Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/281437575
CITATIONS READS
23 11,862
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Onafowokan Onabanjo Oluyombo on 14 May 2018.
and
OLABISI, JAIYEOLA
Abstract
Microfinance is fast becoming a household name globally due to its acceptance as a means of
reaching those that were not served by the conventional big banks. The survival of
microfinance institutions in any country depends majorly on the overall political and economic
environment of such a nation. However, the greatest challenge the microfinance institutions
will face globally in pursuance of its financial intermediary role is how best to manage its
credit and risk exposures in comparison with the rising competition, sophistication and
turbulent economic and social environment especially in developing nations. After examining
different concept of microfinance and risk management, this paper focus on those peculiar risks
associated with microfinance business and suggested how regulators and operators in the
sector can best guide against distress or imminent collapse while striking a balance between
1
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
INTRODUCTION
Business is all about risk taking. However, the level of risk from one industry to another varies
and it depends largely on the nature and services provided by the organization. Banking
business world wide is exposed to more risk than any other business concern as a result of their
trading in money market instruments. Though, some Microfinance Institutions (MFI) does not
take deposit, but operate through grants and donor fund. However, majority of them (MFI) are
deposit taking organization just like a conventional bank. Hence, as a result of accepting
deposit and giving of credit, the MFI are therefore exposed to risks that are inherent in their line
of business.
banks in some countries in the past, risk management in MFI need to be considered now.
According to Oluyombo and Ogundimu (2006), MFI are not bank, even though, some seems to
work like banks while others may be called Microfinance Bank (MFB), but their services and
products are peculiar and targeted to the low income earners. Hence, the need for overview of
CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION
There is need to examine some concepts like microfinance, features of microfinance, risk and
Overview of Microfinance
2
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
According to Asian Development Bank (2000), microfinance is the provision of a broad range
of financial services such as deposits, loans, payment services, money transfers, and insurance
to poor and low-income households and their micro enterprises. Microfinance services are
provided by three types of sources: formal institutions, such as rural banks and cooperatives;
services provided by both formal and semi-formal institutions. Microfinance institutions are
Otero and Rhyne (1994) defines microfinance as a revolution that involves the large scale
provision of small loans and deposit services to low-income people by secure, conveniently
located and competing commercial financial institutions thereby generating the process needed
to democratize capital. This definition means that the numbers of microfinance institutions
should be enough to meet the needs of low income earners in the nation through the provision
of loan facilities and to give room for healthy competition among them.
savings-provided to people who farm or fish or herd; who operate small enterprises or micro
enterprises where goods are produced, recycled, repaired or sold; who provide services; who
work for wages or commissions; who gain income from renting out small amounts of land,
vehicles, draft animals, or machinery and tools; and to other individuals and groups at the local
This definition is encompassing as it tries to state those who may benefit from microfinance
institutions and also inform that developing countries need microfinance institutions more than
3
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
developed countries and especially, that microfinance is meant for those operating small and
micro enterprises.
low-income women and men. Ledgerwood (2000). It means that the purpose of microfinance is
to reach the low income earners either in the urban or rural areas with financial services that
will enable them create wealth without any discrepancy as to the sex of such person.
Ndiaye (2005) opined that access to improved financial services – access to more and better
ways of turning savings into lump sums – helps poor people from sliding deeper into poverty
and helps them lay foundations for their ambitions to better themselves and their families.
Microfinance is about providing financial services to the poor who are traditionally not served
by the conventional financial institutions. Three features distinguish microfinance from other
formal financial products. These are: (i) the smallness of loans advanced and or savings
collected (ii) the absence of asset-based collateral, and (iii) simplicity of operations. Central
Bank of Nigeria (2005). This give a clue that the CBN is aware that there are people that are not
served by the conventional banks because the loan requires by them is very small compare to
Microfinance institution is now a growing phenomenon all over the world. It is emerging as a
rapidly growing financial services industry worldwide as a solution to the crippling effects of
the conventional banks interest on the poor and those operating micro and small scale
enterprises (MSSE).
those that are hitherto un-reached at a reasonable fee that is affordable and economic to the
users of such services, and also, using funds from the providers of financial services to generate
4
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
adequate returns for the users, thereby building up their enterprises and creating employment
opportunities which will reduce the poverty level in the economy. Microfinance is a holistic
approach that has been used in different countries to alleviate the plight of MSSE both in the
rural and urban areas in accessing fund as at when required which was not possible from the
conventional banks.
The distinguishing features of sustainable finance as totally different from other banking
institutions as identified by ADB (2000), CBN (2005), CBN (2006) and Oluyombo (2007)
v. The extension of banking services beyond economic to social and cultural upliftment of
the people.
vi. Development of good inter-personal relationship between the bank and her customers
vii. Their products and services are targeted towards MSSE in their locality.
Risk
Risk can be examined both internally (within the MFI operations) and externally (factors
beyond the control of the MFI). Van Horne (1983) defines risk as the possibility that the actual
return will deviate from that which was expected. It means that result realized from an
5
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
investment may differ from the actual plan. Hence, risks evolve because there is plan that is not
met due to unfavourable circumstances or conditions. Risk was also defined as the chance of a
According to Adewunmi (2005) to survive in today’s very competitive and turbulent economic
and social environments, business and financial institutions in particular must learn to live with
risks by intelligently and professionally managing them (risks). Risk is the probability that the
consequence of an event will be different from the original plan due to certain factors and that
the outcome may not be in the interest of the planner. It should be noted that there would be no
risk where there is no exposure and uncertainty. Where outcome of a decision can be predicted
with 100% level of accuracy without any exposure, then risk will be absent. However, in
today’s business world, the outcome of any plan and/or decision is based on many parameters
and economic factors such that MFI are exposed to outsider and there is no guarantee that all
loans and advances will be paid as at when due, hence risk is present in MFI.
Like any other business organizations, those involved in microfinance business are also exposed
to some peculiar risk. Although, their (risks) names may seems to be the same with other sector
The following factors brought about a different risk for MFI compared to other conventional
banks.
i. MFI services and products are targeted to the poor and low income earners in the
society.
6
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
ii. Most clients of MFI do not have physical assets (house, land, automobile, plant and
machinery) and financial assets (share, bond, stock and debenture certificates) to
iii. There is no supportive regulatory and supervisory policy framework on the part of
some government which lead to physical and economic challenges for MFI.
iv. Where regulatory framework exists, the peculiarity of MF business in most cases is
not taken into consideration. In such country, MFI and other banks are regulated
Haven’t considered the risk factor of MFI, the question that follow is what are these risks?
Berenbach and Churchill (1997) and Ledgerwood (2000) identified four main areas of risks that
are peculiar to MFI as: Portfolio risk, Ownership and governance risk, Management risk and
New industry risk. Adewunmi (2005) recognized risks like: Credit risk, Operational risk,
Interest rate risk and Liquidity risk as those affecting financial institutions. However, this paper
is of the opinion that Liquidity risk, Credit risk, Foreign exchange risk, Ownership return risk
and Operational risk are those that affect MFI directly and they are discussed below.
7
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
Operational
Risk
Foreign
Exchange Ownership
Risk Return
Risk
Liquidity Risk
This is the risk associated with meeting regular and unplanned high withdrawals by large
depositors who are always few in numbers. Some MFI get funds from mandatory legal deposit
from banks and government at different levels. For such MFI, a change of government or
change in government policy may reduced available fund to MFI considerably, which posses
liquidity risk to them. In Nigerian for example, the CBN encourage each state government to
dedicate an amount of not less than 10% of their annual budget for on lending activities of
Liquidity risk will also arise through donor fund which the donors might call back for some
period or suspend forever. In such case, the financial base of such MFI will be threatened.
Credit Risk
Olfield and Santomew (1997) opined that credit risk arises from non-performance by a debtor.
8
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
contracted manner. This can affect the lender who underwrote the contract, other lenders to the
creditor, and the debtor's own shareholders. This is the risk associated with default in loan
repayment as at when due or the uncertainty of meeting financial obligations by client at the
right time. This risk is pronounced in MFI as a result of inadequate collateral for loan disbursed
if the borrower is unable to pay due to financial constraint and/or complete refusal to pay.
Credit risk is not limited to unrepaid loans and advances alone, but extend to those loan
applications that were turn down by MFI, because it may hinder their growth and cause
It is apparent that MFI can not boast of profit like the conventional banks. Where the owners of
MFI are desirous of getting a sizeable return on their investment in a short time, which is
common in a private ownership led businesses; this may lead to unhealthy practice in the
operation and management of MFI so that appropriate return can be given to the owners.
Actually, this risk is in force from the inception of MFI except the owners see their investment
as part of their modest contribution in alleviating the plight of the poor at the short run before
dividends could be declared. However, this is not the case because average investors want
adequate return from the investment at shortest possible period, or else, the fund will be
invested in another line of business with less risk and better return.
9
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
Operational Risk
Adewunmi (2005) defined operational risk as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed
internal processes, people and systems or from external events. However, the operational risk of
MFI essentially has to do with the employee who works in the organization.
In most nations, banks’ employee earns relatively more than many other sector of the economy.
If employee of MFI see them self as banker and form their mind set, it will create a disorder and
operational breakdown. It is expected that this will lead to agitation for better welfare package
and may tend towards unionism which hamper the operation of MFI since they will found it
difficult to pay similar remuneration like the conventional banks and other notable financial
institutions.
Most MFI, especially those in developing countries source for funds from international
organization/donor in foreign currency but lend such fund in their local currency. Despite
lending in local currency, the repayment to the agencies/donors will always be in foreign
the time the loan is due for repayment, the exchange rate would have gone up, which will made
it impossible for MFI to earn profit from the fund. Repayment may have to be met from another
source which may wipe out depositors funds if adequate care is not taken.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk management (RM) is a term that is synonymous to different area of human endeavours.
Risk management was defined by Baffa (1990) as the planning and controlling of all the
10
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
conceivable elements of risks which are inherent in the daily operations of an organization in
order to ensure the organization’s continued existence as well as the realization of its set goals
and objectives’. Meyer (2000) opined that in managing risk, banks must decide which risks to
take, which to transfer and which to avoid. If banks have options as to their risk exposure, do
Risk need to be managed in MFI to avoid mishaps, hardship and loss of financial and human
assets and to guarantee continuous supply of loanable fund to the end user as at when needed.
According to Olfield and Santomew (1997), it has been argued that risk is an essential
ingredient in the financial sector and that some of this risk will be borne by all but the most
transparent and passive institutions. In short, active risk management has a place in most
financial firms.
Risk management is an integral part of monitoring and evaluating both liquid and illiquid assets
and depositors liabilities of MFI to ensure the sustainability of the industry. It should be
understood from the outset that risk can not be managed in any MFI if the management did not
set a goal in that direction. Therefore, the first thing to be done is that there must be a written
goal and drive from the owners and managers as to the need to manage risk on daily basis
Furthermore, the management should put in place a risk management policy and procedures
covering all areas of their microfinance business, including those areas they (MFI) intend to
venture into in the nearest future. The policy should be followed in managing risks as they are
11
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
identified in the industry or in their own location, but not necessarily until it affect the business
negatively.
Management should also be ready to review the RM policy and procedures at regular interval
especially when there is change in regulation, economic policy and other indicators that may
The need for investment strategies and guidelines can not be over emphasized, because this will
help considerably to manage credit risk. Not all investment opportunity presented to MFI
should be financed as a result of the volatile of the industry or trade that may be involved. In
this case, selected trading should be identified, especially those with low risk profile. However,
this depends on the deposit base of the MFI, location and her source of fund.
A motivated employee is the one that will defend the course of his or her employer. Risk can
never be managed without the employee, hence MFI management should be ready and willing
to properly remunerate and motivate the workforce. The motivation should not be limited to
financial reward alone, but it should include an open acknowledgement of the employee who
works very well in the reduction of the firms risk without compromising the business ethics.
From economic point of view, risk should be prioritized using a simple scale of preference in
handling them (risk). Although, all form of risk should be managed, but the impact of these
risks on MFI business differs considerably, hence these risks should be analysed and given their
appropriate scale.
For example, ownership return risk must be given higher priority, if not; all other risk can not
be managed if the owners agitate for more return on their investment. Prioritization of risk will
help the MFI management to know the level of resources that will be deployed to each risk and
12
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
the likely effect on their business. If this is done, the owners and management will not be
caught unaware when these risks are about to occur and/or increase.
Sound internal control system (ICS) is another tool for risk management which has proved to be
necessary and reliable in any financial institution. The ICS should be able to monitor, review
and evaluate all business processes on regular basis to be able to determine the effectiveness or
This process is very essential because risks are assumed out of the daily business operation as a
result of mistake, incompetence, fraud and lack of concentration by one or more personnel that
do not do one thing or the other during or after the business process. However, with sound ICS,
some or all of the processes left undone can be detected early enough so that corrective
measures can be taken on time before the risk is passed to the MFI.
CONCLUSION
Risk is a daily phenomenon in every area of life and business. The management of these risks is
therefore important to reduce to the barest minimum the untold hardship of not recognizing and
MFI are therefore enjoyed to rise above board in their risk management strategies and
procedures to protect the industry and also to encourage the generous national and international
donors who are eager to see many people lifted above the poverty level.
If the owners and management of MFI are not proactive and fully committed in their risk
management, the future of many poor people around the world will be jeopardized.
13
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
References
Adewunmi, Wole (2005) Perspective of Risk Management. The Journal of Banking and
Asian Development Bank (2000). Finance for the Poor: Micro Finance Development Strategy.
ADB, Manila.
Berenbach, Shari and Churchill, Craig (1997) Regulation and Supervision of Microfinance
Institutions: Experience from Latin America, Asia and Africa. Occasional Paper 1.
Central Bank of Nigeria (2005). Microfinance Policy, Regulatory and Supervisory Framework
Central Bank of Nigeria (2006) Requirements and Procedures for the Conversion of Community
Dunn, Elizabeth; Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas and Valdivia, Corinne (1996) Risk and the
Meyer, Laurence H (2000) Why Risk Management is Important for Global Financial
14
Oluyombo, O. O. and Olabisi, J. B. (2008) Risk Management in Microfinance
Institutions. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp 104-112.
Ndiaye, Fode (2005) Microfinance as a Strategy for Poverty Reduction in Africa. Paper
Oldfield, George S. and Santomew, Anthony M. (1997) The Place of Risk Management in
Financial Institutions. Wharton Centre for Financial Institutions Working Paper Number
95-05-B.
Otero, M and Rhyne, E. (1994) The New World of Microenterprise Finance: Building Healthy
financial Institutions for the Poor. West Hartford: Conn Kumarian Press.
Robinson, Marguerite S. (2001) The Microfinance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the
Van Horne, C. James (1983) Financial Management and Policy (6th ed). India: Prentice Hall of
15