You are on page 1of 9

Structure and Properties of Poly(methyl methacrylate)

Particles Prepared by a Modified Microemulsion


Polymerization

WAN JIANG,1 WULI YANG,1 XIANBIAO ZENG,2 SHOUKUAN FU1


1
Department of Macromolecular Science and Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers (Ministry of
Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China

2
Chemistry and Chemical Industry College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, People’s Republic of China

Received 27 January 2003; accepted 13 June 2003

ABSTRACT: Nanoscale poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particles were prepared by


modified microemulsion polymerization. Different from particles made by traditional
microemulsion polymerization, the particles prepared by modified microemulsion po-
lymerization were multichain systems. PMMA samples, whether prepared by the
traditional procedure or the modified procedure, had glass-transition temperatures
(Tg’s) greater than 120 °C and were rich in syndiotactic content (55– 61% rr). After the
samples were dissolved in CHCl3, there were decreases in the Tg values for the
polymers prepared by the traditional procedure and those prepared by the modified
process. However, a more evident Tg decrease was observed in the former than in the
latter; still, for both, Tg was greater than 120 °C. Polarizing optical microscopy and
wide-angle X-ray diffraction indicated that some ordered regions formed in the particles
prepared by modified microemulsion polymerization. The addition of a chain-transfer
agent resulted in a decrease in both the syndiotacticity and Tg through decreasing
polymer molecular weight. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42:
733–741, 2004
Keywords: modified microemulsion polymerization; poly(methyl methacrylate);
nanoparticles; syndiotactic; glass-transition temperature (Tg)

INTRODUCTION groups5– 8 have tried to overcome these draw-


backs to make microemulsion polymerization
Microemulsion polymerization has widely been more practical. Recently, our laboratory devel-
studied since the first reports by Stoffer and Bone oped a modified microemulsion polymerization to
in the early 1980s,1,2 and this procedure is effec- prepare a high-solid-content nanosize polymer la-
tive in producing polymer latices of 10 –100 nm.3,4 tex, in which the monomer was gradually added
However, two major drawbacks limit its broad into the polymerizing microemulsion system
application: (1) low monomer/surfactant weight without disturbing its stability.9,10
ratios, usually less than 1, and (2) low polymer A microsphere prepared by traditional micro-
contents, usually less than 10 wt %. A number of emulsion polymerization generally contains only
a single-chain polymer or a polymer with few
chains and shows some novel characteristics in its
Correspondence to: S. Fu (E-mail: skfu@srcap.stc.sh.cn)
Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, Vol. 42, 733–741 (2004)
conformation and thermal behaviors. Qian et al.11
© 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. found that a single-chain polystyrene (PS) glass

733
734 JIANG ET AL.

prepared by microemulsion polymerization had a pressure before polymerization. Sodium dodecyl


higher conformational temperature than ordinary sulfate (SDS) was purchased from Shanghai Shen-
multichain PS according to Fourier transform in- gong Bioengineering Corp. and was used as re-
frared (FTIR) and displayed an exotherm peak ceived. Ammonium persulfate (APS) was purchased
near the glass-transition temperature (Tg) during from Shanghai Aijian Reagent Factory and purified
the first differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) by recrystallization in water. Cetyltrimethylammo-
scan. The results were interpreted in terms of the nium bromide was purchased from Shanghai
existence of nematic localized cohesion entangle- Chemical Reagent and purified with a mixture of
ments in PS glass. Wu et al.12 reported that the ethanol and acetone (1:1). Nonyl phenol poly(ethe-
density of particles of PS with few chains (0.95 noxy ether) NP-9 (EO: 9) and nonyl phenol poly-
g/cm3) was 9.5% lower than the densities of tra- (ethenoxy ether) NP-40 (EO: 40) were purchased
ditional PS latex and bulk PS (1.05 g/cm3). Our from Henkel KGaA and used as received. Ascorbic
group13 found that particles of PS with few chains acid from Shanghai Xingxing Medicine Developing
showed two exotherm peaks near 107 and 157 °C Center and a 30% hydrogen peroxide solution from
during the first DSC scan, and in the subsequent Shanghai Taopu Chemical Factory were used as
scan, both exotherm peaks disappeared and, only received. N,N,N⬘,N⬘-Tetramethylethylenediamine
one glass transition similar to that of ordinary PS (TMEDA), 1-pentanol (n-Pt), methanol, and chloro-
was kept. The second exotherm peak was ascribed form from Shanghai Chemical Reagent were used
to the relatively compact conformation of PS as received. Deionized water was used for all the
chains and the slightly ordered regions that con- polymerization experiments.
sequently formed inside the particles of PS with
few chains during the heating process. Our
Preparation of PMMA Nanoparticles by Modified
group14 also reported that the DSC curve of a
Microemulsion Polymerization
poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microsphere
prepared by traditional microemulsion polymer- The recipes of modified microemulsion polymer-
ization had one higher Tg (135 °C) in the first scan izations under various conditions are shown in
and that Tg’s of the second and the third scans Table 1. The general procedure of microemulsion
were still higher (125 °C) than that of ordinary polymerization with SDS/n-Pt as a surfactant and
PMMA (105 °C). Recently, Pilcher and Ford15 dis- cosurfactant and APS as an initiator can be de-
covered that PMMA with few chains had higher scribed as follows. The premicroemulsion, com-
Tg’s (125–126 °C) and 58 – 61% rr triads at 60 °C posed of the entire amount of the surfactant, the
(polymerization temperature) and 63– 65% rr tri- auxiliary surfactant, water, and an amount of the
ads at 35 °C. monomer that was slightly higher than its solu-
With modified microemulsion polymerization, bility in water, was added into a 100-mL, four-
relatively concentrated polymeric microemul- necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, an
sions (polymer content ⫽ 10 –30 wt %) were addition funnel, a thermometer, a nitrogen gas
achieved, with particle diameters of 20 – 40 nm inlet, nitrogen gas outlet, and a magnetic stirring
maintained.9 For PMMA prepared by modified bar. The premicroemulsion was heated to 70 ⫾ 2
microemulsion polymerization, we found that a °C for the APS initiator (30 ⫾ 2 °C for redox
higher Tg existed in the first scan and also in the initiators) and was stirred under a nitrogen at-
second scan. Here we report some characteristics mosphere. Then, the requisite amount of the ini-
of PMMA nanoparticles from the modified sys- tiator, which was dissolved in a minimum quan-
tem, such as the Tg, tacticity, and particle size, tity of water, was added. When the polymeriza-
and discuss the conformation and configuration in tion started, the rest of the monomers in the
the restricted volume of a nanosize particle. addition funnel were added into the reaction flask
in a starving addition manner.
The polymer particles were precipitated in
EXPERIMENTAL methanol, and the mixture was allowed to stand
overnight. The precipitated polymer was vacuum-
filtered, washed successively with methanol and
Materials
water, and dried in a vacuum desiccator for 24 h
Monomers were purchased from Shanghai Chemi- at 50 °C. No surfactant peaks were detected in the
1
cal Reagent Co. and were distilled under reduced H NMR spectra of the purified samples.
MODIFIED MICROEMULSION POLYMERIZATION 735

Table 1. Compositions and Particle Sizes of the Samples

Surfactant H2O Dz CV, variable


Sample (g)a Initiator (g) (mL) MMA (g)b (nm) coefficient (%)

A1 SDS/n-Pt APS (0.114) 42 1 ⫹ 5.1 20 31


(0.7/0.1)
A2c SDS/n-Pt APS (0.114) 42 1 18 24
(5.4/0.7)
A3d SDS/n-Pt APS (0.6) 42 1 ⫹ 5.1 20 32
(0.7/0.1) (SH, 0.06)
A4 SDS/n-Pt APS/TMEDA 43 1 ⫹ 5.1 22 35
(0.7/0.1) (0.037/0.02)
A5c SDS/n-Pt APS/TMEDA 185 2.2 21 37
(22/0.62) (0.037/0.02)
A6 SDS/n-Pt H2O2/asorbic acid 43 1 ⫹ 5.1 27 34
(0.7/0.1) (0.06/0.09)
A7c SDS/n-Pt H2O2/asorbic acid 43 1 26 30
(5.4/0.7) (0.06/0.09)
A8d SDS/n-Pt H2O2/asorbic acid 43 1 22 41
(5.4/0.7) (0.06/0.09)
(SH, 0.01)
C CTAB (1.5) H2O2/asorbic acid 42 1 ⫹ 5.1 17 36
(0.06/0.09)
N1 NP-9/NP-40 APS (0.114) 38 1 ⫹ 5.1 22 34
(4.5/0.5)
N2 NP-9/NP-40 H2O2/asorbic acid 38 1 ⫹ 5.1 19 10
(4.5/0.5) (0.06/0.09)
N3 NP-9/NP-40 APS/TMEDA 38 1 ⫹ 5.1 18 25
(4.5/0.5) (0.114/0.06)
N4c NP-9/NP-40 APS (0.114) 47 2.1 105 20
(0.72/0.08)
A9e SDS (0.015) APS (0.037) 43 6.1 137 29
a
n-Pt was used as a consurfactant.
b
The first part of the monomer was in the initial microemulsion, and the second part was postadded.
c
The sample was polymerized by traditional microemulsion polymerization.
d
SH was used as the chain-transfer agent to reduce the molecular weight of the polymer.
e
The sample was polymerized by emulsion polymerization.

Characterization of the Nanoparticles spectrometer was used for 1H NMR analysis with
CDCl3 as a solvent. The tacticities of the samples
The particle size and size distribution were mea-
were measured from the integrated ratios of the
sured by dynamic light scattering on a Malvern
syndiotactic (rr), isotactic (mm), and heterotactic
4700 from Malvern Instruments, Ltd. Gel perme-
(mr) triad signals of ␣-methyl protons.16 The sam-
ation chromatography measurements were car-
ple structure was observed with a Leitz polarized
ried out with an HP series 1100 chromatograph
optical microscopy (POM) instrument. Wide-an-
equipped with Zorbax columns and refractive-in-
gle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) was performed with
dex/ultraviolet dual-mode detectors. The elution
a Rigaku D/max-II diffractometer with Cu K␣
rate of tetrahydrofuran (THF) was 1 mL/min, and
radiation, with a scanning speed of 4°/min.
standard PS was used for calibration. The Tg val-
ues of the samples were measured with a Setaram
DSC92 differential scanning calorimeter at a
heating rate of 10 °C/min from 20 to 200 °C fol- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
lowed by rapid cooling. Stannum (mp ⫽ 353.35 K)
and indium (mp ⫽ 429.78 K) were used to cali- Our modified microemulsion polymerization pro-
brate the instrument. A Bruker Avance 500 NMR cedure includes three steps: (1) the initiation of
736 JIANG ET AL.

Table 2. Molecular Weights, Tg’s, and Tacticities of the Samples

Mw Mn Tg Tg
Sample (⫻105) (⫻105) Mw/Mn (°C) (°C)a rr mr mm

A1 2.4 1.7 1.4 128.0 124.1 0.56 0.35 0.09


A2b 10.0 1.9 5.4 132.1 123.5 0.55 0.37 0.08
A3 0.42 0.15 2.8 115.2 — 0.48 0.39 0.13
A4 2.1 1.2 1.8 127.9 123.5 0.57 0.35 0.08
A5b 9.8 1.7 5.7 131.6 123.8 0.57 0.35 0.08
A6 2.8 0.7 4.0 127.0 124.2 0.56 0.32 0.12
A7b 9.7 2.3 4.3 132.1 124.3 0.56 0.37 0.07
A8 0.13 0.09 1.4 110.7 — 0.47 0.37 0.16
C 7.6 5.3 1.4 132.1 130.2 0.61 0.33 0.06
N1 2.5 0.7 3.6 125.9 123.4 0.55 0.37 0.08
N2 5.4 1.6 3.3 129.8 126.7 0.57 0.36 0.07
N3 5.7 2.4 2.4 129.3 126.4 0.59 0.35 0.06
N4c 2.1 0.9 2.3 115.4 112.7 0.51 0.41 0.08
A9c 1.8 1.0 1.8 110.0 109.5 0.50 0.42 0.08
ICId 1.5 0.8 1.9 105.5 — 0.48 0.42 0.10
a
After the sample was dissolved in CHCl3 and precipitated with methanol.
b
The sample was polymerized by traditional microemulsion polymerization.
c
The sample was polymerized by emulsion polymerization.
d
The PMMA sample was provided by ICI Co.

polymerization in a traditional microemulsion average molecular weight (Mw/Mn)] were 5.4 and
system, (2) the slow and continuous addition of 1.4, respectively. On the basis of the data in Ta-
most of the monomer (during this stage, it is bles 1 and 2, the number of macromolecule chains
important to avoid a buildup of unreacted mono- per microsphere (Np) can be estimated as follows:
mer droplets), and (3) the postaddition reac-
tion.9,10 With this procedure, PMMA microlatices
N p ⫽ Mp/(Mw/NA) ⫽ 共1/6兲␲DW3dp/共Mw/NA) (1)
with nanosize particles were prepared, as shown
in Table 1. For their counterparts, some PMMA
nanoparticles made by traditional microemulsion where dp is the density of PMMA latices (1.18
polymerization and emulsion polymerization, g/cm3)15 and NA is Avogadro’s constant. With Dz
data are also provided. All the particles prepared instead of Dw used as an estimation, Np of A2 was
by modified microemulsion polymerization or tra- 2, and Np of A1 was 11, according to eq 1. The
ditional microemulsion polymerization were results of A5 (2–3 chains) and A4 (17–18 chains)
17–27 nm. In comparison, the modified procedure were similar to those mentioned. It was assumed
needed less surfactant to stabilize the particles. that a particle was a system with few chains
With the microemulsion polymerization, polymer when Np was less than 5. The nanoparticles pre-
particles of a generally constant nanosize could be pared by traditional microemulsion polymeriza-
prepared when the amount of the surfactant or tion (A2, A5, and A7) were systems with few.13,15
the surfactant/monomer ratio changed over a For the modified systems (A1, A4, and A6), the
rather wide range. analysis indicated that they were multichain sys-
In Table 2, it can be seen that PMMA made by tems. In a modified microemulsion polymeriza-
traditional microemulsion polymerization had a tion, the surfactant/monomer ratio used was
higher weight-average molecular weight (Mw lower than that of the traditional procedure, so
⬃ 106) and a wider molecular weight distribution the chances of the radicals entering the pre-exist-
than PMMA by modified microemulsion polymer- ing polymer particles were enhanced. In addition,
ization. For example, A2 and A1 had similar par- the monomers were added incessantly during the
ticle sizes, but Mw of A2 was 106, and that of A1 modified polymerization but not during the tradi-
was 2.4 ⫻ 105; the molecular weight polydisper- tional polymerization. Therefore, there were
sities [weight-average molecular weight/number- lower molecular weight and more polymer chains
MODIFIED MICROEMULSION POLYMERIZATION 737

Figure 1. DSC curves of PMMA particles polymerized by modified microemulsion


polymerization (A4): (1) first scan and (2) second scan.

(⬎10) in the polymer particles prepared by the Tg value (generally ⬎120 °C), and both exotherm
modified microemulsion polymerization than in peaks disappeared. Because the particles made
those prepared by the traditional one. by the traditional and modified procedures were
The representative thermal behaviors of nanosize, they had larger specific surface areas,
PMMA particles made by the modified and tradi- and during the rising temperature procedure, the
tional procedures are shown in Figures 1 and 2. loss of surface area resulted in an energy release,
The results were similar: the samples displayed that is, an exotherm (the sintering phenome-
one peak of the superposition of an exothermic non).13 The PMMA samples prepared by the tra-
transition and a glass transition at about 130 °C ditional and modified microemulsion polymeriza-
in the first scan. A subsequent scan after cooling tions had Tg’s greater than 120 °C in the second
to the ambient temperature still showed a higher scan of DSC (the Tg discussed later is also the Tg

Figure 2. DSC curves of PMMA polymerized by traditional microemulsion polymer-


ization (A2): (1) first scan and (2) second scan.
738 JIANG ET AL.

Figure 3. 1H NMR spectrum (400 MHz) of PMMA particles polymerized by modified


microemulsion polymerization (A1).

in the second scan), which is much higher than the nanoscale (⬍30 nm), and the polymer chains
the values of 105 °C for commercial PMMA (Table were in a restricted space. Especially near the
2).17,18 Tg of the particles from the traditional surface of a particle, the path of its random walk
procedure was higher than that from the modified had to turn back into the particle. The restricted
procedure when the particle size was similar (e.g., volume affected the conformation and tacticity of
A5 and A4 and A7 and A6). the polymer chains,20 and the polymer chain
To explain the high Tg’s, we measured the 1H needed to have more gauche conformations than
NMR spectra of PMMA nanoparticles in CDCl3 its unperturbed state to reduce its high potential
solutions and analyzed the tacticity to the triad energy in a small particle. Therefore, the end
level on the basis of the ␣-methyl protons.15,16 propagation of high-molecular-weight chains was
Figure 3 presents a representative spectrum of also restricted during polymerization, and the
PMMA particles, in which the syndiotactic (rr), tacticity of the polymer could be altered, too. Be-
heterotactic (mr), and isotactic (mm) triad peaks cause the energy of the racemic dyads was lower
of ␣-methyl protons are 0.85, 1.02, and 1.20 ppm. than that of the meso dyads, it could result in a
As shown in Figure 3 and Table 2, the polymers configuration rich in syndiotactic content. For
prepared by the modified and traditional micro- comparison, the tacticity of samples from emul-
emulsion polymerizations were rich in syndiotac- sion polymerization (N4 and A9) were also
tic content (55– 61% rr) in comparison with com- checked. A9 was 137 nm, and the syndiotactic
mercial PMMA (48% rr).17,18 A 13C NMR solid content decreased to 50%, similar to commercial
spectrum of sample A1 (not shown here) also con- PMMA. The results indicated that the small par-
firmed the high syndiotacticity content in the par- ticle size of PMMA with a high molecular weight
ticles prepared by modified microemulsion poly- could result in higher syndiotactic contents and
merization. Because a random coil of PMMA with higher Tg’s.
a molecular weight of 106 has an unperturbed Furthermore, the purified particles prepared
root-mean-square end-to-end distance of 55 nm in by traditional microemulsion polymerization and
bulk,19 all the particles made by the modified and modified microemulsion polymerization were dis-
traditional procedures were toward the low end of solved in CHCl3 and precipitated with methanol
MODIFIED MICROEMULSION POLYMERIZATION 739

ples polymerized by modified microemulsion po-


lymerization. This suggests that the former had a
slightly higher local backbone conformational en-
ergy than the latter. Therefore, when the confor-
mational energy was released after the samples
were treated with a solvent (CHCl3), Tg of the
former decreased close to that of the latter.
In addition, we added a chain-transfer agent
[dodecanethiol (SH)] to reduce the molecular
weight with the aim of seeing if there was still a
high Tg during DSC scanning. From Table 2, for
samples A3 and A8, it can be seen that both the
syndiotacticity and Tg decreased a lot, near to the
values of commercial PMMA. This could be attrib-
uted to the addition of the chain-transfer agent,
which resulted in a decrease in the molecular
weight of the nanoparticles of the same size as
that of the sample in which SH was not added.
When the molecular weight decreased, the num-
ber of polymer chains increased, and the unper-
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of PMMA polymerized by (a) turbed root-mean-square end-to-end distance de-
traditional microemulsion polymerization (A2) and (b) creased less than the nanoparticle size; then, the
modified microemulsion polymerization (A1).
conformation and configuration restriction of the
polymer chain during propagation decreased, and
the influence on the tacticity of PMMA also de-
again. After that, as shown in Table 2, the sam- creased.
ples exhibited slight differences in DSC. There A PMMA particle of A1 was also observed with
were decreases in the Tg values for the polymers POM, as shown in Figure 5. A light area can
by both the traditional and modified microemul- clearly be seen in the photograph. The light area
sion polymerizations, but the decrease for the represents some kind of ordered region. WAXD
former was more obvious than that for the latter; observations are shown in Figure 6. There were at
still, both were greater than 120 °C. This suggests least three diffraction peaks in the S-PMMA film
that the rich syndiotacticity in the polymer defi- at 2␪ ⫽ 10.9, 13.2, and 17.4°.23 The PMMA sam-
nitely had an effect on the Tg value of the samples ples polymerized by modified microemulsion po-
by the modified microemulsion polymerization lymerization did not show clear peaks where the
and by the traditional microemulsion polymeriza- S-PMMA film did, but they showed two peaks at
tion as well. For the higher molecular weight
samples, the polymer chain from the traditional
procedure had a more compacted state than that
from the modified procedure, and the decrease in
the Tg value was greater than that from the mod-
ified procedure after dissolution. The infrared ab-
sorption bands in the 1300 –1000-cm⫺1 range of
PMMA are known to be conformation-restriction-
sensitive.21 Moreover, the absorption peaks ␯1
(1240 cm⫺1) and ␯2 (1270 cm⫺1) have been used in
the literature to calculate the ratio of local back-
bone and side-chain conformational energies; the
bigger the ratio (␯1/␯2) is, the higher the local
backbone conformational energy is.22 In Figure 4,
it can be seen that the ␯1/␯2 ratio for samples
polymerized by traditional microemulsion poly- Figure 5. Polarizing optical microscopy photograph
merization was a little higher than that of sam- of PMMA (A1).
740 JIANG ET AL.

Figure 6. XRD curves of PMMA: (1) N1, (2) C, (3) A1, and (4) ICI.

21 and 23°. These peaks indicated that there were dissolved in CHCl3, there were decreases in the
some ordered regions in the particles made by Tg value for the polymers made by the traditional
modified microemulsion polymerization. The com- procedure and the modified process, but the de-
mercial PMMA had no diffraction peaks. The crease for the former was greater than that for
WAXD signal agreed with the syndiotactic con- the latter, yet for both, Tg was greater than 120
tent of the particle; that is, the richer a sample °C. The addition of a chain-transfer agent re-
was in syndiotactic content (C ⬎ A1 ⬎ N1), the sulted in a decrease in both the syndiotacticity
more definite and resolved the X-ray diffraction and Tg through decreasing polymer molecular
peaks were (C ⬎ A1 ⬎ N1). weight. Polarizing optical microscopy and WAXD
indicated that some ordered regions formed in the
particles prepared by modified microemulsion po-
CONCLUSIONS lymerization.

Nanoscale PMMA particles (17–27 nm) were pre- The authors thank the Major State Basic Research
pared by a modified microemulsion polymeriza- Development Program (G1999064802) and the Na-
tion in which relatively concentrated polymeric tional Natural Science Foundation of China (20244002)
for their financial support.
microemulsions (polymer content ⫽ 10 –30 wt %)
were achieved with a low amount of surfactant
(1–2 wt %). The nanoparticles prepared by tradi- REFERENCES AND NOTES
tional microemulsion polymerization were sys-
tems with few chains, whereas those prepared by 1. Stoffer, J. O.; Bone, T. J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed
the modified microemulsion polymerization were 1980, 18, 2641.
multichain systems. The samples by both proce- 2. Stoffer, J. O.; Bone, T. J Dispersion Sci Technol
1980, 1, 37.
dures displayed one exotherm peak at about 130
3. Kuo, P. L.; Turro, N. J.; Tseng, C. M.; El-Aasser,
°C in the first DSC scan and showed one higher Tg
M. S.; Vanderhoff, J. W. Macromolecules 1987, 20,
(generally ⬎120 °C) in a subsequent scan after 1216.
cooling to the ambient temperature, as well as no 4. Rodriguez, L. A.; Mendizabal, E.; Puig, J. E.; Kaler,
exotherms. All the PMMA samples prepared by E. W. J Appl Polym Sci 1993, 48, 775.
the traditional and modified procedures were rich 5. Loh, S. E.; Gan, L. M.; Chew, C. H.; Ng, S. C. J
in syndiotactic content (55– 61% rr). After they Macromol Sci Pure Appl Chem 1996, 33, 371.
MODIFIED MICROEMULSION POLYMERIZATION 741

6. Gan, L. M.; Lian, N.; Chew, C. H.; Li, G. Z. Lang- Shanghai, China, Oct 11–15, 1995; Chinese Chem-
muir 1994, 10, 2197. ical Society, Shanghai; p 86.
7. Rabelero, M.; Zacarias, M.; Mendizabal, E.; Puig, 15. Pilcher, C. P.; Ford, W. T. Macromolecules 1998,
J. E.; Dominguez, J. M.; Katime, I. Polym Bull 31, 3454.
1997, 38, 695. 16. Hatada, K.; Ora, K.; Yuki, H. J Polym Sci Part A-2:
8. Roy, S.; Devi, S. Polymer 1997, 38, 3325. Polym Phys 1967, 5, 225.
9. Ming, W. H.; Jones, F. N.; Fu, S. K. Macromol 17. Santanu, R.; Surekha, D. J Appl Polym Sci 1966,
Chem Phys 1998, 199, 1075. 62, 1509.
10. Ming, W. H.; Jones, F. N.; Fu, S. K. Polym Bull 18. Thompson, E. V. J Polym Sci Part A-2: Polym Phys
(Berlin) 1998, 40, 749. 1966, 4, 199.
11. Qian, R. Y.; Wu, L. H.; Shen, D. Y.; Napper, D. H.; 19. Polymer Handbook, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York,
Mann, R. A.; Sangster, D. F. Macromolecules 1993, 1989; Vol. 8, p VII–36.
26, 2950. 20. Roy, S.; Devi, S. J Appl Polym Sci 1996, 62,
12. Wu, C.; Chan, K. K.; Woo, K. F.; Qian, R. Y.; Li, 1509.
X. H.; Chen, L. S.; Napper, D. H.; Tan, G. L.; Hill, 21. Willis, H. A.; Zichy, V. J.; Hendra, P. J. Polymer
A. J. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 1592. 1969, 10, 737.
13. Ming, W. H.; Zhao, J.; Lu, X. L.; Wang, C. C.; Fu, 22. Grohens, Y.; Prud’homme, R. E.; Schultz, J. Mac-
S. K. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 7678. romolecules 1998, 31, 2545.
14. Ming, W. H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, C. C.; Fu, S. K. Pre- 23. Luo, D. X.; Pearce, E. M.; Kwei, T. K. Macromole-
prints of the First East-Asian Polymer Conference, cules 1993, 26, 6220.

You might also like