Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert
yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui
opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa
Should Dual or
sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf
Multiple
ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
Citizenship
klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz Be
Possible or
xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv
Not?
bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn
mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq
A REVIEW OF CITIZENSHIP LITERATURE
wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe
Lawrence Okechukwu Emeagwali
rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty
uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio
pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas
dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg
hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjk
Multiple Citizenship 1
Introduction
For the past few years, the number of individuals holding dual or multiple nationalities
have been on the increase, and the legislatures of more and more nations are increasingly
tolerating or supporting this phenomenon. In their 2008 work titled ‘Dual Citizenship in an age
of Mobility’, Faist and Gerdes, state that this trend is surprising due to the fact that not too long
ago within the 19th and 20th centuries, nations had unanimously opposed the notion of dual or
multiple citizenship on the basis of several well founded fears. The reasons for the sudden
change of heart is not clear at the moment, but the question this research piece intends to find
answers to by means of this presentation is, if persons should or should not be allowed to hold
dual or multiple citizenship of at any one time in their lives. The following sections intend to
find answers to the questions by systematically looking at the concept of citizenship, dual
citizenship, the international perspective on both as well as the perceived benefits and
problems of dual or multiple citizenship and from these and backed by literature provide
While the terms nationality and citizenship are often used interchangeably, they actually
differ in meaning. To better understand the concept of citizenship and thus dual or multiple
responsibilities people acquire, due to their having been born as or having become accepted,
tie and central understandings about the community, the world and the common experiences
Elsewhere, Faist stated that the function of nationality is two fold viz: interstate function
and intrastate function. The interstate function of nationality is to provide a clear definition of a
and also protect its citizens against outside and sometimes unfriendly communities or nations;
while the intrastate function also known as the domestic function of nationality is to define the
On citizenship, Faist noted that it is a concept used to confer the legal status of equal
individual liberty among members of the community or nation with the recipient demonstrating
some affinity to a political community with a well differentiated collective identity to ensure
that the trust and solidarity which are entitlements of members of a community are propagated
(Faist, 8).
Multiple Citizenship 3
To buttress Faist’s point in the preceding paragraphs, Renshon who earlier on defined
nationality as the emotional ties between members or citizens of a community or state; noted
in his writing that nationality in most cases is the foundation of citizenship, and in his own
words “citizenship without emotional attachment, is the civic equivalent of a one-night stand”
(Renshon, 7).
According to Ludvig, every person who legally holds two or more nationalities, has dual
or multiple citizenship respectively (3). Also according to Faist and Gerdes, dual citizenship
refers to the situation whereby individuals hold and combine citizenship in and of two nations
(4). Ludvig went further to state that dual citizenship can be obtained through any of the
following six means: descent from one or both parents who are nationals (the principle of jus
sanguinis ); birth on the sovereign nation’s territory (the principle of jus soli); marriage,
adoption or legitimization; naturalization or territorial transfer from one nation to another (5).
To buttress the preceding point from an American perspective, Renshon illustrated that
an American can acquire dual or multiple citizenship in any of the following ways: If he/she is
born to immigrant parents resident in the USA at the time of his/her birth; since all children
born in the USA, automatically become US citizens irrespective of their parent’s immigration
status at the time (jus soli). Secondly, if he/she is born outside the USA to one parent who is an
America citizen and another who is not (jus sanguinis), third, if he/she is resident and chooses
to naturalize in the USA; fourth, if he/she comes from a country which originally has dual
citizenship with third or fourth countries and which automatically makes him/her eligible for
Multiple Citizenship 4
dual citizenship in the USA. Fifth, being born to parents who each have dual citizenship, can
confer on him/her the citizenship entitlement to both his parent’s nationalities of origin and
his/her American one as well granting him multiple citizenship status (Renshon, 6).
Faist and Gerdes noted in their work that there was an international consensus among
nations some decades ago in which nations unanimously agreed that dual citizenship should be
avoided at any possible cost. They stated that this decision was evidenced by the citizenship
laws of individual states as well as in bilateral and multilateral agreements and international
They quoted as an example, a very brief statement which was the preamble to the
Hague convention on citizenship attributed to the League of Nations in 1930 stating that All
persons are entitled to possess one nationality, but one nationality only. This statement the
authors claim, was a mirror reflection of the dominant international opinion and perspective on
citizenship all through the 19th and 20th century (Faist and Gerdes, 5). Elsewhere, Faist
buttressed this observation when he noted that bilateral treaties such as the treaties between
the USA and European countries around the middle of the 19 th century called the Bancroft
Treaties as well as interstate conventions such as the Hague Convention of 1930 and the
European Convention on the Reduction of Multiple Nationality (Council of Europe, 1963); all
The dominance of this perspective did not arise out of the blue however, because, as
Faist and Gerdes continue, states and nations then saw a connection between dual citizenship
and espionage and viewed it as an aid to the occurrence of treasonable offences and other
negative activities (5). Thus from the middle of the 19 th century until way after the second world
war, the authors note that nations fashioned their citizenship laws based on one of the
following two policies: One, that to gain citizenship in a new country, one has to lose his original
citizenship in his home country. Two, individuals born in particular nations had to make a choice
between citizenship of his/her country of birth and that or those of his/her parents upon
attaining maturity age, otherwise, he/she would be expatriated (Faist and Gerde, 5).
Ludvig noted that such rules were very strict that an individual could be expatriated and
lose his original citizenship if there were any slightest evidence of the individual’s political or
social loyalty to another state (3). Faist and gerdes, noted that such show of loyalty could range
from entry into military service, assumption of political office in the other state or merely
Today, however, Faist notes that despite all the previous agreements, dual citizenship is
on the rise and has continued to be since the late 20th century as more and more people
migrate across state borders, and settle down, and as more immigrant populations leave home
with the intention of becoming citizens of foreign lands (10). The author further noted that the
increase in dual citizenship arose clearly from a number of factors. One, the fact that almost all
countries have jus sanguinis rules. While some have this exclusively, most other nations
supplemented their jus sanguinis rules with jus soli and other regulations. Thus he noted that
Multiple Citizenship 6
dual citizenship always occurred as individuals were born in nations where jus soli was the
predominant law, while his/her parents had nationalities from countries where jus sanguinis
was predominant (Faist, 10). Other factors such as gender equality law reforms which
eliminated the clause which previously made a female’s citizenship dependent on that of her
husband. The European Convention on Nationality (Council of Europe, 97) made it even easier,
by stipulating that both parents can transfer their nationality to their children. Also recently,
more countries have made the acquisition of their nation’s citizenship and nationality status
less dependent on the relinguishing or giving up of the applicant’s original citizen status from
his/her originating country. Examples of nations which have done away with these restricitions
include France (1973), Portugal, (1981) and Italy (1992) among others (Faist,11).
Another contributing factor to the recent rise in dual and multiple citizenship
occurrences, have been attributed to the new relationship structure among nations (Faist, 7)
from an European perspective, the intra cooperation among nation states meant that the
threats of war and thus the need to protect and maintain a high conscriptable citizenry is no
longer necessary. Thus a lot of European countries have done away with the provisions of
compulsory military services. Where still present, the individual is allowed to perform military
service in his/her state of regular residence (Faist, 7). The end of the cold war, the decreasing
interstate wars between democracies, enhanced economic and political cooperation between
democratic nation states and the creation of the European union all have served to make more
and more nations less worried about the loyalty of their citizens, thus making it easier to
possible for a person to hold citizenship in more than one country at any one time; it is only
important to first of all take a comprehensive and objective look at the benefits and problems
of dual citizenship.
According to Faist and Gerdes, some benefits of dual citizenship includes high incidences
the diverse populace, and the improvement of trans-national participation and thus tran-
national relations. These benefits are explained in details in the ensuing section.
The authors note that in many countries, not all immigrants who qualify for citizenship
acquisition actually make any effort to apply for it. They attribute this to a lot of factors, most
notably, the requirement of most nations that applicants provide proof of having renounced
their previous citizenship in their countries of origin (8). The authors cited the case of Turkish
and 1997. In the former, this period was the period when dual citizenship was accepted without
any pre-conditions or exceptions and consequently saw a very sharp increase in the
naturalization rate of Turkish immigrants. On the other hand, due to the fact that Germany did
not accept dual citizenship; the naturalization rate of Turkish immigrants during the same
The authors found a similar comparison between the naturalization rates of immigrants
in the USA against immigrants in Canada. Where in the later, immigrants are more likely to
become naturalized than those in the USA due mainly to the fact that while Canada tolerates
and even promotes the need for dual citizenship; the USA’s naturalization process and legal
requirements, sends a message which implies that it does not tolerate dual citizenship even
though it is on record that the USA does not practically take action against individuals holding
Faist and gerde note that dual citizenship confers on immigrants exemptions from
applications for work permits, protects the immigrant from expulsion from the host country,
enables him/her to gain easy access to public employment, reduces bureaucratic and
administrative difficulties and from an EU perspective, also allows the free movement of the
individual around European member states without a visa (9). Although the above depends on
the applicable legal framework in the immigrant nation, these benefits attached to citizenship
will according to Faist and Gerdes “enhance the probability of socioeconomic integration” (9).
When immigrants are granted dual citizenship, they often regard the state’s acceptance
heritage and identities. The authors note that children who are dual citizenship holders easily
integrate if the stae welcomes or accepts dual citizenship. The authors cite the example in
Multiple Citizenship 9
Germny, according to Schroter and Jager; where children of bi-national marriages who are dual
citizens from birth see their dual citizenship as important for their integration obviously due to
backgrounds such as bilingual skills as well as inter cultural mediation (Faisy and Gerdes, 10).
Some immigrants are active globally. They engage in global transnational activities in
this age of ever increasing trans-national mobility of people, information, money, consumer
goods and services. Due to the high immigrant populations in most immigrant nations, it is now
possible for transnational connections through several networks, groups, and organizations.
Indeed dual citizenship benefits the immigrant entrepreneur who has to mobilize and interact
Although dual citizenship has a lot of benefits to both the immigrant and the state,
many nations still base their opposition to the concept of dual or multiple citizenship based on
the following perceived disadvantages they found associated with dual or multiple citizenship:
dual voting implications, lack of proper integration and state loyalty and more importantly, they
believe that dual citizenship devalues national citizenship (Faist and Gerdes, 12)
Multiple Citizenship 10
Dual Voting
One disadvantage opponents of dual citizenship always cite is the violation of the “one
person, one vote” principle. They claim that immigrants with dual citizenship, had the unfair
advantage of propagating their interests especially in the EU by casting their votes twice: one in
their originating country and the other in their country of residence (Faist and Gerdes, 12).
Whether this is truly the case would be dealt with in the sections to follow.
Lack of Integration
Faist and Gerdes reveal that patterns of failed integration due to low employment rates,
low educational levels, and high dependence on welfare by most immigrants is a very important
disadvantage often cited by opponents of dual citizenship. The authors also cite the rising
apprehension over Islamic extremism, which has given rise to high incidences of inhumane
practices such as forced, arranged marriages and honor killings (12). Post September 11 th and
other terrorist activities in select European countries have further strengthened the opposition
Lack of Loyalty
Faist and Gerdes notes that there may exist certain individuals with immigrant status
who have been living as permanent residents in a foreign nation for many years, without ever
wanting to acquire the citizenship of that country. Others may want to acquire citizenship for
certain benefits but would not wish to renounce the citizenship of his/her originating country.
Since citizenship requires the holder to identify with common political values, to show a sense
Multiple Citizenship 11
of responsibility and solidarity towards the common good, and towards fellow citizens
respectively. Within a particular country or nation-state, the dominant groups (usually natives)
of immigration countries cannot help but consider people who retain their previous citizenship
upon acquiring the host country’s citizenship as not being completely and honestly loyal to their
One other disadvantage perceived by opponents of dual citizenship is the fear of the
this, most states have followed in the footsteps of the USA and Canada in the introduction of
naturalization tests and etc to ensure that core values of national citizenship exists in soon to
be citizens.
Faist and Gerde note that this fear is highly present among European nations who fear
that as the region shifts towards one of expanded European citizenship, the devaluation of
national citizenship sets in; as member states lower the requirements for acquiring citizenship,
open their arms to dual citizenship and institutionalize territorial birthright citizenship. The fear
is greater even as opponents view this developments a more or less inevitable (Faist and
Gerdes, 13)
There exist a school of thought which believe that dual citizens especially those in the Diaspora,
constitute an unfair liability to the state as they in some particular countries such as Canada, do
Multiple Citizenship 12
not reside at home, do not pay taxes or participate in the political process, and as such have
very little bond with Canada save the conveniences their Canadian citizenships afford them. A
practical example is the dual citizenship crisis in 2006 where it is recorded that the Canadian
government spent an enormous $100 million to evacuate its dual citizens from Lebanon, during
the Israeli-Hezbollah conflict. While critics agree that these citizens should be evacuated, they
argue that these non tax-paying, non-voting citizens did not deserve the amount of tax payers
fund spent on their evacuation. The question then is: is it fair for a government to help its dual
citizens resident abroad when they are in trouble? In November 2006, the former immigration
minister Monte Solberg was quoted as saying in response to the evacuation crisis that "If we're
in a situation where somebody's absent, isn't paying taxes but is going to be using our social
programs down the road, I think Canadians would feel that that is unfair,". His statement
In the light of the preceding advantages and disadvantages discussed above; should it
then be possible or not for a person to hold citizenship in more than one country at the same
expressed in the disadvantages or problems of dual citizenship stated earlier on, as in there lies
the major factors opposing dual or multiple citizenship. First of all, taking the fear of dual
voting into consideration, we are reminded that opponents of dual or multiple citizenship claim
that it enables holders to propagate or have the undue advantage of being able to vote for their
Multiple Citizenship 13
interests using two votes which dual citizenship legally grants them. Faist and gerdes notes that
people with more money and other resources and holding only one citizenship in some
countries, sometimes have and exert large influences on national elections more than other
citizens do. Although this is may not be obtainable in federal political systems, it is infact true
for others. Also the authors note that the benefit of having more residents participating
politically in a country where they reside far outweighs the disadvantage of dual voting if ever
that occurs as Faist and Gerdes reveal was the case in Switzerland where the “one person, one
vote” principle was seen to be violated with dual citizenship and that violation later ignored
due to the realizat ion of the above mentioned fact. (Faist and Gerdes, 12).
arguments which gives evidence that dual or multiple citizenship leads to or contributes
yochain reactions of non integration, exclusion and segregation among immigrant groups.
However, there are strong empirical findings and evidence to support the idea that dual or
opportunities.
Thirdly, Faist reveals that if we look closely at the disadvantage of lack of loyalty
associated with dual or multiple citizenship, we would find that sometimes it is only natural for
new citizens to want to maintain some ties to their countries of origin, as well as develop new
and strong emotional ties to their new country of residence. Instead of viewing the refusal to
advantage to be used in fostering closer ties and better relationships with the migrant or
immigrant originating country. The authors note that the fact remains that empirical findings
show evidence that dual or multiple citizenships are becoming inevitable. This implies that
Fourthly, regarding the issue of dual citizens in the Diaspora being a liability to the state, a re-
known Canadian researcher Jack Jedwab, director of the Montreal-based Association for
Canadian Studies, revealed that data obtained from an important landmark 2001 StatsCan
survey disagrees with the general perception that dual citizens have more divided loyalties or a
weak commitment to Canada. Jedwab revealed that the statistics indicated that foreign based
dual citizens were as committed to Canada in terms of loyalty as home based dual or single
citizens. In their research work titled’ Dual Citizenship and Canada’s New Diaspora’ DeVoretz
and Woo noted that the perceived problem of liability lies with the inadequacies of the dual
citizenship policies of the Canadian government and not the dual citizens themselves. They
reveal that these policies which as of then had not granted dual citizens in Diaspora the means
to exercise their electoral franchise as well as the absence of such US based system of
worldwide world income tax remitting systems. They noted that the availability of these
systems would reveal that Canadians with dual citizenship statuses resident abroad are not a
liability but just as committed as their domestic counterparts in both their loyalty to Canada as
In my opinion, based on the work of Faist and Gerdes, it should be possible for
individuals to hold dual or multiple citizenships at the same time as long as they have
Multiple Citizenship 15
demonstrated ties to each of the countries in question; as depriving them of citizenship status
in any of the countries in which they have a tie either by birth, relation, marriage, or residence
According to Faist and Gerdes, the arguments often made against dual or multiple
citizenships are weak because the fear of dual voting is often misinformed if at all migrants ever
consider voting in the different countries in which they hold citizenship. Also the rise in dual
citizenship has not led to any proven or noticeable increase in tensions and conflicts; and most
importantly the problems of conflicting laws, rights, tax duties, family, military service,
inheritance and even the ability to vote, can be resolved by enacting legislation similar to the
European union’s law of “state of habitual residence” which states that citizens are allowed to
vote or carry out military service in their state of habitual residence. Other bilateral or
multilateral treaties can also be enacted between nations to resolve these issues which are
obviously resolvable. Finally, Faist and Gerdes notes that when it comes to issues of loyalty of
dual citizens, it is far better to have them as citizens rather than non-citizens.
thus policy makers would do well to not only tolerate it, but also to support it because dual or
multiple citizenship leads to higher rates of naturalization, thus stimulating social and political
citizenship encourages integration and is cost effective, efficient and natural to recognize dual
or multiple citizenship as it reflects the multiple heritage of a whole community of people living
across borders.
Multiple Citizenship 16
References
Faist, Thomas; Gerdes, Jurgen. “Dual Citizenship in an age of Mobility” Council on Migration.
Faist, Thomas; Gerdes, Jurgen; Rieple, Beate. “Dual Citizenship as a Path Dependent Process”
Ginieniewicz, Jorge. “Citizenship Learning and Political Participation” The Case of Latin
Ludvig, Alice. “Dealing with Dual Citizenship in Austria and Germany” A Comparison. European
Renshon, Stanley. “Reforming Dual Citizenship in the United States” Integrating Immigrants into
the American National community. Center for Immigration Studies, 2005. Print.
Renshon, Stanley. “Dual Citizenship and American National Identity”. Centre for Immigration