Table 1 Comparing Perspectives: Old Public Administr (Old Public Administration Primary theoretical and RIRERIEEAW soci ana poticat epistemological foundations commentary augmented by naive Soria science Prevaling rationality and ic rational trond mogorcriuman — behavior Conception ofthe publi interest ESHER anc expresso in raw Towhom are public servants GETS responsive? Role of government focusing on a single, poiically defined cnjectne) Mechanisms for achieving policy AGRA RGRESRID ou objectives exstng government agencies Approach to accountabiy BD crises axe responsibie to democratically fected political leaders ‘Administrative discretion TET atiowen ‘administrative officials Assumed organizational structure SFERUERSABISRGalions market by top-down authori within ‘agencies and contol or regulation of clients Assumed motivational bass of publie servants and administrators ion, New Public Management, and New Public Service ‘New Publ Management more sophisicates SERS, varie diologue based on postivs social (GMMSTAM Jeialanaszonome anaty or the se intrested detsion maker ‘Gacomes ABM cring 2s EAP to ‘unleash market fores) Creating mechanisms ane incentive aaa Berne accumaon ot {etree wi rsa oueomes esr by bead groups etlons erates) RR ce swevemrl goo be organizations erlang van te aberey (CGREPRERELAEISBIA,ideotooicat desire to reduce size of government [New Publi Service approaches to knowledge Including pesitve, Interpretive, real, and postmodern Suatege tonoity, GOBER GERIBIRI (potest ccorome. ‘organizational) Resto SUB. ut stare values EE ou. and community groups, creating shared values) Bui sto meet mutually agreed upon needs GREED p ic servants mast ater to law, community values, Paliial norms, professional Sandards, and etizen interests Discretion needed but ED aE Collaborative strdetires wh leadership shared internally and exernaly EBD sre 1 contibute tosoziety.