Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professor Harvey
Introduction to Philosophy
http://moralmachine.mit.edu/results/-1883107367
2. These results did not reflect what I expected. In each circumstance, I found
myself considering the factor of upholding the law. If the pedestrians were
crossing when unauthorized, then they were in the wrong. You can’t make a car
only obey certain laws. I did not particularly agree with the results shown
because I did not choose any of my answers of the personal aspects of the
people. My answers were based off of the laws, more lives at risk, and species.
3. The moral challenges that the developers might face when designing the cars for
1. I would personally choose to not pull the switch. In the moment, I’m not sure
what course of action I would take, but after evaluating both circumstances I feel
that not intervening would be the best option. I feel the ethical paradigm that
would best support my decision would be the one addressing the divine
command theory. Since I am catholic, I have been taught by the church that God
says killing is a moral sin. By pulling the switch, you are not only changing the
plan God has intended, but also choosing to kill in the process. It is not our
morals on my faith. God teaches “thy shall not kill”, this moral sin would be
committed if one pulled the switch. Thus, my faith would influence my moral
1. The culture I was raise in influences my moral decisions because it has shaped
plays a big role in the choices I make such as the trolley problem. Cultural
influences such as treating woman with respect and protect the young have also
impacted my decisions. Having laws also has affected my choices growing up. I
always abide by the law when choosing my actions which influenced my choices