evidence subject to the provision of the Indian Evidence Act. The
8|Page
provisions of section 127 also make the provisions of section 126 applicable to the assistants,
servants or clerks of the advocates who are bound to not disclose privileged communication.

It is a statutory obligation under Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act for an advocate to not
disclose without the consent of the client any-

1. communication to him by the client or vice versa,

2. contents or conditions of a document, and
3. the advice given to the client,
which was obtained or given in the course and for the ‘purpose of such employment’. This
phrase means that no privilege attaches to communication to an attorney consulted as a friend.
This obligation continues even after employment has ceased. This encapsulates the rule of “once
privileged always privileged”.
The privilege under Section 126 is subject to certain exceptions i.e. under the following
conditions communication can be disclosed:

1. When the communication was made in furtherance of an illegal purpose;  

2. When the attorney gets to know that a crime or fraud has been committed since
employment began;
3. When the client gives consent; 
4. When the information falls into the hands of a third party;
5. When a lawyer sues the client for professional purpose.
Section 127 of the Evidence Act states that Section 126 applies to- 

 Interpreters
 Clerks or servants of barristers
 Pleaders
 Attorneys
 Vakils
In the case of Court in its own motion vs. State, Delhi High Court answered the question,
whether a child victim should be permitted to waive the privilege of the counsellor? Court held
that it can be done if the child does it knowingly and voluntarily and waiver is in the interest of
the child provided the reasons for a waiver should be recorded in writing in the order.

9|Page
In the case of Karamjit Singh v. State, the Court held that one cannot ask for disclosure of any
professional communication and documents of attorney and client under the Right to
Information.
In the case of Board Of Directors, Y.M.C.A. and v. R.H. Niblett, the Court observed that in a
defamation case where the evidence in question is proved to be privileged then the burden to
prove not just normal malice but express malice lies on the plaintiff. The Court stated that if the
occasion is privileged then the publication by a person ‘exercising the privilege to third persons’
if it is reasonable and in the ordinary course of business, where communication wasn’t possible
except in the presence of uninterested people, it is protected. The privilege can’t be destroyed
merely because third-persons (clerks, typists or copyists, etc.) do not have a legitimate interest in
the subject matter. 
Privilege Cannot Be Waived by Voluntary Evidence:
Section 128 states that if the client himself presents some evidence regarding privileged
communication; it doesn’t amount to a waiver of privilege. Summoning the lawyer as a witness
by the client doesn’t amount to consent to disclose but when the client himself asks questions
pertaining to the confidential communication then it amounts to an implied waiver of privilege.

(3.3)-State Privilege:

Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 prohibits any person from giving evidence which
has been taken from unpublished documents that concern the matters of the state. This may only
be done if the head of the concerned government department allows disclosure. This is done in
the interest of the security of the state and wellbeing of the public. Additionally, if a
communication was made to an official of the Indian government in “official confidence”; such
communication would also be privileged if the officer believes its disclosure to be against public
interest. Any information about the commission of an offence given to a police or revenue officer
is also privileged.

In India, such a privilege can only be claimed by the head of a department and not even a court is
allowed to decide what comes under said privilege. For example, when a petitioner sought the
production of certain income-tax returns from the respondent, the court dwelled into the question
of whether or not the document would be protected under state privilege. It was held that only
the Income Tax Commissioner can determine the answer to this question and no one else; not
even a court.

However, the Supreme Court has clarified that in matters such as that of dismissal of a public
servant due to mal-fide activities, the state cannot claim privilege when the court requests the

10 | P a g e
production of his service records. The Supreme Court has also been of the view that such
communication may not be protected under the said privilege if in case the non-disclosure of
such information would have larger negative impacts on public interest that the disclosure.

As per Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872, a person is not permitted to give any
evidence which has been derived from any unpublished official records which relate to any
affairs of State, unless there is the permission of the head of the concerned department
concerned.

4-CONCLUSION:

There are some relationships which are deemed as protected. They are protected because a
person has to place his full confidence on the other and disclose some information which may be
damaging to him and his reputation. This is why the rule of privileged communication is
necessary as without this rule, a client would always be worried about his lawyer disclosing
information against him, or a patient would be worried about his doctor disclosing his medical
details. No one would dare to ask for professional advice and no man could safely go to court, to
find redressal or to defend himself. The Indian Evidence Act protects certain communications
from being disclosed due to the nature of the relationship between the parties to whom such
communications are being made. The act distinguishes between them upon the basis of the
relationships. This privilege however, is not absolute. It may be violated in various cases that
have either been specified in the statute itself or in various instances by the courts in Indian
Jurisprudence.

Various legislations oblige the parties of a protected relationship (attorney-client, doctor-patient,

husband-wife) to adhere to the rule of privileged communication. The foundation of this is to
guard the trust that a client re-poses in an attorney, patient in a doctor and spouses in each other.
However, the privilege is not absolute in nature, it is subjected to certain exceptions. The law
also provides for punishment in case of its violation.

5-BIBLIOGRAPHY:

11 | P a g e
1-https://blog.ipleaders.in/privileged-communication-under-indian-evidence-act-
1872/

2-https://enterslice.com/learning/privileged-communication/

3-http://lawtimesjournal.in/privileged-communication/

12 | P a g e