This document discusses a method for assaying bithionol in liquid soaps proposed by Matuszak and colleagues and compares it to an existing method. The author notes three key issues with the new method: 1) It is only applicable to liquid soaps, negating previous work to create a uniform method for liquid and nonliquid soaps. 2) It requires a "dummy, blank, or control sample" of the soap base without bithionol, limiting its use to manufacturers who can provide these. 3) The practical value of the proposed changes is questionable as buffer solutions may still be needed to control pH. The author concludes the previous uniform method is still preferable.
This document discusses a method for assaying bithionol in liquid soaps proposed by Matuszak and colleagues and compares it to an existing method. The author notes three key issues with the new method: 1) It is only applicable to liquid soaps, negating previous work to create a uniform method for liquid and nonliquid soaps. 2) It requires a "dummy, blank, or control sample" of the soap base without bithionol, limiting its use to manufacturers who can provide these. 3) The practical value of the proposed changes is questionable as buffer solutions may still be needed to control pH. The author concludes the previous uniform method is still preferable.
This document discusses a method for assaying bithionol in liquid soaps proposed by Matuszak and colleagues and compares it to an existing method. The author notes three key issues with the new method: 1) It is only applicable to liquid soaps, negating previous work to create a uniform method for liquid and nonliquid soaps. 2) It requires a "dummy, blank, or control sample" of the soap base without bithionol, limiting its use to manufacturers who can provide these. 3) The practical value of the proposed changes is questionable as buffer solutions may still be needed to control pH. The author concludes the previous uniform method is still preferable.
Assay for Bithionol in Liquid Soap trade of drugs and cosmetics are such that it is
most difficult, if not impossible, to obtain from
Sir: the manufacturer a dummy, blank, or control The method for the assay for bithionol in sample, of any product which a third party wishes liquid soaps as recently described by hlatuszak to analyze independently. and co-workers (1) will undoubtedly give results (c) Matuszak, et al., conclude in their summary which are slightly more accurate than those ob- that the buffer solutions used by us are no longer tained by the method previously proposed by required. Yet they have to add, of course, a solu- us (2). tion which brings the pT€ to 2. Moreover, addi- We feel, however, that the following comments tion of an alkaline buffer will be necessary if the should be noted: soap does not have a pH of 8 of itself; e. g., the (a) The changes we introduced into the method so-called “artificial soaps.” of Childs and Parks (3, which made possible a These considerations lead us to conclude, there- uniform method of assay for liquid and nonliquid fore, that the value of the changes ptoposed by soaps (as well as other cosmetics), have been Matuszak, et al., are more theoretical than negated by the changes proposed by Matuszak, practical. et al., so that the method is again limited to liquid soaps, just like the original method of Childs and (1) Matuszak, J. B . . Bope, F. W., and Harris, L. E., Drug Standards 28 68(1960). Parks. (2) van der Pol,h. J., Phartn. Weckblad, 93, 881(1958). (3) Childs, R . , and Parks, I... THIS JOURNAL, 45, 313 (b) A second, and in our opinion more serious (1956). objection, relates to the accuracy which can be FI. J. VAN DER POL achieved. This is based on the fact that the soap-base of the bithionol soap (without the bi- N. V. Koninklijke Pharmaceutisrhe Pabrieken v/h Brocades-Stheeman en Pharmacia thionol) has to be available. This limits the use P. 0. Box 48 Amsterdam C,Holland of the method to the laboratory of the manufac- Received December 27, 19RO. turer concerned. In Europe, conditions in the Accepted for publication January 6 , 1961.