Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructions
Answer the following questions and then press 'Submit' to get your score.
Question 1
What are the main policy arguments that support the existence of merger control in antitrust regimes?
a) The potential harm faced by firms who do not participate in the merger, and the direct threat to consumers
b) The creation or extension of monopoly power, and increasing the scope for collusion
c) The potential harm firms face when they merge, and the social welfare implications attached to mergers
Question 2
Under merger control, mergers are analysed ex ante, and therefore:
a) A merger between firms dealing in the same goods or services in the same geographic market
b) A merger between firms which produce different goods or services for one specific finished product
c) A merger between firms which produce products which are not in the same market, but which may be substitutes for each other
Question 4
Why might firms be encouraged to merge?
https://global.oup.com/uk/orc/law/competition/marcocolino7e/resources/mcqs/ch18/ 1/2
10/9/2020 Oxford University Press | Online Resource Centre | Chapter 18
a) concentration, product homogeneity, symmetry of market shares and costs, and transparency in pricing
b) the ease with which a firm may retaliate to another's competitive action, barriers to entry, inelastic demand, and absence of buyer power
c) both a) and b) are correct
Question 7
When analysing the possibility for collusion as a result of a merger, four stages need to be considered:
a) Firstly, a plausible mechanism whereby collusion can take place must be identified. Secondly, the market must be analysed. Thirdly, it
must be established that those particular features exist in the case under consideration. Fourthly, evidence of past conduct needs to be
considered
b) Firstly, the views of consumers need to be taken into account. Secondly, the mechanisms in place to prevent collusion must be
considered. Thirdly, it must be established that those mechanisms are likely to fail. Fourthly, the merging parties must explain how they
intend to avoid post-merger collusion
c) Firstly, whether there are civil or criminal sanctions for violations of competition law needs to be considered. Secondly, depending on the
gravity of those sanctions, the relevant competition authority will draft a report on the likelihood of collusion. Thirdly, the parties will be
informed and will get a chance to explain their views. Fourthly, if the merger is approved, it will have to be closely monitored for the first two
years of its existence
Question 8
The 'failing firm defence' essentially argues that:
https://global.oup.com/uk/orc/law/competition/marcocolino7e/resources/mcqs/ch18/ 2/2